🔞 Ashley

43 posts
Opens profile photo
🔞 Ashley
@KoroNMika
🔞Alt account, except complaining TCOAALtwt: x.com/lust_coffin
Joined February 2023

🔞 Ashley’s posts

Gotta say I'm really sick of this shit. 1.7M views and the mf blocked me and restricted the comments so no one can credit me. Hours of my work for this bullshit.
The image is a screenshot of a social media post from the user 'Banana' (@CoffinLeyLey), featuring an anime-style drawing of two characters. One character is wearing a black outfit with a skirt, while the other is in a red and white outfit with a hat. The drawing includes text overlays with humorous dialogue, one character saying 'This is absurd' and the other responding 'I know right? Let's beat the shit out of him'. The post context reveals frustration from the original artist, Ashley (@KoroNMika), who claims their work was used without credit, leading to a significant view count but no recognition. The image highlights issues of content theft and lack of credit in the digital art community.
I'm fully locked in for TCOAAL Idc if I have to wait until 2030 for the full story. I will devour every bit of content I can get of these hot ass siblings. Look at how they touch. This is FLIRTING. I love this CG 💚🩷
The image is a black-and-white illustration featuring two characters, a male and a female, who appear to be siblings based on the post text. They are depicted in a close, intimate pose, with the male character holding a skull and the female character gently touching his hand. The background shows a cityscape at night, adding a mysterious and somewhat gothic atmosphere to the scene. The post text indicates that the characters are from a story called TCOAAL, and the user expresses enthusiasm for the narrative, describing the interaction as flirting. The characters' expressions and body language suggest a deep connection, enhancing the romantic and slightly provocative tone of the image.
has committed multiple acts of copyright infringement with clear malicious intent. My art, and the art of many other creators he's stolen from, is protected by copyright law. His acts of hiding and erasing artists' names is a clear infringement. - 🧵
The post includes a screenshot of a legal text from section 106A.39 regarding the rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity, highlighting the rights of artists to claim authorship and prevent distortion of their work. Below this, there are two images of artwork featuring a character with a distinctive design, wearing a black outfit with green accents. The character is depicted in a provocative pose, which aligns with the context of copyright infringement discussed in the post. The post text by RedLotus, an artist, explains that their watermark was removed from their artwork, which was then reposted without credit. This act of removing the watermark and reposting is highlighted as a violation of copyright law, with the artist expressing frustration over the malicious intent behind these actions.
The post includes a screenshot of a legal text from section 106A.39 regarding the rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity, highlighting the rights of artists to claim authorship and prevent distortion of their work. Below this, there are two images of artwork featuring a character with a distinctive design, wearing a black outfit with green accents. The character is depicted in a provocative pose, which aligns with the context of copyright infringement discussed in the post. The post text by RedLotus, an artist, explains that their watermark was removed from their artwork, which was then reposted without credit. This act of removing the watermark and reposting is highlighted as a violation of copyright law, with the artist expressing frustration over the malicious intent behind these actions.
The post includes a screenshot of a legal text from section 106A.39 regarding the rights of certain authors to attribution and integrity, highlighting the rights of artists to claim authorship and prevent distortion of their work. Below this, there are two images of artwork featuring a character with a distinctive design, wearing a black outfit with green accents. The character is depicted in a provocative pose, which aligns with the context of copyright infringement discussed in the post. The post text by RedLotus, an artist, explains that their watermark was removed from their artwork, which was then reposted without credit. This act of removing the watermark and reposting is highlighted as a violation of copyright law, with the artist expressing frustration over the malicious intent behind these actions.
How some mfs be treating Andrew like he isn't fully aware of his actions and just irreparably in love with his sister-
The image is a meme comparing 'canon' and 'fanon' interpretations of a character, likely from a fictional series. On the left, labeled 'canon', is a dark, shadowy figure with a menacing description: 'heartless villain, can and will destroy anything in their path'. On the right, labeled 'fanon', is a cute, baby-like version of the same character with a more endearing description: 'aww the skrunkly tiny baby did protec at all costs'. This meme humorously contrasts the official portrayal of the character with the fan community's affectionate reinterpretation. The post text mentions 'Andrew' and his awareness of his actions, suggesting this character might be named Andrew and is from a series where fans have created a softer version of him.
The image is a meme comparing 'canon' and 'fanon' interpretations of a character, likely from a fictional series. On the left, labeled 'canon', is a dark, shadowy figure with a menacing description: 'heartless villain, can and will destroy anything in their path'. On the right, labeled 'fanon', is a cute, baby-like version of the same character with a more endearing description: 'aww the skrunkly tiny baby did protec at all costs'. This meme humorously contrasts the official portrayal of the character with the fan community's affectionate reinterpretation. The post text mentions 'Andrew' and his awareness of his actions, suggesting this character might be named Andrew and is from a series where fans have created a softer version of him.
"Boy I love being shown absolutely gruesome, real life sh scars, completely uncensored on my tl"... And yet those people say it's healthier than shipping fictional characters...Wtf
