[–] ▶ №1579881[Quote]>>1579890
As early as 1781, Privy Councillor Dolim claimed that the deplorable characteristics of the Jews, which were merely the effects of constant oppression, would disappear with fair treatment, albeit only in the third generation1).
This assumption was supported by the teachings of the French naturalist Lamarck (d. 1829) on the inheritance of acquired characteristics. He explained that certain mental
dispositions, abilities and traits (good and bad) are created in individual humans by the environment and are then passed on from generation to generation.
Although the
most important representatives of science have recognized "Lamarckism" as a heresy , the Jews hold on to it.
Strange, most strange! –The most ardent representatives of the democratic idea of equality exclude themselves: All people are equal, the
white and black, the yellow and red; but for their leadership the Jewish people are "chosen" by God.–
1) Today, the fifth generation has lived since emancipation. Where is the change?
▶ №1579890[Quote]
>>1579881The Jews dictate how we should view their past. For two and a half
millennia,
they have proven themselves in the art of correcting, revising and constructing history according to their wishes. In modern times, the French "Enlightenment" of the 18th century brought them golden days.
They became the most zealous prophets of the democratic idea of equality and
claimed that The diversities of men and peoples were effects of environmental influences; the deplorable characteristics of the Jews
were due to constant persecutions and oppressions, to
involuntary dispersion, to ghetto life and centuries of rejection.
The claim was made that the non-Jews were to blame for the Jews becoming merchants, money lenders and usurers. With the help of the democrats, the following historical construction by the Jewish poet Heinrich Heine, which contradicts all historical truth, was most widely disseminated: the Jews were by nature a farming
people. In the 7th century AD, they were forced to sell their land
and then worked as merchants for half a millennium.
During the Crusades, anti-Jewish sentiment arose in merchant circles.
Deprived of their source of income, they were once again forced to choose a new one,
the only one still open to them: they became money lenders.
▶ №1579948[Quote]
Just as Goethe felt "horror and terror" before Yahweh in the books of Moses, so the legends of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob touch us Germans like something alien: an Aryan brain is incapable of conceiving such stories
.
1) Chamberlain calls the Jewish Yahweh "the incarnation of arbitrariness".
..And then the Jacob stories! With what pleasure are the accounts of Jacob's superior cunning written down (Gen. 25 ff.). With what pride the
Jews call themselves "the seed of Jacob"! But can and may this arch-father blessed by Jehovah be held up to us Germans as a role model?
We are thinking of the deception of the firstborn. This legend reflects the entire history of the Jewish people. The mother Rebekah means the land of Canaan. Two different peoples live there. The Hebrews, who came as foreigners and those seeking protection, know how to usurp dominion and the birthright2).
Esau and Jacob, the "stupid" and the "clever", appear like two types of people with completely different mental structures. When Jacob later returns home after twenty years of voluntary exile and still fears the revenge of his deceived brother, the latter has long forgotten all the injustice done to him. Full of brotherly love, he runs to meet the arch-robber, hugs and kisses him, and when Jacob offers him gifts, he declares: "I've had enough; keep what you have!"
Among the Jacob stories, the rogue's contest between Jacob and his
uncle Laban played a major role. Read the first book of Moses 29-31 to see with what
pleasure the narrator puts the superior cunning of his favorite in the true light:
Laban is clever, but Jacob is much cleverer; Laban is a rogue, but Jacob is a rascal.
Yet he has no sense at all that this is a case of deceit, for Jacob
knows how to keep up the appearance of being right. In the end, Laban stands there with a long
face; Jacob has taken the whole herd from him, he takes the daughters and children away with
him, Laban has even lost the god of the house, and with all this Jacob is completely
"right" and can still make a great speech.
The role played by the Hebrew strangers after the I and II. Book of Moses the Hebrew
strangers in Egypt play. Joseph, who had been sold as a slave, had attained high esteem with the Pharaoh and had become an all-powerful chamberlain. He uses his influence to bring
all his relatives, his father and his brothers with their wives and children.
They are warmly welcomed. "Now the children of Jacob dwelt in Egypt in the
province of Goshen, and they settled there and multiplied, so that they became exceedingly
numerous"; "they were fruitful and multiplied and became many and exceedingly
numerous, so that the 'land was full of them'"
A new Pharaoh recognized the danger: "The people
of Jacob's children are becoming more numerous and powerful than we are." Increasing oppression followed until Yahweh called Moses to lead the children of Israel out of Egypt. They departed, not without following the advice of their God to steal from the Egyptians. 11 Hos. 3, 21 f. it says: "And I (Yahweh) will give this people favor in the sight of the Egyptians, so that when you go out, you will not go out empty. But every woman shall ask of her neighbor and her household silver and gold vessels and garments, and you shall lay them on your sons and daughters and take them away." The same advice is repeated in chapter 11, and in the following chapter it is explicitly described as a favor from Yahweh that "the children of Israel" succeed in stealing what they have borrowed.
▶ №1579951[Quote]
>Just as Goethe felt "horror and terror" before Yahweh in the books of Moses, so the legends of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob touch us Germans like something alien: an Aryan brain is incapable of conceiving such stories
>.
>1) Chamberlain calls the Jewish Yahweh "the incarnation of arbitrariness".
>
>..And then the Jacob stories! With what pleasure are the accounts of Jacob's superior cunning written down (Gen. 25 ff.). With what pride the
>Jews call themselves "the seed of Jacob"! But can and may this arch-father blessed by Jehovah be held up to us Germans as a role model?
>
>We are thinking of the deception of the firstborn. This legend reflects the entire history of the Jewish people. The mother Rebekah means the land of Canaan. Two different peoples live there. The Hebrews, who came as foreigners and those seeking protection, know how to usurp dominion and the birthright2).
>
>Esau and Jacob, the "stupid" and the "clever", appear like two types of people with completely different mental structures. When Jacob later returns home after twenty years of voluntary exile and still fears the revenge of his deceived brother, the latter has long forgotten all the injustice done to him. Full of brotherly love, he runs to meet the arch-robber, hugs and kisses him, and when Jacob offers him gifts, he declares: "I've had enough; keep what you have!"
>
>
>Among the Jacob stories, the rogue's contest between Jacob and his
>uncle Laban played a major role. Read the first book of Moses 29-31 to see with what
>pleasure the narrator puts the superior cunning of his favorite in the true light:
>Laban is clever, but Jacob is much cleverer; Laban is a rogue, but Jacob is a rascal.
>Yet he has no sense at all that this is a case of deceit, for Jacob
>knows how to keep up the appearance of being right. In the end, Laban stands there with a long
>face; Jacob has taken the whole herd from him, he takes the daughters and children away with
>him, Laban has even lost the god of the house, and with all this Jacob is completely
>"right" and can still make a great speech.
>The role played by the Hebrew strangers after the I and II. Book of Moses the Hebrew
>strangers in Egypt play. Joseph, who had been sold as a slave, had attained high esteem with the Pharaoh and had become an all-powerful chamberlain. He uses his influence to bring
>all his relatives, his father and his brothers with their wives and children.
