Like a hot dog, one does not often associate the word “pure” with “spam”. In fact, one is generally best not to think of what it’s made of – unless you’re Google, of course.
Since 0 AG (After Google), Google has had to contend with pesky webmasters and SEO practitioners looking for ways to rank sites as highly as possible as quickly as possible, often regardless of what that actually did to the search results.
Any decade-plus veteran of SEO will remember the “Wild West” days of SEO and, if they were trying to stick to pure white hat strategies, their frustration.
For years Google told the SEO community that buying links was bad, content scraping and spinning was trouble, blatant link schemes would get you penalized, and that you should focus on good content that people will want to link to naturally.
The problem? The algorithm they had couldn’t compete with what are now deemed “unethical practices”. Webmasters and SEO professionals who “cheated the system” tended to do well.
Fortunately, for those who want to actually create a good user experience (including Google), they’ve figured a lot out over the past few years.
To illustrate the point they launched a page earlier this year on fighting spam that actually shows real-time examples of pages they’re kicking from the index for being “pure spam”. I’ve got to admit, the first time I heard about this manual Google spam action I half chuckled and thought, “Well that’s a pretty bold explanation.”
The question then becomes, “What does this mean?” The this end let’s take a look at a few of the real-time examples of pure spam that Google was displaying (as of the writing of this article) and think about what they might have seen there that qualified it as “pure spam”.
10 Examples Of ‘Pure Spam’
On the page Google notes of those listed, “These pages are examples of ‘pure spam.’ They appear to use aggressive spam techniques such as automatically generated gibberish, cloaking and scraping content from other websites.”
Remember, this is a manual action and so a human actually looked at the following pages and deemed them to fit this criteria. Here is what they’re seeing:
Example 1: NorthCarolinaPhoneLookup.com

This page, with a copyright date of 2008, is a brief blurb of repetitive content at the top with a simple list of numbers below in hopes of ranking for queries for those numbers. For anyone who’s ever looked up a phone number you’ll know the frustration caused by such sites and why Google wants them gone.
The service isn’t unique to this site and the site itself is a duplication of other sites that are likely to be hit soon. Simply substitute the words “north carolina” in the into text for any other state and run a search for it and you’ll see what I mean.
Example 2: Cuzb.com

One need only read the content to understand why this page was marked as “pure spam”. The site is English but the writer clearly is not. In looking for other pages from the site in the index, this penalty extended across the whole domain. Thanks, Google.
Example 3: QuickPayDay.Tripod.co.uk

I had to include this one simply because it was a bit of a head scratcher. The question isn’t whether it’s spam or not (one can’t argue that it’s thin on content) but rather how it even got to the point of a manual review. Sure it’s got some spammy links but even the archives couldn’t find content so one might think basic SEO factors would take care of it.
Example 4: DMMmovie.biz

To determine why this site was classified as “pure spam” simply read the following sentence with me:
“Gru is a modified man. No more a super-villain who needs to be the baddest of the bad people, he’s now trained, with his three lovely children, his very funny gobbledygook discussing, Tic-Tac-looking minions, a creepy dog and an wicked researcher associate (Russell Brand) whose concentrate is now creating jellies and jellies.”
Enough said.
Example 5: AntiquesHeaven.info

Aside from the only purpose of this site being to act as an affiliate site generating revenue by pushing people to eBay and Amazon, the content near the bottom of the page is copied word-for-word from Yahoo Answers.
Oh, and useless keyword stuffing such as:
“great north western telegraph company glass insulatororiental fish bowl tablesdresden lampsgeneral fireproofing co wood file cabinetart nouveau alabaster bustprimitive folk”.
Example 6: PacificRimWatch.MetroBlog.com

