I've researched the afterlife for nearly 10 years. I am convinced that Reptilian beings are REAL and that the tunnel of light that people see when they die is a trap.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-12T19:59:24+00:00

I made a couple posts where i presented the strongest arguments against any religion, not just Christianity and also explained why i personally believe that the prison planet theory is either the truth or the closest thing to the truth.

Feel free to check em out:

What made me lose all my trust in all mainstream religions and why I believe in the prison planet theory
Religion and New Age are fairytales for adults to keep us distracted, docile and asleep. When you look beyond their programming, you start to see red flag after red flag after red flag which reveal a God that's far from loving and reincarnation as a giant scam
The most common comforting belief people repeat when someone dies is "they went to God". But if this is true, is it actually a good thing? Let's think about it.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-12T19:55:42+00:00

It's important that people see the actual evidence supporting the prison planet theory, not just read words about it. It took me a long time to write this post, and even longer time to research everything i have, as you can see from the title of that post (although the post is just a small summary of what i've researched).

But turning it into a book would've been a bad idea, here's why:

That post provides direct links to videos showing reincarnation is real, it includes links to many past-life regressions from many different credible regressionists showing how the deceased are tricked and coerced on the other side into reincarnating back here. It also includes remote viewing videos from different groups explaining the data they obtained, explaining who is behind the veil etc. It also provides links to the discoveries of Robert Monroe, Dr Karla Turner, William Thompkins, Val Valerian, it talks about Gnosticism and how it connects to the prison planet theory etc. None of this is possible with a book, because you cannot show the actual videos or interactive evidence that give the theory its weight. Without the evidence people will think it's sci-fi, so turning it into a book is a waste of time. My post explains the reasoning and the conclusions in a way that is easy to understand, without contradictions or unnecessary distractions. It's as straight to the point as possible. Last but least, i found this information to be too important to monetize, so i released all the important information i knew for free. People deserve to know.

So my advice to you would be this: instead of trying to make a book, focus on writing an in-depth Reddit post where you lay out the theory in your own words. Provide links to the strongest evidence, especially the videos, so people can see the evidence directly instead of just taking your word for it. Otherwise, without solid sources, people will be quick to dismiss what you say, some people will attack you personally even if you do provide evidence + proof (most people cannot handle this topic, they'd rather believe a beautiful lie as opposed to an ugly truth), and call you all sorts of names. A well-structured post backed with real evidence will speak for itself.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-08T15:31:49+00:00

I think you're right that going through pain and suffering can push people to question reality more deeply. But for me personally, this theory didn't come from emotion or trying to make sense of bad experiences. It came from personal research and years of looking into the evidence and noticing patterns that point to something deeply off about the structure of this place. I came to the conclusion that this is a prison planet/loosh farm after researching over 500 past life regressions where people describe being pressured to reincarnate on the other side, seeing that there are many regressionists/alien abduction researchers who came to the conclusion that ETs are truly evil and that all they care about is to exploit/control us, discovering remote viewing data showing manipulation after death and the light being used as a trap, discovering out of body experiencer Robert Monroe and finding out about loosh harvesting and how it fits into the bigger picture, etc.

I sympathize with what you have been through, but i also think that it's important that people, especially those new to this sub understand this theory is not based on trauma or used as some kind of coping mechanism. For many of us, it's simply about connecting dots and following where the information leads. You can live a normal, healthy life and still see that this system runs on suffering, deception, and decay.

Anyway, to answer your question. Besides all the evidence i've come across, my eureka moment was when I realized that this entire place is built on killing, eating, and being eaten. Every single being here is put in a situation where they have to attack, kill and eat another living being just to survive which guarantees endless suffering for all living beings 24/7. That's when it hit me that we actually have proof showing that whoever created this place is extremely evil and what mainstream religions and people around us tell us about “God” is very, very far from the truth.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-04T07:11:35+00:00

Look, you are still framing this as if injustice between humans is the main problem, when in reality it is only one layer of the design. Yes, male privilege exists. Yes, religions and cultures have been shaped by it. But those are surface-level mechanisms, not the source. They are the tools, not the architect.

Learning about privilege may help someone navigate life more consciously, but that does not touch the root issue. It is like learning to play prison politics so you can avoid trouble with other inmates. It might help you survive the day, but you are still behind bars. The deeper question is: who built the bars, and why was this system set up to divide people in the first place?

If the creator was truly loving, the system itself would not have been designed around hierarchy, conflict, and endless suffering. Instead, the world runs on predation and exploitation by default, and injustice between humans is just one expression of that.

So yes, recognizing injustice is useful, but calling it the core problem is missing the forest for the trees. It is one of many ways the system keeps us distracted and fighting each other, instead of seeing the actual builder of the prison.

"what do you propose as a way of escaping the prison planet?"