>They are warmly welcomed. "Now the children of Jacob dwelt in Egypt in the
>province of Goshen, and they settled there and multiplied, so that they became exceedingly
>numerous"; "they were fruitful and multiplied and became many and exceedingly
>numerous, so that the 'land was full of them'"
>
>A new Pharaoh recognized the danger: "The people
>of Jacob's children are becoming more numerous and powerful than we are." Increasing oppression followed until Yahweh called Moses to lead the children of Israel out of Egypt. They departed, not without following the advice of their God to steal from the Egyptians. 11 Hos. 3, 21 f. it says: "And I (Yahweh) will give this people favor in the sight of the Egyptians, so that when you go out, you will not go out empty. But every woman shall ask of her neighbor and her household silver and gold vessels and garments, and you shall lay them on your sons and daughters and take them away." The same advice is repeated in chapter 11, and in the following chapter it is explicitly described as a favor from Yahweh that "the children of Israel" succeed in stealing what they have borrowed.
▶ №1580003[Quote]>>1580023
Victory of the priesthood
The contrast between the two religions, prophethood and priesthood,
between the Yahweh of the prophets and the Yahweh of the priests, who hardly differed from Baal
, continued throughout the 8th, 7th and 6th centuries. The priesthood triumphed, while the
prophets remained lonely and misunderstood. The
destruction of the northern kingdom of Israel certainly contributed to this outcome. For the Jews of the southern kingdom, who were of a different nature
, did not understand the revelatory religion of the prophets; they only heard that they were chosen, and this gave rise to their immense arrogance and presumptuous exclusivity.
The year 621, when the 5th Book of Moses was "discovered" and the youthful King Isaiah solemnly committed the entire nation to it, was already significant for the development of the strictly organized priests and law lurchers. Since then, the exclusivity of the Jewish people and the Jewish religion has progressed. Since then, Yahweh was only allowed to be worshipped in Jerusalem; all other places of worship in the land were destroyed with ruthless severity. The law prescribed numerous external purifications, sacrifices and taxes. The
priesthood rose high above the rest of the people. The rule of the letter began. The outer forms of worship overgrew the inner religious life. The turmoil of the following decades brought the church's reform work to a standstill.
▶ №1580023[Quote]
>>1580003The MaccabeesIt is reminiscent of the attempts of the Russians, Poles and Czechs in modern times to create a unified state out of a motley
mixed bundle of countries and peoples when King Antiochus Epiphanes (175-164 BC) undertook a leveling policy
in one of the great "successor states" of Alexander the Great, namely the Syrian Diadochian Empire. In fact, the diversity of nationalities and religions caused his government the greatest difficulties. He therefore wanted to introduce Hellenic education everywhere
and Hellenic worship. And it by no means seemed hopeless to Hellenize the Jews as well as the others,
. For even then there were numerous "Reform Jews", i.e.
those who adopted Greek education and sought a balance between Greekism
and Judaism. - In Palestine, which belonged to the Syrian empire, this led to the Revolution (167 BC). Under the leadership of the Maccabees, the Jews progressed from success to success, supported in part by the Roman government and in part by the disunity of the Syrian empire. In 139, the head of the Maccabean house, Simon son of Matthias, was recognized by the Syrian Great King not only as High Priest but also as "Prince
of Israel". - Later, divisions arose which caused the Roman general
Pompey to intervene and invade Jerusalem in 63 BC; he
even entered the Temple and the Holy of Holies. Since then, Judea was one of the numerous
Roman "client kingdoms" of the East.
One may admire the Maccabees for their strong will not to let Judaism perish in
the general mass of nations. But in the
centuries before and after Christ, Judaism itself suffered immense
bloodshed as a result of the bitter self-destruction, which shifted the racial composition of the people. The
strict believers (Zealots) raged against all Jews who did not strictly exclude themselves from the
Hellenistic world of thought; they exterminated men, women and children and
destroyed their cities. A disastrous selection of Jews was formed.
▶ №1580044[Quote]>>1580062
Judaism in the Roman Empire
Wilson, the President of the USA, in 1918 called the destruction of Jerusalem (70 AD) and "the annihilation of the Jewish people by the Romans one of the greatest injustices in world history that must be righted". This judgment is wrong.
How did the destruction of Jerusalem come about? During the last period of the Roman Republic, i.e. during the mighty revolutionary wars, from which the military dictatorship of Augustus finally emerged, the Jews always knew how to find the right connection with astonishing agility. First they stood up for Pompey, then for Caesar, later for Cassitis and Brutus, later for the triumvirs of the year 43 and in the final decision initially for Antony and finally for Octavian Augustus. "Loyalty changed like the slogan.
Out of gratitude for Antipater, who had rescued him from a dangerous situation in Alexandria (47 BC), Julius Caesar restored the Jewish state and granted extensive privileges. Antipater became king: he was succeeded by his son Herod. In the year 6 AD, the emperor Augustus, at the Jews' own request, abolished the kingship and made Judea a Roman province; magnificent gifts from the imperial family adorned the temple in Jerusalem. Augustus' successor, the strict Emperor Tiberius, also showed the greatest patience towards the Jews.
▶ №1580062[Quote]>>1580077
>>1580044But when have the Jews ever been satisfied? Despite all the benefits, despite all the privileges, their principled opposition to Rome grew. The payment of taxes was challenged as ungodly. The Galilean Judas called it a disgrace for the Jews to recognize any other Lord over them than the Lord of hosts, who only helps those who help themselves. And when the revolutionary was executed, he was considered a martyr; the dead man was more dangerous to the Romans than the living one. - And so the conflict accumulated.
In addition,
as a result of Jewish arrogance, the hatred of the Jews by others grew. Under the emperors Augustus and Tiberius, peace was maintained. But under the unworthy Emperor Caligula, there was an explosion; since 38 AD, one can speak of a permanent revolutionary state within the Jewish community. It began with three years of bloody persecution of the Jews in Alexandria (38-41 AD). This was followed by a brief lull due to the compliance of the next emperor, Claudius. But on the one hand, the irritable mood remained, on the other hand, the incompatibility of the special position of the Jews with the overall interests of the empire became increasingly apparent. We must note that
the Roman government left no stone unturned to ensure mutual understanding. But
the admonition in the imperial edict that the Jews should now show greater moderation on their part and refrain from insulting those of other faiths speaks volumes. Mommsen writes: "The danger lay in the incompatibility of the imperial comrades of different nationalities, who had now been brought together by fate
." The weapons have not rested since 44 AD.
We marvel at the concessions made by the Roman government. But this compliance increased the power of the Zealots ("zealots"), who terrorized the moderate elements among the Jews. The hatred grew. "On both sides, further coexistence seemed impossible, and they met with thoughts of mutual expulsion."In 66 AD, bloody riots broke out in Caesarea and Jerusalem; in Caesarea the non-Jews were the aggressors, in Jerusalem the Jews. In Jerusalem, not only the Romans but also the moderate Jews were victims of popular rage. This was the signal for cruel Jew-baiting in Damascus, Ascalon and Tyre. And now the real war began in 66-70. The fighting was not only between the Roman and Jewish troops; the Jewish parties also murdered each other. The horrific blood work ended in 70 with
the destruction of Jerusalem.
Despite these terrible outbreaks of mutual hatred,
the imperial government did not allow itself to be carried away by further violent measures. We must recognize it as a moderate policy that the Jews, who were scattered throughout the empire, were henceforth not to form a state within a state, with their own central government in Jerusalem;
but that no obstacles were placed in the way of the Jews in the practice of their religious customs, either in Palestine or elsewhere. Indeed, rabbinical associations were once again allowed to form to take the place of the former high priestly central government. =="It
was not a question of faith, but of power. The Jewish church state as the head of the diaspora was not compatible with the unconditionality of the secular Roman state" ==
▶ №1580077[Quote]>>1580078
>>1580062There were two more horrific, bloody uprisings by the national Jewish community: in 116 AD, an uprising of the Jews broke out in Cyrene, Cyprus and Egypt; it also spread far into the Near East. Just how fierce the fighting was, is shown by the reports that
the Jews killed 220,000 people in Cyrene and 240,000 in Cyprus.
