Should that kike practice be fordidden?
Yes.
I need it for medical reasons soon. So no. You could outlaw circumcision for under 18 year olds though, that would make more sense
If done for medical reasons would be a common sense exception I imagine.
There are alternative treatments, you should look them up and try them. Don't fall for what your Dr Bernstein or Blumenthal is telling you.
Already did that, but nothing much you can do about pinhole phimosis. It's physically impossible to stretch (did it for 5 years) my foreskin enough to pull it back even during an erection
If this is for a phimosis then the treatment of choice is to use a corticoid creme.
If that doesn't show results a preputioplasty surgery can fix it without removing the foreskin.
However the kike doctors won't tell you that!
For anything other than medical reasons, yes.
the only reason its foreskins and not labia is bcuz infants have foreskins
it would be less crude to cut off the beef flaps of adult women without their consent, and using THOSE for their creepy oprah face creams etc. bcuz youre not mutilating a baby
the kikes figured out how to profit 700+ dollars from every infant in usa
what a fucking joke of a practice
it would be less crude to cut off the beef flaps of adult women without their consent, and using THOSE for their creepy oprah face creams etc. bcuz youre not mutilating a baby
the kikes figured out how to profit 700+ dollars from every infant in usa
what a fucking joke of a practice
Now I'm an anarchist through and through, the government shouldn't mandate a thing.
But if we were to live in countries where female genital operations are banned for kids then the same should apply for foreskin removal. Won't happen though because foids have value and men don't in this is gynocentric society.
But if we were to live in countries where female genital operations are banned for kids then the same should apply for foreskin removal. Won't happen though because foids have value and men don't in this is gynocentric society.
yes
You would love Somalia then
How come? They have a government
Anarchy: a state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority or other controlling system
Definitely applies to Somalia
Federal Government of Somalia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Them having a federal government not good enough for you?
Do you also believe that North Korea is a Democracy just because they have "Democratic" in their name ?Federal Government of Somalia - Wikipedia
Them having a federal government not good enough for you?
We are not talking about North Korea here though. Your claim was that Somalia does not have a government, it does have a government. The fact that it is in a civil war does not nullify that other fact. By that rationale the UK was an anarchist country during the Troubles.
Similar threads
Homegrownman326
Users who are viewing this thread
