Advertisement oop
Story continues below
Advertisement 1

'Pretendian' the ultimate step in colonialism, says Metis legal expert

Recent revelations of Indigenous identify fraud are just the tip of the iceberg in Canadian universities, government and other institutions, author of report suggests

Article content

Since Grey Owl a century ago,people of European descent have falsely claimed to be Indigenous for personal gain or a sense of absolution, but one Metis legal expert says it would take a psychiatrist to try to fully answer, “why?”

Article content

“It does boggle my brain, how do you keep all those lies, balls up in the air, for decades,” said Jean Teillet, a Vancouver-based lawyer who wrote a report for the University of Saskatchewan last year exploring Indigenous identify fraud.

Article content
Article content
Advertisement 1
Story continues below
Article content

“What a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive … that’s what happens. They get tangled up in their own stories,” said Teillet, who is the great-grandniece of famed Metis leader Louis Riel.

Article content

It does boggle my brain, how do you keep all those lies, balls up in the air, for decades

Article content
Article content

Teillet’s report examined the harm caused by Indigenous identity fraud, outlined red flags for spotting potential deceit and suggested measures to prevent it.

Article content

It came in the wake of a series of controversies over claims of Indigenous identity by prominent members of Canadian academic, literary and entertainment circles in recent years. The report was released in October, just as the CBC published an investigation into claims of Cree heritage by Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, a former judge, professor and B.C. representative for children and youth.

Article content

It’s not a new phenomenon, though, Teillet’s report says, pointing to Archibald Stansfield Belaney, a British-born man who claimed his mother was Indigenous and called himself Grey Owl, rising to fame as a writer and environmentalist while living in Canada in the 1920s and ’30s.

Article content
Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

Teillet said she sees Indigenous identity fraud as “the ultimate step in colonialism.”

Article content
Read More
  1. Senator Lillian Dyck stands outside the Senate Foyer on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, Dec. 13, 2017.
    Retired Cree senator stunned by 'facade' of Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond's heritage
  2. Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond in 2020.
    FIRST READING: Yet another prominent Indigenous Canadian who may not actually be Indigenous
  3. Advertisement embed-more-topic
    Story continues below
Article content

She said it undermines what it means to be Indigenous, after two centuries of government policies aimed at curtailing Indigenous rights and stamping out Indigenous languages and cultures.

Article content

“I think there are people who use (false Indigenous identity) to make themselves not feel like the colonizer, so you’re not the bad guy,” said Teillet.

Article content

Her report cites University of Alberta scholar Kim TallBear, who calls false Indigenous claims “a final act of theft in a long history of multiple layers and strategies of theft.”

Article content

Such identity fraud is akin to violence, Teillet said.

Article content

“It’s not (violence) that leaves you with physical bruises. But it bruises the community, because you’re taking. It’s what colonialism does, it takes and it takes. That’s what they’re doing when they’re assuming these kinds of identities.”

Article content

The term “pretendian” making the rounds is clever, Teillet said, “but, to my mind, ‘pretend’ makes it too innocent. It makes it difficult to see the harm.”

Advertisement 1
Advertisement 2
Advertisement
Article content

Teillet said identity fraudsters play into stereotypes about Indigenous Peoples and get away with it in part because Canadians generally aren’t educated about the diversity and complexity of Indigenous identity and culture across the country.

Article content

“It is no accident that Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond and Carrie Bourassa just pulled out all these tropes about trauma and addictions and violence in the family,” she said, referring latterly to a former health professor who resigned from the University of Saskatchewan amid questions about her Indigenous identity last year.

Article content

“That’s what Canadians think about Indigenous people, so they play us, right?”

Article content

What Canadians should be asking, Teillet said, is “why do (we) buy into it?”

Article content

In addition to reliance on stereotypes, Teillet’s report says red flags include vague claims, family secrets, shifting or conflicting stories, or reliance on DNA testing to find some kind of Indigenous ancestry dating back several hundred years ago.

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

Teillet is confident the recent revelations of false identity are “just the tip of the iceberg” in Canadian universities, government and other institutions, she adds.

Article content

“We’re waiting for the next expose about some high-level government person who’s also a fake. Because they’re there, probably by the hundreds, if not the thousands.”

Article content

They're there, probably by the hundreds, if not the thousands

Article content

Canadian institutions generally lack and must establish procedures for verifying Indigenous identity, Teillet said, starting with a “big sign” on all of their application forms for grants, scholarships, faculty and staff positions saying “we will check.”

Article content

“The minute people know that their claim to be Indigenous is going to be scrutinized … that alone is going to stop a lot of the fraud, I think.”

Article content

Institutions must also introduce policies establishing processes and consequences for potential fraudsters already embedded in their positions, she added.

Article content

It feels unfair, because verification puts the onus and scrutiny on Indigenous people, Teillet said, but something must be done to stem the tide of fraud.

Article content
Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content

Teillet’s report acknowledges concerns about establishing “identity police.”

Article content

For example, fraudsters should not be confused with people seeking to reconnect with their Indigenous ancestry after losing connection as a result of government policies.

Article content

Teillet’s report said institutions should listen to Indigenous Peoples when moving beyond self-identification as the standard for establishing Indigenous identity, which could involve building relationships with communities, recognizing the knowledge of elders and establishing Indigenous expert panels.

Article content

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 25, 2023.

Article content

Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

Article content
Advertisement 2
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Conversation

|

All Comments

    1. Comment by William Craig.

      This story emphasizes how wrongly a persons race in Canada is so important as it is frequently used to determine financial and legal benefit. "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."

    2. Comment by Mickhail Craige.

      Is cultural appropriation limited to a 'one way street'?

      Example: Have noted many forms of culturally identifiable apparel not considered part of the first nations identity being worn by those clearly identifying as such. Similar may apply in various other venues.

      Suspect this is not a concern to most, however, if it is such a concern to one group - should it be fully adopted as not to be condoned by cultural appropriation from any other segment?

      At some point in time there may come realizations that cultural identity is a personal issue and others may share in it without fear of rancor or expectation of political/economic advantage...St Patrick's Day??

    3. Comment by Brian Howard.

      Ha ha, sure, this from a blond haired blue eyed woman who claims to be a (word I can’t say). She’s authentic though.

    4. Comment by .

      The avatar of ""
    5. Comment by Arnel Schiratti.

      Seems to me that the answer to the question "why do they do it" is very simple ... Because they want to benefit from getting ahead of the line (not because they seek absolution or colonialism). And the answer to how to stop it is that people should get ahead by their qualifications and actions ... Not their race. Seems to me that indigenous groups also have a responsibility in helping find a way to ensure that those claiming to be from their ancestry are who they says they are. Be part of the solution, not constant finger pointers at others to do things you find uncomfortable. If institutions start such a process, will they next and again be vilified as colonialists and racist?