TLDR for DNRcels: Ephebophilia is okay (but can be creepy), IT has confirmation bias.
Firstly, I'll need to define what pedophilia, hebephilia, and ephebophilia are. (The latter two aren't even recognised by my spell checker)
When I refer to pedophilia, I'm referring to a sexual fetish for pre-pubescent children. Not minors, pre-pubescent children. Virtually none of us support it. There's no incentive to have sex with them as they haven't reached puberty yet. It is literally wasting your time, and they are not able to consent. They might not even know what consent is yet.
Hebephilia is a sexual fetish for early adolescents (roughly 12-14). While this more acceptable, these people are usually below the age of consent in most jurisdictions. Plus, if there is a significant age gap, people will think this is creepy.
Ephebophilia is different. It is a sexual fetish for later adolescents (15-17). In many jurisdictions, they are above the main age of consent, they usually have some understanding of consent and sexual education, etc. I don't support human trafficking, so Epstein is still not someone I support. However, you need to realise that this is more okay. It can only really be considered ephebophilia if the older person is at least 25. Otherwise, it's safe to assume age matching, which we all view as okay.
Now, for the segway into the blackpill's irrefutability.
Most men, naturally have desires for women that are younger. This is normal, as youth indicates fertility. Whether they choose to act on those desires is their decision. They can settle for a 30 year old roastie if they'd like.
However, IT does not seem to think the same way we do.
IT believes that anything involving a minor is pedophilia. While it isn't necessarily wrong, this is like saying any vehicle with wheels is a car.
The truth is, that IT says these things because, like most people, they want to see evidence that supports what they already believe, and they don't want to listen to the other side of the debate. While some things we believe are debatable (e.g. lesbians being chadsexual, the dogpill), I'd say the facepill and heightpill are some of the less debatable aspects of the blackpill.
Science is only ever acknowledged when it agrees with your beliefs. And trust me, the science is on our side. There has been many, many studies into this. The "Scientific Blackpill" page on the Wiki has pretty much anything you need.
Anecdotes aren't refuting us. Insulting isn't refuting us. Ad hominem isn't refuting us.
What is refuting us, is providing scientific evidence that women really are attracted to what the bluepill says, when their actions (which is what matters) does not support this, and instead supports the blackpill. The most nuclear blackpills come from its strongest opponents.
IT seems to understand actions speak louder than words, yet the blackpill isn't something they will acknowledge, because the bluepill is so deeply integrated into them that they feel any opposition to it is in bad faith.
Firstly, I'll need to define what pedophilia, hebephilia, and ephebophilia are. (The latter two aren't even recognised by my spell checker)
When I refer to pedophilia, I'm referring to a sexual fetish for pre-pubescent children. Not minors, pre-pubescent children. Virtually none of us support it. There's no incentive to have sex with them as they haven't reached puberty yet. It is literally wasting your time, and they are not able to consent. They might not even know what consent is yet.
Hebephilia is a sexual fetish for early adolescents (roughly 12-14). While this more acceptable, these people are usually below the age of consent in most jurisdictions. Plus, if there is a significant age gap, people will think this is creepy.
Ephebophilia is different. It is a sexual fetish for later adolescents (15-17). In many jurisdictions, they are above the main age of consent, they usually have some understanding of consent and sexual education, etc. I don't support human trafficking, so Epstein is still not someone I support. However, you need to realise that this is more okay. It can only really be considered ephebophilia if the older person is at least 25. Otherwise, it's safe to assume age matching, which we all view as okay.
Now, for the segway into the blackpill's irrefutability.
Most men, naturally have desires for women that are younger. This is normal, as youth indicates fertility. Whether they choose to act on those desires is their decision. They can settle for a 30 year old roastie if they'd like.
However, IT does not seem to think the same way we do.
IT believes that anything involving a minor is pedophilia. While it isn't necessarily wrong, this is like saying any vehicle with wheels is a car.
The truth is, that IT says these things because, like most people, they want to see evidence that supports what they already believe, and they don't want to listen to the other side of the debate. While some things we believe are debatable (e.g. lesbians being chadsexual, the dogpill), I'd say the facepill and heightpill are some of the less debatable aspects of the blackpill.
Science is only ever acknowledged when it agrees with your beliefs. And trust me, the science is on our side. There has been many, many studies into this. The "Scientific Blackpill" page on the Wiki has pretty much anything you need.
Anecdotes aren't refuting us. Insulting isn't refuting us. Ad hominem isn't refuting us.
What is refuting us, is providing scientific evidence that women really are attracted to what the bluepill says, when their actions (which is what matters) does not support this, and instead supports the blackpill. The most nuclear blackpills come from its strongest opponents.
IT seems to understand actions speak louder than words, yet the blackpill isn't something they will acknowledge, because the bluepill is so deeply integrated into them that they feel any opposition to it is in bad faith.
