Clean-Up Centrism is a centrist ideology of MisterJ centered on the belief that democratic systems can become so chaotic and dysfunctional that extremism and polarization thrive, threatening the stability and future of a nation. It advocates for a temporary suspension of democracy to "clean up" the system, creating a functional, stable, and educated society before restoring democratic governance. Outside of the civic matters, however, is very pragmatic 
economically, 
culturally and 
diplomatically.
Cleaning Up
The Basics
Clean-Up Centrism recognizes that unchecked polarization and extremism can undermine democratic institutions, turning them into tools of chaos rather than governance. Fragile 
democracies that can't handle stability and the rise of extremism are called 
"Dirty Democracies". When democracies are on the brink of collapse, decisive intervention is necessary to prevent further deterioration.
Dirty Democracy vs. Clean Democracy
A Dirty Democracy is a democratic system that, while maintaining elections and basic civil rights, is plagued by instability, polarization, and dysfunction. This occurs due to 
unchecked populism, 
extremist influences, 
media manipulation, or 
widespread political ignorance among the electorate. Instead of serving the public good, politics becomes a chaotic battleground where misinformation, 
corruption, and radicalization thrive.
A 
Clean Democracy is a democratic system that is stable, functional, and rational, where governance is based on informed decision-making rather than emotional manipulation or radical influences. It ensures that democracy is sustainable by removing or neutralizing forces that would destabilize it. Clean-Up Centrism aims to transform Dirty Democracies into Clean Democracies through temporary 
technocratic control and political education.
The Cleaning Part
A technocratic junta of impartial experts is installed to govern temporarily. This junta focuses on restoring stability, reforming broken institutions, and depoliticizing key sectors of society. The junta operates above partisan politics, basing decisions solely on practical and evidence-based solutions rather than ideological leanings.
Extremist groups are systematically dismantled through measures such as imprisonment and censorships. The ideology views these actions as regrettable but necessary to protect the greater good. Efforts are made to rehabilitate individuals who are drawn to extremist ideologies, steering them back toward constructive societal roles.
During the suspension period, the junta oversees a comprehensive and unbiased political education program aimed at teaching citizens how to engage critically with political processes and recognize manipulative rhetoric. By raising awareness and fostering critical thinking, the population becomes equipped to make informed voting decisions when democracy is restored.
Once extremist threats are neutralized and the population is adequately educated, democratic governance is reinstated. The reintroduced system is designed to be more resilient, functional, and effective, having eliminated the factors that previously endangered its integrity. In other words, the once unstable Dirty Democracy is now a Clean Democracy.
The Radicalism Meter
It is a system designed to classify ideologies into levels based on their degree of extremism, influence on polarization, and potential threat to societal stability. By distinguishing between harmless political diversity and dangerous radicalism, the meter allows the centrist junta to focus its efforts on the true threats to democracy while avoiding unnecessary suppression of moderate voices.
Level 0 - The Apoliticals, the grillers, the apathetic guys, you know them. These people are outside the political spectrum and pose no threat to stability. Their apathy might be addressed through political education programs to encourage informed participation in the future. They don't NEED to be political, they just need to know what extremism is and despise it.
Level 1 - Comprising 
social democrats, 
liberals, 
conservatives, and other centrist and reasonable 
alternatives 
. These are the pillars of functional democracy and align with the junta's goals of pragmatic, evidence-based governance.
Level 2 - 
Left-wing and 
right-wing populists who are not radicals themselves but fuel polarization and enable the rise of more extreme ideologies. Nothing wrong with populism per se, it can even be 
beneficial 
, but it is generally done in a negative way. They are acknowledged as contributors to instability and division but not inherently dangerous. The junta seeks to weaken their influence while addressing their grievances to prevent escalation.
Level 3 - These are individuals and movements that lean heavily into ideology but lack the dogmatic extremism of Level 4. Generally Pragmatic 
Authoritarians and 
Libertarians who are not THAT extreme. They should be treated with caution, as their ideologies could tip into extremism if unchecked. They may be allies if their goals align with stability, but their power is kept in check.
Level 4 - 
Fascists, 
Stalinists, 
anarchists, and other hardcore ideologues who challenge the centrist order and advocate for systems that are inherently destabilizing. These ideologies should be seen as threats to democracy and society. If their influence is substantial, censorship and other methods are used to diminish their impact.
Level 5 - The most dangerous extremists, including 
Nazis, 
Pol Potists and others who either directly engage in or advocate for acts of terror or mass violence. They don't even NEED to be that ideologically extreme, at the moment someone commited an act of extreme violence in the name of an ideology, they can be labeled as a Level 5 threat.
The Five Signs Of Extremism
To determine if someone qualifies as an extremist, Clean-Up Centrism not only uses the system mentioned above, but it also uses the following criteria:
Absolutism In Belief: Extremists believe they are 100% right and everyone else is either blind, corrupt, or evil. They reject compromise and view their ideology as the only valid path.
