Research Article


DOI :10.26650/iutd.756209   IUP :10.26650/iutd.756209    Full Text (PDF)

Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel

Yeşim Dilek

The concept of the ‘eye’ denotes much more in the ancient Near East than an organ that enabling sight in living creatures. The origin of the belief that the eye possesses certain powers originates from ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, and regions neighboring Israel. The eye discharged key symbolic roles and was attributed dualist qualities in the spiritual existence of the ancient people: eyes could be good or evil, divine and or devilish, protective or destructive. The duplexity of features attached to the eye caused it to appear in nearly all significant religious works reflecting the beliefs of the people of that period including written texts, sculptures, iconography, sacred objects, amulets, and prayers. These early societies generally lacked scientific and technological knowledge and tended to accord symbolic meaning to all extraordinary phenomena they encountered. Their lives and beliefs were thus steered by their beliefs. The symbolic connotations devised for the eye, which these societies created and attached to. It persist in some present-day societies.

DOI :10.26650/iutd.756209   IUP :10.26650/iutd.756209    Full Text (PDF)

Eski Yakındoğu’da Göz Sembolizmi ve Düalizm: Mezopotamya, Mısır ve İsrail

Yeşim Dilek

Antik Yakındoğu’da ‘göz’ kavramı canlıların görmesini sağlayan bir organ olmanın ötesinde çok farklı anlamlar ifade etmektedir. İyi ve kötü, ilahi ve şeytani, koruyucu ve yıkıcı gibi düalist güçlere sahip olduğuna inanılan göz, antik çağ insanının yaşamını şekillendiren dini hayatında oldukça önemli sembolik rollere sahip olmuştur. Göze yüklenen çift yönlü bu özellikler onu, o dönem insanının inançlarını yansıtan yazılı metin, heykel, ikonografi, kutsal obje, koruyucu muska ve dua gibi dini anlam içeren tüm eserlerde bir şekilde yer almasına neden olmuştur. Bilim ve teknoloji bilgisinden büyük ölçüde uzak olan bu toplumlar, her karşılaştıkları olağanüstü duruma sembolik bir anlam yükleme eğiliminde olmuşlardır ve dolayısıyla yaşam biçimlerini inançları doğrultusunda yönetmiş ve yönlendirmişlerdir. Bu toplumların yarattıkları ve anlam yükledikleri gözün sembolik çağrışımlarına bazı günümüz toplumlarında dahi inanılmaktadır. Gözün belirli güçlere sahip olduğuna duyulan inancın kökeni, Antik Mezopotamya, Mısır ve komşu bölgelerden İsrail’e kadar uzanmaktadır.


EXTENDED ABSTRACT


Dualism is both a religious and a philosophical doctrine that is measured by these two principles of the origin of the universe and the creative power of all beings. The phenomenon of dualism forms the building block of the beliefs and religious systems of some societies. Dualism describes polar distinctions such as good and evil, chaos and order, admiration and fear, or life and death, these binary particularities are critical elements for individuals who exist solely in accordance with their beliefs. The Mesopotamian and Levant societies are among the ancient Near East civilizations that most reflected dualism in their religious lives. The ancient Egyptian bidirectional view of was based on harmony and balance and was quite different from the other two civilizations mentioned above.

Ancient Egyptians learned from their lives and reasons for living to create balanced system that blended the good and the bad to achieve integrity that would lead them to the ultimate eternal goal. The conception of the numinous in these three civilizations can help to elucidate their divergent belief systems, lifestyles, and worldview issue. In turn, these differences can clarify their apprehensions of dualism and explain the dual features of the eye symbol. The significance of the notions of the evil eye and the divine protective eye in the Ancient Near East can thus be elucidated.

Scrutiny of sources expressing the phenomenon of dualism pertaining to the symbolism of the eye in the Ancient Near East societies clarifies that such a conception, which included the idea of the evil and the divine eye originated in these three early societies. 

Certain norms mandated by the religious beliefs of ancient Mesopotamian societies, and the lifestyles of the people living in thesis region led to their perceptions of the universe to also be divided and demarcated with clear boundaries. These societies could not balance the good and the bad because of their beliefs and thus created a dualist reality constituted by their conception of the universe at its center. Assessing the symbolism of the eye enables the awareness that Mesopotamian society approached its symbolic value in a double-sided manner, focusing more on negative effects. Most experts, believe that the concept of the evil eye belief emerged from ancient Mesopotamia and spread to surrounding areas. Written documents and archaeological data reveal that the people of Sumer, who are believed to be the first inhabitants of the region, initiated, continued, and extended this belief.

