search
Shmuley Boteach

Why China Must Drop Iran and Embrace Israel

Two ancient civilizations, united by shared trauma, must now unite in moral leadership.

The echoes of Nanking and October 7 demand that China reexamine its alliances and stand with Israel against barbarism.

The other night, my wife Debbie and I were guests of our dear friends Sir Clive and Lady Anya Gillinson at Carnegie Hall. Clive—who is like a brother to me—is the most accomplished head of a cultural institution anywhere on earth. Over more than two decades, he has transformed Carnegie Hall, already world-famous, into an unparalleled global supernova of live music who’s prestige is unchallenged, even in the greatest cultural Meccas of Paris, Rome, Vienna, and Milan.

The occasion was an unforgettable and inspiring concert by the National Youth Orchestra, created by Clive and Carnegie Hall, which is about to tour Asia—most notably China. In the “Presidential” box with us, as Clive’s personal guest, was the newly appointed Consul General of China in New York.

Last year, we had attended China’s own National Youth Orchestra’s performance at Carnegie Hall, which was indeed outstanding—although as an American, I will confess it was perhaps not quite as electrifying as our own. (I trust the Chinese people can forgive my patriotic bias.)

In our warm and brief conversation, I told the Consul General how deeply moved I am, as a Jew, an American, and a student of history, by the story of the Rape of Nanking in 1937. The atrocities that befell China in those months echo, almost uncannily, the horrors that the Jewish people—and especially Israeli women—endured on October 7 in the barbaric Hamas attack on the communities surrounding Gaza.

I write today not merely as a man of faith, but as a voice for those silenced by rape, terror, and ideological apathy. I call upon China’s leadership—and the conscience of every Chinese citizen—to recognize our shared past trauma, born of two of history’s most harrowing chapters: the Rape of Nanking and the October 7 massacre in Israel.

These twin horrors should unite our peoples—not only in mourning but in moral purpose.

Two Catastrophes, One Moral Imperative

Each event tore at the fabric of human dignity. Relative to the size of each nation’s population, the massacres in Nanking and southern Israel are chillingly comparable.

In Nanking, between December 1937 and March 1938, the Japanese Imperial Army unleashed an orgy of terror in China’s capital. Civilians were systematically hunted, executed, burned alive. And women—mothers, daughters, grandmothers—were violated on a scale that defies comprehension.

“They raped my sister and my mother in front of me. When my father protested, they shot him.” —Nanking survivor

Most camel victims were forced to “service” four to six Japanese soldiers daily; some who were particularly “attractive” endured 10 to 20 assaults per day. Japanese soldiers reportedly shoved poles into women’s vaginas “to see how far they would go” and stuffed burning cotton into their private parts, igniting them from within. Babies were bayoneted. Pregnant women were disemboweled. Conservative estimates place the death toll above 200,000; rape victims numbered anywhere from 20,000 to 80,000.

Now consider October 7, 2023. On that horrific morning, Hamas terrorists stormed southern Israel—attacking music festivals, kibbutzim, and family homes. Nearly 1,200 men, women, and children were massacred. More than 250 were taken hostage. And like Nanking, sexual violence was not incidental but strategic and systemic.

A UN investigation found “clear and convincing” evidence of systemic sexual violence by Hamas—rape, gang rape, genital mutilation, and forced nudity at multiple sites. Women were raped in front of their children. Some had their breasts sliced off; Hamas terrorists reportedly tossed the severed remains back and forth like grotesque toys. Others were raped and then shot in the vagina.

“They tied my neighbor’s teenage daughter naked to a pole and made her watch as they slaughtered her family.” —October 7 survivor

Men were castrated. Children were forced to witness their parents’ torture and murder.

The parallels are too stark to ignore: entire communities annihilated, women’s bodies weaponized to humiliate nations, and atrocities proudly recorded. The Japanese filmed Nanking. Hamas used GoPros. Both celebrated their crimes, rather than concealing them.

China’s Strategic and Moral Crossroads

Why should the People’s Republic of China—a nation of ancient wisdom and emerging global power—heed Israel’s cries? Because China knows too well the corrosive legacy of victimization and denial.

China’s current alignment—embracing Iran while sidelining Israel—is shortsighted and problematically immoral. Iran funds and arms Hamas, whose barbarity is a stain on the great world religion of Islam. Iran’s proxies—Hezbollah in Lebanon, militias in Syria and Yemen—share the same genocidal ideology that engineered October 7.

By contrast, Israel prosecutes perpetrators and cares for survivors. It has transformed grief into resilience and serves as a global leader in documenting wartime sexual violence, notably through the Dinah Project.