Demonization of Opponent: Extremists dehumanize political enemies rather than engaging in rational debate. They use loaded language, calling opponents "traitors," "scum," "cockroaches," etc.
Anti-Democracy: Not all anti-democrats are extremists, of course. Hell, some 
autocrats were hunting extremists. However, more often then not, they are radicals themselfs for pretty obvious reasons. 
Totalitarians, anarchists, ya' know 'em.
Call for Violence or Unrest: Extremists promote riots, coups, terrorism, or assassinations. It can either be a riot, a storm in the parliment (
coff 
coff) or full on murderous tendency. If it is the later, then it will be a Level 5 threat.
Cult Mentality: Extremists refuse to criticize their own ideology or accept opposing views. They follow a leader, theory, or movement blindly, dismissing all counterarguments as propaganda.
How much of an extremist the individual is will depend on how much signs of extremism they showed (obviously), so, If someone bingo'd this, congratulation! You will get shot in the basement. If not, expect censorship or arrest.
- Absolutism In Belief: 2 Points
- Demonization of Opponents: 2 Points
- Anti-Democracy: 3 Points
- Cult Mentality: 3 Points
- Call for Violence:
- Inciting Minor Violence: 2 Points
- Participating in Riots: 3 Points
- Coordinating Political Violence: 4 Points
- Terrorism and Insurrection: 5 Points
Well, that's surely a good organization, but how do we punish those extremists? Calm down, Jimmy, 'cause the action taken will depend on the amount of points the man got. We won't punish someone with 
3 Points in the same way I will deal with someone with 
12 Points.
- 0 Points: Nothing to worry about.
2 Points: Mild guy, maybe what it takes to impede them from falling into extremism be political education.
3-5 Points: Has some extremist tendencies but is not fully committed to radicalism. Some monitoring or soft censorship can be helpful.
6-8 Points: Strongly ideological, resistant to compromise, and influential. Go to the blacklist, and a political ban may be in order
9-11 Points: Actively promotes radical beliefs and may pose a threat. That's hard censorship for you, and re-education is in order! If troublesome enough, arrest.
12+ Points: A lunatic. Fully radicalized and dangerous, with violent or anti-democratic tendencies. Imprisoment for life, exile and execution are in order.
The Other Ideological Stuff
Soap Economy
Money is good, money is pretty good. And is always good to be responsable on how to increase safely our profits without making it laissez-faire and proceed to go to the hands of few 
oligarchs so it will end up controlled economy at the end of the day. A responsible economy will gradually open it's economy to be freer and have more opportunities without going full 
Boris Yeltsin and screw up everything.
● 
Economic Rights: There are fundamental rights for people in the world of the commerce. Right to enterprise, right to freely trade with whoever you want, right to unionize, the right to compete in the regional, national and international market, the right to economic safety and others. A good government is able to grant all of these for it's citizens, giving a chance for anyone to be rich!
● 
Global Profit: Why restrict the economy just within our borders? There are lots of countries that need investments, and why not help to elevate their infrastructure while we enrich ourselfs? And that while our people enjoy to receive those totally not supervised Xiomis and Iphones while we receive the profits of importation too.
● 
Enviromental Taxes: While profit is good, not dying for inhailing carbon like oxygen with no trees to absorb and killing our planet sounds good too, so there is a $70 Carbon Tax.
Worker Appeasers
Some right-wing idiots believe that "oPpREss wORkeRs = ProFiT", or they are just sadistic assholes. But this amount of oppression will only lead to further problems, because oppressed workers will understandibly go towards dangerous ideologies, like 
Communism. So it's much more smarter and ethical to just give in for some of it's demands and work on a Safe Net for them.
● 
Worker Appeaser #1: I don't know why the heck countries like 
USA don't have goddamn healthcare, it's just so basic! Oh no, wait, I know why.... ANyways, it's important for the healthcare system be FUNCTIONAL, so the workers will see that the taxes are going somewhere other than in the pockets of politicians and will embrace it.
● 
Have A Voice: Unions are there to be the mouth of many workers, and surpress their voices will only grow ressentment. Looking at you, 
Elon. So enable these voices to be heard will be enough. We don't even need to attend to all of their demands, just give in compromises.
Sanitizer Diplomacy
What is 
"Sanitizer Diplomacy"? It's simple: being cooperative and friendly with Clean Democracies, offering assistence to Dirty Democracies so they can fix things up more effectively (and owing support for you), be pragmatic dealing with 
Authoritarian countries and clean extreme neighbors.
● 
Opportunistic Neutrality: Choosing a side generally means that you will miss half of the fun. Why botter with "Western Democracy" or "Eastern Might" when you can just profit from both sides and mind our own business? Diplomacy must be made in a way that benifits my country in a healthy way, and two massive blocs wanting to get on our good side is a massive opportunity to make profit.