I propose the Wayne Bush and Julie McVey method which i made a post about recently: https://www.reddit.com/r/EscapingPrisonPlanet/comments/1nol9j0/how_to_escape_the_reincarnation_cycle_by_wayne/

Also it's worth keeping in mind that we cannot be sure that even if we follow everything Wayne says, we will escape. We simply do not know if this is enough or fully accurate. What we do know is that Wayne Bush has been researching this topic for over 20 years and probably knows a lot more than we do. Do not look at this post as "this is the absolute truth and I need to stop my research here". Look at it as "okay, this is a possible solution, so I will save it somewhere and then keep researching for better solutions. If they show up, fine. If they do not, at least I have this one".

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-03T15:28:20+00:00

It seems that you are missing my point too. I am not denying that men have abused women throughout history or that systemic injustice exists. What I am saying is that focusing only on intra-system oppression while ignoring the architect of the system is like blaming the prisoners for the conditions of the prison while ignoring the warden who designed it.

Yes, men have played roles in maintaining structures of power, just as women have too in their own ways. But both are running on hardware and instincts they did not design. The wolf eats the sheep because it was built to. The human exploits the weak because that instinct was coded into the system. You can scream "male privilege" all day long, but that just shifts the blame sideways instead of upwards.

The core truth is this: no truly good and loving creator would have built a system where predation, violence, rape, famine, hierarchy, and exploitation are baked in from the ground up. That is not a "social justice issue". That is a design issue. Pointing fingers at men, women, or any group within the prison is just infighting. And infighting is exactly what keeps the prison strong.

If people really want to transcend this place, they need to stop getting trapped in identity-politics-level arguments and instead recognize the prison itself. Otherwise, the demiurge laughs while we fight over crumbs.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-02T13:12:39+00:00

I think you completely misunderstood what I wrote. I am not talking about masculine vs feminine energy or which one has been pushed out of the picture. I am talking about the system itself that allowed all of this to exist in the first place.

Saying "the problem was always man" just shifts the blame from the architect of this place to the beings inside it and it is like blaming a lion for killing a gazelle when the lion was literally designed to do that. Humans did not design their instincts, weaknesses, or drives. They were born with them.

The whole masculine/feminine framework is just another distraction from looking at the deeper truth: if the so-called creator was loving and just, the world would not have been designed this way at all. The suffering of women (or anyone) would not even exist.

So the issue is not about "bringing the feminine back". The issue is that we are trapped in a rigged system where suffering is guaranteed by design. Until that is acknowledged, talking about energies and balance will only keep people distracted from the real problem.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-02T07:24:02+00:00

Small brain people blame men or women for this, but big brain people realize that the real root of the problem is the system itself, the way we were designed. Who created us with these drives, weaknesses, and vulnerabilities? It was not women who chose to be physically weaker, and it was not men who chose to be born with powerful lust drives. Both sexes were set up this way.

If you are part of this subreddit, you should already be aware of this!! Perhaps you are new here, in which case, i will put things into perspective for you:

Every male human and every male animal is born with lust. That is not their fault. Some are born with less ability to control or resist it, which means abuse and exploitation are built into the system from the start. If we were created by a truly loving, perfect God, why design a world where a certain percentage of the population has to live in fear of the other half? Why make women physically weaker, more vulnerable to violence, pregnancy, and social control? Why allow children to be born into danger of sexual abuse at all?

It is not men vs. women, it is humanity vs the creator of this broken system, the Demiurge. The suffering women endure is not accidental, it is baked into the design of this reality. Predation, abuse, and exploitation are everywhere, not just between humans but in the entire animal kingdom. That reveals something about the personality of this so called benevolent and loving creator which so many people love to bow down to.

Incarnating as a woman has it's downsides, just like incarnating as a male has it's downsides. But blaming men or women misses the bigger picture. The real evil is the so-called God who set up the rules of the game.

Blaming men for being born with lust or women for being born physically weaker is like blaming a lion for killing a gazelle to survive. The lion did not design itself to survive that way, it was designed like that by the creator. Just like humans did not choose their instincts, drives, or vulnerabilities.

So when abuse happens, the real blame should not go to the individual alone but to the architect of the system that made such abuse inevitable. The ridiculous "God" people worship is the one who programmed predators to kill and humans to exploit, then has the nerve to be called "loving".

The problem is not the animals for doing what they must to survive, just as the problem is not men or women for being born into roles they never asked for. The problem is the so-called creator who set the rules to guarantee endless suffering.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-10-01T08:38:54+00:00

Let me share something that most people don't seem to think about when it comes to those who believe they "chose this experience". Based on everything I’ve researched, even those who are absolutely convinced they selected their life conditions and acted out of free will could have been deceived.