China prides itself on “the people’s welfare” as a cornerstone of governance. That welfare must include women, who disproportionately suffer in wartime atrocities. Aligning with Israel over Iran would send a powerful moral message: victims of sexual violence and genocide deserve accountability—not ideological excuses.

Lessons From History, A Path for the Future

In Nanking and Israel, sexual violence was a weapon of genocide, aimed at annihilating identity and pride.

After Nanking, Japan denied or minimized its crimes for decades. Only recently has full acknowledgment begun. Similarly, Hamas denies its rapes, even as video, forensic reports, and survivor testimonies stack into a Mount Everest of evidence.

“Both atrocities were not hidden—they were celebrated.”

China, which has itself wrestled with historical denial—from the Cultural Revolution to WWII—should understand the necessity of truth for healing.

Together, China and Israel could co-sponsor a new international treaty against sexual violence in war. They could lead the United Nations in atrocity prevention, drawing from their hard-earned moral authority and suffering.

A Strategic Pivot With Global Benefits

China’s dependency on Iranian oil may seem pragmatic. But this friendship is a reputational liability. Iran is a state sponsor of terror, allied to Assad’s genocidal Syria, and now a cheerleader for Hamas’s atrocities.

A pivot toward Israel offers China not only moral high ground but tangible benefits: access to Israeli innovations in clean technology, famine relief, counterterrorism, and diplomacy.

A Chinese-Israeli joint memorial, or an annual remembrance for victims of sexual violence in Nanking and October 7, would send an unambiguous message: the sanctity of life and dignity is not Western—it is universal.

China could even leverage its Belt and Road Initiative to create “rapid forensic response units” modeled on Israel’s Dinah Project—helping nations document and prosecute wartime sexual violence. This would position China as a growing leader in global humanitarian norms that specifically retain to outlawing rape as a weapon of war.

The Call of History

China’s leadership now stands at a crossroads: support regimes that perpetrate terror, or pivot toward ethical clarity and partnership with a nation that has turned tragedy into resilience.

“Drop the murderers in Tehran. Condemn the monsters in Gaza. Embrace your Jewish brothers—and especially your Jewish sisters.”

Remember Nanking: a city of blood and shame, and—eventually—reckoning. Remember Israel: a people gazing at the ashes of October 7 and refusing to yield.

It is time for China and Israel, two ancient civilizations, to build bridges—not only of shared sorrow but of shared resolve. To say: never again. Never to rape as terror. Never to genocide. Never to denial.

China: Israel calls you to join the side of survivors, justice, and rebuilding. History awaits your answer.

Drop the murderers in Tehran. Condemn the monsters in Gaza. And embrace your Jewish brothers—and especially your Jewish sisters.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the author of “Kosher Hate” and “Judaism for Everyone.” Follow him on Instagram and X @RabbiShmuley.

About the Author
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the founder of This World: The Values Network. He is the author of Judaism for Everyone and 30 other books, including his most recent, Kosher Lust. Follow him on Twitter@RabbiShmuley.

Open Letter to Candace Owens’ Father-in-Law Who Has Condemned Her Antisemitism

I write today as a rabbi deeply committed to the moral integrity of our public civic leaders—and for that reason I write directly to you, Lord Michael Farmer. You are Deputy Chairman of the Council of Christians and Jews, a position of moral authority which carries with it tremendous responsibility. Last year you rose to the heights of moral courage by taking upon yourself the painful responsibility of publicly criticizing and condemning the execrable opinions of your infernally antisemitic daughter-in-law Candace Owen.

I am painfully aware that you risked access to your own grandchildren through your public statements and Candace is nothing if not psychotically  vindictive. I truly pity you for having such a deranged and unhinged hater marry into your family and become the dark matter that is pushing apart your family’s close-knot universe. But I write this public letter to you appealing to your conscience to do even more, now that Candace has gone full American Nazi.

Last week Candace again denied the Holocaust by saying that its most famous witness, Nobel Peace Laureate Elie Wiesel, was a fake Holocaust survivor. Wiesel was my dearest friend and mentor whom I have known since 1990 when I brought him to speak to thousands of students at Oxford University – where I was Rabbi for 11 years – and electrified the student body with his demanding protestations that antisemitism, bigotry, and racism must finally end.

Elie died on July 2nd, 2016 and I was with is widow Marion and son Elisha through every phase of mourning. The great man is not here to defend himself against your daughter-in-law’s hate. You must utterly and unequivocally condemn her, as an antisemite and, with sorrow, as a member of your own family.

Let me begin by recalling what you have already said.

