Repeat Of Situation Similar To Prism42 Situation And Addressing Things (Brief Response):
What happened? Months ago, in 2025, I mentioned this situation to a Kiwi Farms user without discussing the more extreme details. I noted that Lex joined a Discord server where I sought assistance with Chris Tyson-related research and attempted to contact an ex-employee. I wanted to double-check my dates to ensure accuracy. In two servers I joined, there were many passionate anti-MrBeast individuals, so I was transparent about my identity and purpose. One person reached out to me. For context, a user who I now know is a minor helped me locate VODs related to a Chris associate on a server I joined. I had asked for help finding Minecraft-related VODs connected to this individual, offering to credit anyone who assisted in a thread (which I never updated) on January 13, 2025.
I was transparent about using Kiwi Farms to anyone who offered help and intended to credit the minor for aiding with the timeline, as I always credit contributors. I didn’t ask the person’s age. In hindsight, I regret not verifying the minor's age or checking her Twitter, which would have stated her age when they offered help, and I acknowledge I should have.
Another red flag is the person claiming to go to school. I was at one point attending classes so I made a really bad well fuck up because when someone says that, this should be your first sign that you should ask their age which I did not. And that is completely my fault.
A few days later without me or the minor texting, they mentioned a server (MrBeast Investigation Bureau) where people collaborated to expose the company's questionable practices, and I requested an invite.
The MrBeast Investigation Bureau server was created by u/BrettZotij (brett z) and u/ednamode23 (HomoAspien). On December 29 2024, Brett asked HomoAspien if he should invite others, prompting him to share the invite in a group chat with Brett and Downtown-Station.
Downstation Station or
u/Downtown_Station5859 is a moderator of the MrBeast Snark Reddit, along with HomoAspein.
This directly confirms that these two mods, along with Brett, were clearly in communication and in group chats. After the minor invited me (keep in mind I did not know her age), I was under the impression that these guys seriously disliked Jimmy, so I told the minor to ask them if they had heard of a person of interest that pertains to the moderators. Some people would respond but most would ignore and nothing entirely noteworthy.
I would chime in, as I was lurking, to say that if you want to learn more about Chris Tyson, look into the adult moderators. Brett would later get confused and think I was referring to the underage users of the Chris Tyson server and referred to Milk as a minor (he is not). I later clarified this.
As an archivist, I initially engaged in impassioned discussions on a server about troubling findings uncovered by others. These rants, driven by my deep investment in the topic, were ultimately inconsequential. However, I should have exercised due diligence. While an adult may freely delve into intense subjects, I failed to verify the age of the minor as highlighted before. By involving them in this complex and potentially dangerous matter, I put them at risk, and I take full responsibility for this. My failure to conduct basic due diligence 4 months ago was irresponsible and shows I should not handle serious/sensitive investigations especially if it involves minors or digging into corporations.
In the server, I advised that it would be unwise to share the most damning information collected, as the server is publicly accessible. Anyone could join, log the server, and use publicly available information for more nefarious purposes. This is hypocritical because I downloaded the server, but this is how I typically operate. Anything involving Chris or valuable data that can be exchanged for information about the person of interest and their associates is archived and saved. Brett invited me to a private chat and opened it for me. The minor also requested to join but was not allowed in. When the minor said she was working with me, as mentioned earlier, I had requested help verifying the dates of certain streams and VODs. This was the only assistance I ever sought from her, and as stated, I regret involving her, especially in hindsight, after learning her age later.
The next day, someone asked Snow if Jake Weddle was on the server, prompting her to say she would contact him to gauge his interest and if the mods would allow it. This is more confirmation that Jake Weddle and the minor were in contact. Brett encouraged the minor to invite Jake Weddle to a global server for the allegations. Another user offered to invite Rosanna Pansino after contacting her. Brett was in a group chat with HomoAspien, a friend of Lex, who is also in a group chat with r/mrbeastsnark moderators, including Downtown. If someone is friends with Lex, why would they encourage inviting Jake Weddle? Secondly, why was Jake Weddle in contact with a minor to begin with and did he know the age?
The minor then asked Weddle about joining the server in the Reddit DMs where she provided the invite.
Jake joined the server at 11:40 PM, and the minor greeted him enthusiastically calling Jake corny. If the times in these screenshots differ, it is because I and another person documenting Lex and their associates live in different time zones. You need to add 6 hours to make the time to match due to the timezone
Lex in an aggressive-tone stated, “You know me, buddy.” HomoAspien posted a popcorn-eating GIF, and Lex commented that Jake knew her, asking him how the cocaine was. Lex added that this would be good commentary fodder.