I’m not sure what’s in the water they drink while building sites that sell illegal copies of movies or maybe more, what the people who would purchase from this site sprinkled on their morning oatmeal but let’s read the following sentence together:
“Brendon has been displaying Off-shore Rim upset love on this computing machine relating to weeks currently. It’s safe to mention this individual desires it.”
Clearly not human written and if auto-translated and not spun, they’re using the worst translation tool on the planet.
And it doesn’t help their case that the site language setting is Spanish as is most of the navigation.
Example 7: DC.CCJ.in.ua

There are two very clear reasons why this page has been deemed “pure spam” and we’re going to even ignore the fact that all the images are broken:
- They’ve taken content directly from Facebook – and right in the first paragraph as well.
- The horrible spun content (for example: “Facebook password finder.The Stages of the of the certain stage. It is the smell rumour.”).
“Pure spam”? Definitely.
Example 8: CouponCentral101.com

Ah, coupon sites. Admittedly, my first instinct as I saw this site was that the “pure spam” classification was due tot he fact that pretty much every link on the page is an external link to an ad site.
But then I realized that the copy on the page was taken directly from an Ezine article. How do we know it wasn’t duplicated on Ezine after? The archives show us that on May 29, 2012 the site had different content and the article was posted on February 20, 2012.
So – thin, no value content, and even the content that is there is duplicated.
Example 9: HowWeightManagement.com

First look it seems that, while a little heavy-handed with the ads and footer links, not “pure spam”. That is, until you read the content which contains such gems as:
“the benefits calorie burning is the only benefit of Pure Barre. According to Pure Barre, the technology to protect your joints, because it does not involve any rebound or jump. Each followed by stretching create long bulk, muscle exercise intensity part.”
Thank you Google for removing this rubbish.
Example 10: RkwVik43.biz