● 
Good Neighbor Policy 2.0: 
Brazil is the strongest and richest of South America, but it barely has leadership role, even if the others call the country the "Leader Of Latin America". Negotiate with our close hermanos is a benefical way to improve OUR image as regional leaders and as a global player.
● 
Muds In The Continent: I'm no military hawk, but when a country is unstabilizing your borders with such a extremist zeal, you have to do something about. Instead of pulverizing them, the best appraoch would be making defense pacts with it's bordering neighbors that are suffering from micro-agressions and make economic pressure to make them more cooperative and stop with it's extremist ideals. If they do be cooperative, then less of an extreme threat to unstabilize your borders. If not, then make them regret to even have radical views when you take their capital. Of course, you need first to be more.... realistic when measuring your country's manpower with the enemy's.
● 
Too Far To Clean: When dealing with stronger or more distant extreme countries, make economic deals with them, it will benefit you anyways, but NEVER praise them in the international community. Never let their ideals go into your borders. It's all just business, no ideals.
The National, The Cultural and The Racial
● 
Cooperative Patriotism: All nations have something to offer to the world. I'm not talking about bombs or tanks. I'm talking about food, energy, materials, lessons, virtues, cultures and more. The fact that your country has a role in the international community is a reason to be 
patriotic. That's why you should never feel like your country is worthless. No matter how bad things are, things will get better for your nation. Some Brazilians think that our country is a failure. Why would we think in this way? Regional leaders of South America who will step in when things get messy, best military of the Southern Hemisphere and a important source of food for hundreds of peoples. Sure our nation worth something.
● 
Intercultural Harmony: No culture is better than the other. Of course, we are going to prioritize OUR national culture, as it's our duty as a nation, but just remember that there are many cultures in the world, all as beautiful as your own, there are no "uncivilized mongrels" in the world. So, there is nothing wrong with someone of other cultures immigrate into your country and continue to practice most of their customs (as long as they remember in what country they are, as they will have to remember some laws are different). But is important to know that they remain a minority. If not, then Brazil, no, ANY country would leave their essence, identiy, and wither become an unoriginal culture of a dominant culture or just a gray mix of multiple peoples.
● 
Racial Democracy: C'mon, what the hell being racist will get you into? Why the hell your skin tone should matter in making approaches? Whatever your skin colour is, black, white, yellow, brown, we are just humans. You can have the same culture and customs as me, the same job as me, the same conditions as me, the same values as me. Racism is the greatest of all prejudices, the greatest of all dogmas, and the greatest of all extremes, and a federal crime. The fact that there are racist sites openly declaring their disdain to other """races""" and get away with it angers me to no end.
Relations
My relations and opinions largely remained the same from 
Centrism J-Side, so I will just copy paste most of them.
Clean As A Whistle
Washed Up
Decent Enough?
Dirty
Trash Can
Clean As A Whistle.
● 
100 Axes Model: That's it. That's the best model ever! Look how complex yet so undertandable this model is! AMAZING!
● 
Cosmic Values: Hell yeah! An incredibely complete model that promotes a LOT of values for only a single axe. Albeit it needs to have some more axes, it is very, VERY good! (Credits to 
Lunaceianism for making this model.)
● 
9 Axes Model: Not complex enough, but a good first step for newbies in politics by being less "intimidating".
● 
10 Groups: What is better than one compass regarding just economics? 10 COMPASSES!
Washed Up
● 
Radar Model: Nolan Model made right.
Decent Enough?
● 
Political Cube: A more complicated version of the 8Values.
● 
Political Triangle: Pretty complex, detailed, hold a good variety of ideologies and, while having only three "axes", it has 6 "sub-axes", which already makes it better than the Political Compass, but there are some visible problems here.
- Where the hell are the Libertarian leftists?
- Progressivism and confederalism shouldn't be on the "democracy" section. One is a cultural idea and the other a federal idea, not civic ones.
- Not necessariely all monarchies are rightists, look it up.
- Separatism counts here? Pretty sure it can be placed, like, every single political entity depending on the separatist group.
Dirty
● 
Nolan Model: Isn't this, like, a fusion between Political Compass and the Horseshoe Theory?
● 
8Values: Better than the Political Compass, but really? Just four axes?
● 
Political Compass: A good evolution from the Horizontal Line, but still pretty simplistic with only the economic and civic axis.
Trash Can
● 
Left/Right Spectrum: How the hell can people actually believe in this outdated, simplistic theorem? Where is my Nazbols? Where is my Ancaps? Pathetic!
● 
Ramp Model: Just bullshit rightist theorem. At least the Horizontal Line is impartial.
● 
Fishhook Theory: We are NOT sympathizers of the far-left/far-right!
