[–] ▶ №13393366[Quote] [Voice Chat]>>13397072
Soy culture can only thrive in a world where anything deemed Right-Wing is frowned upon, and specifically a world dominated by Far-Left ideals and post (judeo) modernist takes. While our world is definitely not a Right Wing paradise, it's also not the same world we knew a year ago.
So what happens when the world moves on, but the culture that was specifically crafted for the old one doesn't?
Easy, it gets rewritten or outright dies. In the case of soy culture, it also depends on the changes of the Internet, and the inherent centralization that X the heckin' everything app is providing, which leads to a bit of contradiction.
How did soy culture become popular on Twitter if it grew up in completely hostile places?
YouTube would be an example, it's incredibly rulecucked but most of the pillars of soy culture are archived there. The answer is that soy culture, real soy culture can only exist in a semi-obscure state. Soy culture was never meant to be mass-appealing (just enough to make the 4trooners seethe) since the masses were, well, soyboys. And yet here we are, all because Twitter is now the Right-Wing site, and soy culture is distinctly RW. There are currently more people who know soy culture on the wider Internet than actual users of the street (formerly 'party).
An app like X is everything an imageboard wants to be: easily accessible, multitude of topics and a fairly free sense of speech. It's not perfect but it doesn't need to be, as long as it's designed as an everyday app, it has notifications, accounts, etc. It even outcompetes Reddit.
You have seen it with 4cuck, X rolled around and every 4cucker who hated da social medias and zoomers soon found himself on X. And it has happened to soy sites too. I could bet a thousand dollars that (You), the person reading this thread also has a Twitter account.
>What does it mean then?
That soy culture becomes subservient to a social media.
>And is it bad?
Why would anyone use obscure imageboard forums if X provides the same thing but with shiny blue bubbles that tell you when someone replied to you?
But here comes the catch: vibes and feels. The Twitter users KNOW that they're not the real deal so they find themselves in this delusion where they keep browsing their curated goy app but also want to feel part of the group, and since those people outnumber natives 10:1 it becomes easy to explain things such as the decadence of gem and coal, in favour of ayran or troonslop, why now every 'jak that has to mock someone is brown, purity spirals etc.
>Why does it happen?
Soy culture can't move on (slopjaks would be a great example) > soy culture gets cherrypicked by the increasing masses of RW normalfags > displacement begins and so on and on
Just think of the latest additions to soy culture: gigachads riding a fly, total NAS and giga was already squeezed out by 2021, hunky twink sex machine, it's just a reskinned jartycuck made in a desperate attempt to stop the waves of immigrants. In the entire year of 2025, this is what soy culture produced, NAS and some FOTM self-loathing image.
>So how could this change?
It probably won't but as long as Twitter.com exists, things will get worse, until you'll see this aging site screencap Twitter threads not in an attempt to mock the wholesome tranny who made the post, but to share it with your SoyTwittersisters and comment upon the latest Twitter Drama.