The image features an illustration of a character with a somber expression, characterized by dark, wavy hair and a black outfit. The character's design is simple yet expressive, with a focus on the facial expression that conveys a sense of frustration or disillusionment. This image is part of a social media post by user Ashley (@KoroNMika), who expresses disdain for being exposed to uncensored, real-life self-harm scars on their timeline. The post contrasts this with the idea that some people consider such content healthier than engaging with fictional character relationships, highlighting a debate on mental health representation and the impact of graphic content versus fictional narratives on social media platforms.
Wow is my art really that distinct? I kinda thought people would forget about me after a week. Such loyal little sheep~ 🩷
Two black shoes with white star and crescent moon patterns. The shoes are styled in a distinctive design associated with Andrew X Ashley and Lust Coffin.
I have to stop taking naps on my days off- And by naps I mean falling asleep for 6 hours, waking up at 10, and going right back to bed until 4. I hate being tired all the time
The image is an illustration of a person with dark hair, wearing a purple shirt, who appears to be very tired or exhausted. The character is depicted with a hand on their forehead and a weary expression, emphasizing their fatigue. This visual aligns with the post text by Ashley (@KoroNMika), who describes their struggle with excessive napping on days off, leading to a cycle of sleep that leaves them feeling tired all the time. The illustration effectively captures the essence of feeling drained and the frustration of not being able to break the cycle of sleep.
What is bro on about bc I genuinely can't understand what he's trying to say. Can someone help? Is he trying to claim it's not my art? Is he trying to say since it's uploaded it's no longer mine? Maybe I'm just an idiot like he says, over and over and over :) 🩷
The image is a screenshot of a social media post by user @KoroNMika, featuring an anime-style artwork of a character lying on a bed, dressed in a school uniform with a skirt and thigh-high stockings. The character is depicted in a relaxed pose, with one leg raised and a hand resting on their head. The post includes text expressing confusion over a direct message conversation where the sender accuses @KoroNMika of not owning the art because it was uploaded a year ago. The conversation includes offensive language from the sender, calling @KoroNMika an idiot repeatedly. The post text indicates @KoroNMika's confusion and frustration over the accusations, questioning the logic behind the claims. The image also includes interaction metrics like likes, reposts, and bookmarks, indicating engagement with the post.
The image is a screenshot of a social media post by user @KoroNMika, featuring an anime-style artwork of a character lying on a bed, dressed in a school uniform with a skirt and thigh-high stockings. The character is depicted in a relaxed pose, with one leg raised and a hand resting on their head. The post includes text expressing confusion over a direct message conversation where the sender accuses @KoroNMika of not owning the art because it was uploaded a year ago. The conversation includes offensive language from the sender, calling @KoroNMika an idiot repeatedly. The post text indicates @KoroNMika's confusion and frustration over the accusations, questioning the logic behind the claims. The image also includes interaction metrics like likes, reposts, and bookmarks, indicating engagement with the post.
The image is a screenshot of a social media post by user @KoroNMika, featuring an anime-style artwork of a character lying on a bed, dressed in a school uniform with a skirt and thigh-high stockings. The character is depicted in a relaxed pose, with one leg raised and a hand resting on their head. The post includes text expressing confusion over a direct message conversation where the sender accuses @KoroNMika of not owning the art because it was uploaded a year ago. The conversation includes offensive language from the sender, calling @KoroNMika an idiot repeatedly. The post text indicates @KoroNMika's confusion and frustration over the accusations, questioning the logic behind the claims. The image also includes interaction metrics like likes, reposts, and bookmarks, indicating engagement with the post.
The image is a screenshot of a social media post by user @KoroNMika, featuring an anime-style artwork of a character lying on a bed, dressed in a school uniform with a skirt and thigh-high stockings. The character is depicted in a relaxed pose, with one leg raised and a hand resting on their head. The post includes text expressing confusion over a direct message conversation where the sender accuses @KoroNMika of not owning the art because it was uploaded a year ago. The conversation includes offensive language from the sender, calling @KoroNMika an idiot repeatedly. The post text indicates @KoroNMika's confusion and frustration over the accusations, questioning the logic behind the claims. The image also includes interaction metrics like likes, reposts, and bookmarks, indicating engagement with the post.
I grew up thinking Reddit is where the worst, freakiest, most edgy people on the internet were. But it's just full of a bunch of oversensitive pussies now. Boring.
This just in: Incest is ethical! Breed your sister! Seriously though- "My kinky drawings are more ethical than your kinky drawings 😡" type attitude
The image is a screenshot of a social media post discussing the ethics of different fetishes, particularly focusing on the attitudes towards fiction versus reality in online communities. The post mentions psychologists and the stigmatization of certain fetishes, suggesting a nuanced discussion on how these topics are perceived. The text overlay in the image includes comments from users debating the morality and ethics of various fetishes, with one user humorously suggesting that their 'kinky drawings' are more ethical than others. The context provided by the original post text adds a layer of satire, highlighting the absurdity of comparing the ethics of different fetishes in such a manner.
Replying to
He cannot use the excuse of fair use because his intentions and actions show a clear effort to hide the original authors. Nor can he claim to be an archive, for the same reason. He shows no sign of stopping even when confronted. (Although he's not very eloquent anyway.)
Image
Image
Replying to
Our work as artists are copyrighted the moment we make them, including when we post them. It's obvious that Twitter doesn't care about real artists but my lawyer sure does. 🩷 There is no excuse since his reposting is clearly altered in a way no other reposts are.