● 
Horseshoe Theory: The radicals are equally harmful, but are not literally the same! And you utilize the Horizontal Line bullshit as a base!
Post-Political Singularity: The worst OF THE WORST! Clean As A Whistle.
● Lunaceianism - Albeit a little too progressive, your ideals are VERY good in pretty much all the other areas! Protecting minority rights? Recognizing the Tolerance Paradox? Rejection of extremism? Syncretic policies in economics, geopolitics and social and civic issues? Rejection of stupid conspiracy theories? Promotion of rationality and putting aside dogma? Having a political perception just as complete as mine? That's incredible!
● 
Kuzism - This guy gets it! Welfare state, moderate progressivism, anti-racism and responsable politics, what do you don't have? The Business-Farmer Council system also sounds like a really good idea, even if I'm more of an industrialist guy.
● 
Savoinism 
- A centrist democratic tecnocrat? Unusual, but pretty good. Your rejection of extreme ideas like Communism and Fascism is also admirable.
● 
Lilacist Democracy - Welfarist, check. Liberal, check. Moderate, check. Good, you passed the Based Test.
● 
Proto-Willimism - Oh, another centrist pragmatist who knows the dangers of extremism and radicalism. Not too sure about distributionism, but cool, notheless. Another good example of Third Positionist. See ya in Cisplatina.
● 
Aquilenism - Economic pragmatism? Very cool. Glad you don't support the Right's greatest shame in Brazil, even if I wouldn't call him a reactionary, just a pretty stupid traditionalist.
● 
Pensamiento de Champi - Social democrata baseado que no necesita de radicalismo.
● 
Dirtbag Center-Left - Ah yes, someone with a good dark sense of humor but still respectful. Somewhat me.
● 
2x2Masterism - I really dislike libertarianism, but hey, at least you also dislike cultural wars and is pretty centrist in other axis.
● 
Happiness thought - Screw Communism! Screw Fascism! Screw Anarchism! SCREW RADICALISM!
● 
Brazilian Liberalism - We have very similar ideals. 
Anti-Radicalism, Welfarism, 
Cultural Liberalism and 
pragmatic foreign policy. I just think you are a little too harsh on immigrants, as second generational immigrants should already be able to vote and only be deported when charged by a core international crime (rape, torture, etc.). Despite this, we are pretty similar.
● .png){kind=small}
Midskism (Updated) - Ah! Knocked more sense now, uh? What can I say, techno-populism can be quite beneficial for the populance, peaceful diplomacy beneficial for the globe, and a pragmatic view beneficial for the economy. Russia would be better under your system.
● Centrism J-Side - Ah, my past self. Maybe it's time to be a little more active in protecting centrist values than just follow the 
Overton Window all of the time. Despite that, I'm generally still you ASIDE from the Cleaning part.
● 
Snowism - That's a nice ideology, 
Fruit Juice! Pro-democracy, welfare and more. Though, you are pretty interventionist and frankly, you should be more tough with internal extremists.
● 
Neoradical Liberalism - We have incredibly similar views on the 
economic and cultural axis, as well as a good, but not that pragmatic, diplomatic style. However, incentive the military industrial may not be a good idea and I'm a not a big fan of populism.
● 
Neo-Dirigisme - Aside of the "upgrading the human body" part, I agree with pretty much everything in your page. Be it the healthy class cooperation, the synthesis of regulation and free market to protect the small business, promotion of green technology and, of course, authoritarian measures towards extreme ideologies.
● 
Opkedism - Ah, a more realistic liberal warhawk. I really appreciate your respect for liberty, equality and fraternity. I'm not too sure about your whole interventionist thing, but you seem determined to make the countries of the Middle East much more stable under your realistic approach towards re-democratization.
● 
Frosxabytism - That's actually a pretty solid ideology. A truly 
Clean Democracy example of proper governance and freedom, just the right amount of regulation in the File:Ordlib.png economy to stop 
corporate monopolies, balanced policies on the issue of migration and immigration (though at least one crime, no matter how small, being a reason to deport may be a little too harsh), 
secular institutions and variability on energy means are very beneficial. Also, your philosophy that one can be File:Altruist.png altruistic while being 
individualist is pretty on point, which is promoted by your combination of 
pragmatism and 
idealism (though I am not actually idealistic). In the military matters, the only thing I disagree is irredentism, but I do believe that you already see that, as you say that it can only be achieved in opportune circumstances (but it must be the duty of the diplomats, not the military). But... please don't promote "neo-eugenics", please... Despite that, pretty solid ideology.