Not like the Internet will keep existing in the format we know in a year or two geg
▶ №13393373[Quote]>>13393490
cobson fact sign posts will never catch on
▶ №13393408[Quote]
GEM
▶ №13393411[Quote]
cobson didnt say that in the movie
▶ №13393417[Quote]>>13393435
this is already happening, there is a circle of "soytwt"
▶ №13393435[Quote]>>13393492
>>13393417>and why that's a good thingWe're so fucked
▶ №13393492[Quote]>>13393514>>13396641
>>13393435The internet is becoming more and more and more centralized, niche things will cease to exist, if you thought it already was bad it WILL get worse, for example most sites used to have their own memes, now there is one global monoculture for memes showed to everyone by Know Your Meme and that LIMC faggot
▶ №13393514[Quote]
>>13393492It's a sad state but I would sacrifice the internet to save the world from faggotry if you catch my drift
Hopefully the world actually gets saved
▶ №13393570[Quote]>>13393680
There's going to be a major backlash towards the right and a swing into far leftism again in 5-10yrs, all of this stuff is cyclical. I think we will be too old to replicate soy culture the same but the torch could be continued. I was Right Wing throughout 2020-early 2025 but seeing how the majority of the Right still worship Jews and Israel, also nonwhite Christians being imported. I'm apolitical now, still enjoy Soy culture and experience immense nostalgia for 2022-24. The hidden /trump/ board in 2023-24 always made me laugh to browse the catalog, even when it remained stagnant. I've never used X/Twitter I hate Elon, and social media like Discord, Instagram, etc. I know that X killed 4troon
▶ №13393626[Quote]>>13393671
>But here comes the catch: vibes and feels
took me until here to realize this was ai
kys
▶ №13393671[Quote]
>>13393626It's all handwritten
▶ №13393680[Quote]
>>13393570I hope fucking not the Left has to be abolished in its entirety or we will actually be forced to eat ze bugs and mutilate ourselves
▶ №13393710[Quote]>>13393768
never did I think winning would be a bad thing…
▶ №13393760[Quote]
the reason why its cyclical is because out of touch kikes take hold of emerging trends and then currentthingcuck it into the ground until the whole social movement is "I SUPPORT SURVEILLANCE AND KILLING PEOPLE I DONT LIKE" same thing happened to the baptists in the past, same thing happened to the democratic party since 2000 or so
▶ №13393768[Quote]
>>13393710There was a time where we would joke about the sharty shutting down or dying or coal that killed the sharty but everyone knew it wasn't happening so it was easy to joke about
Now not anymore because deep down you know you're just saying a fact
▶ №13393858[Quote]>>13396569
>Soy culture can only thrive in a world where anything deemed Right-Wing is frowned upon, and specifically a world dominated by Far-Left ideals and post (judeo) modernist takes. While our world is definitely not a Right Wing paradise, it's also not the same world we knew a year ago.
>So what happens when the world moves on, but the culture that was specifically crafted for the old one doesn't?
>Easy, it gets rewritten or outright dies. In the case of soy culture, it also depends on the changes of the Internet, and the inherent centralization that X the heckin' everything app is providing, which leads to a bit of contradiction.
>How did soy culture become popular on Twitter if it grew up in completely hostile places?
>YouTube would be an example, it's incredibly rulecucked but most of the pillars of soy culture are archived there. The answer is that soy culture, real soy culture can only exist in a semi-obscure state. Soy culture was never meant to be mass-appealing (just enough to make the 4trooners seethe) since the masses were, well, soyboys. And yet here we are, all because Twitter is now the Right-Wing site, and soy culture is distinctly RW. There are currently more people who know soy culture on the wider Internet than actual users of the street (formerly 'party).
>An app like X is everything an imageboard wants to be: easily accessible, multitude of topics and a fairly free sense of speech. It's not perfect but it doesn't need to be, as long as it's designed as an everyday app, it has notifications, accounts, etc. It even outcompetes Reddit.
>You have seen it with 4cuck, X rolled around and every 4cucker who hated da social medias and zoomers soon found himself on X. And it has happened to soy sites too. I could bet a thousand dollars that (You), the person reading this thread also has a Twitter account.
>>What does it mean then?
>That soy culture becomes subservient to a social media.
>>And is it bad?
>Why would anyone use obscure imageboard forums if X provides the same thing but with shiny blue bubbles that tell you when someone replied to you?
>But here comes the catch: vibes and feels. The Twitter users KNOW that they're not the real deal so they find themselves in this delusion where they keep browsing their curated goy app but also want to feel part of the group, and since those people outnumber natives 10:1 it becomes easy to explain things such as the decadence of gem and coal, in favour of ayran or troonslop, why now every 'jak that has to mock someone is brown, purity spirals etc.
>>Why does it happen?
