Social democrats are often listening rules and coming to maximisation of happiness for people. Sometimes they're breaking rules for making more happiness.
The libertarian socialists often revolve against authority and laws, but not fully erasing this. His strive for social justice is admirable, but methods can be violent.
Anarcho-Pacifism opposes the use of violent means to confront authority and advocates the use of peaceful means to achieve anarchism, so I put it here.
"Chaotic" is very obvious, whether it is its laissez faire market economy or anarchism. However, left-wing market anarchism hopes to achieve a just and fair market economy.
Just look up people like Martin Luther King, Jr. or Desmond Tutu. Many Christian Socialists use their religion to promote equality and justice in their communities.
Many of their economic policies, including widespread ownership, pro-small business and artisans, and the promotion of mutual aid, are equitable and more sustainable in the long run than laissez-faire capitalism or state socialism.
Steming from the Enlightenment, classical liberalism laid the foundations for liberal democracy and constitutional governments. They also helped to challenge and overthrow the old feudal system of the Middle Ages.
Benevolent dictators and autocrats, like Atatürk, Lee Kwan-Yew, and Josip Broz Tito, tend to run their countries for the benefit of their people, but their methods of dealing with opposition can be very questionable.
Has experts run the government and come up with sensible solutions for any problem they might find. But technocrats are distant from the people and could enact solutions that are unpopular.
Yet another example of a lawful neutral ideology, as traditions can either bring people together or they can be used as an excuse for demonizing those who want to deviate from the norm.
Predecessor of ideologies like socialism, anarchism, fascism, nationalism, bolshevism, etc., Jacobinism has overthrown the French monarchy and introduced republican rule. But this has lead to the Reign of Terror, which killed thousands of people who were suspected to oppose the French Republic.
Much like Jacobinism, Marxism-Leninism has overthrown the Russian monarchy and was spread to other countries, especially in former colonies. But this has suppressed libertarian forms of socialism, which gave people a negative view of socialism in general.
Uses the state to aggressively promote progressive values, but at the expense of civil liberties, like freedom of speech, freedom of expression, and freedom of religion.
Invades other lands, enslaves the existing population there, and destroys the culture of the indigenous people (all the while imposing the culture of the invading country).
The state control over the economy, the promotion of militarism and traditionalism, and the violent suppression of the opposition definitely makes fascism a lawful evil ideology.
Doing things for other people and making their lives better is a good thing to do. And while altruism is often associated with communitarianism, there are also altruistic individualists.
Separating religion from the government makes it so that people cannot use their religious beliefs as an excuse for committing crimes against humanity or even to justify political corruption. Also religious freedom is a right.
People deserve equal rights and freedoms in both the legal world and in society in general. It makes little sense to place some people above others for arbitrary reasons.
The state taking the role of a parent to the country is a nice gesture, but like with raising a rebellious teenager, restricting the rights and freedoms of the people leads to some civil unrest.
Spreading democracy to other countries sounds like a good idea on paper, and there are instances where military intervention is needed. In practice, however, this has led to the overthrow of democratically elected governments that want left wing (or even center left) economics or destabilizing countries in the long run.
Helping your citizens is a noble thing, but actively going out of your way to not help cultural/ethnic minorities is a dubious act at best and a human rights violation at worst.
The goal of eugenics is to control who can or cannot reproduce in order to increase desirable traits. But in practice, there is a lot of debate on what counts as “desirable traits”, not to mention that eugenics were used in very bigoted ways.
Whether it’s down to ignorance or lack of interest, apolitical people are the definition of true neutral. Does not takes sides, unites everyone over a good barbecue.
Putting your country on a pedestal and demanding that people worship it like a goddess under the threat of decimation is an evil thing to do because it’s a very dangerous form of nationalism and is quite different from simple national/cultural pride.
Advocates for civil liberties and the decentralization of political power. Tends to go a bit too far in regards of deregulation in the economic system, which could hunt the most vulnerable in society.
Some separatist movements genuinely want their people to be free from the tyranny of whatever country they are currently under. Others are trying to separate from the country, but not for the sake of liberation, but for ethnocentric reasons.
As a political ideology, populism advocates for the greater representation of the people and their causes over that of the elites. This has the potential effect of being corrupted by hijackers who want to target and oppress minority groups.
The goal of abolishing the state, capitalism, and other forms of social hierarchy via direct action and revolution makes anarcho-communism and similar ideologies fit the bill of chaotic moral.
Can be an obnoxious jokester that doesn’t realize when their jokes are going too far, or a well-meaning jester who has good jokes and can poke fun at anyone while making them laugh at the same time.