I can't believe almost 2 years have passed.
The advent of AI chatbots means that it's very easy to interpret the cards.
You type a prompt to ChatGPT or any sufficiently intelligent chatbot in this way (of course, you can customize and change it): "Please interpret the question "question" the cards Card1, Card2, Card3
After, you can ask it to elaborate on any given point, or perform a past/present/future reading with "Now as past/present/future".
(Edit: Perhaps some "prompt engineering" in the vein of "You are OracleGPT, a master and extremely competent tarotist and divinator. You know all the cards' meanings and can state predictions regarding questions, bold if need be..." But it may not be necessary as standard ChatGPT/insert chatbot here is enough from what I have observed.)
Yesterday I talked with AnthroHeart about adding more than 3 cards. He said that one time when he had had 5, it hadn't been more helpful, and that he does not know how to programatically do the "celtic cross" tarot arrangement, where the cards are in a stack, being revealed one after the other.
And if there were many cards, they would be cramped on the page.
I said that he can use a responsive layout to make the cards be automatically resized.
I also asked him about adding the Lenormand cards, which are 36 cards that are read in pairs, with the second one modifying the first's meaning, or in small spreads. They are more practical and "for everyday life". They can express a flexibility tarot doesn't. "Tarot focuses on the why, while Lenomand tends to focus on the how".
They have a Grand Tableau where all 36 cards are spread, providing much information.
There's also the I-Ching, an ancient method of divination, which can be executed through coins, numbers, cut lines, tossing bamboo sticks, or more.
There is(/was) an app in the Google Play Store called "DeepWare Changes" which provides the I-Ching.
You pick the method and it shows the results, alongside a rich interpretation.
There's also Geomancy, which is somewhat old comparatively speaking (according to Wikipedia), and focuses on examining patterns of pebbles, assigning meanings to them such as Daughters, Mothers, Judge, Executioner, constellations and such. It looks to me slightly similar to tarot.
All of these could be added and improved with Repeater.
When I asked AnthroHeart if he would add Lenomand cards, he said he would not likely make another version.
Gemini 2.5 Flash: The description of Lenormand cards provided is largely **accurate and insightful**, highlighting some key distinctions from Tarot. Here's a breakdown of why:
**Accurate Points:**
* **36 Cards:** Absolutely correct. Lenormand decks consistently have 36 cards.
* **Read in Pairs (and Small Spreads):** This is a cornerstone of Lenormand interpretation. Two-card combinations (like "Man + Dog" for a loyal friend) are fundamental, and longer lines/small spreads (3, 5, or 7 cards) are common. The idea of the second card modifying the first is also very true.
* **More Practical and "For Everyday Life":** This is a commonly cited advantage of Lenormand. The card meanings are generally more literal, concrete, and relate to everyday situations, events, and people.
* **"Tarot focuses on the why, while Lenormand tends to focus on the how":** This is an excellent way to distinguish the two systems.
* **Tarot (the "why"):** Often delves into psychological motivations, spiritual lessons, archetypal influences, and deeper underlying causes of situations. It's great for self-reflection and understanding the bigger picture.
* **Lenormand (the "how"):** Tends to be more direct and predictive, focusing on the sequence of events, specific people, actions, and concrete outcomes. It answers questions like "What will happen?" "Who is involved?" "Where will it lead?"
* **Can express a flexibility Tarot doesn't:** While both are flexible in their own ways, Lenormand's simple, direct meanings combine to create a vast number of nuanced sentences, making it incredibly adaptable to various questions without requiring deep psychological abstraction.
* **Grand Tableau (All 36 Cards):** This is the ultimate and most comprehensive Lenormand spread. Laying out all 36 cards allows for a highly detailed reading covering multiple aspects of a querent's life, showing interconnections, timelines, and main themes. It indeed provides "much information."
**Slight Nuances/Further Considerations (but doesn't make the description inaccurate):**
* **"They are read in pairs... or in small spreads."**: While true, the fundamental building block is often seen as the *pair*. Even in longer lines, you're essentially reading pairs within that line, or the central card with its surrounding cards.
* **"Can express a flexibility Tarot doesn't."**: Tarot also has immense flexibility in its interpretations and the array of spreads available. However, the *nature* of Lenormand's flexibility is different – it's in the combinatorial, "sentence-like" way the simple symbols blend to describe practical scenarios. Tarot's flexibility might be more in its ability to adapt to abstract and spiritual questions.
**In summary: Yes, the description is remarkably accurate.** It successfully captures the essence and unique selling points of Lenormand cards, especially in contrast to Tarot. It's a good concise overview for someone trying to understand what Lenormand is about.
GPT 4.1:
Your summary is **largely accurate** with a few points that can be clarified or expanded for completeness:
### Your Main Points, Addressed:
#### 1. **Lenormand cards are 36 cards that are read in pairs…**
- **Correct.** The standard Lenormand deck has 36 cards (unlike Tarot's 78).
- **Reading in pairs:** Lenormand cards are often read in pairs or strings, with the second card influencing or modifying the first card’s meaning; this is standard Lenormand technique.
#### 2. **Read in small spreads.**
- **Correct.** Lenormand readings often use small spreads like 3, 5, or 9 cards.
- **Add:** The cards can also be read in lines (strings of cards, e.g., 3, 5, or 7 in a row) and in larger spreads, notably the Grand Tableau.
#### 3. **They are more practical and "for everyday life".**
- **Correct.** Lenormand tends to give concrete, everyday details (events, people, actions), rather than exploring deep themes or archetypes.
#### 4. **Lenormand is more flexible than Tarot.**
- **Partially correct.**
- Tarot and Lenormand are both flexible in their own ways, but Lenormand’s “stringing” technique and focus on context makes it direct and adaptable for detail-rich questions.
#### 5. **"Tarot focuses on the why, while Lenormand tends to focus on the how".**
- **Generally accurate.**
- Tarot dives deep into motivations, lessons, and psychological aspects (“why”), while Lenormand gives practical, straightforward insights into events and outcomes (“how” & “what”).
#### 6. **Grand Tableau uses all 36 cards for much information.**
- **Correct and important.** The Grand Tableau spreads all 36 cards in a large layout, revealing complex interactions with positions for person cards (Significators), timing, houses, etc.
---
### **Summary**
- **Accurate overall.**
- Lenormand is practical, concrete, and detail-oriented; Tarot is archetypal, psychological, and nuanced.
- Technique differences: Tarot = single cards with set meanings and spreads; Lenormand = cards in sequence or tableau, meanings highly dependent on combinations.
- **Grand Tableau:** Unique to Lenormand, using *all* 36 cards at once for a comprehensive overview.
If you want a more in-depth comparison or have any specific detail you’d like explained, let me know!