>Soy culture can't move on (slopjaks would be a great example) > soy culture gets cherrypicked by the increasing masses of RW normalfags > displacement begins and so on and on
>Just think of the latest additions to soy culture: gigachads riding a fly, total NAS and giga was already squeezed out by 2021, hunky twink sex machine, it's just a reskinned jartycuck made in a desperate attempt to stop the waves of immigrants. In the entire year of 2025, this is what soy culture produced, NAS and some FOTM self-loathing image.
>>So how could this change?
>It probably won't but as long as Twitter.com exists, things will get worse, until you'll see this aging site screencap Twitter threads not in an attempt to mock the wholesome tranny who made the post, but to share it with your SoyTwittersisters and comment upon the latest Twitter Drama.
>Not like the Internet will keep existing in the format we know in a year or two geg
▶ №13395586[Quote]
Up
▶ №13395614[Quote]>>13395700>>13396569
>Soy culture can only thrive in a world where anything deemed Right-Wing is frowned upon, and specifically a world dominated by Far-Left ideals and post (judeo) modernist takes. While our world is definitely not a Right Wing paradise, it's also not the same world we knew a year ago.
>So what happens when the world moves on, but the culture that was specifically crafted for the old one doesn't?
>Easy, it gets rewritten or outright dies. In the case of soy culture, it also depends on the changes of the Internet, and the inherent centralization that X the heckin' everything app is providing, which leads to a bit of contradiction.
>How did soy culture become popular on Twitter if it grew up in completely hostile places?
>YouTube would be an example, it's incredibly rulecucked but most of the pillars of soy culture are archived there. The answer is that soy culture, real soy culture can only exist in a semi-obscure state. Soy culture was never meant to be mass-appealing (just enough to make the 4trooners seethe) since the masses were, well, soyboys. And yet here we are, all because Twitter is now the Right-Wing site, and soy culture is distinctly RW. There are currently more people who know soy culture on the wider Internet than actual users of the street (formerly 'party).
>An app like X is everything an imageboard wants to be: easily accessible, multitude of topics and a fairly free sense of speech. It's not perfect but it doesn't need to be, as long as it's designed as an everyday app, it has notifications, accounts, etc. It even outcompetes Reddit.
>You have seen it with 4cuck, X rolled around and every 4cucker who hated da social medias and zoomers soon found himself on X. And it has happened to soy sites too. I could bet a thousand dollars that (You), the person reading this thread also has a Twitter account.
>>What does it mean then?
>That soy culture becomes subservient to a social media.
>>And is it bad?
>Why would anyone use obscure imageboard forums if X provides the same thing but with shiny blue bubbles that tell you when someone replied to you?
>But here comes the catch: vibes and feels. The Twitter users KNOW that they're not the real deal so they find themselves in this delusion where they keep browsing their curated goy app but also want to feel part of the group, and since those people outnumber natives 10:1 it becomes easy to explain things such as the decadence of gem and coal, in favour of ayran or troonslop, why now every 'jak that has to mock someone is brown, purity spirals etc.
>>Why does it happen?
>Soy culture can't move on (slopjaks would be a great example) > soy culture gets cherrypicked by the increasing masses of RW normalfags > displacement begins and so on and on
>Just think of the latest additions to soy culture: gigachads riding a fly, total NAS and giga was already squeezed out by 2021, hunky twink sex machine, it's just a reskinned jartycuck made in a desperate attempt to stop the waves of immigrants. In the entire year of 2025, this is what soy culture produced, NAS and some FOTM self-loathing image.
>>So how could this change?
>It probably won't but as long as Twitter.com exists, things will get worse, until you'll see this aging site screencap Twitter threads not in an attempt to mock the wholesome tranny who made the post, but to share it with your SoyTwittersisters and comment upon the latest Twitter Drama.
>Not like the Internet will keep existing in the format we know in a year or two geg
▶ №13395627[Quote]>>13396569
>Soy culture can only thrive in a world where anything deemed Right-Wing is frowned upon, and specifically a world dominated by Far-Left ideals and post (judeo) modernist takes. While our world is definitely not a Right Wing paradise, it's also not the same world we knew a year ago.