● 
Neoradical Republicanism - Why yes, a fellow defensive democracy who aims to remodel American democracy to a true "Land of the Free", with no extremists aiming to undermine the system. I long was fan of the 
German model of parlimentarism, and you seem to have the same opinion as mine in that topic. We also have in mind a program to educate the people on politics, even if I'm not limited to school and childrens, as there are still so many adults in need of that. Our economic and diplomatic axis are almost the same, even if you are (obviously) a lot more 
pro-West and hawkish, and in social topics, we are both pretty moderate, even if I'm not all in for the legalization of cannabis and other drugs. In short, we are 90% similar. Good one, bro.
Washed Up
● 
Donutzism - I'm fine and even supportive in relation of 
Georgism and 
Distributism, and I'm very supportive of your 
enviromental awareness and 
class cooperation. However, I remain wary of your 
cultural traditionalist view of how things should be, plus 
militarization of society is not beneficial in a world where civil matters are more important than shows of force. And there is also the weird "go back to the countryside" thing. Not belittling the role of the agrarian life, but maybe we should just remain with urbanism to increase economic and industrial incentives, and the life in urban cities is not monotonous, you just have to look into ways to entertain yourself in a developed area. Good things that you are 
socially inclusive ideals, like Anti-Racism and 
native protection, otherwise, you would probably be a semi-radical on my book.
● 
Mauricioism - Alright, let me be clear: Chicago economics are incredibly volatile and chaotic, the poor will be poorer, and radicalism will rise. However, you seem to be a lot more pragmatic than the other followers of this same market, even if still bad. Healthcare, enviromental taxes and unions are polocies that I fully suport. Also, we have similar opinions on Brazilian politics, hating both Lula and Bolsonaro, agreeing that Itamar Franco was one of the best presidents and, while I am not that hostile towards them, I understand your beef with the Centrão.
● Midskism (Dated) - Albeit a little TOO leftist for my taste, looks like you are pretty pragmatic enough to notice the dangers of extremism in all sides and the technocracy-populist synthesis looks like a good idea with the elections of fully capable people. I'm just a little baffled with the idea of toppling the American and Chinese governments, as reform within the system is the most desirable method.
Decent Enough?
● 
Neo-Scorpism - Most of it's ideas, like true equality, free market (even if temporary) and anti-culture war, are good, but a little too anti-western to my taste, and i'm not sure about Socialism (especially the statist variation) or Tridentism, as they are not present on the Overton Window. At least it believes that the economic axis and market axis are separate.
● 
Markez Thought - Good principiles of social state and interesting economic model, but i'm not sure if it's better than Social Democracy or Liberalism. Also, you are a little too enthusiatic about cooperating with an authoritarian state like Russia.
● 
Aploism 
- Good cultural and economic policies. Not so good civic policies. Remember, authority should be the means and democracy the end.
● 
Narco-Aploism - Same as the one above, but stereotypically hippie
● 
Ilunaticism - Wholesome 100 Chungus Mussolini. In all seriousness, though, I am not too sure about a full-on not transitional Technocracy and overly regulatory economy of Corporatism.
● 
Carangejoism - Se caragejo peixe é, então economia de extrema-direita fede tanto quanto peixe.
● 
Niiloism - Fever dream as an ideology lol.
● 
Bread and Circuses Thought - Jânio Quadros' Thought, you say?
Dirty
● 
Jadedism - Looks like you've got an incredibely professional ideology. Congrats, but that doesn't mean I agree with most of it. I am not necessarially a big fan of State Capitalism or any other overly planned economy, as this will just increase economic stagnation. Sure, some regulation is needed to healthcare and public works, but mostly just to stop monopolies of big corporations. Over regulation will just transfer this monopoly to the State. The EFD sounds like a good source to see the equality of rend to see if the economy is just enough to everyone have electricity, but the GDP should still be the primary way of measuring the economy by the capital flux. Other problem is your climate scepticism, which denies the basic studies of biology our modern society already understands and can see the affects. Of course, Green Energy may not be the most efficient energy, but pays off at the long run. I also find slightly weird you thinking that the "British Empire" still looms in the shadows, influecing the goddamn most powerful country in the world. Also, I understand your beef with 
Barack Obama, but does he really deserve to be down to history as one of the worst presidents of the US? Then he should contest with people like 
Woodrow Wilson and Herbert Hoover. However, your ideology is not all bad. I share your opinions on issues like Sex Work and gambling, as these are in fact some issues that lives in the U.S. and I support your foreign matters (thank you for supporting the BRICS), as this would make the United States less imperialistic and more altrustic (just cut off the "combat British imperialism" part), and this would improve relations with other superpowers and secure a future with no threat of a nuclear war. The best part of your ideology is your great commitiment to intranational and international projects that would be benefical to less fortune countries. My only problem with them would be the enviromental impact, so maybe wait it until the enviromental issues are mostly solved? Hands down, the most benefical of the projects would be the Transaqua Project and the Oasis Plan. In short, I mostly disapprove of most of your ideology, but you have an excellent foreign policy.
