Wearable device maker IYO Inc.'s claims of consumer confusion, filed against OpenAI and Io Products June 9, are “purely hypothetical and thus insufficiently ripe” for the court to act, OpenAI said in a Thursday opposition filing in the US District Court for the Northern District of California. IYO can’t win a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction because it hasn’t shown ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.