In August 2024, when Candace revived lurid blood‑libel conspiracies, you distanced yourself, politely but firmly, declining family loyalty in the face of bigotry. You publicly repudiated her repeated antisemitic remarks and dissociated yourself from her hateful discourse. That statement was meaningful—especially from a man of faith and influence. But candor of that sort, tempered by polite reticence, is now tragically insufficient.

Because what Owens has now claimed is so morally repugnant that it cannot be ignored. By calling Elie Wiesel, the greatest witness to genocide in human history – a fraud and a self-manufactured Holocaust survivor, she has again, as when she denied Joseph Mengele’s human experimentation at Auschwitz, denied the genocide of the Jews.

That is defamation, denial and erasure of history—and the pain of millions. That allegation, levied in public defiance, crosses every line of decency. It is not a political misstep—it is outright Holocaust denial. She has rejected the suffering of our ancestors. And she has done so for notoriety, profit, ideological zeal, and hate.

You may well feel the pain that comes from public censure of one’s own family. I commiserate with you, Lord Farmer, for having such a deranged and unhinged antisemite marry into your family. But that only heightens the obligation: as patriarch of one of Britain’s most respected families, you must speak now, clearly, and unambiguously.

Allow me to list what Candace Owens has publicly said about Jews and related matters:

  1. She has denied Nazi medical experiments and minimized the Holocaust, calling such atrocities “bizarre propaganda” and claiming the Holocaust was “an ethnic cleansing that almost took place”  .
  2. She revived medieval blood libel tropes, suggesting a “small ring of specific people who are using the fact they are Jewish to shield themselves from any criticism”—a conspiracy of Jewish control  .
  3. She promoted the Khazar conspiracy theory, claiming Ashkenazi Jews descend from immoral Khazars who converted very recently and continued “sexual deviancy” and infiltration  .
  4. She defamed Leo Frank, wrongly convicted and lynched, implying he engaged in ritual murder and linked this to a “Frankish Cult” hiding in Israel practicing incest and pedophilia as sacramental rites  .
  5. She insinuated that AIPAC was behind the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, as part of yet another antisemitic conspiracy  .
  6. She defended Ye’s antisemitic tirades, denied Kanye West’s Jew‑hate was antisemitic, and blamed the Anti‑Defamation League for instigating antisemitism in response  .
  7. For all this Owens was named “Antisemite of the Year” by StopAntisemitism in late 2024, and she celebrated the title on her YouTube channel  .

Now in 2025, she has gone further still—publicly calling Elie Wiesel a fake. There has been no credible denial or retraction from her.

Moreover, she is currently embroiled in a defamation lawsuit by French President Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron—who accuse her of defaming them with conspiracy theories that Brigitte was born male and is the brother Jean‑Michel Trogneux, of incest, CIA mind‑control, identity fraud, and other fabrications, while mocking them publicly and doubling down rather than retracting  . These are not mere political missteps—they illustrate a pattern of utterly reckless, defamatory, and hateful speech. Brigitte Macron is the mother of three children. Can you imagine the pain and shame this woman feels – amid her lofty social station – to hear your daughter-in-law’s daily assault on her femininity, identity, and womanhood?

I’m sorry Lord Farmer. But your daughter-in-law has become a monster. And I’m scared for your grandchildren – as no doubt you are as well – being raised in an environment of such hellish hatred.

You have already taken an important first step in repudiating her remarks. But Lord Farmer, that was the a al first step. Now she has openly denied one of the foundational 20th‑century testimonies of Jewish suffering and survival. You must go beyond inference or quiet distancing. You must publicly denounce her: condemn her as an antisemite, a Holocaust denier, and a disgrace to your own family’s sacred honor.

As Deputy Chairman of the Council of Christians and Jews, you hold a position of moral stewardship. You have a commitment to inter‑faith dialogue and to standing against prejudice in every form. When the deepest expressions of antisemitism emerge—from within your own household no less—it is your duty to speak unambiguously. Silence or equivocation now risks signaling acceptance—or at least tolerance—of denial of Jewish suffering.

Understandably, to attack a family member is fraught and painful. But moral duty transcends familial ties. I urge you to publish another full statement, of your own voice, utterly condemning her most recent remarks and affirming your support for survivors like Elie Wiesel and your rejection of antisemitic conspiracism.

I do not report these things lightly. My heart aches that such hate lives in your household. I pity you for the distress it must bring. But I also know your conscience and integrity. You can end this shame through clarity and moral courage.

