India

Karnataka temple town ex-worker claims 16 years of hidden murders, mass graves

In his complaint filed on July 3, he said he saw some of these murders himself and was threatened to either bury or burn the bodies. He said he kept quiet because he feared for his life.

 Photograph: (The Hindu)
Photograph: (The Hindu)

A former sanitation worker from Dharmasthala village in Dakshina Kannada district has made a shocking claim. He said that between 1998 and 2014, he was forced to get rid of many murder victims, including many women who were also sexually assaulted. In his complaint filed on July 3, he said he saw some of these murders himself and was threatened to either bury or burn the bodies. He said he kept quiet because he feared for his life.

He gave his complaint to the Superintendent of Police in Mangaluru and the Dharmasthala Police Station. A case was registered the next day under Section 211(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). Police said they will investigate his claims and are asking the court for permission to excavate (exhume) the places where the bodies might be buried.

Dharmasthala is a well-known temple town about 75 km from Mangaluru. It is famous for its Shiva temple, which is managed by the Jain Heggade family. The man who complained said he worked as a sanitation worker for the Dharmasthala temple administration from 1995 to 2014. At first, he was in charge of cleaning around the Netravati river. He said that over time, he started finding more and more dead bodies, many of them were women who looked like they had been raped and murdered. He said, “Many female bodies had no clothes or underwear. Some had wounds and marks showing they had been attacked or strangled.”

The man said that when he refused to do these horrible tasks and threatened to inform the police, his bosses beat him up.“They threatened me, saying things like ‘We will cut you into pieces,’ ‘We will bury you like the other bodies,’ and ‘We will kill your whole family,’” he wrote in his complaint. He also said he was told that the worker before him had “disappeared” after refusing to follow similar orders. The man claimed he had to bury bodies at different places around Dharmasthala. Sometimes, he was ordered to burn them using diesel. He said “hundreds” of bodies were disposed of this way.

Ran away after family was attacked

He said he finally ran away with his family in December 2014 after facing years of threats and fear. He decided to leave after a girl in his family was allegedly sexually assaulted by someone connected to his bosses.
Even after leaving, he lived in constant fear that his family would be killed, just like the other victims. Since then, he has been hiding in another state and living with guilt.

To prove his claims, he said he recently went back to one of the burial sites, dug up a body, and gave the remains and photos to the police. He also submitted his Aadhaar card and old employee ID as proof of his identity.
The man wrote, “I believe the dead deserve a respectful farewell. If the bodies that are being dug up get proper last rites, their souls will find peace, and I will feel less guilty.”

He has offered to show where the bodies are buried and name the people involved, but he asked for protection under the Witness Protection Act, of 2018, before revealing names. He said some of the people involved are linked to the temple administration.

He also said, “Some of the people I have named are very powerful and might kill anyone who goes against them.”
His lawyers said he has already given a sealed complaint with the names to Supreme Court lawyer KV Dhananjay as a safety measure.

Police response

In a statement, the police said they received his complaint and registered a case. The man claimed he was “threatened with death” and “forced to secretly dispose of many bodies” over the years. The police said they would fully investigate, get court permission to dig up the burial sites, and keep his identity secret.

Read the Next Article
India

Maintenance not allowed under domestic violence Act in void marriage: Allahabad HC

Justice Rajeev Misra passed the judgment while hearing a man’s petition challenging earlier orders from Ghaziabad courts. Those orders had directed him to pay ₹10,000 per month as interim maintenance to his estranged wife.

 Photograph: (The Sentinel)
Photograph: (The Sentinel)

The Allahabad High Court has cancelled interim maintenance granted to a woman whose marriage was legally declared invalid from the beginning.

Justice Rajeev Misra passed the judgment while hearing a man’s petition challenging earlier orders from Ghaziabad courts. Those orders had directed him to pay ₹10,000 per month as interim maintenance to his estranged wife. The High Court said that once the marriage is declared void, there is no valid domestic relationship, so the woman cannot claim benefits under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Marriage declared void

The couple got married in 2015, but soon after, their relationship turned sour. The woman filed several police complaints against the man and his family. During a bail hearing in one of the cases, it was revealed that the woman was already married to someone else at the time of her second marriage. She later admitted this in court.

Following this, the man approached the Family Court in Delhi under the Hindu Marriage Act, asking to declare the marriage void. In 2021, the court ruled in his favour. The woman’s appeal in the Delhi High Court was withdrawn in 2022, making the void-marriage ruling final.

