Science & technology | Research rankings

Are China’s universities really the best in the world?

Nature’s prestigious index says yes

The antenna for the Chinese Spectral Radioheliograph.
The sky’s the limitPhotograph: Eyevine

A decade ago Nature, a scientific publisher, began tallying the contributions made by researchers at different institutions to papers published across a set of 145 respected journals. When the first such Nature Index was published in 2016, the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) ranked first, but American and European institutions dominated the top ten. Harvard placed second, with Stanford and MIT fifth and sixth; the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and the German Max Planck Society were third and fourth; Oxford and Cambridge took ninth and tenth (seventh and eighth place went, respectively, to the Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres and the University of Tokyo).

the-economist-today
The Economist today

Handpicked stories, in your inbox

A daily newsletter with the best of our journalism

Alfafa fieldsYuma, Arizona.

Climate change will hurt the richest farmers—and the poorest

Even with realistic adaptation, crop yields will fall as temperatures rise

illustration of a Rubik’s Cube floating in a digital space. One visible face of the cube features a robot head, while another shows a human face

How to find the smartest AI

Developers are building fiendish tests only the best models can pass


Bogong moth (Agrotis infusa)

Meet the moths that use the stars to find their way

The skill was previously thought unique to humans and certain birds


The world needs to understand the deep oceans better

Otherwise it cannot protect them properly

Is the “manopause” real?

If it is, it is nothing like the menopause

A routine test for fetal abnormalities could improve a mother’s health

Studies show these can help detect pre-eclampsia and predict preterm births