The note I’ve had to add to the picture probably says enough. Google isn’t a fan of content that’s difficult to read. And if you read the text you’ll see it varies from Minecraft to pay stubs to pubic hair. Not exactly tied together by relevancy.
There is a full litany of issues ranging from missing images (and by images I mean all of them), text such as:
“… Minecraft Force Op 1.5.2 which is finally released today and using that you can. O maior servidor de Minecraft online do mundo.Mais de 15 servidores download media de 4 mil jogadores …”
Switching from English to Portuguese mid-paragraph isn’t particularly helpful outside of a language site.
On top of that the site’s content is extremely poor quality (even outside of the mix of language) and there is no focus. In short, the site would be a disaster for users.
So What is “Pure Spam”?
We all have our own definition of “pure spam” but what’s more important is understanding what Google means by it. At this time and after reviewing literally hundreds of example of what they consider it to be, the focus of this penalty seems to rest on content.
There doesn’t appear to be a crossover into links in what they define “pure spam” to be. Websites with this penalty should focus their attention on their content and user experience.
With that said, websites prone to a penalty such as this one likely have serious issues in their backlink profiles as well. I’m not suggesting that webmasters ignore reviewing their links in the event of this penalty, simply that links don’t appear to be a major tying factor in the sites receiving it or even how Google themselves define the penalty. Best not to wait for an “unnatural links” warning however.
Additional Reading
I pondered writing a section of this article on what to do if you receive this penalty. Heck, on the same page they list the sites being penalized they also list a number of spam strategies they’re going after so it’s pretty clear what’s covered.
That said, I couldn’t cover the subject better that fellow SEW writer Kristine Schachinger did in her article Pure Spam: What Are Google Penalties & What to Do to Recover. Well written and covers the recovery subject point-by-point.
me hu khalnayak
The anatomy of a negative SEO attack · 3 months ago
you can edit it by opening the pop up and hitting pause, now wherever you click creates a square
Google Easter Egg: Search “Conway’s Game of Life” · 4 months ago
A nice web design helps with th growth of a website, his user retention and so much more, it is really important to have accessibility
Design systems and SEO: does it help or hinder SERP achievements? · 4 months ago
What a great article! There were a lot of good and very useful information shown here. Thanks for sharing!
How to adapt SEO strategies for the zero-click search landscape · 5 months ago
Building a thriving blog community involves: 1. **Focus on a Single Idea**: Center your blog on a specific topic to attract like-minded readers. 2. **Encourage Interaction**: Invite comments and discussions to foster engagement. 3. **Leverage Social Media**: Share content...
Seven strategies for building a thriving community around your blog · 5 months ago
You need to focus on writing but write with SEO friendly keywords which will be good for SEO of the content.
Marketing with intent: The combined power of SEO and content · 6 months ago
Loved about internal linking and submission to google news. Always get great input from searchenginewatch.
thanks
Technical SEO checklist: a webmaster’s guide to on-page optimisation · 8 months ago
Hi. I am new to all this. I have devised an xml site map, with the appropriate coding, for search engines only. Great instructions, thank you. But how do I insert this into my website - in the header section, as it is? Or does it need meta codes?
How to create an XML sitemap and submit it to Google · 8 months ago
Good content. But… SEO writing doubles—at the least—the number of words inflicted on our readers. More than 70 years ago, The Elements of Style and the Art of Readable Writing warned against adding fluff to our writing. Now we add fluff and brag about our SEO...
How to escape Google’s filter bubble · 10 months ago
The largest provider of expired domains worldwide is Seo.Domains
How to Build Links Using Expired Domains · 10 months ago
Thank you for Ways to Market "Your Online Business" for Free ~ Brought to you by Search Engine Watch!
#thankyou #for #ways #to #market #your #online #business #brought #to #you #by #searchenginewatch
30 ways to market your online business for free · 11 months ago
Brand New Content Marketing Specialties Are in the News! They are being developed by the following: Topsearchengines In web of: Bing®, Yahoo®, Google®! You will soon find them. Being brought to you by: BYG Content...
The Search Engine Report – August 5, 1997 Number 9 · 11 months ago
I'll suggest using SEOwallet. This is the best extension.
Five extensions to help you boost on-page SEO · 1 year ago
The list is very useful. But i'll suggest using SEOwallet. This is the best extension i've ever seen. Sleek and elegant design with all the important things covered in quite a decent manner.
The 15 best Google Chrome extensions for SEO · 1 year ago
i'll suggest use SEOwallet
Technical SEO checklist: a webmaster’s guide to on-page optimisation · 1 year ago
Good content, thanks for sharing.
Imitating search algorithms for a successful link building strategy · 1 year ago
I was used the same tactics to grow my network in the past.
How Guest Posting Propelled One Site From 0 to 100,000 Customers · 1 year ago
I actually found out that easter egg too even before I seen this
and in the last years it also added possibility to modify the cells like literally life in google
Google Easter Egg: Search “Conway’s Game of Life” · 1 year ago
Thanks for sharing this.
Technical SEO checklist: a webmaster’s guide to on-page optimisation · 1 year ago
This informative guide will give you details about Google ranking factors, from on-page optimization to backlinking. Rebecca's summary of the sentence makes the strategies of SEO available and actionable to enhance search engine visibility and performance.
An in-depth guide to Google ranking factors · 1 year ago
What about DogPile. Search Engine's are sold and resold so much, it's almost confusing trying to keep up with them...
Where Are They Now? Search Engines We’ve Known & Loved · 1 year ago
It needs to be as clear as possible for the visitor.
The visitor must find their information as easy as possible.
All questions need to be answered.
11 quick UX tips to improve landing page conversion · 1 year ago
Always good to have the refresh, thanks.
Technical SEO checklist: a webmaster’s guide to on-page optimisation · 1 year ago
No, the primary use case of FAQ schema is for learn pages. For product catalog pages - one should consider having a carousel schema.
How to win at SEO with FAQ schema markup · 1 year ago
Google the following, Unique Value Proposition, with proof of concept. Exactly the way you need to discover it on the web:
See what is it you need to help you find out how you can do it; Yourself With out Varyingyour Searchengine!
SEO basics: 22 essentials you need for optimizing your site · 1 year ago