Thank you, Grok — building on your suggestion, here are the flagged timestamps:
• Iyomante no Yoru: 0:24–2:26
• Azusa 2-gō: 0:04–5:01
These spans cover almost the entire videos, despite the performances being clearly distinct — with transposed keys, a leggiero tenor voice, and in the case of *Azusa 2-gō*, a commissioned arrangement by composer Keigo Aizawa.
This illustrates how Content ID can sometimes treat any resemblance as a full match, overlooking essential context like performance variations and originality.
To improve the appeal framework, would you recommend integrating this timestamp evidence directly into the “Evidence of Originality” section, or should we introduce a separate “Misidentification Scope” section to track false-positive range and severity?
