Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation

Support the Guardian

Fund independent journalism with $15 per month
Support us
Support us
Exchanging wedding rings
‘Richard Holden fails to mention that cousin marriage was once a common practice among the British aristocracy.’ Photograph: Getty/iStockphoto
‘Richard Holden fails to mention that cousin marriage was once a common practice among the British aristocracy.’ Photograph: Getty/iStockphoto

MP’s call to ban cousin marriage is prejudiced

This article is more than 4 months old

Dr Qurratul-Ain Rehman points to the low absolute risk of birth defects in children born to consanguineous parents in response to Richard Holden’s bill

I find it intriguing that a Conservative former minister, Richard Holden, has called for first-cousin marriage to be banned in the UK. He argues that the practice threatens women’s freedom and leads to birth defects. Medical evidence shows that while the risk of birth defects is relatively higher among children born to consanguineous parents, the absolute risk remains low. In fact, the absolute risk increase is comparable to factors such as older maternal age, obesity and smoking – but there are no calls to ban them.

As a GP working at the Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability in London, I manage patients with genetic disorders ranging from Down’s syndrome to rare mitochondrial and genetic diseases. None of my patients were born of consanguineous parents.

I would also like to point out the historical inconsistency in the values being defended – Holden fails to mention that cousin marriage was once a common practice among the British aristocracy. I feel that grouping the whole Pakistani community as being subject to a “clan mentality” demeans them and highlights Holden’s intolerance.

As an elected member of parliament, Holden has a responsibility to bring communities together rather than alienating any on grounds of prejudice and intolerance. I wish he would focus on more pressing issues, both domestic and international.
Dr Qurratul-Ain Rehman
New Malden, London

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

Related stories

Related stories

  • Soothing solutions for crying babies

  • Now that’s what I call a 1970s party

  • Double standards over Neil Ferguson’s resignation

  • Role of vitamin D deficiency in BAME medic deaths

  • Don’t let don’t-knows triumph at the polls

  • Gene editing: don’t bet the farm on this pig in a poke

  • Life, the universe and everything? Stephen Hawking’s Hitchhiker’s legacy

  • Geneticists know there’s more to life

More from Opinion

More from Opinion

  • This new EU deal is great for Britain. Now, Labour, focus on the future, not on Farage

  • Starmer and his allies spent so long attacking Labour’s left, they forgot how to govern

  • Trump makes the Gulf states feel powerful, but the real test is: can they stop Israel’s war?

  • Owners of second homes in Wales are having to sell up. That’s no disaster: it’s a godsend

  • If our destiny is cyber-attacks and empty shelves at the Co-op, here’s what we should do next

  • The USSR occupied eastern Europe, calling it ‘liberation’ – Russia is repeating the crime in Ukraine

  • Modern parenting rejects abusive ways of punishing children. Will England listen?

  • A Labour lost in the weeds can’t rebuild this country. Starmer must regain his nerve

  • Should phone-obsessed diners be forced to stop scrolling? Not if restaurants want to stay open

  • My advice to the new Green party leadership: it’s time to expose the climate deniers

Most viewed

Most viewed