Getting to know you: Social media personalization as a means of enhancing brand loyalty and perceived quality

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.10.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Social media has become one of the largest environments of human interaction, with more than 80% of Americans using social media and firm spending on social media marketing more than quadrupling in the past decade. Yet, little is known about the effects of ad personalization in the social media context. This research develops and tests a comprehensive model of personalized advertising in the development of consumer's brand perceptions using 242 responses collected from Amazon Mechanical Turk. Results suggest perceived personalization positively impacts consumer brand engagement and brand attachment, both enhance perceived quality and brand loyalty of brands advertised on Facebook.

Introduction

Social media has become a nearly-ubiquitous environment for human interaction. In fact, a recent study by the Pew Research Center on social media use in the United States found that over 80% of all Americans use at least one form of social media, and greater than two-thirds use Facebook specifically—more than 75% of whom check their Facebook pages at least once a day (Smith and Anderson, 2018). Consequently, as social media use becomes increasingly common, firms seek to reach and interact with current and potential customers through social media platforms. Trends in marketing budget allocations reflect this important shift; data suggests that social media spending has increased by nearly 250% in the past ten years, with analysts expecting even more growth as firms seek to capitalize on the unique opportunities presented by social media (CMO Survey, 2018). One area of particular growing interest for marketers is using personalized advertisements based on customers’ specific personal preferences, prior purchase histories, demographics, and recent searches on the Internet (Li, 2016). Personalized ads allow producers to engage consumers in just such a manner—on a personal level with the aim of developing a more effective relationship and better meeting consumers’ needs.
The effectiveness of personalization is well-documented in traditional media such as direct mail (Baek and Morimoto, 2012), telemarketing (Yu and Cude, 2009), mobile messaging (Xu, 2006), and website ad personalization (Awad and Krishnan, 2006, Ho and Bodoff, 2014), but little is known about the effects of personalization in social media given its recent emergence and the disruptiveness of social media as compared to more traditional channels (Baird and Parasnis, 2011). More precisely, while prior work on personalization in traditional marketing channels reveals increases in brand engagement and attachment, and consequently in perceived quality and brand loyalty, scholarship investigating these effects in social media is needed given the different nature of the online environment. For instance, social media is a more intimate setting than traditional channels like direct mail or telemarketing as the customer is able to interact directly with the ad and the company, and because many customers utilize social media frequently throughout the day creating an enhanced opportunity to build a customer relationship (Sashi, 2012). Further, results among emerging scholarship in this area have yet to paint a consistent picture with their findings. For instance, while some work suggests personalizing web browsing experiences increases sales (Oberoi et al., 2017), personalization on Facebook can engender brand avoidance when users become skeptical of the personalization (Tran, 2017). In other words, the intimate nature of social media may make consumers more resistant to personalization when they view it as invasive.
In light of the differences of this more intimate setting and the gap in our understanding of personalization in this space, our intent with this work is to develop and test a comprehensive model of personalization's effects on consumer brand perceptions and attitudes, namely consumer brand engagement, brand attachment, perceived quality, and brand loyalty. Toward this end, we first review literature related to social media marketing and to personalization and develop a model with the constructs mentioned above. We then develop hypotheses and report on the results of a PLS-SEM analysis of 242 observations from a manipulation-based survey in MTurk before concluding with a discussion and suggestions for future research.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organization

Section snippets

Literature review

Personalization can be defined as delivering personalized advertisements to individuals based upon their exclusive preferences (Li, 2016) that is used by many organizations for effective advertising and relationship management in social media and email (Montgomery and Smith, 2009). Ideally, as the relationship is cultivated, so too is the consumer's attachment and loyalty to the brand, ultimately driving consumer purchasing behaviors (Hollebeek et al., 2014). One reason that personalization can

Hypothesis development

As noted above, companies have access to a substantial amount of information as it pertains to their customers due to the growth of social media, and social media provides organizations with a way to interact with and reach consumers through personalized advertising. The advantage of personalization is in this interaction: it allows the organization to form relationship with users (Blasco-Arcas et al., 2016) and, consequently, generate deeper consumer engagement (Maslowska et al., 2016). Put

Data collection and procedure

Participants were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. A brief introduction of the survey was given to respondents before the survey started. A question “Are you on Facebook?” was created to be sure that only those who had a Facebook account could proceed to the next section, where they were provided with the following definition of personalized advertising:
“Personalized advertising on Facebook is the process of advertising in which a retailer develops a customized ad of a product or

Discussion

A growing body of literature investigates the effects of personalization in traditional media (Baek and Morimoto, 2012, Goldsmith and Freiden, 2004, Gurau et al., 2003, Kim et al., 2001); however, research examining personalization's impact on social media has yet to accumulate. This work was undertaken in response to recent calls for research investigating the effects of personalized advertising on (Kaplan and Haenlein, 2010).
The current research sheds light into the underlying mechanisms that

References (68)

  • P. Oberoi et al.

