The recent Sinder document proves without doubt that victory in the court of public opinion is obtained via an eloquent and persuasive narrative far more often than it is won by telling the truth.
The Sinder document provides a great deal of context and information that was obviously left out of the other side's narrative. It contains factual evidence that paints her attackers in a deeply negative light, and renders many of the common critiques of her actions invalid.
It's also terribly written, absurdly long, and presented in a way that is so egregiously self-sabotaging that I would believe it if you told me Sinder had been hacked and this was a malicious actor putting out an alpha version she intended to work on for another six months.
These factors all but guarantee it will never get the traction she clearly hopes it will, and underlines why these documents need to be carefully coordinated by people who know how to craft a narrative, frame evidence in a compelling manner... and most of all know when to STOP TYPING.
I think this whole debacle will go down in vtuber history as the indie version of the Dokibird incident, but instead of one side committing every PR deadly sin under the sun, both sides engage in a furious competition to see who can outdo the other. It's embarrassing to witness.