Flynn suckers hate the video games so much that they've eaten their own tail. They're at the point where they're trying to complain about how bad A STORY WRITTEN BY IAN FLYNN is compared to another story written by Ian Flynn, just because one of them was a video game.

It can no longer be denied. They hate the video games MORE than they like Ian Flynn. I am once again vindicated. The fact that Frontiers was "written" by Flynn doesn't matter to them. It was still a Sonic video game. Therefore it was inferior. BECAUSE it was a video game. There's no other way to interpret this kind of take at this point.

They don't actually like Ian Flynn or his writing at all. To them he is just a convenient tool to enable their sheer hatred of the video games. This confirms it.

The fact that Frontiers was written after the metal virus arc should mean that you should consider cyber corruption to be superior and more grave than the virus, no?

After all, Flynn wrote Frontiers. If you like him, you should naturally think anything New he's written is superior to anything that came before it. Or do you think he's stagnated as a writer? Do you think he's become inferior to his former storytelling splendor?

Or will your excuse be that Frontiers wasn't as good as the comics because it was made with more oversight from SEGA? Contradicting the narrative that everything bad about the comics is due to SEGA 's meddling and Flynn somehow has more creative freedom now that he's writing the games?

Such a tangled knot you cultists have wrapped yourself up into lol. You hate the games so much that you can't help but condemn them, even though doing so tears holes of cognitive dissonance into your worship of the fatfuck Flynn. It's hilarious.