S
So lets get few important points first:
1. No one is against 16yo girls fucking with 16-18yo boys
2. People think 16 is a normal age to have sex
Agecucks only are against 16yo girls having sex if the man is over 19yo. Their argument is that the guy has more emotional intelligence and they would have bigger power dynamics than 16yo girl with lets say 18yo boy. But here is the thing.
If an 18yo tiktoker who is a millionare would try to date a 16yo girl, they would have literally no issue with that, even if they knew about the disproportions of power.
Meanwhile if a clearly autistic 22yo guy, who doesn't know how to talk to women would try to date said 16yo girl, they would suddenly jump on him being a pedophile and a groomer. Even if a guy would clearly show how he didn't do any grooming, they would still accuse him of grooming, cause In their mind if you are 4+ years older than a 16yo girl then you 100% are grooming her and there is no other way around it.
This is the attitude that is a literal ageism. The assumption that every guy who has a significant age gap over the girl is automatically a groomer who should be put into prison and killed. Even if not proven that he is a groomer, people will just think he is because he is an old and ugly guy. This is quite common how feminists are trying to make men attracted to even 18yo girls bad if they are over 30, because 30yo men are ugly and dirty etc.
Im a man of respect, and I take offense in people saying Im suddenly a bad person just because I want to date 16yo women when If I would be 18, I would suddenly not do anything wrong. The grooming argument doesn't even consider that women mature faster and 16yo girl is on the same level as 18yo guy at worst.
The funny thing is that a lot of people these people are okay with it being legal to date 18yo girls as 30yo guy just not something that is okay socially.
If we assume that girls at 16 are old enough to decide to have sex, but not if the guy is 4+ years older than her, then why make the unrestricted age of consent at 18? If according to their logic 18yo girls are still much more immature than 30yo guy, so in both cases he is grooming them.
If they think 20+ men shouldnt have sex with 16yo girls, because they are much more mature and will groom them, then the age of consent for the 30yo men should be 25, since women who are 18-24 are supposedly still less mature and easy to groom, so why stop at 18 exactly when 16 is already old enough to have sex, while 25 is the minimum age to not be groomed?
1. No one is against 16yo girls fucking with 16-18yo boys
2. People think 16 is a normal age to have sex
Agecucks only are against 16yo girls having sex if the man is over 19yo. Their argument is that the guy has more emotional intelligence and they would have bigger power dynamics than 16yo girl with lets say 18yo boy. But here is the thing.
If an 18yo tiktoker who is a millionare would try to date a 16yo girl, they would have literally no issue with that, even if they knew about the disproportions of power.
Meanwhile if a clearly autistic 22yo guy, who doesn't know how to talk to women would try to date said 16yo girl, they would suddenly jump on him being a pedophile and a groomer. Even if a guy would clearly show how he didn't do any grooming, they would still accuse him of grooming, cause In their mind if you are 4+ years older than a 16yo girl then you 100% are grooming her and there is no other way around it.
This is the attitude that is a literal ageism. The assumption that every guy who has a significant age gap over the girl is automatically a groomer who should be put into prison and killed. Even if not proven that he is a groomer, people will just think he is because he is an old and ugly guy. This is quite common how feminists are trying to make men attracted to even 18yo girls bad if they are over 30, because 30yo men are ugly and dirty etc.
Im a man of respect, and I take offense in people saying Im suddenly a bad person just because I want to date 16yo women when If I would be 18, I would suddenly not do anything wrong. The grooming argument doesn't even consider that women mature faster and 16yo girl is on the same level as 18yo guy at worst.
The funny thing is that a lot of people these people are okay with it being legal to date 18yo girls as 30yo guy just not something that is okay socially.
If we assume that girls at 16 are old enough to decide to have sex, but not if the guy is 4+ years older than her, then why make the unrestricted age of consent at 18? If according to their logic 18yo girls are still much more immature than 30yo guy, so in both cases he is grooming them.
If they think 20+ men shouldnt have sex with 16yo girls, because they are much more mature and will groom them, then the age of consent for the 30yo men should be 25, since women who are 18-24 are supposedly still less mature and easy to groom, so why stop at 18 exactly when 16 is already old enough to have sex, while 25 is the minimum age to not be groomed?