>So what happens when the world moves on, but the culture that was specifically crafted for the old one doesn't?
>Easy, it gets rewritten or outright dies. In the case of soy culture, it also depends on the changes of the Internet, and the inherent centralization that X the heckin' everything app is providing, which leads to a bit of contradiction.
>How did soy culture become popular on Twitter if it grew up in completely hostile places?
>YouTube would be an example, it's incredibly rulecucked but most of the pillars of soy culture are archived there. The answer is that soy culture, real soy culture can only exist in a semi-obscure state. Soy culture was never meant to be mass-appealing (just enough to make the 4trooners seethe) since the masses were, well, soyboys. And yet here we are, all because Twitter is now the Right-Wing site, and soy culture is distinctly RW. There are currently more people who know soy culture on the wider Internet than actual users of the street (formerly 'party).
>An app like X is everything an imageboard wants to be: easily accessible, multitude of topics and a fairly free sense of speech. It's not perfect but it doesn't need to be, as long as it's designed as an everyday app, it has notifications, accounts, etc. It even outcompetes Reddit.
>You have seen it with 4cuck, X rolled around and every 4cucker who hated da social medias and zoomers soon found himself on X. And it has happened to soy sites too. I could bet a thousand dollars that (You), the person reading this thread also has a Twitter account.
>>What does it mean then?
>That soy culture becomes subservient to a social media.
>>And is it bad?
>Why would anyone use obscure imageboard forums if X provides the same thing but with shiny blue bubbles that tell you when someone replied to you?
>But here comes the catch: vibes and feels. The Twitter users KNOW that they're not the real deal so they find themselves in this delusion where they keep browsing their curated goy app but also want to feel part of the group, and since those people outnumber natives 10:1 it becomes easy to explain things such as the decadence of gem and coal, in favour of ayran or troonslop, why now every 'jak that has to mock someone is brown, purity spirals etc.
>>Why does it happen?
>Soy culture can't move on (slopjaks would be a great example) > soy culture gets cherrypicked by the increasing masses of RW normalfags > displacement begins and so on and on
>Just think of the latest additions to soy culture: gigachads riding a fly, total NAS and giga was already squeezed out by 2021, hunky twink sex machine, it's just a reskinned jartycuck made in a desperate attempt to stop the waves of immigrants. In the entire year of 2025, this is what soy culture produced, NAS and some FOTM self-loathing image.
>>So how could this change?
>It probably won't but as long as Twitter.com exists, things will get worse, until you'll see this aging site screencap Twitter threads not in an attempt to mock the wholesome tranny who made the post, but to share it with your SoyTwittersisters and comment upon the latest Twitter Drama.
>Not like the Internet will keep existing in the format we know in a year or two geg
▶ №13395650[Quote]>>13395660
Can someone tl;dr this for me?
▶ №13395660[Quote]>>13395696
>>13395650hes saying the site is taking over by right wing twitterfags and the sharty has fallen or something
▶ №13395696[Quote]>>13395708>>13396658
>>13395660tsmt sharty is rightfully marxist-leninist
▶ №13395700[Quote]
>>13395614I made this htsm
▶ №13395708[Quote]>>13396658
>>13395696This but for real
▶ №13395710[Quote]>>13396569
>Soy culture can only thrive in a world where anything deemed Right-Wing is frowned upon, and specifically a world dominated by Far-Left ideals and post (judeo) modernist takes. While our world is definitely not a Right Wing paradise, it's also not the same world we knew a year ago.
>So what happens when the world moves on, but the culture that was specifically crafted for the old one doesn't?
>Easy, it gets rewritten or outright dies. In the case of soy culture, it also depends on the changes of the Internet, and the inherent centralization that X the heckin' everything app is providing, which leads to a bit of contradiction.
