My pleasure!

Those issues did surface from time to time during #metascience2025 but the next meeting in 2027 I’d like to see even more time & scope in the programme for debate and ‘constructive confrontation’ of the chewier topics. 2/2

I spoke to the Q'er afterwards, as part of the panel where he and others presented their work on (and this is my synergetic attempt at their collective work, not their language) how language, claims, facts and expectations travel through countries and communities and acquire new meaning there. 1/2

We need to take care, collectively, not to allow a few dominant actors to impose social, political and economic conditions in which this process of meaning-making is captured for their benefit. 2/2

As people working in research, I'd argue that it's literally our job to critically analyse the field; to acknowledge and challenge power imbalances. The critical should be inherent in the movement/ self-styled discourse coalition. 2/2

Reform began as a critique of the status quo. The irony that It will now brook no arguments is evident to most.