Imagine the following scenario: A "spirit guide" or "angel" (archon) came to you in the astral realm and presented you with only two options: either go to Earth or another planet, without ever revealing to you that there was a third choice, one where you could go anywhere you truly wanted? You would think you were choosing freely, but in reality, the options presented to you were limited. The "choice" you thought you made might not have been a real choice at all, but an illusion carefully crafted to give you the false sense of free will. The other place/planet they might've been told about, could've perhaps housed the same conditions as planet Earth, so in the end, their choice didn't matter, what mattered was that they gave their permission to incarnate in one of those two places. I have seen evidence from past life regressions showing that the recently deceased humans were being coerced/tricked/lied to on the other side. But because New Agers are unaware that a third option existed (do what you want), they are now convinced that everyone chose their suffering, traumas, and all the horrible things that are happening in their lives.

So when people tell you "oh yeah, we plan our lives, we chose this and that", "we acted out of free will" they are telling you their own personal truth, not the actual truth of our situation. Based on my personal experience with them, the vast majority of New Agers never investigate/research too much, they do not look at the data and they rarely think outside the box. They just repeat what they hear from that movement (which in my opinion is archonic in nature). Same thing religious people do.

The "you chose it" or "you are miserable because you keep choosing to be" line is nothing more than spiritual gaslighting. It takes real pain and suffering and shifts the blame onto the victim, while pretending that cruelty is "spiritual wisdom". If a dog is beaten daily by its owner, would anyone in their right mind say the dog "chose" that suffering? Of course not. The dog is trapped in circumstances beyond its control. Same with factory-farmed animals. Cows and chickens did not "choose" to be abused and slaughtered, yet here they are, victims of a system they never consented to. But when it comes to humans, New Agers suddenly twist logic and claim every abuse, illness, and trauma is "chosen".

The truth is, most suffering is created by the design of this system. Predation, disease, exploitation, abuse are baked into the fabric of this world. To blame individuals for responding to trauma or hardship is to protect the system itself. That is why the archonic New Age "you chose this" excuse exists: it is the perfect way to keep people passive, to stop them from questioning why this reality is set up like this in the first place.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-25T13:55:34+00:00

Exactly. Pain and suffering have been normalized to such a degree that people just accept it as part of life, instead of realizing it is the design of the system itself. The fact that we even need to cope this way shows how deeply the trap is disguised as 'normal'.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-25T09:30:36+00:00

Like i said, lots of research. He did not come to this conclusion easily, he's been researching the nature of reality for 20+ years. Here's another post by Wayne Bush which talks a bit about what he's researched.

At the end of the post, i also added a link to a 10 part podcast-playlist where Wayne Bush talks with Mark from Forever Conscious Research Channel, who is an NDE researcher. This 10 part podcast playlist lasts for a total of 50 hours! The first few podcasts are more focused on how the elites (who are nothing more than a lower level archon group) control our perceptions using music, tv, hollywood, occult symbolism and stuff like that. Then they delve deeper into this subject and start talking about religions, NDEs, pre birth memories and experiences, past life regressions, soul-recycling, loosh harvesting, astral entities and also about what may be the possible afterlife solutions to escaping out of here when our time comes.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-24T18:32:01+00:00

Not a stupid question. The thing is, we cannot be sure that even if we follow everything Wayne says, we will escape. We simply do not know if this is enough or fully accurate. What we do know is that Wayne Bush has been researching this topic for over 20 years and probably knows a lot more than we do :). Do not look at this post as "this is the absolute truth and I need to stop my research here." Look at it as "okay, this is a possible solution, so I will save it somewhere and then keep researching for better solutions. If they show up, fine. If they do not, at least I have this one."

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-18T08:03:20+00:00

100%. This is because even though these people may be actual experiencers, this doesn't mean they're aware of the real agendas of the ETs.

Alien abduction researcher and hypnotherapist:

The experiencers promote Archonic agendas on the internet:

"The abductees are force-fed lies and half-truths aimed at conditioning them into feeling disdain and contempt for their fellow humans. For example, the contactee may feel disgust for humanity's warlike and selfish nature, condemning it in favor of a new found love and worship for the spiritually advanced extraterrestrials. These peace-proclaiming contactees vehemently oppose anyone who challenges the extraterrestrial agenda, accusing 'revisionists' of being 'fear based'. I have personally encountered abductees who fear speaking out in public about anything negative, or giving the aliens a bad image. In one case the abductee was being manipulated through deception, fear and even physical pain, to promote the extraterrestrial "space brother" propaganda through the Internet"

Alien propaganda conditions people to believe that they are special 'Starseeds':

"Based on the reports of several contactees, I believe the aliens could be conditioning the public to a naive mind set - a mental state designed to suspend critical thinking. This is especially apparent in abductees and UFO spiritualists who think of themselves as chosen "Star Seeds." In this context, I am referring to the "false light" Star Seeds, as opposed to the true light bearers. If one observes closely, the false light can be discerned from the true light. True light bearers are not afraid of exposing the dark and have spiritual discernment. The false light bearers display incongruence in their actions and beliefs, and naively focus on the positivist elements of extraterrestrials, while in denial of any negative alien abduction material, or their own. Or they blame all negative abduction reports on the "military and black projects." They lack discernment and may exhibit repressed trauma and duplicity as well."

