Final Verdict: Yes, Yasuke is a Samurai

4 min readNov 28, 2024

Unveiling the Yasuke Controversy: Disinformation, History, and Cultural Identity

In an era dominated by digital narratives, the story of Yasuke — the African man who became a samurai under Oda Nobunaga in feudal Japan — has sparked one of the most unexpected and multifaceted debates of recent times. What begins as a question of historical interpretation quickly unfurls into a narrative interwoven with misinformation, geopolitical agendas, and cultural sensitivity.

This article delves into the controversy, examining the historical evidence, Japan’s legal framework, the disinformation campaigns at play, and the broader implications for our understanding of history and culture. By the end, you’ll have a deeper understanding of how Yasuke’s legacy reflects not only Japan’s history but also the complexities of modern information warfare.

Yasuke is a Samurai (Definitive Guide)

Was Yasuke Truly a Samurai?

The question of Yasuke’s status as a samurai is at the heart of this debate. Historical accounts, including Japan’s 16th-century chronicles, describe Yasuke as a retainer and bodyguard to Nobunaga. The Japanese Broadcasting Act and NHK’s strict fact-checking standards have consistently supported Yasuke’s portrayal as a samurai, reaffirmed in their 2021 documentary, Black Samurai Yasuke.

Yet, detractors argue against this status, questioning the historical evidence and accusing historians like Thomas Lockley, author of African Samurai: The True Story of Yasuke, of fabricating narratives. These claims, however, crumble under scrutiny. Historical records, including Nobunaga gifting Yasuke a sword and residence, lend credibility to Yasuke’s recognition as a samurai — a title not given lightly in feudal Japan.

The Role of Disinformation

The Yasuke debate is not merely a historical dispute; it exemplifies the growing influence of disinformation. Foreign actors, including Russia and China, have been implicated in amplifying the controversy. These campaigns manipulate narratives to sow division and undermine trust in reliable sources.

• Narrative One: Claims that Yasuke’s samurai status is a product of “woke” Western agendas emerged shortly after the trailer for Assassin’s Creed Shadows was released in May 2024. This narrative gained traction among Western conservatives and spread across platforms like YouTube and X (formerly Twitter).

• Narrative Two: A false rumor suggesting Nobunaga initiated African slavery further fueled the debate, particularly among Japanese conservatives concerned about historical revisionism.

• Narrative Three: The idea that hundreds of African samurai played pivotal roles in Japanese history created additional confusion, despite no historical evidence supporting this claim.

These narratives demonstrate how coordinated disinformation efforts can fabricate divisions and distort historical discussions.

Japan’s Legal Landscape and Cultural Sensitivities

Japan’s legal and cultural frameworks play a crucial role in how the Yasuke debate has unfolded domestically. The country’s Defamation Law and Broadcasting Act emphasize the importance of reputation and factual accuracy. These laws have been pivotal in addressing misinformation, holding broadcasters and individuals accountable for misleading claims.

NHK, Japan’s public broadcaster, exemplifies this commitment. In its 2021 documentary on Yasuke, NHK consulted multiple historians and reaffirmed its portrayal even amid criticism. This underscores the trust placed in NHK’s content and highlights the stark contrast between credible Japanese sources and speculative online debates.

Understanding Japanese Perspectives

The Yasuke controversy also reflects deeper cultural dynamics. Japanese conservatives, deeply rooted in the nation’s pre-WWII identity, value the preservation of Japan’s history and cultural integrity. However, many Japanese view Yasuke’s story as a symbol of inclusivity, celebrating a historical figure who defied societal norms of his time.

A 2024 survey of 3,741 Japanese participants revealed nuanced perspectives. While some expressed concerns about accurate cultural representation in Assassin’s Creed Shadows, the majority were indifferent to the controversy, with many supporting Yasuke’s portrayal as a samurai.

The Global Implications

The Yasuke debate serves as a case study in how historical narratives are weaponized in the age of information warfare. Disinformation campaigns exploit cultural sensitivities, creating rifts not only within nations but also between global communities.

This controversy highlights the importance of critical thinking, media literacy, and a commitment to factual accuracy. It reminds us that history is not just a record of the past but a battleground for competing ideologies and agendas.

Conclusion: The Legacy of Yasuke

Yasuke’s story is more than a historical curiosity; it’s a testament to the power of cross-cultural exchange and the resilience of individuals who break barriers. As debates continue, it’s essential to approach such discussions with nuance and respect for historical evidence.

In an era where misinformation thrives, the Yasuke controversy reminds us of the importance of seeking truth and fostering informed dialogue. Whether you view Yasuke as a symbol of inclusivity, a subject of historical intrigue, or a cautionary tale about disinformation, his legacy continues to resonate across time and cultures.

Join the Conversation

If this exploration of Yasuke’s legacy and its broader implications resonated with you, consider sharing this article and engaging in thoughtful discussion. Together, we can navigate the complexities of history and truth in an increasingly interconnected world.