    Technology sourcing for website personalization and social media marketing: a study of e-retailing industry

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2017)
  • S.S. Srinivasan et al.

    Customer loyalty in e-commerce: an exploration of its antecedents and consequences

    J. Retail.

    (2002)
  • M. Thomson et al.

    The ties that bind: measuring the strength of consumers' emotional attachments to brands

    J. Consum. Psychol.

    (2005)
  • Trang P. Tran

    Personalized ads on Facebook: an effective marketing tool for online marketer

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2017)
  • B. Yoo et al.

    Developing and validating a multidimensional consumer-based brand equity scale

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2001)
  • K.Z. Zhang et al.

    Consumer participation and gender differences on companies' microblogs: a brand attachment process perspective

    Comput. Hum. Behav.

    (2015)
  • M.T. Akçura et al.

    Consumer learning and brand valuation: an application on over-the-counter drugs

    Mark. Sci.

    (2004)
  • J.C. Anderson et al.

    Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1988)
  • A. Ansari et al.

    E-customization

    J. Mark. Res.

    (2003)
  • N.F. Awad et al.

    The personalization privacy paradox: an empirical evaluation of information transparency and the willingness to be profiled online for personalization

    MIS Q.

    (2006)
  • T.H. Baek et al.

    Stay away from me

    J. Advert.

    (2012)
  • C.H. Baird et al.

    From social media to social customer relationship management

    Strategy Leadersh.

    (2011)
  • L. Blasco-Arcas et al.

    Engagement platforms: the role of emotions in fostering customer engagement and brand image in interactive media

    J. Serv. Theory Pract.

    (2016)
  • A. Chaudhuri et al.

    The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty

    J. Mark.

    (2001)
  • Wynne W. Chin et al.

    Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares

    Stat. Strateg. Small Sample Res.

    (1999)
  • S.-C. Chu et al.

    Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites

    Int. J. Advert.

    (2011)
  • CMO Survey

    CMO Survey Report: Highlights and Insights Report

    (2018)
  • I.P. Cvijikj et al.

    Online engagement factors on Facebook brand pages

    Social Netw. Anal. Min.

    (2013)
  • A. Dijkstra

    Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation

    Health Educ. Res.

    (2005)
  • F.-R. Esch et al.

    Are brands forever? How brand knowledge and relationships affect current and future purchases

    J. Product Brand Manag.

    (2006)
  • Claes Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    J. Mark. Res.

    (1981)
  • R.E. Goldsmith et al.

    Have it your way: consumer attitudes toward personalized marketing

    Mark. Intell. Plan.

    (2004)
  • J. Gummerus et al.

    Customer engagement in a Facebook brand community

    Manag. Res. Rev.

    (2012)
  • C. Gurau et al.

    “To legislate or not to legislate”: a comparative exploratory study of privacy/personalisation factors affecting French, UK and US Web sites

    J. Consum. Mark.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (198)

    • Revisiting the consumer brand engagement concept

      2021, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The marketing discipline has similarly evolved its approach to customer management, moving from a transactional era, to a relational era, and now, adapting to the current era of engagement (Pansari & Kumar, 2017). Marketing practice and research currently reflect this customer engagement perspective, as this viewpoint has been crucial in gaining competitive advantage (Alvarez-Milán, Felix, Rauschnabel, & Hinsch, 2018; Amazon, 2019; Gallup, 2019; Kumar & Pansari, 2016) by positively influencing essential attitudinal and behavioral outcomes such as satisfaction (Brodie, Ilic, Juric, & Hollebeek, 2013), loyalty (Hollebeek, 2011; Shanahan, Tran, & Taylor, 2019), and brand usage (Harrigan, Evers, Miles, & Daly, 2018; Hollebeek et al., 2014). Despite the proliferation of conceptual and empirical engagement research (over 30 publications since 2010 in the Journal of Business Research alone), there is little consensus as to the true composition of the engagement concept (Beckers, van Doorn, & Verhoef, 2018; Mollen & Wilson, 2010) and how it should be measured (Baldus, Voorhees, & Calantone, 2015; Bruneau, 2018; Dessart, Veloutsou, & Morgan-Thomas, 2016; Hollebeek et al., 2014; Sprott, Czellar, & Spangenberg, 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text