On the other hand, in Alexandria,
the besieged Greeks slew what Jews were left in the city at the time. The revolt that broke out in Palestine in 130 AD under the Emperor Hadrian has no equal in history; ==the entire Jewish community supported the
rebels==. The struggle between the Jews and the Roman troops lasted three years and was incredibly cruel. Credible reports tell of 50 captured fortresses, 985 occupied villages and 580,000 casualties. - Once again, the Roman government practiced far-reaching religious tolerance after the uprising was suppressed.
But it seemed as if, due to the bloody losses since the time of the Maccabees (over three centuries), all moderate Jews had been exterminated. The remaining Judaism increased its isolation. Mommsen speaks of the "rigid rabbinism, which knows nothing of the world outside of Abraham's bosom and the Mosaic Law, nor does it want to know"; of the "literalism towards the holy scriptures, which reached dizzying heights of absurdity."
The mysterious Talmud emerged, which isolates Jewish thought like a Chinese wall from the spirit of other peoples. ▶ №1580078[Quote]>>1580082
>>1580077The Orientalization of the entire ancient cultural worldHans F. Gunther [Author of the Racial Elements of European Histor] rightly emphasizes that when we speak of the "alien Jewish character,"
it is not only about Judaism, but about common traits shared by all peoples of Near Eastern and Oriental descent. However, the Jewish people became the most resilient, self-assured, and assertive bearers of Near Eastern and Oriental blood and spirit. One after another, the great states founded by Nordic heroes were infected by this spirit, leading to their decline:
the Persian Empire;
the Greek-Macedonian Empire of Alexander the Great;
the Roman Empire.
From the East, the shroud of death slowly descended over the entire ancient cultural world, over the so-called "Earth Circle," i.e., over all countries around the Mediterranean. The international cultural community was achieved, which still appears to many people today as the highest ideal: "
(((Unified Humanity)))." In truth, one after another, the Persians, the Greeks, and the Romans surrendered their ethnicity and national culture in favor of Asia.
Asia penetrated into Europe; Asian blood and Asian spirit. The Asian gods and the Chaldean worldview spread throughout the Roman Empire; people allowed themselves to be corrupted by Asian vices. And the Roman emperors? They adopted the Asian theocracy, universalism, and absolutism; the deification…
▶ №1580082[Quote]
>>1580078(((International cultural community, unified humanity)))! I find the term
Roman-Jewish mixed and world culture more appropriate. "
Roman-Jewish" means "Rome," which has been the epitome of all mixing and blurring for nearly 2000 years, for the destruction of ethnic uniqueness, for the melting pot of peoples, blood, culture, and religious mixture, for the equality of everything that bears the human face. And amidst this "
(((unified humanity)))," the Jews, the most ardent proclaimers of the international idea,
asserted and preserved their nationality. On one hand, they sharply distinguished themselves from all other people; on the other hand,
they sought to increase their influence over them to guide them according to their will. We admire the tenacity with which the dispersed people asserted their strong sense of close kinship amidst the melting pot of nations. Harnack estimated the total number of Jews at the beginning of our era to be 4-4.5 million; of these, 1 million in Egypt, 1 million in Syria, and 0.5 million in Palestine. He assumes that Jews made up about 7% of the total population of the Roman Empire during the time of Emperor Augustus. They primarily lived in the large cities of the East: in Alexandria, there were said to be 200,000 Jews among 500,000 inhabitants; it was similar in Antioch and the other newly founded Greek cities of the East. Later, they also penetrated into the West; during the time of Emperor Augustus, about 15,000 Jews may have lived in Rome.
The best expert on Roman history, Theodor Mommsen, emphasized the significance of Judaism for the disintegration of the ancient cultural world. He wrote: "The Jew is relatively indifferent to the state; he is as reluctant to give up the core of his national uniqueness as he is willing to envelop it with any nationality.
Even in antiquity, Judaism was an effective ferment of national decomposition." - The same Mommsen points out that
there was already a fear of Jews in the Roman Empire. "How closely the Jews held together at that time (during Caesar's time) is evidenced by the remark of a writer of that period that it would be concerning for the governor to encroach too closely on the Jews in his province, as he could be sure of being booed by the capital's mob upon his return." Jews at the forefront of the mob against an inconvenient high official!
▶ №1580084[Quote]
Wtf is this thread?
▶ №1580116[Quote]
Despite their dispersion, for these troubled centuries, one can Applying verses from Schiller's "Bride of Messina" to her:
"The foreign conquerors come and go;
we obey, but we stop."
There can be no talk of cruel persecutions of the Jews by the tolerant Germanic conquerors. On the contrary, the Jews were often successful in gaining high positions of trust through their interpreting services and healing skills, through their business acumen, through their dexterity in procuring and exploiting the goods. But again and again they attracted the hatred of the people: through their arrogance and mockery of Christianity, through their slave trade and the keeping of Christian slaves, through their parasitic, exploitative activity.
The history of Spain, which was repeatedly celebrated by the Jews as their "second promised land", is especially instructive. Here, when the Visigoths conquered the country in the 5th century, they found many rich Jewish communities. And later, when the opposition between the Germanic "heretics" and the Roman (Welsh) Orthodox believers intensified, the Jews sided with the Goths in this dispute between the two Christian denominations and received great benefits in return. But with this their arrogance grew, and when in 586 the Gothic king Rekkared transferred to the Roman Catholic Church, the change began. First of all, old laws were renewed:
>Exclusion of Jews from public office,
>Prohibition of marriage between Christians and Jews,
>Prohibition of owning Christian slaves.
In the year 612 there was even an expulsion of the Jews; 90,000 are said to have been affected by it. - Later, the threat of the Arabs led to ever stricter measures against the Jews. - Not without reason. In fact, they treacherously helped the Arabs when they crossed the Strait of Gibraltar and defeated the Visigoths in the battle of Xeres de la Frontera (711).
The Arab rule in Spain was a golden time for Judaism; Spain took over the leadership of the entire world Judaism. Today, too much is still being made of the simultaneous flowering of Arab and Jewish science and education at that time. The Jews were placed in high positions of trust; their wealth grew, especially through the profitable slave trade. - Nevertheless, they were also an element of decomposition in the Spanish Arab state. With sure instinct, they have been observing since the age of 11. In the XVII century, the Christian kings of Castile advanced and supported them by espionage.
Why should we not be allowed to truthfully say that Jews, by their very nature, are incapable of assimilating into a foreign nationality, becoming loyal citizens, and feeling genuine love for their homeland? They remain outsiders and wish to remain outsiders.
Just as in ancient times the Babylonian Jews reached out to the Persians, the Persian Jews to the Greeks, and the Greek Jews to the Romans, so later in Spain the Roman Jews reached out to the Goths, the Gothic Jews to the Arabs, and the Arab Jews to the Christian kings of Castile.
And in other countries? The fate of the Jews also changed in the Frankish Empire. In general, it can be said that they fared well under the Carolingians during the 8th, 9th, and 10th centuries. Indeed, Jewish writers wrongly claim Charlemagne (768-814) as a pronounced friend of the Jews. For although he granted the Jews great freedoms and used the Jew Isaac for his dealings with the Caliph Harun al-Rashid, he still kept them somewhat in check. This was different under his weak son Louis the "Pious" (814-840), who was completely under Jewish influence!
