Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Log in

Efficient Vanadium Extraction from Vanadium Slag by Roasting-Free Assisted Acid Leaching: Pure Oxygen Oxidation of Molten Vanadium Slag

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method of roasting-free vanadium recovery from molten vanadium slag via pure oxygen oxidation-assisted acid leaching was investigated in order to implement efficient and green vanadium recovery. The oxidation process of molten vanadium slag discharged from converters by pure oxygen was simulated, and the phase evolution mechanism of pure oxygen vanadium oxide slag (POOVS) was analyzed. The law between phase evolution and the vanadium recovery rate was systematically expounded. According to the results, POOVS is a Fe2O3–V2O5–Mn2O3–TiO2–Cr2O3–SiO2 system, and 80.49 to 86.05 pct of vanadium is V5+. The vanadium leaching efficiency of POOVS reached 97.23 pct. In the range of CaO addition, with the increase of the CaO/V2O5 ratio, the vanadium-rich phase in POOVS changed from V2O5 and Mn2V2O7 to xCaO–V2O5, and the leaching efficiency of vanadium was improved. Under the guidance of response surface methodology, the optimal leaching process parameters were a leaching temperature of 70 °C, a leaching time of 1.63 hours, a H2SO4 concentration of 25 pct, and a solid–liquid ratio of 0.09 g/mL. The roasting-free pretreatment method of vanadium slag proposed in this paper uses the waste heat and reaction heat of vanadium slag to complete the mineral phase evolution, which is a green and efficient vanadium extraction technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
¥17,985 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Japan)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. J.C. Lee, K. Kurniawan, E.Y. Kim, K.W. Chung, R. Kim, and H.S. Jeon: J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, vol. 12, pp. 343–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.02.065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. T.T. Lv, Y. Peng, G.X. Zhang, S. Jiang, Z.L. Yang, S.Y. Yang, and H. Peng: Adv. Sci., 2023, vol. 10, p. 2206907. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206907.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K.E. Rodby, R.L. Jaffe, E.A. Olivetti, and F.R. Brushett: J. Power. Sources, 2023, vol. 560, p. 232605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H. Peng, J. Guo, B. Li, and H.S. Huang: Environ. Chem. Lett., 2022, vol. 20, pp. 1249–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01380-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Gao, A.U. Olayiwola, B. Liu, S.N. Wang, H. Du, J.Z. Li, X.D. Wang, D.H. Chen, and Y. Zhang: Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev., 2022, vol. 43, pp. 466–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08827508.2021.1883013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H.Y. Li, C.J. Wang, Y.H. Yuan, Y. Guo, J. Diao, and B. Xie: J. Clean. Prod., 2020, vol. 260, p. 121091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H.Y. Li, C.J. Wang, M.M. Lin, Y. Guo, and B. Xie: Powder Technol., 2020, vol. 360, pp. 503–08. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.074.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Chen, Z.H. Wang, Z.F. Qin, G.Q. Zhang, H.R. Yue, B. Liang, and D.M. Luo: J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2021, vol. 12, pp. 1391–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.036.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. X.J. Hui, J.H. Zhang, Y. Liang, Y.W. Chang, W. Zhang, and G.Q. Zhang: Sep. Purif. Technol., 2022, vol. 297, p. 121466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y.R. An, B.Z. Ma, X. Li, Y.Q. Chen, C.Y. Wang, B.H. Wang, M.L. Gao, and G.S. Feng: Process. Saf. Environ. Prot., 2023, vol. 173, pp. 263–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.03.013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. P.C. Hu, Y.M. Zhang, H. Liu, T. Liu, S. Li, R.B. Zhang, and Z.J. Guo: Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, vol. 304, p. 122319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. S.Y. Liu, L. Ye, L.J. Wang, and K. Chou: Sep. Purif. Technol., 2023, vol. 312, p. 123407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123407.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. H. Peng: J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2019, vol. 7, p. 103313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. W.J. Huang, S. Yu, X. Shen, L. Xu, N. Wang, and M. Chen: Steel Res. Int., 2016, vol. 87, pp. 1228–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201500333.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Z.P. Lin, L.L. Bai, X. Zhang, H.F. Dong, and F.G. Wu: J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2018, vol. 468, pp. 164–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.08.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. H.R. Yue and X.X. Xue: J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, vol. 393, p. 122368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. W.C. Song, H. Li, F.X. Zhu, K. Li, and Q. Zheng: Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China, 2014, vol. 24, pp. 2687–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63399-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Hryha, E. Rutqvist, and L. Nyborg: Surf. Interface Anal., 2012, vol. 44, pp. 1022–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.3844.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Silversmit, D. Depla, H. Poelman, G.B. Marin, and R.D. Gryse: J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 2004, vol. 135, pp. 167–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2004.03.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. X.N. Lu, L. Deng, S.A. Saslow, H.S. Liu, C.J. Benmore, B.P. Parruzot, J.T. Reiser, S.H. Kim, J.V. Ryan, J.D. Vienna, and J.C. Du: J. Phys. Chem. B, 2021, vol. 125, pp. 12365–77. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c07134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. H. Peng, J. Guo, X.G. Zheng, Z.H. Liu, and C.Y. Tao: J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2018, vol. 6, pp. 5119–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.08.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Yang, Y. Liu, X.Y. Wan, T.A. Zhang, S.N. Lin, K. Wang, and X.L. Li: Minerals, 2023, vol. 13, p. 628. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13050628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. L.P. Rivoira, J. Cussa, M.L. Martínez, and A.R. Beltramone: Catal. Today, 2020, vol. 349, pp. 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.05.053.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J.C. Yu, B.Z. Ma, S.H. Zhao, Z.C. Yao, C.Y. Wang, B.H. Wang, M.L. Gao, and G.S. Feng: Process. Saf. Environ. Prot., 2023, vol. 172, pp. 727–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.02.071.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. H.X. Fang, H.Y. Li, T. Zhang, B.S. Liu, and B. Xie: ISIJ Int., 2015, vol. 55, pp. 200–06. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.55.200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J.H. Zhang, W. Zhang, L. Zhang, and S.Q. Gu: Int. J. Miner. Process., 2015, vol. 138, pp. 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2015.03.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Yang, L.D. Teng, and S. Seetharaman: Steel Res. Int., 2014, vol. 85, pp. 1588–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.201400017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Wen, T. Jiang, T.X. Yu, B.J. Chen, and L. Li: J. Clean. Prod., 2022, vol. 367, p. 133077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133077.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Arshadi, A. Esmaeili, and S. Yaghmaei: Hydrometallurgy, 2020, vol. 197, p. 105464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2020.105464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support of this work from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52204419) the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (No. 2022-BS-076), and the Guangxi Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2021AA12013).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yan Liu or Ting-an Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, Ta. et al. Efficient Vanadium Extraction from Vanadium Slag by Roasting-Free Assisted Acid Leaching: Pure Oxygen Oxidation of Molten Vanadium Slag. Metall Mater Trans B 55, 1231–1243 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-024-02999-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-024-02999-2