Oh, I’m definitely gonna take advice from someone whose big argument starts with calling people “libtarded.” You opened your mouth, and all that spilled out was 4chan brain rot and Reddit-tier paranoia dressed up as research. You think name-calling and cherry-picked Cold War ghost stories make you sound smart. They don’t. They make you sound like a dude yelling at a globe.
USAID isn’t perfect, but reducing decades of foreign aid programs into “15% reached recipients” without context just proves you read a headline, didn’t understand it, and ran to X to flex like you discovered a conspiracy. Most of that money goes through contractors, staffing, logistics, infrastructure, and compliance. You think humanitarian aid just gets wired like Venmo to villagers?
And yes, there were sketchy overlaps during the Cold War, genius. That’s history, not a revelation. If you actually read up on your own like you told everyone else to do, you’d realize the 1980s aren’t still happening and this isn’t a Jason Bourne movie.
You’re not blowing anyone’s mind. You’re just parroting edgy nonsense you found online without the depth to back it up. So sit the hell down and maybe next time try leading with facts instead of slurs if you want people to take you seriously. Or don’t. Just know you’re being laughed at, not followed.
Quote
Jimmy Pyramid II
@MNovanglia67674
Replying to @FL8ThomasMix @SenMarkey and 2 others
Read more. @USAID was a slush fund for NGOs. You seem libtarded, so you should also be aware they collaborated with the CIA to overthrow governments. And only about 15% of USAID funds reached 'recipients'. No conservative conspiracies, feel free to read up on your own.