According to Mesopotamian societies, the demons created by the sky god An represented the principal source of the evil eye because they caused all kinds of diabolic events. Thus, the evil eye was believed to cause diseases, famines, disasters, and other damage to human lives and livelihoods. Mesopotamians used magic, prayer, ritual, and most commonly, eye-shaped amulets to ward off or avoid the evil eye. The concept of the eye can also be associated with gods, even though this connection was uncommon in Ancient Mesopotamian societies where communities that accorded predominance to the negative aspect of the symbolic eye. The notion of the all-seeing and justice-meting eye was predominantly associated with the sky god, An; the moon god Nanna / Sin, sky gods such as the sun god Utu/ Šamaš, and Enlil, one of the most important gods of the pantheon,; and Marduk , the chief god of the Babylonian period.

The Egyptians perceived the universe differently from Mesopotamian society, Egyptians and thus focused more on the positive side of life evaluating all dualist approaches through harmony. They also emphasized the protective aspect of the symbolic eye Nonetheless, the existence of the evil eye belief in this society can be particularly understood through myths and iconographies. Horus myths and the use of the wedjat eye in the form of amulets most clearly evidence the existence of this belief. Like the Mesopotamians, the Egyptians believed the evil eye to threaten health, family, unity, and especially children. Like the Mesopotamians, they used prayers, spells, and amulets to ward off this evil power. The difference between the Egyptian conception of the evil eye and the Mesopotamian concerned the latter’s belief that the evil eyes of human beings could also cause damage to others. 

The relationship of the eye with the divine world can be observed most clearly in ancient Near Eastern civilizations in Egypt, in the idea of the protective eye. First, the eye was associated with the sun and the moon which were the most prominent celestial bodies of the sky. It attained its protective quality through this association, which was disseminated through varied versions of myths. Egyptian literature encompasses numerous eye-related narratives such as the escape and return of the eye goddess of Ra, the creation of human beings from the tears of the creator god, and the wounding of Horus' eye by Seth. The emergence of these stories and their connections with worldly life revealed the protective role and importance of the eye in ancient Egyptian society. 

Distinct differences like those observed in Mesopotamia attract attention when the approach of the Israeli citizens to the religious dimension of dualism, is noted in which the period after the society converted to monotheism. The religious beliefs of the people of Israel are founded on the acceptance of Yahweh as the only God, and all religious developments are collected in the Old Testament along with the teachings. The dualism between good and evil is evident in the Old Testament, in which a single phenomenon is referenced as good, and a two-dimensional evil embodies sin. Good emanates firmly and directly from God. Conversely, evil is vested in the devil, who was created by God for certain reasons. Evil may also be sourced from the wicked ideas inherent in human beings. 

The sacred values of Judaism do not allow visual representations. Hence, all inferences of eye symbolism must be based on the foundational text, the Old Testament. This holy book contains many positive and negative references to the symbolic features of the eye. First, this belief is evidenced in the assertion that the evil eye originates from as the negative emotions of people, for instance, mischief and jealousy. Moreover, the positive symbolic features attributed to the eye are used metaphorically in the Old Testament. Among these references is the divine eye that first sees, knows and represents justice as the eye of God.