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-16T11:51:46+00:00

Okay, i'll try to edit the post later to include some paragraphs about that (although Bramley's book never focuses too much on leaving the reincarnation cycle, but on exposing what goes on behind the scenes, how the ETs have been manipulating humanity for millenia, etc).

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-16T11:06:51+00:00

and here are the sources for my claims, they are not made up:

Dude, I really don't understand what's wrong with you. You are once again trying to spin what happened, and after all this discussion and me trying to explain it multiple times, you still don't get what I'm saying. I never claimed that the claims on the pages you're now mentioning are made up. I am saying that your original comment from yesterday (which didn't include those pages), the one with the paragraph between quotation marks framed as Bramley's own words, the one you've already edited so many times so it no longer reads like it did yesterday, was 100% made up by you. And like that wasn't enough, you also tried to put the blame on me for not including it, even though it did not exist in the book (proof: several words in that paragraph you tried to pass off as from the book don't exist in it). Kapish? I really don't know how I could make this any clearer than I already have.

Like if all this wasn't enough, you also constantly tried to spin it in a different way to hide your original intent. I hope you understand what I'm saying now. I am not going to waste any more energy replying to you.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-16T08:57:23+00:00

I don't know if you are just bored or don't have anything better to do than constantly spinning what happened and editing all your comments every few minutes, but I don't have time for that.

It's not about whether i personally believed it, i clearly didn't and i already pointed out that what you said wasn't in the book. The problem is that by framing it in parentheses as if it were Bramley's words, you made it look like a direct quote from the book to everyone else reading your comment. That's misleading and dirty. Why use parentheses at all if it wasn't from the book? It gives the impression that I "left out" something that literally isn't there, which is exactly what happened when your comment began with "Somehow OP left out the most important part:" and was immediately followed by that made-up paragraph.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-16T08:39:23+00:00

So, one of the objectives of this subreddit is to expose what happens behind the scenes, how we are manipulated, who does it, and why. If that is too much for you, feel free to unsubscribe.

But do not make misleading claims about me. That was a very low move because, first, you copy-pasted a paragraph and used parentheses to make it look like it was Bramley's own words and to give the impression that I had left it out of the book. After about 10-12 hours you then quietly removed the parentheses from your original comment instead of admitting the mistake, and you are still trying to spin it. You've also edited that original comment a bunch of times to make it look less misleading. That paragraph does not appear in the book at all. If it actually exists, post a screenshot. Otherwise, just admit you made it up, especially since some of the words you used do not appear in the book (see my previous reply).

Regarding what you wrote about salvation, Bramley does not provide a literal method to escape Custodial control. In the 'Escape from Eden' chapter, he does talk about personal responsibility, exercising small freedoms, negotiating with potential extraterrestrial custodians etc but these are not actual methods of how to leave the reincarnation cycle. Your summary exaggerates and misrepresents the text (also, in my post people can see the free link to the book, so people can feel free to download and read it themselves).

Even if you personally interpret hints of liberation in the description of the control mechanisms, it does not change the fact that you originally copy-pasted a paragraph, presented it as Bramley's words using parentheses to make it look like it was in the book, and then accused me of leaving it out. That is very misleading and it your intent is clear.

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-16T00:18:48+00:00

I am. Still, i'd like to believe that's a real person :)

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-15T19:22:14+00:00

Where is that paragraph in the book? I don't recall reading it and i just did a ctrl+f and couldn't find it anywhere in the book.

edit: the words "dogmatic", "hierarchies" and "escaping" for example do not even exist anywhere in the book (i checked with ctrl+f, you can check too) and the part which you're saying I "left out" contains those words. I also looked for the words "bramley suggested" which the paragraph you're saying I "left out"" starts with, and it's nowhere to be found either (it's also odd that Bramley who is the author of the book would supposedly write "bramley suggested" in the third person about himself).

So what is going on here? Did you actually just make up a lie about me "leaving out the most important part" which does not even exist? This is the weirdest thing i've ever seen someone do on Reddit.

edit 2: very nice how this user now edited his comment after so many hours to now make it sound completely different (see my other comments below).

EsotericN1nja · 2025-09-15T14:15:57+00:00

Yet no one questions it, everyone thinks the way we live is "normal".

Four-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email	100 Awards Club

EsotericN1nja

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Alien abduction researcher and hypnotherapist:

EsotericN1nja

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,

Alien abduction researcher and hypnotherapist: