LemonMice
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2025
OOA is false, negros are homo erectus
20k years is far too short for such enormous differences
Yoruba and Igbo Black Africans have 4% Homo Erectus, groups like Mbuti pygmies have around 16% which can reach as high as 19%
Horn/east Africans are 100% Homo Sapien.
OOA theory is vindicated hardcore by evidence in archeogenetics. Innate group differences has been vindicated hardcore by archeogenetics. Thus evolutionary mechanics are true.
You are being retarded and not applying evolution properly, it's just serving your ideology. You do realize we can just contrast all modern populations with Neanderthals and Denisovans on a PCA calculator. You will see that Neanderthals, Sapiens and Denisovian all form separate clusters, they do not join at the fringes at all. All modern populations clusters together. Some black Africans and Australians are on the fringes of the sapien genetic cluster towards the other species.
20k years is not far too short for enormous differences. Selection pressures really took off once civilization started 10k years ago. We co-evolved as society got more complex over the millenia. And that evolution was driven by superiors having higher fertility rates than inferiors or just surviving better.
Source:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021v1.full.pdf
NW euros have serious group differences between their ancestors 2000 years ago. So does Ashkenazi Jews, Palestinian/Jordan Christians and Sarmatians are mostly Iron age Israelites, so a sibling to biblical jews and they had the exact same selection pressures (no differences). Ashkenazi Jews are also superior to their Roman ancestors as well.
No such thing as magic blood dude. Our bronze age western steppe ancestors were generally swarthy, but had a broad northern european morphology to them. The Aryans were iron age WSH who stayed in South + central asia (not our ancestors, just relatives), and yes they were very fair and nordic. Once PIE made contact with globular amphora culture (who were the fairest european farmers), they got an obsession with fair traits.
How else do you make future whites superior to past whites (a sign of true progress) without having either your genetic elites having high gene flow + higher fertility rate than inferiors? They need an outsized contribution to the gene pool for eugenics/ directional selection to happen.yes i see, please touch grass
IVFcuck can mean we set up elite sperm/egg banks and men can fertilize an elite gifted woman's egg to make an embryo for his wife to incubate. Wife can do the same with an elite male sperm donor. Both pass on their genes. Both of their children are most likely superior to them and our bell curve shifts to the right finally.
Or you can wait for embryo selection, but not everyone will do that.
on the contrary, transhumanism will end in entrenched and highly stratified castes
We already have a hidden fucking caste system. Whites from multi-generational professional families (think doctors, dentists, certain trades, scientists, engineers, etc) are genetically superior to the working class. They have a higher education attainment, they have a different genotype making them genetically distinct (they still genetically cluster with us, that is just described by ancient ancestral composition)
150 IQ genius from working class may be equal to a 150 IQ genius from the upper middle class multi-generational family (upper class for several generations)... But their kids will not be equal even if they both reproduced with the exact same women. They have different means to regress to.
Jews, whites, east asians, etc all have hidden caste systems. The difference between ours and pajeets is that some elite families breed out, or had a crappy means and leaves. New elite families form and take their place. For pajeetland, their elite families just pretend they are elite even if they regressed to a pathetic mean that's like 5 IQ points above the average. Their elite stock never refreshed itself.
And pajeets can detect any caste system. They know exactly which people to suck up to. They don't suck up to the everyday Ashkenazi or white, they suck up to those who hail from good family backgrounds, as those people run the show. Upper class focuses on networking and using their time wisely for a reason.
Look at the family backgrounds of directors of say the CIA. Or perhaps the family background of some great inventors/researchers. G fucking loaded. There's a huge difference between whites who descend from successful lines of Bishops (priest class) than working class. Huge difference in average intellectual accomplishments between Jews who descend from Rabbis and those who don't.
It's bullshit, but welcome to the sexual reproduction lotto system. Humans, Ideas and Machines run the world. For humans, if you don't pop out the vagina of the right lineages, you are powerless to change anything 99.9% of the time.
Antisemitism was an upper class thing at first. Working class was too illiterate, too uneducated to notice the wrongdoings of Jews. Like many things from genes to culture. The working class adopted it as it "trickled down" from the elites.hating jews is the hobby of every good honest lower class man for about as long as jews are in europe
Hating Jews is stupid. Fearing them is smarter as the Ashkenazi and Sephardi somewhat are covertly dangerous people. We can compete with Sephardi in duels of wit but not Ashky. They got a SD over us in genius world, so their IQ ceiling is higher than ours. And we're like 7 SD away from the theoretical maximum for human intelligence naturally.