Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online March 23, 2015

Individualized femininity and feminist politics of choice

Abstract

Women’s right to exercise choice has been one of feminism’s central political claims. Where second wave feminism focused on the constraints women faced in making free choices, choice feminism more recently reorients feminist politics with a call for recognition of the choices women are actually making. From this perspective the role of feminism is to validate women’s choices without passing judgement. This article analyses this shift in orientation by locating women’s choices within a late modern gender order in which the ideal of choice has increasingly been associated with a new form of femininity characterized as self-determining, individuated and ‘empowered’. Instead of offering an effective analysis of the changing social conditions within which the relationship between feminism, femininity and individual choice has become increasingly complicated, choice feminism directs criticism at feminist perspectives characterized as overly prescriptive. This critique fails to appreciate how feminist ideals have been recuperated in the service of late capitalism and neoliberal forms of governance. By failing to engage critically with processes currently impacting on the social organization of gender choice feminism aids in the constitution of an individuated neoliberal feminist subject which performs cultural work vital to the reproduction of neoliberal governmentality.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Adkins L (2002) Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late Modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ashfar H (2008) Can I see your hair? Choice, agency and attitudes. Ethnic and Racial Studies 31(2): 411–427.
Baker J (2008) The ideology of choice. Women’s Studies International Forum 31(1): 53–64.
Baker J (2010) Great expectations and post-feminist accountability. Gender and Education 22(1): 1–15.
Beck U, Beck-Gernsheim E (2002) Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
Braun V (2009) ‘The women are doing it for themselves’: The rhetoric of choice and agency around female ‘cosmetic surgery’. Australian Feminist Studies 24(60): 233–249.
Budgeon S (2003) Choosing a Self: Young Women and the Individualization of Identity: Westport, CT: Praegar Publishing.
Budgeon S (2011) Third Wave Feminism and the Politics of Gender in Late Modernity. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Budgeon S (2014) The dynamics of gender hegemony: Femininities, masculinities and social change. Sociology 48: 317–334.
Burman E (2005) Childhood, neo-liberalism and the feminization of education. Gender and Education 17(4): 351–367.
Burman E (2009) Beyond ‘emotional literacy’ in feminist and educational research. British Educational Research Journal 35(1): 137–155.
Coole D (2000) Threads and plaits or an unfinished project? Feminism(s) through the twentieth century. Journal of Political Ideologies 5(1): 35–54.
Eisenstein H (2005) A dangerous liaison? Feminism and corporate globalization. Science and Society 69(3): 487–518.
Eisenstein Z (1993) The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Evans A, Riley S (2013) Immaculate consumption: Negotiating the sex symbol in postfeminist celebrity culture. Journal of Gender Studies 22(3): 268–281.
Everingham C, Stevenson D, Warner-Smith P (2007) ‘Things are getting better all the time’? Challenging the narrative of women’s progress from a generational perspective. Sociology 41(3): 419–437.
Eschle C, Maiguashca B (2014) Reclaiming feminist futures. Political Studies 62(3): 634–651.
Fahs B (2011) Breaking body hair boundaries. Feminism and Psychology 22(4): 482–506.
Ferguson J (2009) The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode 41(1): 166–184.
Ferguson ML (2010) Choice feminism and the fear of politics. Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 247–253.
Fraser N (2009) Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. New Left Review 56: 97–117.
Genz S (2009) Postfeminities in Popular Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Giddens A (1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity.
Gill R (2007) Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and ‘choice’ for feminism – A reply to Duits and van Zoonen. European Journal of Women’s Studies 14(1): 69–80.
Gill R (2008) Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity 25: 432–445.
Gill R, Scharff C (eds) (2013) New Femininities. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Goodman RT (2013) Gender Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Harris A (2004) Future Girl. London: Routledge.
Hatton E, Trautner MN (2013) Images of powerful women in the age of ‘choice feminism’. Journal of Gender Studies 22(1): 65–78.
Hinds H, Stacey J (2001) Imaging feminism, imaging femininity. Feminist Media Studies 1(2): 153–177.
Hirshman LR (2006) Get To Work: A Manifesto for Women of the World. New York: Viking.
Hirshman NJ (2010) Choosing betrayal. Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 271–278.
Hollows J (2000) Feminism, Femininity and Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Hughes C (2002) Key Concepts in Feminist Theory and Research. London: Sage.
Illouz E (2007) Cold Intimacies. Cambridge: Polity.