● 
Hendersonism - Somehow the opposite of the one above. Some of our policies are incredibly similar, especially the civic ideals. Albeit I do believe that direct technocratic intervention is needed, the "Cleaning Stage" can encompass the political reforms that you do belive, with the IMS and the ban of dangerous extremism from public office being especially integrated within my ideology. I 100% support egalitarian cohesion and, while I'm a little skeptical about abortion, as long as it's cheap and up to the states to decide, i'm fine with it. You seem to be believe in a more sustainable form of capitalism, with healthcare and green energy being enough to pacify the workers and the nature respectivelly, making a capitalist system where workers can work and succeed in life (and not become commies) and we don't need to worry too much about climate disasters destroying our beautiful land (and resources to be spend on idnustries), while also putting effort in technology (which equals money) and education (with useless subjects left behind, of course), I just think that Fiscal Conservatism is not that good, Social Liberalism is still better in my opinion. But then there is my main problem with you, diplomacy or just a New Manifest Destiny for you. Yeah, annexing Canada will be SO easy like we are in goddamn Fallout and WON'T rise tensions on NATO, and sure Greenland and Mexico should be part of the US, because "why not", and NO, Latin America should NOT be absorbed into the United States under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Furthermore, while I'm not so sympathetic with Russia, "cut them off 0f the benefits of civilization", "make them feel hungry" and "let them die alone and scarred" is NOT an acceptable thought. In stances, you have very good internal policies, but awful external policies. (And you are also a zenophobic progressives on what you view as "reactionary countries" like European countries (yeah, they are SO reactionary...), the Arabian nations and Russia).
Hendersonism - To be fair, my stances on Pan-Americanism as outlined on the page are like three months out of date. I support a loose confederation between the USA, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean nations, etc. (like, maybe a NATO-esque organization or an IGO or whatnot) at best now since they're too culturally distinct from the USA. This would allow my primary goal of securing North America at any cost/"Manifest Destiny 2" to be realized while also not invading everyone. I do support military action in Haiti, though, and also against cartels in Mexico. Also, I am not xenophobic against Euros; I simply see the need for them to remain under American dominance so they don't tear each other apart (which they are historically known for doing, save for Westphalia). I do, however, still despise Russia and MENA and I want them to bleed.
● 
Vanguard Hippie - I like your disdain for supporting important social causes like Feminism, LGBT and others, but really? Technologically regressive, purely hedonistic, Jacobinist and Anti-Humanist? That's not okay. Also, aren't you just Antidemocratic Hippieanism again?
No, I became more technology agnostic and discarded the vanguard party.
● 
Itapism - I'm sympathetic over your opposition to such a dangerous elements like 
Fascism and Communism, but I'm not a very big fan of Syndicalism, ESPECIALLY the 
National Syndicalist variation. Also, really? A traditionalist revolution doesn't sound good for me. Your positive stance for both 
Monarchism and a proletarian dictatorship are such a dirty idelas....
● 
Dark Minarchism - Let's see what I agree here... Economic globalization is a pretty affective diplo-economic model, there will always be 
Imperialists, Libleft-Libright cooperation, 
Technoliberalism, and.... that's it. Now for the things I disagree with. 
Laissez-faire economics, 
Economic Darwinism (which will TOTALLY not collapse), 
Neoreactionarism, whatever dystopian hell you are approving through 
corporate dominions and 
Minarchism.
● 
Oștism - You seem to have a pretty good understanding of the political situations of your country, which can be reflected on your semi-federal stance, and your ideals towards the LGBT and women rights are reasonable enough. However, Right-Wing Populism is a no go, and some of your opinions make you look a little bit with a Paleoconservative.
● 
Andrionism - You are a nice guy, but I really dislike your politics. Libertarianism? Traditionalism? EGOISM!? However, you seem to have a pretty reasonable foreign policy and on the stance on crime.
● 
Canorism 
- Not bad for a socialist, pragmatic enough, not a Stalinist, market socialist and not fully antagonizing traditionalism. However, you seem to be a little too internationalist with a Eurofederalist mindset and you are still a left-wing guy.
- Ermm im not a marksoc,i Simply belive in a short nep-like stage (for the most part i Simply belive in a kinda decentralized planned economy)
● 
Noocratic Socialism - Good opinions on the porn industry and crime, not bad for a conservative socialist. However, I'm afraid that our similarities end here. Socialism is already bad enough, plus that to a traditionalist noocracy that is quick to become a manipulative oligarchy and you get literally Venezula without populism.
Trash Can
● 
Lusoreactionaryism - Yeah..... There is some to empackage here. I'm okay with corporatism. Hell, I even praise some examples of the economic system. I also admire your ecological policy. But you turned into a ultramilitaristic and segregationist fascist. And yes, ethnopluralism is a segregationist and racist policy, don't even try to hide it under "equal rights, different approaches" that George Wallace praised. I would admire your turn-away from libertarianism if you didn't choose to follow it's equally dumb counterpart. (Also, your pro-Lula stance is quite.... interesting.)