While [Redacted] took these screenshots, the logs confirm that these messages, before being purged due to Jake's later ban, do exist, and he specifically states he knows [Redacted] and the minor.
[Redacted] and Lex also deleted their messages, likely to conceal evidence. [Redacted] threatened to sue if any of their information was leaked, which is concerning because [Redacted]'s parents are millionaires. While this threat likely does not pertain to us leaking the server logs (possibly pertaining to certain documents), [Redacted] might still attempt to use any information they have to silence or legally intimidate us.
Lex continued to provoke Jake Weddle by asking if he had a new Adderall plug and referencing his confession to writing about sexual assault. These messages were later deleted as demonstrated by the logs we downloaded. Remember Jake claiming Lex read his diary using alt account? This is important because we can verify it. Before Lex deleted her Reddit account a few days ago, we archived her posts. One
post by Lex, containing photos of Jake’s diary, directly confirms this.
This is another example, with evidence, of Lex's malicious behavior, weaponizing information against Jake. Here are more deleted posts that demonstrate this (
A1,
A2).
It’s almost as if Brett, HomoAspien and Lex pre-planned to trick the minor into inviting Jake. While clearly these individuals are malicious, it does not change the fact Jake is in contact with a 13 year old. The document we are working on will detail the inconsistencies in Lex's behavior, including bullying a 13-year-old and weaponizing the fact that this minor is communicating with Jake, rather than expressing concern and investigating the exact details of their interactions or obtaining the messages. If you believe an adult is engaging in inappropriate behavior with a minor, collecting evidence should be your top priority, Lex.
What can be focused on in this post is Jake knowing the age of the minor.
The discord logs I have confirm this screenshot is authenicate and real.
The minor and Jake, in the Reddit logs, discussed how Lex was portraying Jake as a pedophile.
Is Jake a pedophile? No. He is a loser who trauma-dumped on a parasocial underage 13 year old fan and should have completely cut contact as soon as he learned their age. At the same time, Lex is a vindictive ex willing to let children be harmed if it hurts Jake. When the minor's real age was discovered, I agreed with everyone that Jake, at 27 or 28 years old, should not be communicating with a 13-year-old. I informed the server that I was unaware of the minor's age and offered to show Edna my full, uncensored DMs specifically sending it to him on Telegram, which I did.
I mentioned receiving screenshots, so what is the full context regarding that? Recall the secret channel in the server I was invited to, called Secret Lab. The most alarming aspect of this channel was that anyone could access it simply by asking Brett. This meant that anyone with malicious intent could obtain sensitive information, putting former contestants and employees in significant danger and highlighting the recklessness of Edna and Brett. In fact, I would not call it mere recklessness but willful negligence. When dealing with a large company like MrBeast or handling sensitive data such as documents, NDAs, and other materials, you must prioritize ensuring your channels are 100% secure and safe. Negligence can expose your source to lawsuits or harm from malicious actors. This is not only about you. This is about the safety of those around you and if you cannot do that then you have no reason to involve yourself in something as sensitive and serious as this because there were sensitive stuff sent.
This was alarming because they claimed to have vetted another journalist, whom I’ll call L, but it turned out they were not vetted. This was proven in the group chat called The Front Lines, of which I have the full logs, where they put [Redacted] at significant risk by involving an unvetted individual. They relied on the same individual to supposedly get “legal advice” and Edna was the idiot who failed to vet L.
Moreover, they let more random people in a case-sensitive channel.
I’m not claiming to be the smartest or most professional person. I am a retard on Kiwi Farms, but I’m pointing out that Edna, despite having journalist contacts, failed to vet or secure the chat. This is a red flag. How can someone handling serious cases mainly with MrBeast whistleblowers and case-sensitive documents be so negligent? I may lack expertise, but no one in that chat seemed concerned about malicious individuals accessing the channel or prioritizing security for their sources who are likely going to get targeted or sued if things get leaked.
I was the one who recommended using platforms (Element, Signal, etc) other than Discord, as Lex stated, "Discord has one of the weakest APIs." More red flags were found. [Redacted] lost access to a chat, and neither Edna nor anyone else thought to have this person archive the entire chat. Instead, they believed screenshots were sufficient, despite the fact that screenshots can be misrepresented, taken out of context, or manipulated to fit a narrative. The same risk applies here.
