>>105953841google does not make the hardware.
they aren't the one making the secure enclave to store signatures and secret to reconstructs encryption keys, the G chips are just rebranded samsung chips, do you trust samsung less than chinkshit that are required by laws to introduce backdoors?
google can't legally change this and does not own the fabs to make these things anyways.
they're litearlly hopeless even if they wanted to introduce a backdoor in the hardware...
you're also telling me that you'd rather trust chink oem with a proven track record of puting actual backdoors in hardware and you'd rather use an insecure os based on aosp with security features turned off?
this is absolute braindead take, pixel 9 and above are hardware-wise the most secure computer on the planet right now and i'm not even exagerating.
grapheneos is also the most secure non-embedded OS on the planet right now.
no chinkshit oem is more secure than pixel, that's a fact, no matter what hardware fairphone use it will always be less secure than pixel
eos is also notoriously sketchy with shady early-on investors and retarded leadership.
I would never trust these dropout projects over grapheneos which is used by feds and terrorists alike because pixel + grapheneos is the only safe combination outsise phones like the Thales Teorem or something.