PDF View

References

  • Akalın, K.H., “Yahve ve Kenan Tanrıları”, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, XIV/1 (2012), s. 85-103. google scholar
  • Alter, R., Genesis: Translation and Commentary, W. W. Norton, New York 1996. google scholar
  • Aydın, F., “Bir Sessizliğin ya da Yhvh’nin Tarihi (YHVH’nin Telaffuz Edilmeme Olgusu Uzerine Bir Araştırma)”, Usul, sayı 2 (2004), s. 103-128. google scholar
  • Bianchi, U., “Dualism”, ed. M. Eliade, The Encyclopedia of Religion, IV, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York 1987, 506-512. google scholar
  • Black J.- A. Green, Mezopotamya Mitolojisi Sözlüğü. Tanrılar İritler Semboller, Köprü Kitapları, İstanbul 2017. google scholar
  • Borghouts, J. F., “The Evil Eye of Apopis”, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, vol. 59 (1973), s. 114-150. google scholar
  • Bottero, J. - S. N. Kramer, Mezopotamya Mitolojisi, çev. Alp Tümertekin, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2017. google scholar
  • Budge, W., From Fetish to God in Ancient Egypt, Oxford University Press, London 1934. google scholar
  • ________, Amulets and Superstitions, with 22 plates and 300 Text Illustrations, New York 1978. google scholar
  • ________, Antik Mısır Edebiyatı, çev. Selin Albayrak, Atlantis Yayınevi, İzmir 2016. google scholar
  • ________, Antik Mısır’da Ölüm Sonrası Yaşam ve Tanrılar çev. Şebnem Duran, Lilith Yayıncılık, İzmir 2018. google scholar
  • Demirci, K., Eski Mezopotamya Dinlerine Giriş Tanrılar, Ritüel, Tapınak, Ayışığı Kitapları, İstanbul 2013. google scholar
  • Dilek, Y., Eski Mezopotamya Dini Ritüelleri ve Kullanılan Objeler, Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, İstanbul 2019. google scholar
  • Durie, L. Dualism in Jewish Apocalyptic and Persian Religion, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Stellenbosch University, 2012. google scholar
  • Durkheim, E., Dini Hayatın İlkel Biçimleri, Ataç Yayınları, İstanbul 2005. google scholar
  • Eliade, M., Babil Simyası ve Kozmolojisi, çev. Mehmet Emin Özcan, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul 2002. google scholar
  • ________, Dinler Tarihine Giriş, çev. Lale Arslan Özcan, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul 2014. google scholar
  • Elliott, J. H., Beware the Evil Eye the Evil Eye in the Bible and the Ancient World, Vol 1: Introduction, Mesopotamia and Egypt, Wipf and Stock Publishers, Oregon 2015. google scholar
  • ________, Beware the Evil Eye the Evil Eye in the Bible and the Ancient World, Vol 3: The Bible and Related Sources, Wipf and Stock Publishers, Oregon 2016. google scholar
  • ________, The Evil Eye with modifications in The Ancient Mediterranean Social World: A Sourcebook, ed. Zeba Crook, Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids 2016. google scholar
  • Elworthy, F. T., The Evil Eye an Account of This Ancient Widespread Supersitition, Murray, London 1895. google scholar
  • Evans M. J., “The Middle Assyrian Period”, Beyond Babylon: Art, Trade and Diplomacy in the Second Millenium B.C., ed. Joan Aruz, Kim Benzel, Jean M. Evans, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York Yale University Press, New Haven and London 2008. google scholar
  • Fohrer, G., History of Israelite Religion. S.P.C.K, London 1973. google scholar
  • Ford, J. N., “Ninety-Nine by the Evil eye and One from Natural Causes”, KTU2 1.96 in its Near Eastern Context, Ugarit-Forschungen, sayı 30 (1998), s. 201-278. google scholar
  • Frankfort, H., Ancient Egyptian Religion, Columbia University Press, New York 1948. google scholar
  • ________, Kingship and the Gods, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1978. google scholar
  • Frazer, J. G., The Golden Bough: A Study of Magic and Religion, vol. I, Second Edition, Macmillan and Co. Ltd, London 1900. google scholar
  • Gershman, B., “The economic origins of the evil eye belief”, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, sayı 110 (2015), s. 119-144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo 12.002. google scholar
  • Ginzburg, L., The Legends of the Jews, The Jewish Publication Society of America, Philadelphia 1913. google scholar
  • Goff, B. L., Symbols of Prehistoric Mesopotamia, Yale University Press, New Haven and London 1963. google scholar
  • Heidel, A, Enüma Eliş Babil Yaratılış Destanı, çev. İsmet Birkan, Ayraç Yayınevi, Ankara 2000. google scholar
  • Hornung, E., Kadim Mısır Ötedünya Kitapları, çev. Zehra Aksu Yılmazer, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul 2006. google scholar
  • Irigaray, C., “The Eye of Horus: An Initiation into Pharaonic Wisdom”, https://www.academia.edu/33249747/ The_Eye_of_Horus_An_Initiation_into_Pharaonic_Wisdom_Parts_I-III, 2017, s. 1-20. google scholar
  • Işık, H., “Kitab-ı Mukaddes ve Kur’an’a Göre Şeytan”, Bozok Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi [BOZİFDER], sayı 13 (2018), s. 35-74. google scholar
  • Jacobsen, T., Karanlığın Hazineleri, çev. Sibel Erduman, Paris Yayınları, İstanbul 2017. google scholar
  • Kotze, Z., “A Case of the Evil Eye in Genesis 16:4-5: A Social-Scientific Serspective”, HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, 73 (3), s. 1-6. google scholar
  • Kramer, S. N., Sumer Mitolojisi, çev. Hamide Koyukan, Kabalcı Yayınevi, İstanbul 2001. google scholar
  • Limmer A. S., The Social Functions and Ritual Significance of Jewelry in the Iron age II Southern Levant, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, The University of Arizona, Arizona 2007. google scholar
  • Lurker, M., The Gods and Symbols of Ancient Egypt, Thames and Hudson, London 1980. google scholar
  • Otto, R., Kutsal’a Dair, Altıkırkbeş Yayınları, İstanbul 2014. google scholar
  • Petazzoni, R., The All-Knowing God, Methuen&Co. Ltd., London 1956. google scholar
  • Pinch, G., Magic in Ancient Egypt, University of Texas Press, Austin 1994. google scholar
  • ________, Mısır Mitolojisi, çev. Ekin Duru, Say Yayınları, İstanbul 2019. google scholar
  • Seawright, H. L., The symbolism of the eye in Mesopotamia and Israel, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Laurier University, Ontario 1988. google scholar
  • Tevrat, Dorlion Yayınları, Ankara 2018. google scholar
  • Thomsen, M. Louise. “The Evil Eye in Mesopotamia”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, LI/1, The University of Chicago Press, 1992, s. 19-32. google scholar
  • Ulmer, R., The Evil Eye in the Bible and in Rabbinic Literature, Ktav Publishing, Hoboken, NJ 1994. google scholar
  • ________, “The Divine Eye in Ancient Egypt and in the Midrashic Interpretation of Formative Judaism”, Journal of Religion & Society, vol. 5, 2003, s. 1-17. google scholar
  • Wasserman, N., “Seeing Eye to Eye: Concerning Two Incantations Against Lamashtu’s Evil Eye”, Nouvelles AssyriologiquesBreves et Utilitaires, 1995, s. 61-70. google scholar
  • Watterson, B., The Gods of Ancient Egypt, Batsford Ltd, London 1984. google scholar
  • Wilkinson, R. H., Eski Mısır’ın Bütün Tanrı ve Tanrıçaları, çev. Ahmet Fethi Yıldırım, Alfa Mitoloji Yayınları,İstanbul 2016. google scholar