[Redacted] was praised by Edna, but from what I recall, no one in that channel attempted to have this person download logs to preserve evidence. I was the only one who repeatedly stated that screenshots were insufficient and that making a video should not be the first priority.
The priority is collecting as much evidence as possible to prove your case and demonstrate that wrongdoing occurred. [Redacted] and Edna will not acknowledge this; instead, they will
take credit for evidence preservation when, without my insistence and persistence, [Redacted] would have only screenshots and not logs. I was also willing to protect these logs. I told [Redacted] directly that they should download these logs.
I also gave [Redacted] constructive criticism when they discussed their video, stating that the focus should be on their allegations, not MrBeast making edgy jokes or creating content for profit.
I added that I would not pressure [Redacted], but I noted the mistakes Dawson French made.
His errors not only affected him but also diverted attention from what happened with Chris Tyson, causing people to forget. Some now claim Chris is innocent, and more malicious individuals connected with him are trying to convince Redditors to accept the idea of Chris returning. I believe people can be redeemed, but when someone refuses to take accountability, whitewashes their actions, and lies about this website and archives being fake, I do not believe they have changed. To return to the main point, if you are handling allegations, you must choose your actions and words carefully. Otherwise, they can be used against anyone who feels victimized, causing their claims to be doubted, as the allegations depend on you spreading the information, providing evidence and compiling.
Lex was later invited to the secret channel. Server invites were paused, and other content creators who were friendly with Jake, including Cam Nuggets, joined. Despite my criticisms of Lex, she rightfully stated that Snow should not be on the server. HomoAspien and other channel members agreed, and Snow was banned. This is a good example of doing the right thing by banning the minor, despite their prior mishandling of the situation/treating this serious situation as a joke in the chat, which we will detail further in the Google doc that we are working on.
This is further proof that Lex and Brett are friendly and coordinate with each other, and it also confirms Jake knew the minor's age. Let me explain. Before the minor was banned, her age (13-14) was mentioned, and she discussed with Jake how Lex was falsely accusing him of being a pedophile. While Jake is not a pedophile, it is inappropriate and wrong for a 27- or 28-year-old to message and trauma-dump a 13-year-old fan. This also indicates Jake was aware of the minor’s age, especially since he was discussing Lex with [Redacted], who likely mentioned the minor and related details as well. Here is more of the conversation.
Jake Weddle's father is mentioned later on. Who is he? Nathan Weddle, is a
convicted sex offender who had sex with a 15 year old girl. Jake discussed him in depth on the "
F You Dad Podcast." The female victim knew Nathan because he was her swim coach. Nathan served as the
head coach of the Capital Area Swim Team for the past four years before his conviction and was
charged for four counts of indecent liberties with a child and six counts of statutory rape. Following Weddle's arrest,
authorities discovered texts from Shannon Lynn Foster on Nathan's phone discussing his relationship with the 15 year old and was also charged. Some individuals in these logs compared Jake Weddle’s communication with a minor to Chris Tyson’s actions. While both are problematic, Chris Tyson’s behavior is arguably worse, as he has been proven to engage in NSFW conversations with minors, consume lolicon and was into EPI. Jake Weddle made a fucked up choice by knowingly trauma-dumping on a 13-year-old, but there is nothing sexual in these logs. It is, however, highly inappropriate either way.
When everything went down, I was in the shower and cleaning my apartment. When I done, I saw that Lex was in the server and was concerned for the safety of everyone in the chat. The person taking live screenshots of the chat (not Lex, someone else) claimed Lex was trying to hack Jake’s and a minor’s account (did not know this was the minor Jake was talking too until later). They also said Lex uses people to do her dirty work to maintain plausible deniability.
Lex has previously joked that Commentary YouTubers might claim she framed Jake and that she tried to hack the minor.
I didn’t see those messages until I analyzed the server logs to figure out what happened with the minor and Jake, but it’s possible the person got confused, as they are not a native English speaker; during voice chats, it was clear English is not their first language. I know this individual was in contact with Dogpack404 at one point, unlike my limited interactions with Dawson, where we did not speak much in depth. But I believed him and this is important for later so keep in mind. Keeping this in mind, I told her directly that I thought she could endanger everyone in the chat.
This part of the conversation rightfully makes me look and sound retarded, particularly regarding OPSEC on Discord.
The person I was speaking with, who was monitoring Lex, told me to stop being a faggot and to investigate what was happening between a minor he kept referencing while fishing Lex for information so I did.
When I revisted the interactions on the MIB Discord between Jake and the minor. I found them deeply concerning, which is why I explained to HomoAspien that I was unaware of the minor’s age and disturbed that Jake seemed to knowingly communicate with them.