▶ №1580158[Quote]>>1580214
In the 9th and 10th centuries, Jews were able to spread across Germany. We find them in Magdeburg, Merseburg, Regensburg, Giessen, and Prague; primarily in the slave trade. It was of great importance for the Jews living among us that they had a center in the Mainz Rabbinical School.
They were by no means hindered from settling down and turning to agriculture; even the Jewish professor Graetz acknowledges the possibility of land acquisition. They did not become a trading and usurious people "through a harsh fate" [i.e. restrictions from the church]. At the end of this section, the close relations of the unfortunate Emperor Henry IV (1056-1106) with Judaism may be mentioned.
Probably, bitter necessity brought him into dependence on Jewish moneylenders. We have documents about his favors, especially towards the Jews in Worms and Speyer. In Speyer, the Jew-friendly Bishop Rudiger Huozmann had already granted the Jews, in 1084, alongside other freedoms, their own jurisdiction. In 1191, he was surpassed by the emperor, who determined that in a trial between Christians and Jews, judgment would be rendered according to Jewish law.
Sombart writes about this:
"For centuries, a special Jewish law has been in force for the acquisition of movable property by Jews; it has found its first recognition in the privilege granted by Henry IV to the Jews of Speyer: 'If a stolen thing is found in a Jew, and the Jew claims to have bought it, he may confirm by oath according to his law for what sum he bought it; if the owner then pays him so much, he shall give it to the latter for it."
This gave rise to a legally guaranteed right of the Jews to steal. At that time, our legal confusion began due to the penetration of foreign legal views. - The new Jewish settlement in Speyer was also surrounded with a protective wall [to defend against] the growing hostile popular mood; it is the first ghetto segregation in Germany: not an imposed hardship, but a perk for the protection of the Jews! Of course, the ghetto later turned into a plague for the Jews: just as the one created by Louis the Pious in the 9th century turned into a plague for the Jews. In the nineteenth century, as a benefit, the protection granted later developed the "chamber servitude", which pushed the Jews down to serfs.
▶ №1580214[Quote]
>>1580158The Jewish Expulsions The 13th century was for the Jews at the same time a time of greatest, tremendous enrichment and the beginning of increasing persecutions. It must be noted that
these usually did not start from above, but from below. As in ancient times, the Jews succeeded in
Medieval and modern times
by repeatedly winning the favor of the great.
It was precisely because individual kings, secular and spiritual princes, the authorities of the cities, gave up their subjects to exploitation by the Jews in order to obtain money, that bitterness grew in the lower strata of the people: just as it was against the Roman Pontifical church. Finally,
the Jews were expelled from Western and Central Europe. The religious opposition played a role in this only to the extent that excessive insults of the Jews against Christ and Christianity became known.
In England, the impetus for the expulsion of the Jews (1291)
was the discovery of widespread Jewish counterfeit coins.
In France, the Jews gained great wealth and extensive land ownership during the 13th century. Although it followed in the beginning in the 14th century, the property was confiscated several times, but the Jews found protection under the kings Louis X and Charles V. In exchange for enormous tribute payments,
they were allowed an interest rate of up to 80% on their financial transactions. The bitterness of the people forced their complete expulsion in 1394.
Particularly instructive is the history of Spain. Time and again, the accumulated anger of the people erupted over economic oppression and the treachery of the Jews, over mockery of Christianity and of quackery.
We hear of the Jewish financial advisors to the kings; their activities were particularly severe under Alfonso I (1325-1380) and his brother Don Pedro.
"The Jews suck the blood of the afflicted Christians and consume their goods through tax farming," states an old chronicle. The public outrage grew, and around 1480, massive persecutions of Jews began. To escape, many Jews converted to Christianity. Since 1451, the Inquisition had been working against Jews and false Christians, who were called "Maranos." However, the royal couple, Ferdinand and Isabella, tried once more to show leniency.
It was only when, during the Granada War against the last Moors of Spain, the Jews secretly supported the enemy that the punitive measures broke out in 1492. A decree was issued stating that Jews had to either convert to Christianity or leave the country within four months. At that time, about 300,000 Jews emigrated from Spain: some to Turkey, where their descendants are still called "Spaniards"; others to Portugal, from where they were soon expelled as well.
In Germany, due to the multitude of states, a unified approach was no longer possible.
When the Jews were expelled from one place, they were welcomed in another. The 15th century brought the expulsion of Jews from the most important German trading cities: from Cologne, Augsburg, Strasbourg, Erfurt, Nuremberg, Ulm, Regensburg. In contrast, they found refuge in Frankfurt am Main and Hamburg. A little later, the Jews in Italy faced a similar fate. In the 14th and 15th centuries, the hostility towards the Jews was so great that accusations of ritual murder and well poisoning gained widespread belief. Around 1350, during the time of the "Black Death" (bubonic plague), there were brutal persecutions of Jews first in France and then in Germany.
▶ №1580216[Quote]>>1580244
words words words
▶ №1580244[Quote]>>1580248
>>1580218This is SECA actually
>>1580216Shalom
Poland as a Jewish LandSince ancient times, numerous Jews lived in Eastern Europe,
from where they engaged in a thriving slave trade. Our German word "Sklave" originated from "Slawe"; the Slavic peoples provided a rich source for forced labor. Later, Poland became the refuge for Jews expelled from Germany;
they became indispensable to the magnates in the exploitation of the peasants.
From the dukes and later the kings, they received numerous privileges, including distilleries and the sale of spirits. Despite all appeals, even from high clergy and the Pope, they repeatedly found protection among the kings and magnates. Indeed, in the 17th century, the long-stored popular rage also broke out here, especially against the Jewish tax and tribute suckers, leading to horrific persecutions of Jews ("pogroms") throughout the East.
But then the Polish nobility took the Jews back in, and the world owes the inexhaustible Jewish cradle in the East to them. At the end of the Middle Ages and long thereafter, the German language was widely spread throughout the East. When the Jews expelled from Germany immigrated to Poland, Judeo-German, the "Yiddish" language, developed.
▶ №1580248[Quote]>>1580265
>>1580244Nobody really cares about ts other than sub-iq clittycels
jews won
nazis lost
▶ №1580250[Quote]>>1580257>>1580265
Modern Times
The Ghetto Period
"Ghetto, Ghetto compulsion!" The German Michel is expected to feel the deepest sympathy for the "poor" Jews: for the (((eternally persecuted and oppressed Jews))), who have been crammed together in filthy Jewish quarters and narrow Jewish alleys, leading a life unworthy of human beings, defenseless and at the mercy of the whims and mockery of Christians.
Indeed, the life of the Jews in the 15th to 18th century was by no means enviable; but due to their own fault. For two and a half millennia, they have always lived as foreigners among other peoples and have had the stubborn will to remain foreigners. For two and a half millennia, their ghetto life has been as voluntary as their dispersal. The ghetto (the Jewish quarter) was something similar to today's foreign districts in the cities of China. I recall for antiquity once more Alexandria, Antioch, Rome. In the early Middle Ages, there was no ghetto compulsion anywhere; rather, the religious community and the professional guild brought the Jews together. The first walled ghetto in Germany, the Jewish quarter in Speyer (1084), was a privilege. Only towards the end of the Middle Ages did ghetto compulsion arise from voluntary separation, and even then the segregation was not strict; numerous exceptions are known, e.g., for court Jews and doctors.
