The company used a tax scheme the IRS previously endorsed when pricing the marketing investments and intangible intellectual property it paid several offshore affiliates, it told the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Coca-Cola accused the government of treating it differently than other companies in an “arbitrary” and “opportunistic” way in increasing its tax burden, while claiming its actions were unreviewable.
The government’s model ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.