Skip to main content
You are the owner of this article.
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit

With immigration to Canada reduced, here are some of the big changes the Carney government may focus on

When push comes to shove, critics say the federal government’s only option is to get as many temporary residents in Canada out in the next two years. 

Updated
3 min read
Lena Diab

Immigration Minister Lena Diab, appointed in May, is epected to  finetune  economic immigration programs so Canada can still attract needed talent as it pulls back the welcome mat for other newcomers. 


Unlike her predecessor who constantly stepped into the spotlight, Nova Scotia MP Lena Diab has kept a low profile since she was named immigration minister in May.

But experts fear this could just be the calm before the storm, and they expect more big immigration changes to complete Marc Miller’s unfinished business when Parliament returns on Sept. 15. 

Despite efforts to reduce immigration, Ottawa is still far from its committed targets, with close to three million non-permanent residents still in the country, hovering at seven per cent of Canada’s population. That’s two percentage points above the level the Liberals would like to reach by the end of 2027.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is already in attack mode two weeks after winning a byelection, calling on the government to scrap the temporary foreign worker program and end all new permits.

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration -:-
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time -:-
 
1x

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre rallied his caucus as they prepare to return to the House of Commons. Poilievre says things are getting worse in Canada under Prime Minister Mark Carney's leadership and Conservatives are ready to propose solutions. (Sept. 14, 2025)

When push comes to shove, critics say the federal government’s only option is to get as many temporary residents in Canada out in the next two years. Enforcement will top the agenda as officials refocus on economic immigration to meet certain labour market needs while spots are limited.

“The level of reductions that they have committed to are very, very difficult to achieve with that number of people who are already here,” said Kyle Hyndman, a Vancouver-based immigration lawyer.

“The challenge for the minister and the government right now is to meet those extremely difficult, extremely challenging targets without creating unintended consequences, and doing so in a rational and constitutional way.”

There are already signs that Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government is being pushed in that direction.

The Strong Borders Act, tabled in June, seeks the power to suspend, cancel or stop accepting and processing of immigration applications and documents such as visas and permits due to public interest. It would also increase surveillance capabilities and expand information sharing between government departments and with international partners. Other provisions would restrict access to asylum for people who have previously been in Canada.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

Another sign, critics said, is that while the Immigration Department faced the elimination of 3,300 jobs, Ottawa was hiring 1,000 new border officers and investing in equipment like scanners and drones to secure the border, as well as upgrades of immigration detention facilities. 

Gabriela Ramo said immigration lawyers have seen increasing immigration refusals and a significant surge in application processing times since last year, which many believe are further attempts to discourage migrants from coming to Canada or staying in the country.  

“I don’t think that’s happening organically,” said the former chair of the Canadian Bar Association’s immigration section. “It’s happening because one way you reduce the number of people is by making the system slower. If you’re slower, you accept less people, that brings your number down.

“You either invest in enforcement to get people out or you create what we see in the U.S. with this huge population of undocumented workers, which has all sorts of ramifications.”

Another priority for the Carney government is to finetune the economic immigration programs so Canada can still attract needed talent as it pulls back the welcome mat, given it can’t really make much headway with the already limited spots for family reunifications and protected refugees. Critics also expect Diab to continue to focus on permanent residence pathways for those with backgrounds in health care, STEM, skilled trades, agriculture and other in-demand jobs.

“What’s lost in the debate around immigration is of the people that we still want to let in, how do we make sure that those are the right people?” asked Hyndman. “We certainly hope that the minister is preoccupied with that right now.”

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

But the system requires more than just some minor tweaks. Vancouver immigration lawyer Jonathan Leebosh said the minister must also overhaul the bureaucracy of her department to modernize operations and ensure immigration processes and decisions are clear.

Processing should be streamlined to reduce red tape and duplication, he said. For instance, someone from a country requiring visas looking to extend a work permit shouldn’t have to first apply to the Edmonton processing centre, wait and then apply for a temporary resident visa and send a passport to the Ottawa office to complete the process.

“Modernization” has been the catchword of successive immigration ministers when confronted with criticisms about application backlogs and processing times, and Ottawa has pumped millions of dollars into digitalizing the immigration system over the years. 

Yet, “the dial only ever moves so slightly,” said Leebosh, who speaks on behalf of the Canadian Immigration Lawyers Association.

To better align skilled immigration to the economy, he said Ottawa should reinvigorate what many consider the highly successful provincial immigration program, which allows provinces to select and nominate immigration candidates with skills they need. Under the federal immigration reduction plan, the spots allotted to the program annually has been halved from 110,000 last year to 55,000 in 2025 through 2027, impeding provinces’ ability to fill gaps in local labour market. 

The key, said Leebosh, is to ensure immigration is still working for Canada to get back citizens’ trust and support for immigration, which has been waning in the last two years as high numbers of newcomers have been blamed for the housing crisis, a strained health-care system and suppressing wage increases.

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

The Liberals have increasingly used the immigration minister’s special powers to issue ad-hoc directives and public policies to circumvent parliamentary and public scrutiny, and Carney must change that culture to allow stronger debates on immigration, experts said.

While it’s expected the opposition will propose some amendments to the Strong Borders Act, experts believe the bill will likely pass in some form.

“The big question is whether the Conservatives will see this as furthering their agenda or they will see it as weakening them because they don’t want to be seen supporting the Liberal government,” said Hyndman. “And that’s a political determination.”

That said, he is quite confident that when it comes to immigration, Canada has yet to reach the end of its swing to the right.

Nicholas Keung

Nicholas Keung is a Toronto-based reporter covering immigration for the Star. Follow him on Twitter: @nkeung.

More from The Star & partners

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

To join the conversation set a first and last name in your user profile.

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Community Guidelines. Toronto Star does not endorse these opinions.

Conversation

|

Top Comments

    1. Comment by David.

      The feds need to do a much better job of working with the provinces and municipalities to assess needs, capacity, and funding requirements. This was a major downfall of the Trudeau Liberals, and I trust Carney will bring far more scrutiny and precision to the task. We rely on immigration and need to get this right as a country.

    2. Comment by IR.

      with unemployment in Ontario now at 9% why do we need ANY foreign workers? I know of a Canadian that couldn't find work for almost a year and sent out a thousand resumes! Let's get those who are already here working and if there are more jobs left over THEN call in extra help. Don't worry, if the call goes out people will come right away. No need to invite them without enough work and have to listen to the immigrants complain about the high cost of everything PLUS that they cannot find work. That is not being kind to anyone.

    3. Comment by Nick.

      Why are we told the government is being "pushed" when it's simply fulfilling its campaign promise to slow population growth by limiting immigration, with a greater focus on matching immigrants with provincial employment needs? Temporary residents will be capped at 5% of the population within two years, by 2027, and permanent resident admissions will be capped at 1% of the population, or about 400,000 newcomers, per year. Yet the author frames this active policy fulfillment as the government being "pushed," as though it's being forced to do something it doesn't want to do. That's a false and misleading characterization.

      It seems that even if the government immediately proceeds to do what it was elected to do, the newspapers will find a way to frame it negatively -- often by quoting selected "experts" who have their own unmentioned agendas. How is that serving the needs of readers?

    Send us your Feedback