This was still acknowledged a few years ago by the Jew Rathenau: "In close connection with each other, in strict isolation from the outside: thus they live in a semi-voluntary, invisible ghetto, not a living part of the people, but a foreign organism within its body."
What were the conditions in the 15th to 18th century? The states of Western and Central Europe had exercised their undeniable right to expel foreigners. Instead of settling in the East, where there was plenty of space, and dedicating themselves to agriculture or a trade, the Jews behaved like people who want to enter a park where a sign at the entrance reads "Entry for strangers prohibited." They want to remain "strangers," but do not want to be treated as "strangers." They managed to sneak in here and there. The ongoing wars of modern times, the financial needs of kings, princes, and city authorities, and the rising luxury opened the gates for them.
▶ №1580265[Quote]>>1580268>>1580274
>>1580248Shalom. I will continue translating this marvellous book of trukes that you don't want non-Jews to read.
>>1580250Indeed, Luther had warned seriously and loudly against the Jews in his later years. But that was forgotten; at times one gets the impression that the Jews were seen as allies in the fight against Rome. However,
how little they were affected by the great intellectual movement of the Renaissance, Humanism, and the Reformation is evident from the fact that it was precisely in the 16th century that the Shulchan Aruch was written down, which establishes all areas of practical Jewish religious law in brief form. Here we encounter a completely foreign spirit that deeply offends our German sensibility.
Important Jewish MigrationsAround the turn of the Middle Ages to the Modern Era, hundreds of thousands of Jews were first expelled from Spain and then from Portugal. This expulsion coincided with the discovery of America and the sea route to the East Indies; it is no wonder that many Jews turned to the New World! Others went to Holland and England. In 1597, the first Portuguese Jews settled in Amsterdam and gained access; soon the first synagogue was opened, and the Jews themselves called Amsterdam their new, great Jerusalem. Jewish communities emerged in numerous other cities in Holland; during the Dutch Wars of Liberation, Jews also migrated from Antwerp. - In England, the admission of Jews had been prohibited since 1291. However, Queen Elizabeth had a Jewish court physician around 1600; Cromwell also believed around 1650 that he could not do without Jews. Nevertheless, there were still restrictions on the admission of Jews. Only the "Glorious" Revolution of 1688 brought about a change. William III of Orange was called to the throne of England; many Jews from Amsterdam migrated with him and enriched England with the trained technique of stock trading. Sombart writes: "The stock exchange appeared like Minerva, fully armed, springing forth; the main negotiators of the first English bond were Jews; they stood by the side of the Orange William III."
Among his Jewish advisors, the wealthy Medina had the greatest influence.
1) Shakespeare created his Shylock after this Rodrigo Lopez.
At that time, the long struggle between France and England began (1688-1815); the most brilliant military leaders that confront us at the beginning are the English Duke of Marlborough and Prince Eugene, and at the end, the English Duke of Wellington and Prince Blucher. We read about Duke Marlborough in Sombart: "The wealthy Medina was the banker of Lord Marlborough, paying him an annual pension of 6,000 pounds (120,000 gold marks) and reaping the first fruits of campaign news in return. The days of victory for the English army were as profitable for him as they were glorious for England's arms. All the tricks of the bull and bear market, the false news from the war front, the supposedly arrived couriers, the secret stock market conspiracies, the entire secret machinery of Mammon was known to the founding fathers of the London stock exchange and was duly exploited by them…
We know a whole series of Jewish financiers from the time of Queen Anne (1702-1714) who speculated on a large scale in the stock market. Manasseh Lopez made a great fortune by exploiting a panic (caused by false alarms that the queen was dead) and buying up all the government funds that quickly fell in price." ▶ №1580274[Quote]>>1580280>>1580288
>>1580257But we are all remembering and reading it now? Marge.
>>1580265Like a mental epidemic,
stock market fraud swept over Holland, England, and later France in the 17th and 18th centuries. We think of the tulip mania in Holland, the South Sea bubble in England, and the Law system in France. "Through stock trading, the entire nation was caught in a true frenzy of unbridled greed and bacchanalian indulgence."
Puritanism and EnlightenmentIndeed, the various, conflicting English-Scottish churches and sects detached themselves from Rome;
but they increasingly came under the influence of Judaism. Common to them is a preference for the Old Testament, which is particularly evident among the Puritans. Like the Jews, the Anglicans and Scots sought and continue to seek to regulate and rationalize all of life through strict laws; the Jewish Sabbath celebration was mirrored in the narrow-minded sanctification of Sunday; a Christian pharisaism emerged. Against their will, the Puritans, through the rationalization and methodization of life, benefited capitalism. Around 1700, they awakened a fierce commercial and acquisitive drive within themselves that alarmed their clergy to the highest degree. A contemporary writes: "Not compelled by anyone, but rather as a result of an unforeseen and unexpected change in the spirit of the people, all their thoughts and inclinations are directed toward business, as if they were being gathered and guided by a higher power."
It began the peculiar balance between a displayed piety and the unbridled greed for money, which is so unappealing to us Germans in the English and North Americans: "a powerful drive for acquisition under the ashes of an unheard-of bigotry."
1) Regarding Great Britain, Professor Kuhnemann states that, in its essence, it is "more a Jewish than a Christian power." There is a widely spread society in the Anglo-Saxon world that calls itself
"Believers in Identity" because they believe that Britons and Israelites are "identical"; they claim that the Britons are the ten tribes separated from Judah after Solomon's death, the lost and found Israel. The same tendencies are represented by the influential Anglo-Israelite movement, which even infects the English royal family.
Jewish spirit! And just as the Jews divided into orthodox and liberal Jews 2000 years ago, so did Puritanism and the "Enlightenment" develop from the same root. This is the age of rationalism, where people believed they could calculate everything and regulate it with their own calculating minds. In this context, of course, the natural sciences could thrive, and much blessing has arisen from it.
▶ №1580288[Quote]>>1580293>>1580296
>>1580268The Talmud permits the rape of 3 year olds
>>1580274FreemasonryThe close connection between Anglo-Americanism and Judaism has been significantly contributed to by the development of the Freemason order. The Grand Lodge founded in London in 1717 became the mother of all modern Freemasonry; it is already evident from the "Book of Constitutions" from 1723 that the order was a secret society. It is astonishing how quickly it spread not only across England and the American New England states but also throughout Western and Central European countries. Freemasonry presented itself as a kind of religion, and it may have contributed to its spread that it particularly opposed Roman Papism. The demand for a "natural and reasonable religion" also corresponded to the intellectual currents of the time. Already in the Constitution book of 1723, it states: "The Mason is obligated to that religion in which all men agree." Indeed,
we find almost no Jews in the lodges during the first decades, as they were considered only semi-citizens.
The bitter enmity between Freemasonry and the Roman Papal Church reveals itself, upon closer inspection, as a competition in the pursuit of world domination. Internally, the Papal Church and the "Counter-Church," the Jesuits and the Freemasons are fundamentally related. And when it is said of the Papal Church: "The Chair of Moses came as the Chair of Peter to Rome," one can say of Freemasonry: "The Ark of the Covenant came from Jerusalem to London." An English writer stated: "The Freemason is an artificial Jew." Without recognizing the close connection between Anglo-Americanism, Judaism, and Freemasonry, one cannot understand the history of the last centuries at all. An English Masonic publication wrote in 1902: "
The greatness of Britain is the work of Freemasonry." For 100 years, the Jews have gradually also gained external leadership in world Freemasonry.