● 
M48 Pattonism - You support despiteful 
laissez-faire and far-right economics, a minarchist civic attitude ready to collapse and an interventionist foreign policy that sure as hell is alarming. Do you REALLY think that 
Putin is a communist? That every 
socialist is going to automatically side with the 
communist dictatorships when you know as hell that the left does more infighting than anything else? I may dislike socialism, but I hate the usage of the "left = communist dictatorship supporter" mindset even more. Bold of you to assume that a democratic socialist will support 
Mao Zedong just because he is socialist too. Also, while I sympathize with your support of absolute free speech, I can't help but disagree with it since this will allow some vile ideals to take place in the minds of the people. You also tends to whitewash America's heinous acts, like that terrible 
Operation Condor, and is very questionable for a to support a fucking 
dictatorship. However, not all of your takes are garbage, as your moderate social stance and your 
anti-fascist and 
anti-communist opinions, and I am very happy you no longer support these totalitarian idiots in your """"redemption"""" story. But you are still in the trash can.
● 
Deivinism- What can I say? Reactionary, socialist (admit it) and anti-liberal. At least you are civically reasonable, but that's not saying much as every other belief is quite off the window.
● 
Kassuism - Anarcho-Capitalism, just as dysfunctional as communism and even more of a joke. I do believe that you guys are actual anarchist.... like this was supposed to be a good thing.
● 
Nitrism - An 
counter-eligntment reactionary guy who thinks we should return to the days were you must praise the King and follow every word of the bible or you go to the flames. Well, at least you are not a fascist anymore, but that's a really bad take of 
Internationalism.
● 
Ego-Libertarian Marxism - The extreme opposite from the Nazi above, and yet you still manages to be only SLIGHTLY better than him. Really? Ultraprogressivism? Communism? Egoism? Goddamn Satanic Atheism?! Back off, fucking commie!
● 
Belinism - Sorry kid, this is a constantly evolving house, so, no off-compass reactionarism.
● 
Meowxism - Far-left on everything? Hell, you should left this wiki too.
● 
Zelligism - What kind of drug were you high on when you wrote this page?
● 
HopesDarkness - List of things you don't like: civility, morality and society, three things that I support.
● 
Coco0330 Thought - Average Commie.
● 
Aryan Monarchism - A progressive Nazi... "Wonderful"....
● 
Lanceism - Hating LGBT, check. Hating Jews, check. Corporatist, check. Christian fundamentalist, check. Totalitarian, check. What are you, a 
Konstantin Rodzaevsky wannabe?
- Funny, I am a big fan of Konstantin Rodzaevsky.
● 
Vedocracy - Some antiquist, fundamentalist Pseudo-Hindu guy who wants the whole world crafted on his image, while killing anyone slightly out of the line? That's just Warhammer 40k 2: Revenge Of India!
● 
Meadowism - I am not sympathetic to Communism dogma, 
Post-Civilization ideals or just going 
Gotta Go Fast.
● .png){kind=small}
Abelism 
- URGH! And here I believed that 
Reactionary Populists were a thing of the past. Are you trying to simulate 
Rafael Trujilo or something? Someone who disguises his extremist views on "The Great Replacement" theories on 
Racial """Realism""", who is openly 
homophobic with "degeneracy" talking nonsense. You fail to realize that the 
SJW guys are only a minority on all of the communities, the 
LGBT, 
feminists and others. You generalize too much. Also, hint of the day: "AT LEAST I don't kill them like 
Hitler" is a really poor choice of words. A fucking 
Nazi in denial. Someone needs a cleaning, I see.
● 
Fukirianism - A cursed amalgamation of File:Insarch anarchic masses with 
brutal totalitarism, where the tyranny extends to not just one, but by disorganized masses, upholding irrational brutality to assume what they call "freedom" which is nothing more than individual tyranny, like a 
ochlocracy. A cursed amalgamation of Fascist rhetoric and 
Marxist practices, where both revolutionary violent methods to get what they want generates into needless violence. What a henious ideology...
● 
Cadetism - Just another Right-Wing Populist who is this close of turning into a full-on extremist. Far-right economics will just cut the benefits of the workers, which will snowball from ressentment, communist ideas and then revolutions. I don't actually care about your pro-life and pro-nuclear family thing, but discrimination against LGBT people and Trans may need to be corrected.
● 
Yatagarasism
- Only good take I found here is maybe the 
Council Democracy part and the need to critique to the Japanese work system. Conscripting every worker as a soldier is unhuman and incredibly reactionary "samurai style" view, as well as that disgusting 
Trostkyte doctrine. Oh, and you think that the modern 
Japanesefar-left has gone very inactive as it was a bad thing.