Citations

Copy and paste a formatted citation or use one of the options to export in your chosen format


EXPORT



APA

Dilek, Y. (2021). Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel. Turkish Journal of History, 0(74), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209


AMA

Dilek Y. Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel. Turkish Journal of History. 2021;0(74):1-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209


ABNT

Dilek, Y. Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel. Turkish Journal of History, [Publisher Location], v. 0, n. 74, p. 1-30, 2021.


Chicago: Author-Date Style

Dilek, Yeşim,. 2021. “Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel.” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 74: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209


Chicago: Humanities Style

Dilek, Yeşim,. “Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel.” Turkish Journal of History 0, no. 74 (May. 2025): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209


Harvard: Australian Style

Dilek, Y 2021, 'Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel', Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 74, pp. 1-30, viewed 22 May. 2025, https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209


Harvard: Author-Date Style

Dilek, Y. (2021) ‘Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel’, Turkish Journal of History, 0(74), pp. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209 (22 May. 2025).


MLA

Dilek, Yeşim,. “Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel.” Turkish Journal of History, vol. 0, no. 74, 2021, pp. 1-30. [Database Container], https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209


Vancouver

Dilek Y. Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel. Turkish Journal of History [Internet]. 22 May. 2025 [cited 22 May. 2025];0(74):1-30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209 doi: 10.26650/iutd.756209


ISNAD

Dilek, Yeşim. “Eye Symbolism and Dualism in the Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia, Egypt and Israel”. Turkish Journal of History 0/74 (May. 2025): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.26650/iutd.756209



TIMELINE


Submitted22.06.2020
Accepted10.02.2021
Published Online07.06.2021

LICENCE


Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC)

This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.