▶ №1580293[Quote]>>1580319
>>1580288>aussie averifag nigger thinks the talmud is divine revelation when its just rabbis arguing with each other over snca Diz nigga is not serious brah :skull
skullskull
skullskull:
▶ №1580295[Quote]
Forgot to SUPERRAPE
▶ №1580296[Quote]>>1580319
>>1580280Bro does NOT want goyim reading this book
>>1580288North America as a Jewish LandSombart's statement "America is a Jewish land in all its parts"
initially applied only to South and Central America. Spanish and Portuguese Jews arrived there alongside the explorers. The first merchants and industrialists in America were Jews. From the very beginning, sugar plantations and the sugar industry formed a main source of their enrichment for centuries. This applies to both the Spanish West Indies and Portuguese Brazil, where numerous esteemed Dutch Jews settled when it was under Dutch control from 1624 to 1654; it also applies to the French colonies in the West Indies and southern North America.
Everywhere,
Jews were the rulers of the sugar industry and sugar trade.
And what about the present-day United States of North America? Here, the development was initially quite different, as no adventurers and fortune seekers immigrated, but rather simple, serious men and women who settled amidst many hardships and dangers, seeking not earthly power and honor, but freedom of their faith: Puritans and Quakers from England, Palatines from Germany, Huguenots from France.
Rural settlements emerged without slave labor. - But since the accession of William III of Orange (1689), the English motherland experienced the "blessings" of Jewish immigration, and gradually the Jewish economic spirit, combined with an incredible Phariseeism, spread in the New England states of North America. Sombart refers to Americanism as distilled Jewish spirit. And Halfeld writes: "The peculiar duality in American life (the idealistic pathos that pairs with shrewd business practices: the religious underpinning of the success concept; the preacher who is an entrepreneur; the proselytizer of morality; the businessman with God and ideals on his lips; Wilson's 14 points; the world peace certified by Wall Street):
all of this ultimately traces back to the Puritan ethos." - The Americans have also masterfully managed to put Freemasonry in their service. The number of Jews in the United States was initially small, about 4,000 around 1800, and about 50,000 by 1850. But today there are well over 4 million; in New York alone, more than 2.5 million Jews live there.
▶ №1580319[Quote]>>1580344
>>1580293>eve&doe it is the core of rabbinical judaism from which they derive community guidance and the highest level of jewish learning>eve&doe there is no counterargument in any of them made against raping 3yos>>1580296The Jews in GermanyIn Germany, the fragmentation of states benefited the Jews, making a unified approach against them more difficult. Particularly the Thirty Years' War gave them the opportunity to expand once again. The financial needs of the Emperor and the princes opened the gates for them; a mass immigration of Eastern Jews occurred.
The HabsburgsIndeed, in Austria during the 16th, 17th, and 18th centuries, there were repeated harsh measures against the Jews; however,
the Habsburg emperors became increasingly dependent on Jewish moneylenders, partly due to the many wars and partly due to their extravagance. The age of court Jews began during the Thirty Years' War. We hear of the Bohemian Jew Lazarus, who "obtained intelligence and reports, which were of great importance to the imperial armada, or had them obtained at his own expense and always endeavored to supply all kinds of clothing and ammunition needs to the imperial armada." The Jew Jakob Bassewi Schmieles was elevated to the nobility under the name "von Treuenberg." As Kernholt writes, his "loyalty" was primarily expressed in that he accepted and circulated the low-value thalers he was paid for his supplies.
The court Jews were given the opportunity by emperors and princes to establish themselves even in places where Jews were otherwise not tolerated. A hundred years later, under Emperor Charles VI (1711-1740), the ennoblement of wealthy Jews became so rampant that through blood mixtures, the majority of the Austrian nobility gradually became Jewish. The example of Vienna was imitated by hundreds of German princes; soon there were court Jews at all larger and smaller courts who satisfied the great financial needs of the princes at the expense of the subjects.
The most famous court Jew became Suss, who became an all-powerful minister in Wurttemberg and attracted the justified hatred of the people.The HohenzollernsThe Electorate of Brandenburg had no Jews in the 17th century. We must deem it disastrous that the Great Elector Frederick William I, when there was a temporary expulsion of Jews from Vienna in 1670, allowed the immigration of fifty Jewish families. His extravagant son, King Frederick I, was tempted by the lucrative source of revenue from the protection letters for Jews to permit a larger number of Jews and we have received loud complaints about the resulting grievances.
There were no expulsions in the 18th century. However, Kings Frederick William I and Frederick II, the Great, were eager to protect their subjects from exploitation. This became increasingly difficult as the acquisition of Silesia and West Prussia multiplied the Jewish population of the state. Frederick II issued a "Regulation for the Jewish Community" in Prussia. The freedom of movement for Jews was restricted for the sake of the greater good, and they remained under foreign law. The great king prioritized duties to his own people; he was, as Kernholt writes, "the last Hohenzollern of whom one can say this about his Jewish policy." It should not be overlooked that even Frederick the Great felt compelled during the Seven Years' War (1756-1763) to engage with Jewish coin debasers due to immense financial need. In the process, the court Jew Ephraim became wealthy.
▶ №1580344[Quote]>>1580359
>>1580319The Free Imperial CitiesSombart mentions Hamburg and Frankfurt am Main among the German cities that accepted Jews. In this context, the Hamburg Senate denied the presence of Jews in 1603 for self-serving and commercial gain, despite the complaints of the citizenry and the clergy. - We have an excellent book by Hofmeister on the gradual Judaization of the Hanseatic city of Lubeck: "From Hanseatic Spirit to Merchant Spirit";
there we read how the council always sides with the Jews, while the entire citizenry demands vigorous measures against the immigration of Jews. - The Napoleonic era brought a flood of Jews. After the Wars of Liberation, the brave mayor Smidt distinguished himself in keeping his Hanseatic city of Bremen free of Jews.
The Beginning of the Judaization of Berlin(((Moses Mendelssohn)))"Robbery of the Firstborn!" We think of the last centuries before Christ, of the so-called Hellenistic age. In the newly founded Greek cities of the East, especially in Alexandria and Antioch, Greek-speaking Jews lived alongside the Greeks.
A rapprochement occurred between Judaism and Hellenism. But the end result was that the
Greeks lost their uniqueness and became orientalized; the Jews adopted the language and cultural treasures of the Greeks but remained Jews.The same is repeating itself today since the 18th century after Christ, and the "Enlightenment" with its ideas of freedom, equality, brotherhood, tolerance, and humanity became the ladder for the rise of the Jews;
they skillfully presented their desires for civil rights equality as a demand for tolerance and wounded human dignity. The Jew
(((Moses Mendelssohn))) (1729-1786) became the father of Reform Judaism
(((without ceasing to be a true Law Jew inwardly))). He was, as Bartels has demonstrated, by no means the ideal person he is portrayed as; rather, he accuses him of duplicity.