Despite this, the woman continued with her domestic violence case filed back in 2016. In 2022, the Ghaziabad trial court awarded her interim maintenance, which was upheld by the appellate court in 2023. The man then challenged both orders in the Allahabad High Court.

High court’s stand

The High Court said that once the marriage was declared void from the start, there is no legal relationship between the couple. According to the law, this means the woman cannot be considered an “aggrieved person” under the Domestic Violence Act.

The court explained that a void marriage has no legal standing — it is as if the marriage never happened. Therefore, the woman is not entitled to maintenance. The court also referred to Supreme Court judgments that confirmed this legal position. Finally, it cancelled both lower court orders and said that both parties will bear their own legal costs.

Read the Next Article
India

SC asks centre and states to respond to plea for 'right to know' for consumers

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta issued this notice on Monday. The petition was filed by lawyer and politician Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

 Photograph: (India Today)
Photograph: (India Today)

The Supreme Court of India has asked the Central government and all states to give their response within four weeks on a plea that demands the "right to know" for consumers. This means that customers should have full information not only about the product but also about the people who sell it.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta issued this notice on Monday. The petition was filed by lawyer and politician Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay.

In the plea, Upadhyay said that the "right to know" is very important for customers. It helps them make better choices and also protects them from unfair sellers. The petition said it is necessary for all distributors, traders, and shop owners to show important details like their name, address, phone number, registration, and number of workers. This information should be written in bold letters on a board at the shop's entrance so that everyone can see it clearly.

"The right to know helps consumers avoid falling prey to a fraudulent or deceptive distributor, dealer, trader, seller, or shop owner, who might misrepresent a product/service or disappear after a sale, purchase, and money transaction," the petition stated.

The plea added that if a customer faces any problem with a product or service, they must know the seller’s details to file a complaint or ask for help from the consumer courts.

"When a distributor, dealer, trader, seller, and shop owner are transparent about their details, it fosters a fair and competitive market where consumers can make informed choices," the plea further added.

The petition also said that the consumer should know not only the quality and expiry of the product but also who is selling it. This can stop people from being cheated and will increase trust in the market.

You might also be interested in: Jaishankar recalls his UPSC journey, gave interview on the day Emergency was lifted

Read the Next Article
India

Jaishankar recalls his UPSC journey, gave interview on the day Emergency was lifted

He shared that he was the first candidate of the day to appear for the interview, held at Shahjahan Road in Delhi, nearly 48 years ago. The atmosphere at the time was politically charged, as India was just emerging from a 21-month-long Emergency

 Photograph: (Sputnik India)
Photograph: (Sputnik India)

External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar recently took a trip down memory lane, sharing a personal story with a fresh batch of civil service entrants in Delhi. He shared that his UPSC interview happened on 21 March 1977, a date that also marked the official end of the Emergency in India.

‘The interview taught me two key \lessons’

Talking about his experience, Jaishankar said the interview taught him two lasting lessons:

“How to communicate well under pressure,” and “That influential people often live in their own ‘bubble,’ disconnected from reality.”

Speaking at the event, Jaishankar described the interview stage as the most challenging part of the UPSC exams, calling it an “Agni Pariksha”, a true test of one's character and ability.

“(1977) Election results were coming from the previous day... The sense of the defeat of the Emergency rule was coming into understanding. In a way, that is what got me through the interview,” Jaishankar told PTI.

He shared that he was the first candidate of the day to appear for the interview, held at Shahjahan Road in Delhi, nearly 48 years ago. The atmosphere at the time was politically charged, as India was just emerging from a 21-month-long Emergency declared by the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in June 1975.

‘We campaigned against The Emergency’

As a student of political science at Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), Jaishankar was actively involved in the political movement of the time.

“We had taken part in the 1977 election campaign. We had all gone there and worked for the defeat of the Emergency,” he said.

According to him, this direct involvement in political activities gave him the right perspective and preparation for questions asked during the interview.

The External Affairs Minister also said that the interview experience introduced him to the concept of what is now referred to as the “Lutyens’ bubble”, a term often used to describe the disconnection of elite policymakers from the ground realities faced by common citizens.



You might also be interested in - ‘The Emergency Diaries’ recounts PM Modi’s experiences during 1975 emergency

Subscribe