We need you to comprehensively condemn the totality of Candace’s assault on the Jews, too long to list here, but the highlights of which are:

  • Holocaust minimization and denial, including denial of Nazi medical experiments.
  • Blood‑libel conspiracies about Jewish control and occult pedophilia.
  • Promotion of Khazar conspiracy theories delegitimizing Jewish identity.
  • Defaming Leo Frank with ritual murder allegations tied to a mythical cult.
  • Accusing AIPAC of JFK assassination.
  • Defending Kanye West’s antisemitism and blaming pro‑Jewish institutions.
  • Celebrating “Antisemite of the Year” award.
  • Now claiming Elie Wiesel was not a real Holocaust survivor.
  • Endorsing the blood libel by saying  that Jews did indeed engage in consuming Christian blood.

Lord Farmer: your legacy at the Council of Christians and Jews—and indeed your public moral standing—depends on whether you now stand firmly for truth, memory, and humanity. This is a moment to reaffirm that hate has no place in your family, your faith, or your public life.

You have already taken an incredible first step, emerging as a man of rare moral courage. Yet that step now must lewd to dull and total reputation. If I, God forbid, had a Nazi or Klan member in my family, though it would break my heart, and I would repudiate them utterly.

The time has come for you to deliver a full, unequivocal condemnation of Candace Owens’s rhetoric and hate. To do less is to risk being seen as complicit in the normalization of denial, defamation, and hatred.

With deep respect, I ask you: further fulfill your moral obligation. Do not allow this dastardly hater to undermine all that you have accomplished in your noble record of inter‑faith leadership. Stand up, and say that Candace’s obsessive and downright sick antisemitism has no place in our world, and certainly none in your household.

With deep respect and appreciation,

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Referred to by Newsweek and The Washington Post as “the most famous rabbi in America,” Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the international best-selling author of 36 books and is the only Rabbbi to have ever won The London Times Preacher of the Year competition, of which he remains the record holder till this day.

About the Author
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the founder of This World: The Values Network. He is the author of Judaism for Everyone and 30 other books, including his most recent, Kosher Lust. Follow him on Twitter@RabbiShmuley.

Pope Leo Must Condemn Hamas or Risk the Legacy of Pope Pius XII

The Jewish people have a long and painful memory of what happens when the world’s moral voices fall silent in the face of evil. From the gas chambers of Auschwitz to the terror tunnels of Gaza, Jewish suffering has often been met not with moral clarity but with cowardly neutrality. Today, we are witnessing that silence again—not from the halls of the United Nations or the chancelleries of Europe, where we’ve long expected it—but from the Vatican itself.

Pope Leo, whose election I applauded with all my heart, has issued repeated calls for a ceasefire in Gaza, invoking lofty language about peace, mercy, and human dignity. And yet, stunningly, he has failed to condemn Hamas—a genocidal terrorist organization that proudly murders Jewish civilians, rapes Jewish, Christian, and Muslim women, and parades kidnapped children as trophies. In doing so, Pope Leo risks placing himself in the shameful legacy of Pope Pius XII, whose silence during the Holocaust remains one of the darkest stains on the modern moral history of the Catholic Church.

As I’ve written in my book “Kosher Hate” and in many essays and speeches over the years, to truly love the innocent is to despise those who threaten them. Hatred of evil is not sinful. It is righteous. It is holy. It is, in fact, a Biblical imperative. “You who love the Lord, hate evil!” cries King David in Psalm 97. The Torah exhorts us, “Justice, justice shall you pursue” (Deuteronomy 16:20)—not peace at any price, but justice even at great cost.

There is no justice in allowing Hamas to survive. There is no morality in calling for peace while evil still rules in Gaza.

Let’s be clear: Hamas is not a freedom movement. It is not the voice of Palestinian dignity or national aspiration. It is a fanatical Islamist death cult whose charter calls for the murder of Jews worldwide. Its operatives do not fight soldiers in defense of territory; they rape women in their homes, burn babies in cribs, and gleefully livestream their slaughter for their supporters.

On October 7, 2023, the mask came off. The world saw the full face of evil. Hamas terrorists stormed into Israeli communities and committed some of the most grotesque atrocities since the Holocaust. And yet Pope Leo, with all the moral authority of his office, has not uttered a single, unequivocal condemnation of this savagery. Instead, he calls for a ceasefire—one that would leave this evil intact, resupplied, and ready to strike again.

With all due respect to the Holy Father: This is not peace. It is appeasement.

This is not compassion. It is cowardice.

In “Kosher Hate,” I make the case that hatred—when directed at injustice—is not only permissible, it is necessary. Our world has become so obsessed with tolerance that it has forgotten how to discriminate—morally, not racially—between good and evil. We are told to “hate the sin, love the sinner.” But when the sinner is proud of their sin, when the sin is systemic and ideological and genocidal, we must hate the ideology, the system, and those who perpetuate it.