With success,
(((Moses Mendelssohn))) endeavored to lead his fellow tribesmen out of the intellectual ghetto, to convey to them the treasures of German culture, and to guide them to use the educated German language instead of the Jewish German patois. Through his own example,
he showed them the way to (((literary activity and to influencing public opinion))). His efforts were aided by the humanitarian spirit of the Enlightenment. Competing with each other, the French and Germans strove to be "modern," and they created images of model Jews who had never lived anywhere at any time:
numerous writers presented themselves as advocates for Jews in order to appear "unprejudiced." The Jewish professor Graetz writes: "It was a very important moment in the history of the Jews when the two young men, Mendelssohn and Lessing, became acquainted with each other." Indeed, it was very important! We particularly think of Lessing's poem "Nathan the Wise." Generally, the main character is seen as his friend Moses Mendelssohn. Famous is the story from the time of the Crusades about the three rings, which Lessing adapted for his didactic poem. According to his portrayal, a time will come when the three rings, that is, the three external forms of religion (Judaism, Christianity, Islam), will lose their significance to make way for the true religion that requires no external forms.
We regret that in this poetry, the ideal figure of the Reform Jew is portrayed with more or less serious character flaws, not only in the representatives of Islam but also in those of Christianity. Above all, however, Enlightenment ideas, especially the thought of a natural and rational religion (of "Deism"), are placed in the service of Judaism; Deism and Judaism appear to be closely intertwined, and to this day, Jews present themselves as the main bearers of the "Enlightenment"; everything that does not suit them is labeled as "backward." However, the so-called natural and rational religion (of "Deism") is not a religion at all, but at most a beautiful morality. As Adolf Bartels rightly says, our current defensive struggle is less against Lessing himself, who will retain his significant place in our literary history, than against the growing cult of Lessing and the Lessing legend in the 19th century; the increasing glorification of Lessing kept pace with the growing power of Judaism. Not only the Jews Borne, Heine, Graetz, Engel have celebrated him excessively, but also respected German professors, among them Erich Schmidt.
▶ №1580359[Quote]
>>1580344The goal that Moses Mendelssohn pursued
was the complete equality of Jews (((without them ceasing to be Jews))): thus a preference. Behind the 1781 publication of the secret councilor Dohm's "On the Civil Improvement of the Jews," which caused an enormous stir, stood
(((Moses Mendelssohn))).
The Jews of all Europe looked to him as their strong advocate. His significance for the history of Judaism cannot be overestimated.
The result of the connection between Judaism and Germanness that began with him was that
we Germans surrendered our national identity to the cosmopolitan ideas of humanity, while the Jews asserted themselves, and Jewish thought penetrated ever wider circles. Although they remained primarily brokers of culture at that time,
they made themselves masters of culture, and in 1912 a Jew was allowed to declare: "Jews manage the intellectual property of a people that denies us the right and the ability to do so." - The incursion of Judaism into our literature has made Berlin a Jewish city. Here, above all,
developed the shallow superficiality and omniscience, the arrogance and cheekiness. Berlin was the New Jerusalem for the "Reform Jews," for the presumptuous "Enlighteners," who can neither become Germans nor want to.
How little "pressed" the situation of the Berlin Jews was at the end of the 18th century is demonstrated by their social standing.
The wealthy Jews emerged as patrons of art and science; their salons were frequented by the socially and intellectually prominent of Berlin at that time. Even significant figures appeared, such as Schleiermacher and the Humboldts, and in 1786, the French Count Mirabeau. However, it was the "pretty" Jewish women, such as Dorothea Veit (later Schlegel), the daughter of Mendelssohn, and Henriette Herz, who exerted the greatest attraction. Like light to moths, they drew men into their spell. And in their salons, it was not merely about intellectual banter and the exchange of poems, scientific and artistic works; rather, we have evidence that even the most intimate relationships were formed. There is talk of "intellectual courtesans," "intellectual brothels," "communism of enjoyment." It is natural that libertines like Gentz and Mirabeau felt comfortable in such circles. It was concerning that statesmen and princes also mingled in these salons. Therefore, it is not unjust to speak of an
Esther policy, which, with the help of "beautiful, clever women," was intended to benefit the Jewish people. This is the cultured Berlin social tone of which the Jewish professor Graetz writes: "Spirited Jews and Jewish women initially created in Berlin that
(((cultured cosmopolitan tone))) which has become the peculiarity of this world city and has had an inspiring effect on the rest of Germany from here."
▶ №1580491[Quote]>>1580495>>1580513
Judaism as a Combat Organisation
Judaism is a unified Combat Organization, set up politically, religiously, economically or humanitarianly as needed. His goal is called Zion, i.e. the rule of the Jewish man.
As people of the present day, we are experiencing the dramatic final battle for the dominion of the earth: whether the light-born Aryan or the underworldly Jew will shape the world according to his face. Judaism has been waging this battle for 2500 years, waging it underground according to its nature. The form of existence of the Diaspora and its ghettos, consciously and voluntarily chosen by the Jews, meant a declaration of war on all non-Jewish peoples. The beneficial arrangement of the Diaspora enabled the net-like Jewish underworld to invisibly and never tangibly undermine the diverse upper world of the non-Jewish peoples.
Already during their stay in Assyria and Babylonia, the Jews were a conspiratorial society which, guided by Jerusalem, worked for the destruction of the cultural world of that time, driven by the insane idea of a world mosaicism to be achieved through world revolution. In Europe, Jewish forces were the driving forces behind all movements that sought to purify and split the Roman Church. Albigenses, Hussifs and Anabaptists, imbued with the Jewish-Old Testament spirit, were the rams of Judaism. Of the orders of that time, the non-German Knights Templar in particular succumbed to the Jewish art of subversion. When they were destroyed, his Jewish remnants saved themselves in Freemasonry, especially in the Scottish masonry guilds. The awakening of the Germanic soul and the unleashing of the deepest creative forces in the events of the Reformation were also very soon turned into Jewish benefits.
The intellectual currents of the modern era, humanism and the Enlightenment, were also partly the effects of Jewish pro domo [self interest] work. Its result was emancipation; it was the victory of Talmudic thinking over Aryan trustworthiness.
Through the "great" French Revolution of 1789, Judaism gained a position of power that it brutally expanded over the next few decades. This triggered the first anti-Semitic stirrings and movements among the non-Jews. Against this new enemy, defensive work had to be done. Thus, in the course of the 19th century, many new combat organizations were created by the Jews, which on the one hand had to fight anti-Judaism, and on the other hand were intended to accelerate Judah's rise to world domination. In the sense of its certain final victory, Judaism stepped somewhat out of its anonymity, unwisely lifted here and there the veil of its mystery and its aims; this also made the fighting style of some Jewish organizations recognizable to us.
The deepest, most unadulterated insight into Jewish warfare, provided by the Jews themselves, is afforded by the 1072 so-called Kahalakten of the Jewish community in Minsk, which, in Russian specification, characterize the whole of Jewry as a conspiracy against non-Judaism that is ingeniously organized against non-Judaism. These Kahal files show us the paths followed with uncanny tenacity by which the Jews come to power, enlighten us about the means sanctified by the end with which the Jews ensnare their host peoples with a fine-meshed network of oriental cunning, cunning and unscrupulousness. The Kahalakten shine into the abysses of the Jewish soul and reveal the whole brutality of the Jewish Janus head. They show the roots of Jewish destructiveness, the chosen nature cemented up by the Diaspora and the ghetto, and the ridiculous Judeocentric conception of history that the world was created because of Israel and could not exist without it.
