Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Premaxillary Graft with Costal Cartilage in Rhinoplasty: A Technique to Support the Nasal Tip

  • Original Articles
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Rhinoplasty is an ever-evolving field, with innovative techniques continually being developed to enhance both aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients. Increasingly, research has focused on the integral role of the facial skeleton in providing nasal support and projection. Central to the structural integrity of the nose is the maxillary bone, which occupies a pivotal position in the midface.

Methods

The objective of this study is to assess the outcomes of patients who underwent rhinoplasty involving the placement of a premaxillary graft fashioned from costal cartilage. The study aims to evaluate the graft’s tolerance, stability, and potential complications. The patient cohort comprised individuals who underwent open approach rhinoplasty with premaxillary insufficiency, necessitating the placement of a costal cartilage graft anterior to the nasal spine, performed by the same surgeon between 2021 and 2022. A total of 38 patients, consisting of 5 men and 33 women aged between 18 and 58 years, were operated on during this period.

Results

Consistent maintenance of tip support was observed across all cases. Among the 33 patients, 20 were randomly chosen for a comparative assessment of the nasolabial angle in preoperative and postoperative profile photographs, demonstrating a statistically significant improvement. No complications such as graft displacement, scarring, extrusion, or infections were reported.

Conclusion

The use of a premaxillary graft with costal cartilage appears to be a viable, well-tolerated option with favorable long-term outcomes.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ¥17,985 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data Availability

For this type of study, we do not have data to deposit in a public repository.

References

  1. Lang J (1995) Clinical anatomy of the masticatory apparatus and peripharyngeal spaces. [S.l.]: Thieme. ISBN 978-3-13-799101-4

  2. Lee DJ, Kim WK, Chung CE, Kim S, Baek S (1989) Photogrammetric study on the face of adult Korean female. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 16:423–432

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giunta SX (1996) Premaxillary augmentation in Asian rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 4(1):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1064-7406(23)00609-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park HS (2001) Lambda-shaped implant for augmentation of anterior nasal spine in Asian rhinoplasty as an ancillary procedure. Aesthet Plast Surg 25(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002660010086. (PMID: 11322402)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Allar ML, Movahed R, Wolford LM, Oliver DR, Harrison SD, Thiesen G, Kim KB (2019) Nasolabial changes following double jaw surgery. J Craniofac Surg 30(8):2560–2564. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000005876. (PMID: 31689731)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khamashta-Ledezma L, Naini FB (2015) Prospective assessment of maxillary advancement effects: maxillary incisor exposure, and upper lip and nasal changes. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 147(4):454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.11.028. (PMID: 25836005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiwari R, Chakravarthi PS, Kattimani VS, Lingamaneni KP (2018) A perioral soft tissue evaluation after orthognathic surgery using three-dimensional computed tomography scan. Open Dent J 30(12):366–376. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010366.PMID:29875889;PMCID:PMC5958298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siddiqui HP, Sennimalai K, Samrit VD, Bhatt K, Duggal R (2023) Binder’s syndrome: a narrative review. Spec Care Dent 43(1):73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12731. (Epub 2022 Jun 2 PMID: 35654104)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baser B, Singh P, Surana P, Roy PK, Chaubey P (2022) Early surgical intervention for nasal deformity in Binder’s syndrome. J Laryngol Otol 136(2):146–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215121002619. (Epub 2021 Sep 30 PMID: 34588007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fanous N, Yoskovitch A (2000) Premaxillary augmentation: adjunct to rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(3):707–712. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200009030-00031. (PMID: 10987482)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JH, Jung MS, Lee BH, Jeong HS, Suh IS, Ahn DK (2016) Silicone implant-based paranasal augmentation for mild midface concavity. Arch Craniofac Surg 17(1):20–24. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.1.20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fanous N, Yoskovitch A (2002) Premaxillary augmentation for central maxillary recession: an adjunct to rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 10(4):415–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1064-7406(02)00035-4. (PMID: 15062302)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shokri T, Wang W, Cohn JE, Kadakia S, Ducic Y (2020) Premaxillary deficiency: techniques in augmentation and reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 34(2):92–98. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709175. (Epub 2020 May 6. PMID: 32390776; PMCID: PMC7202913)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Goh RC, Chen YR (2010) Surgical management of Binder’s syndrome: lessons learned. Aesthet Plast Surg 34(6):722–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-010-9533-7. (Epub 2010 Jun 5 PMID: 20526595)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhatt YC, Vyas KA, Tandale MS, Panse NS, Bakshi HS, Srivastava RK (2008) Maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder’s syndrome) and its treatment with costal cartilage graft: a follow-up study. Indian J Plast Surg 41(2):151–159. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.44925.PMID:19753255;PMCID:PMC2740517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang Z, You X, Cai Z, Liu Q, Du L, Cui W, Chen Z, Sheng Y (2018) Effectiveness of autologous costal cartilage transplantation in repair of Binder’s syndrome. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 32(8):1056–1060. https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.201802064. (Chinese)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim WS, Kim CH, Yoon JH (2010) Premaxillary augmentation using autologous costal cartilage as an adjunct to rhinoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(9):e686–e690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.007. (Epub 2010 Aug 2 PMID: 20627762)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Z, Wang P, Zhang Y, Shen G (2017) Nasal airway evaluation after Le Fort I osteotomy combined with septoplasty in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 28(1):207–211. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003259. (PMID:27930464;PMCID:PMC5266412)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Holmes AD, Lee SJ, Greensmith A, Heggie A, Meara JG (2010) Nasal reconstruction for maxillonasal dysplasia. J Craniofac Surg 21(2):543–551. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d024b0. (PMID: 20216441)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None of the authors received any funding or financial support for the content of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil Fakih-Gomez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to Publish

All participants have provided consent for the publication of their photographs.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Video 1: Surgical demonstration of the premaxillary graft technique. (MOV 142917 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martins, L., Fagundes, M.S.C., Patrial, M.T.C.R.d. et al. Premaxillary Graft with Costal Cartilage in Rhinoplasty: A Technique to Support the Nasal Tip. Aesth Plast Surg 49, 2746–2753 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04388-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-024-04388-1

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Nabil Fakih-Gomez
word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word

mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1
mmMwWLliI0fiflO&1