Inoue M (2007) Language and gender in the age of neoliberalism. Gender and Language 1(1): 79–91.
Kirkpatrick J (2010) Selling out? Solidarity and choice in the American feminist movement. Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 241–245.
McRobbie A (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
Marso LJ (2010) Feminism’s quest for common desires. Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 263–269.
Moran C, Lee C (2013) Selling genital cosmetic surgery to healthy women. Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 373–391.
Morini C (2007) The feminization of labour in cognitive capitalism. Feminist Review 87(1): 40–59.
Oksala J (2013) Feminism and neoliberal governmentality. Foucault Studies 16: 32–55.
Rich E (2005) Young women, feminist identities and neoliberalism. Women’s Studies International Forum 28(6): 495–508.
Riley SCE, Scharff C (2012) Feminism versus femininity? Feminism and Psychology 23(2): 207–223.
Ringrose J (2007) Successful girls? Complicating post-feminist, neoliberal discourses of educational achievement and gender equality. Gender and Education 19(4): 471–489.
Ringrose J, Walkerdine V (2008) The TV make-over as site of neo-liberal reinvention toward bourgeois femininity. Feminist Media Studies 8(3): 227–246.
Rottenberg C (2014) The rise of neoliberal feminism. Cultural Studies 28(3): 418–437.
Scharff C (2012) Repudiating Feminism. Farnham: Ashgate.
Smyth L (2002) Feminism and abortion politics: Choice, rights and reproductive freedom. Women’s Studies International Forum 25(3): 335–345.
Snyder CR (2008) What is third-wave feminism? A new directions essay. Signs 34(1): 175–196.
Snyder-Hall CR (2010) Third-wave feminism and the defence of ‘choice’. Perspectives on Politics 8(1): 255–261.
Stevenson D, Everingham C, Robinson P (2011) Choices and life chances: Feminism and the politics of generational change. Social Politics 18(1): 125–145.
Stone A (2004) On the genealogy of women: A defence of anti-essentialism. In: Gillis S, Howie G, Munford R (eds) Choice Feminism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 85–96.
Stringer R (2014) Knowing Victims. London: Routledge.
Stuart A, Donaghue N (2011) Choosing to conform. Feminism and Psychology 22(1): 98–121.
Swan E (2008) ‘You make me feel like a woman’: Therapeutic cultures and the contagion of femininity. Gender, Work and Organization 15(1): 88–107.
Tasker Y, Negra D (2007) Interrogating Postfeminism. London: Duke University Press.
Vance C (ed.) (1984) Pleasure and Danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Walby S (2011) The Future of Feminism. Cambridge: Polity.
Walkerdine V (2003) Reclassifying upward mobility: Femininity and the neo-liberal subject. Gender and Education 15(3): 237–248.
Walkerdine V, Lucey H, Melody J (2001) Growing up Girl. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Widdows H (2013) Rejecting the choice paradigm. In: Madhok S, Philips A, Wilson K (eds) Gender, Agency and Coercion. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 157–180.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: March 23, 2015
Issue published: August 2015

Keywords

  1. Feminization of labour
  2. individualization
  3. neoliberal feminism
  4. neoliberalism
  5. postfeminism

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Notes

Shelley Budgeon, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Park Road, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Email: shelley.budgeon@gmail.com

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in European Journal of Women's Studies.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9522

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 111 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 103

  1. Global (post)feminist icon? Celebrity feminism, diplomacy, and Eileen Gu’s star persona in China and the US
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. ‘Why are Menstruating Women in India Removing their Wombs?’ Neoliberalism and Reproductive Justice: Unveiling the ‘Womb Divide’
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Empowering women through alternative sustainable livelihood: a case study of ornamental fish farming in India
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. The New Experts of Online Dating: Feminism, Advice, and Harm on Instagram
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Women Who Quit: Media and Policy Discourse about Gender and Work
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. På sporet av kjønn
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Structural Infertilities: Childbearing and Reproductive Justice in Chile
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Women who initiate divorce embrace autonomy
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. March 8, 2019: A snapshot of new participants in the feminist mobilisation8 de març de 2019: una instantània dels nous participants en la mobilització feminista8 de marzo de 2019: Una instantánea de los nuevos participantes en la movilización feminista
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Starting a cultural collective for mothers of children with disabilities: A case study
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

Get access

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.