● 
N.Brionism - Ah yes, an open and proud Nazbol, taking whatever awful thing there is from the economic far-left and cultural far-right (nem ferrando isso é centro-esquerda culturalmente).
● 
Rowemonism - The fact that you are based on a terrorist commie group (even one as pathetic as "Let's Protest Against The G7 And Call It Revolutionary Effort" Student Band) already places you as a Level 5 extremist. A Trotskyist with nonsensical ideas of "world revolution" in the modern days, where every terrorist attack is quickly surpressed with no hopes of ever rising to something more than a lunatic groups of crackheads. The Chukaku-Ha can't even take an opportunity during the lockdown, goddamn it. Furthermore, your take on consent and "sexual liberation" is REALLY problematic. You are just a waste of human being. Defensive democracies like the one in don't do enough to surpress these fucking terrorist extremists six-feet under. If it was by my way, your frustrated student band would march with the Zatotukai in the death camps.
- damn, well you seem to be more knowledgeable about my org than I thought you would, surely I will make the org better trust me, world revolution is near.
● 
Neo-Zankism - An neo-Kraterocratic brute who still believes in the lies of meritocratic capitalism and their "survival of the fittest" economy. Fiscal conservatism will bring more chaos to the economy, reactionarism will just revert our progress in the social matters. The flawed philosophy of meritocratic capitalism is clear: the poor are weak, even if they are this way because of the lack of opportunity, and the elite are strong, even they just inherited their riches. Are you asking for a socialist revolution to pop up in such an unjust society of grudged workers?
Comments
Markez Thought 
- hi, how did you make the gif?
- Pixiliart allows me to create gifs.
Neo-Dirigisme - Add me plss [x]
Brazilian Liberalism - Update me [x]- I would like to know the point of maintaining democracy if the people’s political rights are limited?
- - What do you mean that the people's political rights are limited? As I said, the technocratic junta is TEMPORARY. People are going to vote anyways and (as long you are not a dangerous extremist), you are pretty much free to express whatever you want during the "Cleaning".
- And for you, what is a dangerous extremist after all?
- - A slightly influential person who harbors non-reasonable political views, like fascism or
communism. Political views that, not only are outside the 
Overton Window, but also are at the border of the 
Political Compass or even beyond. Emphasis on "influential", as I will not censor a random guy with a Discord group of five guys, expect me to wait 'till this group has 50 members.
Nitrism - Remove my two previous ideologies and add me [x]
Abelism 
- Add me [x]
- Add me pweasss [x]
Yatagarasism
- add please? [x]- Lunaceianism
I updated my icon. Please update all outdated icons to my new ones (V2) 
Oștist Progressivism - Add me back [x]- Hendersonism - And here I was thinking that I was the biggest fan of arbitrary categorism on this wiki. Add me or something. [x]
N.Brioism - Add me back [x]
Mauricioism - Add me? [x]
M48 Pattonism - Add me? [x]
- Brazilian Liberalism - DON'T ADD M48 PATTON. HE'S EVIL!1!1!1!1!1!1!
Andrionism - Add me? [x]
Cadetism Hi friend, I got a new ball could you change mine- Rowemonism - Add me in exchange, I added you btw. [x]
Canorism 
- Add me, (i added you) [x]
Neo-Zankism 
- Feel free to add me. [x]
Dark Egoism - Feel free to add me. [x]
Magnavium - how based am I broski?
Zankism - Add me. Also, Feel free to add my old version 
Proto-Zankism.
- bro call yourself moderate but get 10 in his radicality test. Literally living proof for fishhook theory 💀💀
- for example, i gave him 3 fo anti-democracy (even if fully technocratic junta is temporary, he still limits right to be radical and ridht to vote for radicals, and supports hierarchy of political knowledge), 2 for absolutism, cuz he believes pragmatism and centrism as absolute, and won’t compromises with radicals. 4 for coordinated political violence against radicals. and 1 for dehumanising opponents (but not too much, therefore not 2). he calls opponents “dogmatics”, “extremists” and “ideological”.
- - """Extremism""" in defense of moderatism is no vice, got it?
- for example, i gave him 3 fo anti-democracy (even if fully technocratic junta is temporary, he still limits right to be radical and ridht to vote for radicals, and supports hierarchy of political knowledge), 2 for absolutism, cuz he believes pragmatism and centrism as absolute, and won’t compromises with radicals. 4 for coordinated political violence against radicals. and 1 for dehumanising opponents (but not too much, therefore not 2). he calls opponents “dogmatics”, “extremists” and “ideological”.
Noocratic Socialism - Add me? [x]
Frosxabytism - Add me? [x]
Neoradical Republicanism - Add me and I can add you back. [x]
Neo-Marshravenism - Add me