The West’s allergic reaction to moral judgment has created a spiritual vacuum—one that Hamas and its ilk are only too happy to fill. And if the Vatican refuses to name evil, if it hides behind platitudes while Jews are butchered, it loses all claim to moral leadership.

Pope Leo should heed the lessons of history. During World War II, Pope Pius XII had ample opportunity to speak out against Hitler’s Final Solution. He knew what was happening. Jewish leaders, including Rabbi Isaac Herzog, pleaded with the Vatican to intervene. The Catholic Church had extensive diplomatic networks, access to intelligence, and global influence. And yet, the Pope remained absolutely and completely silent.

No excommunication for Nazis. No official denunciation of the death camps. No instruction to Catholic institutions to offer sanctuary to the Jews, which, when it was offered, was done sporadically and only in the greatest secrecy. The Church feared provoking the Reich more than it feared the wrath of heaven.

The result was the moral collapse of an institution that could have saved millions of lives but chose instead to protect its political neutrality.

Pope Leo is now at a similar moment of reckoning.

He has the opportunity to break with this shameful past. He can rise as a moral giant in a time of crisis. But only if he finds the courage to do what Pope Pius XII did not: to condemn the murderers of Jews and all innocents, not just mourn their victims.

This is not a call for vengeance. It is a call for moral vision and moral courage.

In the book of Ecclesiastes, we are reminded, “There is a time for peace and a time for war” (Ecclesiastes 3:8). When men of God fail to discern between the two, the innocent pay the price.

To equate Israel’s war of self-defense with Hamas’s war of extermination is a grave injustice. The IDF, for all its flaws and imperfections, common to all liberators of democracies, seeks to minimize civilian casualties, often at the cost of Israeli soldiers’ lives. Hamas maximizes civilian casualties—Israeli and Palestinian alike—as part of its strategy of blood and spectacle. It embeds rocket launchers in schools, stores weapons in mosques, and hides command centers under hospitals. Every dead Palestinian child is a photo-op for Hamas, and a PR tool for their apologists.

If Pope Leo truly believes in protecting innocent life, he should be the first to demand the dismantling of Hamas’s terror infrastructure. He should demand the release of hostages. He should call for international prosecution of Hamas’s leaders for crimes against humanity.

And he should stop hiding behind the fog of “evenhandedness.” God is not evenhanded between the righteous and the wicked. Neither should His servants be.

Too many religious leaders today lack the moral vocabulary to confront evil. They prefer the safety of sloganeering to the discomfort of moral judgment. They preach love but forget that love must sometimes take the form of outrage. That is what “Kosher Hate” is about: harnessing righteous indignation in the service of justice.

We are commanded in the Torah to “blot out the memory of Amalek” (Deuteronomy 25:19)—the biblical archetype of genocidal hatred, embodied in genocidal ideologies like Hitler and the Nazis. That commandment is not about revenge. It is about ensuring that evil ideologies are not allowed to regenerate. Hamas, not my brothers the Palestinians, is a modern-day Amalek. Its mission is to destroy the Jewish people. That is not a slogan. That is not Israeli propaganda. That is Hamas’s own declared purpose.

If we cannot hate that mission, we cannot love our own children.

The Jewish people do not ask the Vatican to become Zionist. We do not ask Christians to adopt our politics. We ask only that the Church live up to its moral ideals. And that means calling evil by its name.

It means telling the world that Hamas is not a partner for peace but a cancer to be removed. That a ceasefire without justice is not a peace agreement but a death sentence—delayed, not canceled.

Pope Leo, you are the spiritual leader of 1.3 billion Catholics. You have the power to shift the moral compass of nations. Please do not squander it on sterile neutrality. Please do not allow yourself to become another Pius XII.

Use your pulpit not for platitudes, but for prophecy.

Speak not only of mercy, but of judgment.

Preach not only peace, but righteousness.

And most of all, condemn those who commit atrocities in the name of religion.

The Jewish people are watching. The world is watching. And Heaven is watching.

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the author of “Kosher Hate: How to Fight Antisemitism, Racism, and Bigotry Without Losing Your Soul.” He has been called “America’s Rabbi” by The Washington Post and is one of the world’s leading voices on Jewish ethics, interfaith dialogue, and human rights.

About the Author
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the founder of This World: The Values Network. He is the author of Judaism for Everyone and 30 other books, including his most recent, Kosher Lust. Follow him on Twitter@RabbiShmuley.