The Kahalakten prove definitively and conclusively that the Jewish religion, this minimum of religion, is nothing other than the constitution of the Jewish world state, that the so-called Jewish law forms the core of the Jewish state. The most instructive for the host peoples, and especially for the friends of the Jews, are the cavalry acts, in which the much-vaunted social spirit of Judaism becomes visible; they prove the false pathos of the Jewish slogans of (((freedom, equality, fraternity, human rights and charity, tolerance and equality, socialism and democracy))). The Kahalakten confirm that Jewry itself does not make the slightest use of these alleged conditions for the progress of mankind, which are proclaimed in advertising! What is preached to the non-Jewish states as the highest state wisdom has no place in the Jewish world state. In it there is neither freedom nor equality, neither fraternity nor tolerance, neither respect for human dignity nor genuine socialism.
Oriental despotism is the form of government of the Kahal.
▶ №1580495[Quote]>>1580513
>>1580491i was about to sleep and you're still going :skull
skullskull
skullskull
skullskull
skullskull::skull:
somebody rape this aussie furfag averi pedo nigger already
▶ №1580513[Quote]>>1580517>>1580568
>>1580495You are Jewish
>>1580491The Kahal is the form in which world Jewry, dispersed through the diaspora and ghetto, is held together with unparalleled discipline. Each Jewish community forms a Kahal, which, merging into larger associations, ultimately becomes the World Kahal, the supreme center of world Jewry, currently based in New York. To the outsider, the Kahal seems merely to be a harmless Jewish community structure that regulates life in the ghetto. However, the manner of this regulation of life is crucial for the assessment. The Kahal documents reveal each Jewish community as a pus-filled sore that festers in and on the body of the host nations and absorbs their best juices and strengths; they reveal it as a mine, as an explosive device that can destroy at any time and that is embedded in the state of the host nation, causing confusion and insecurity through countless small explosions.
The Jews, who were supposedly eternally persecuted in Russia, had the privilege of the most far-reaching self-government, i.e.,
the Jewish ghettos were self-governing bodies. The administration of the ghetto was called Kahal. The Bet-Din was closely attached to it as a Talmudic court.
Each Kahal community is a kind of "Talmudic municipal republic", but it is governed in a completely undemocratic way: the Jewish state, in each of its miniature editions, i.e., in each Kahal community,
is a domineering oligarchy which, consisting only of rich Jews, violates the other racial comrades politically, economically, socially and spiritually. There is neither personal freedom nor social equality, neither universal nor equal suffrage.
The so-called Kahal families always arrange it in such a way that they remain at the top and maintain their position of power by draconian means. Anyone who does not comply with the orders of the Kahal authorities falls under the minor or the large ban; the latter is tantamount to the destruction of the life of the banished person. Against all kinds of recalcitrants, the Bet-Din is loyal to the Kahal. It is not important for either of them to turn right into injustice and vice versa with outrageous arbitrariness.
In 1803, "humane" Judaism still knew in its ghettos - stakes of shame! ▶ №1580519[Quote]>>1580523>>1580530
>wordswordswordswordswordswordswordswordswords
Ai, summarize this thread
▶ №1580521[Quote]>>1580524>>1580526>>1580530
>>1580517what is that 'son based on?
▶ №1580523[Quote]>>1580530
>>1580519Aussie is an averifag and loves 'p
▶ №1580540[Quote]
OYYYYYYYY DON'T LET THE GOYIM KNOW
▶ №1580541[Quote]
nobody cares lmao
▶ №1580542[Quote]
'chive this
▶ №1580544[Quote]
>>1580543nobody is saying this
▶ №1580548[Quote]
averinigger aussie LOST
▶ №1580562[Quote]
nigger
▶ №1580567[Quote]
kike clitties wew
▶ №1580568[Quote]
>>1580513The tyrannical power of the Kahal extends to the most trivial details of life. For example, it prescribes which business someone may or should operate. It meddles in intimate, domestic relationships,
sniffs out each and every one, extinguishes all mental functions, mechanizes and mechanizes the independent life of its subjects. The Kahal's main focus, while sparing its own purse, is to procure funds with which Russian officials are to be bribed. The collection of such "gift money" recurs again and again in the minutes. If it is necessary to prevent an action of a political or economic nature against Judaism, it stands together like one man in the Kahal, collects enormous sums of money and - is usually successful. One example is enough for many:
The Russian government had the spirits monopoly taken out of its hands by the Jews. The Jews took advantage of it to corrupt the Russian people by educating them to drink liquor, and at the same time had the advantage of huge revenues. The systematic depraving of the Russian people did not go unnoticed by insightful government authorities. They tried to take away the monopoly from the Jews. Then
the terrible power of the Kahal organization became apparent. Hundreds of thousands of roubles were mercilessly collected for bribery purposes from all Kahal's subjects, and they were clever and disciplined enough to see the salutary purpose of this collection of money. After two years of fighting, the money, the Jewish ammunition, had shot the enemy. The liquor monopoly remained in Jewish hands, and the Russian people's liquor continued for more than 100 years, until the people had become ripe for the Bolsheviks' butcher's knives.
In compliance with Talmudic regulations, the Kahal develops rights of ownership and exploitation that cannot be surpassed in terms of danger to the public.
Since for the Jew the property of the non-Jews is ownerless property, the Kahal grants the chasaka, i.e. the right of possession of the property of a non-Jew.
This right of ownership can be extended to everything: to houses and land, to estates and monasteries of the uncircumcised. Indeed, the Kahal even sells to this or that Jew the right to choose a victim, an object of exploitation, among the non-Jews. This monopoly of the slaughter of a foreigner's property must then not be disturbed by any other Jew. The purpose of this monopoly is the systematic expropriation of the host peoples. The Kahal issues documents about these sales and even acknowledges the money received for this scam! An abolition of the state of the host people also means the principle, often applied by the Kahal, that all oaths sworn to the host peoples are only sham oaths, that all non-Jewish orders and laws have no validity for the Jews in contrast to those of the Kahal.
▶ №1580590[Quote]
>amerimutt flag turns out to be a kike
Man you retarded ass anglos really got your stupid ass democratic system subverted didn't you? Maybe next time you retards will create a system that doesn't allow you to become a minority in your own fucking country KEK! Racist and intolerant Chads win again!
▶ №1580619[Quote]
>>1580605>>1580569Why are there so many kikes on this site
▶ №1580622[Quote]
>>1580569>btw, that specific "3 year old" passage you telegram pedos love to spam is routinely explained, clarified, and contextualized by actual scholarsThere is more than one passage
The Jews not only deny in general that as a "counter-race" they selfishly and domineeringly acted together across all the boundaries of their host peoples only according to their own interests, but they assert against every special cleansing measure of the host peoples that it was unnecessary and was born only out of hysterical panic or blinded delusions of hatred. Today, in its defense against the blow it struck in 1933,
world Jewry spreads misinformation outside the borders of the German people that the Jews in Germany were a modest and peaceful group of citizens, that they lacked any ambition for power.
In the face of this assertion, an attempt is made here to reflect on the facts. Against the thesis of the political harmlessness of the Jews in Germany,
it is asserted that they tirelessly strove for influence in German politics and that they achieved decisive influence during the Weimar Intermediate Reich, that the cleansing measures of the National Socialist Revolution were an indispensable prerequisite for German rebirth.
Only rarely has the political striving for power of the Jews in Germany come to the fore undisguised. Jewish influence was so dangerous precisely because it always tried to remain anonymous and camouflage itself.
Only in the time of the greatest development of Jewish power, in the period after 1918, did the Jews allow themselves to be tempted to give up their camouflage in some places and thus, to their current chagrin, significantly facilitated the German defensive struggle. ▶ №1580665[Quote]
This is keyed actually