>How did soy culture become popular on Twitter if it grew up in completely hostile places?
>YouTube would be an example, it's incredibly rulecucked but most of the pillars of soy culture are archived there. The answer is that soy culture, real soy culture can only exist in a semi-obscure state. Soy culture was never meant to be mass-appealing (just enough to make the 4trooners seethe) since the masses were, well, soyboys. And yet here we are, all because Twitter is now the Right-Wing site, and soy culture is distinctly RW. There are currently more people who know soy culture on the wider Internet than actual users of the street (formerly 'party).
>An app like X is everything an imageboard wants to be: easily accessible, multitude of topics and a fairly free sense of speech. It's not perfect but it doesn't need to be, as long as it's designed as an everyday app, it has notifications, accounts, etc. It even outcompetes Reddit.
>You have seen it with 4cuck, X rolled around and every 4cucker who hated da social medias and zoomers soon found himself on X. And it has happened to soy sites too. I could bet a thousand dollars that (You), the person reading this thread also has a Twitter account.
>>What does it mean then?
>That soy culture becomes subservient to a social media.
>>And is it bad?
>Why would anyone use obscure imageboard forums if X provides the same thing but with shiny blue bubbles that tell you when someone replied to you?
>But here comes the catch: vibes and feels. The Twitter users KNOW that they're not the real deal so they find themselves in this delusion where they keep browsing their curated goy app but also want to feel part of the group, and since those people outnumber natives 10:1 it becomes easy to explain things such as the decadence of gem and coal, in favour of ayran or troonslop, why now every 'jak that has to mock someone is brown, purity spirals etc.
>>Why does it happen?
>Soy culture can't move on (slopjaks would be a great example) > soy culture gets cherrypicked by the increasing masses of RW normalfags > displacement begins and so on and on
>Just think of the latest additions to soy culture: gigachads riding a fly, total NAS and giga was already squeezed out by 2021, hunky twink sex machine, it's just a reskinned jartycuck made in a desperate attempt to stop the waves of immigrants. In the entire year of 2025, this is what soy culture produced, NAS and some FOTM self-loathing image.
>>So how could this change?
>It probably won't but as long as Twitter.com exists, things will get worse, until you'll see this aging site screencap Twitter threads not in an attempt to mock the wholesome tranny who made the post, but to share it with your SoyTwittersisters and comment upon the latest Twitter Drama.
>Not like the Internet will keep existing in the format we know in a year or two geg
▶ №13396273[Quote]
>I could bet a thousand dollars that (You), the person reading this thread also has a Twitter account.
evendoe I don't
▶ №13396460[Quote]>>13397072
this centralization you talk about works for normalGODS, not for us
there are forums older then 99% of our users where the same people still post that they did at the beginning
since i immigrated here i haven't been anywhere else on the internet for enjoyment, its all worthless
when you are on here for a bit you forget how much it has to offer compared to the rest of the internet
even if 'jakking stops (wich it wont GEG) the first point will still be true
▶ №13397072[Quote]
>>13393366 (OP)Tsmt the tides of history are of decay the internet will be tamed by the systems that be, the site will become worse than 4cuck on a large enough time scale and billions will die.
>>13396460Normalfaggots will go along with anything, culture is top down. With the centralization of the internet dissident groups will become even more disenfranchised the masses will bow down to their overlords and fight ham ass or however israel has a right to defend itself o algo. Sure they will be allowed to own the heckin trannies on xitter but this is only a mere temporary rebranding of the global elite
Sites like this are something different, they are organic. Due to their organic nature they are temporary unlike sites where time itself is only enforced by an algorithm. Without their algorithms mainstream sites would be a timeles maze where the past and now exist at the same time. Of course with our temporary natural nature this site will decay, but others like it will emarge even if in the future they may lose the word imageboard and downgrade to messageboard so weaponized p could not be used agints them and thus legal actions would be harder to take as well.