Upon learning the minor's age, I took the following actions, as noted in the logs: I immediately cut ties, apologized directly, and asked them to send screenshots of parts of the conversations she had with Jake.
Here is my correspondence with the minor sent to Edna, stating that Jake’s contact with the minor is inexcusable. I also sent him the full DMs on Telegram.
Here are the DMs between the minor and me where I directly apologize to them and request screenshots of the conversations with Jake and tell her she should cut ties with him.
My mention of being scared refers to me being horrified at unknowingly involving a minor in my research and honestly how reckless I was.
Before breaking contact, I requested the minor send me screenshots of her communication with Jake.
I told the minor to break contact with Jake at this time.
While people may criticize me (rightfully) for not verifying the person's age when I first interacted with them, I immediately cut ties as soon as I learned their age. Jake did not. He continued communicating with the minor despite knowing his vindictive ex was clearly trying to destroy him and had no qualms about endangering this kid in the process. After ending contact, I shared some of the screenshots I obtained with people in the server’s secret lab.
While I believe Lex is malicious, it is still right to be concerned, given the child’s age and their interactions with Jake outside of art. This shouldn't be happening at all whatsoever.
The other adults in this situation did not contact the minor, which seems reasonable until the details are known. When the minor offered Lex screenshots before I was online, she declined. While I understand not wanting to knowingly interact with children, I cannot comprehend why she would refuse evidence of what she says is grooming.
Lex also won’t mention that she knew about these interactions long before she publicly bashed Jake for it. It is almost like she intentionally did not want the evidence so she could use this against Jake later while pleading ignorance to the details.
While the screenshot was taken by the minor but how can we verify it beyond the screenshot? Although Lex frequently purges her messages, the minor’s responses to these messages remain visible in an older post,
confirming the authenticity of this screenshot.
VS
Lex appears to have directly introduced the minor to Jake while claiming on Discord she did not want this to become major internet drama. This is yet another contradictory statement.
If that was true, why did you have you and your friends blast the minor on Reddit?
Purging your reddit account does not erase what you posted, which was archived. You never cared about the minor—only about yourself. and getting petty revenge.
https://www.reddit.com/user/Ok-Onion-754/
That is still wrong, but if you are going to blast this, at least collect evidence and consult the minor so you can prioritize her safety, which you never did. There is even more to cover. Remember how I mentioned that someone notified me about Lex supposedly trying to hack a kid's account? This is important because I originally didn’t know if I mishandled the situation. I mentioned it might be strange to try adding the minor back to get more clarification and screenshots, and Brett added that her age was concerning.
Brett said it was inappropriate for Jake to interact with the kid, and he's right. However, Brent noted there's no Discord archives, and without archives like Chris Tyson's, no one will believe it. One issue I never raised with Brett or his group was their continued references to LavaGS. They know nothing about this situation, and honestly, neither do I, nor do I pretend to. LavaGS knows his own experiences, and no one should speak for someone who never asked to be represented or labled as a victim, especially if they aren’t that person.
Brett urged me to get the logs, but I had no contact with the minor and refused to reach out again. Obtaining the logs would require hacking, which I wouldn’t do. However, I wanted to test him to see if that is what he was asking, so I told him it would involve tricking the child into sharing her Discord token. He confirmed himself that is likely the only option.
For those unfamiliar with the MIB server lore, Brett is a friendly, highly autistic individual who is schizo. Though Brett pressured me to get the logs, I suspect Lex influenced him. I’d never comply, and I don’t believe Brett is malicious, just easily swayed and kinda dumb. I think Lex manipulates vulnerable people, using them as shields to hide her harmful actions. Some MrBeast snark alts are stalking and trying to dox the minor. I do think it is possible Lex has a hand in this. A redditor who defended Jake warned us about how Edna and Lex are willing to dox minors.
While I, along with someone else, am working to handle this situation, we believe deleting accounts would destroy evidence and enable account impersonation. We’re working on the document and will ensure its completion. A second post is being created to issue additional clarification including on the removal of the post by r/YoutubeDrama moderators who were actually trying to protect the minor from these people they know have a history of being malicious. The minor is helping with the document to ensure her voice is heard. Once it’s complete, her accounts will likely be deleted, her parents are already being notified, and hopefully, she’ll stay offline. We’re managing this situation because no adult is acting responsibly—some blame the minor defending Jake, while others claim to protect her but send death threats in DMs and blast her on Reddit.
