Police civil liability for inappropriate response to domestic assault victims☆
Introduction
Access through your organization
Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.
Section snippets
Domestic violence and equal protection
Gender discrimination and intermediate scrutiny
Months of apathetic police response
Gender discrimination based on untimely response to 911 calls
Gender discrimination motivated by animus against women
Gender discrimination based on failure to enforce a state statute
Crime type discrimination and minimal scrutiny
Crime type discrimination based on statistical evidence
Crime type discrimination based on failure to arrest domestic abusers outside an officer's presence
Crime type discrimination based on failure to dispatch police officers to emergency domestic violence calls for assistance
Crime type discrimination based on failure to remove domestic abusers from victims' homes
Conclusion
References (68)
- et al.
Multiple parties in domestic violence situations and arrest
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2000) Police handling of domestic calls: The importance of offender's presence in the arrest decision
Journal of Criminal Justice
(1996)- et al.
Developing police policy: An evaluation of the control principle
American Journal of Police
(1994) - et al.
Enforcement of the domestic abuse act in Minnesota: A preliminary study
Law and Inequality
(1988) A multi-year study of Ohio urban, suburban, and rural police dispositions of domestic disputes
Victimology: An International Journal
(1985)The manners and customs of the police
(1980)- et al.
Police attitudes toward preferred arrest: Influences of rank and productivity
American Journal of Police
(1992) - et al.
A review of domestic violence arrest statistics in a police department using a proarrest policy: Are proarrest policies enough?
Journal of Family Violence
(1994) Due process and equal protection challenges to the inadequate response of the police in domestic violence situations
Southern California Law Review
(1995)Recent developments: mandatory arrest for domestic violence
Harvard Women's Law Journal
(1988)
Responding to crimes of violence against women: Gender differences versus organizational imperatives
Crime and Delinquency
The scientific evidence is not conclusive: Arrest is no panacea
Understanding police culture
Civil liabilities in American policing: A text for law enforcement personnel
The impact of civil liabilities on policing
Criminal procedure
Arrest and the reduction of repeat wife assault
Woman battering in the United States: Till death do us part
Rethinking estrangement, interventions, and intimate femicide
Violence Against Women
Cases and materials on Constitutional law: Themes for the Constitution's third century
Police handling of domestic violence calls: An overview and further investigation
Women and Criminal Justice
Lessons from two randomized experiments in criminal justice settings
Crime and Delinquency
Arrest for domestic and other assaults
Criminology
Cops, courts, and woman battering
Women battering: More than a family problem
Police use of deadly force: Research and reform
Justice Quarterly
Differential police treatment of male-on-female spousal violence
Criminology
Civil suits against police change domestic violence response
Trial
Heavy hands: An introduction to the crimes of domestic violence
Constitutional law
Effects of restraining orders on domestic violence victims
The relative effects of offense, offender, and victim variables on the decision to prosecute domestic violence cases
Violence Against Women
Does the legal system batter women? Vindicating battered women's constitutional rights to adequate police protection
Arizona State Law Journal
Cited by (20)
Evaluating the impact of police officer body-worn cameras (BWCs) on response-to-resistance and serious external complaints: Evidence from the Orlando police department (OPD) experience utilizing a randomized controlled experiment
2015, Journal of Criminal JusticeCitation Excerpt :Other more recent and tragic high profile events have also put the discussion and implementation of police BWCs in the forefront such as the Michael Brown incident in Ferguson, Missouri and the Eric Garner incident in New York City (Jennings, Fridell, & Lynch, 2014). Although problematic issues in policing and technological advancements in policing are not necessarily anything new (Blackwell & Vaughn, 2003; Culver, 2004; Kowalski & Lundman, 2007; McElvain & Kposowa, 2004; PERF, 2012; Phillips & Varano, 2008; Weir, Stewart, & Morris, 2012; Weitzer, 2002; Zhao, Lovrich, & Robinson, 2001; Zhao, Ren, & Lovrich, 2010), the national discourse and public sentiment tends to favor the implementation of BWCs as a method to increase officer accountability and reduce an array of negative outcomes that may result from a police-citizen encounter. Furthermore, while prior research has documented the utility of technological innovations in policing such as GPS monitoring devices, (Hughes & Burton, 2014), in-car cameras (IACP, 2003), and closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras (Surette, 2005; Menichelli, 2014), there was not nearly the level of public and media scrutiny and attention directed toward these innovations as there currently exists with regard to police BWCs.
Cops and cameras: Officer perceptions of the use of body-worn cameras in law enforcement
2014, Journal of Criminal JusticeCitation Excerpt :Policing has been witness to a significant amount of problematic issues (Blackwell & Vaughn, 2003; Kowalski & Lundman, 2007; McElvain & Kposowa, 2004; Phillips & Varano, 2008; Weir, Stewart, & Morris, 2012; Weitzer, 2002; Zhao, Ren, & Lovrich, 2010) as well as innovation and change in recent years (Culver, 2004; Zhao, Lovrich, & Robinson, 2001).
Patriarchy reasserted: Fathers' rights and anti-VAWA activism
2008, Feminist CriminologyUnderstanding gender, crime, and justice
2006, Understanding Gender Crime and JusticeDual arrest decisions in domestic violence cases: The influence of departmental policies
2004, Crime and Delinquency
- ☆
- An earlier version of the article was presented at the 2000 American Society of Criminology meeting, held in San Francisco, CA. Authorship is alphabetical; both authors made equal contributions to the completion of the article.