Heh. How about to my link to my free comic site up-front so you don’t have to read an entire boring-ass article to find it? Yeah, let’s do that.
I’m fine, guys. Weird week, to say the least. But a lot of people were worried about me. I’m not going to go into the flame war too much other than to say I was touched by the support I was getting. You guys are the best. I do need to clarify something though.
Yeah, I had an ugly meltdown on this site. It was not pretty and I deserved a TO for it. But a lot of people took umbrage at the fact that while criticizing another artist’s work, after I used my own art as a counter-example, the go-to line was that my art sucked. People were pissed somebody said that to me. Two people in fact!
Let’s assume that they are right though. I dig my art but I can totally see why other people would not.
But I would not be doing it or making it public if I didn’t think it was worthwhile. I am not a believer that a work of art or entertainment should exist “just because”. If I didn’t think I was doing something special and unique, sucky artwork or not, I would not do it. I got back into Gilda And Meek And The Un-Iverse for the sole reason that I believe it filled in a bunch of holes that popular culture genre and comics were currently lacking. If I were a happy TV viewer, movie watcher, or comic reader, I wouldn’t have bothered. I wouldn't have found it necessary.
So let’s assume my art sucks. It’s certainly unpolished and unprofessional. No denying it. And yet with it I can tell the story I have always wanted to tell that nobody else was willing to. And by not working with a second, more polished artist (or God forbid A.I.) to make things LOOK better, I can keep things a one-man operation, and do things entirely on my own terms.
I don’t mind if my artwork is perceived as sucky, because me doing it myself gives me a level of freedom and autonomy I NEED to tell my story. The Un-Iverse is entirely down to one person: Me. And I wouldn’t have it any other way.
Regardless of whether my art sucks (and that’s a valid opinion) what doesn’t suck are either my scripts or my boarding. They feel very cinematic, sucky artwork and all. I am a genre-obsessed nerd and pacing and timing mean EVERYTHING to me.
Take a look at this action sequence from the issue Gilda And Meek #24 “Timeline Trilogy: Part 3: Now And Forever”
I can ONLY speak for me, but even if that art sucks, and I think you might be right, the fact that it sucks is the least important part about the sequence. Despite me having a shaky, unsteady hand, despite the panels being crooked, and it being done in unfinished pencils, it strikes me as a damn effective sequence anyways. The boarding and pacing and script make up for it entirely.
And hell, even if you notice the fact that the artwork sucks, there is something about it that doesn’t: The facial expressions on the characters. They look fantastic to me and are my one artistic gift. I have the rare artistic talent to let a reader know exactly what my character is thinking just based on the drawing of their facial expression. As far as that goes, the saga’s annoying Narrator is almost besides the point.
The irony? If I was told I would be a shitty artist all throughout my life, but I was granted a genie’s wish to have a strength in ONE particular artistic skill (and no other) being good at facial expressions would be the exact thing I picked. For some amazing random coincidence, the Universe made me good at the one artistic thing I actually care about and think matters. Talk about Universal Design!
This next action sequence is kinda bloody, but yeah, you can see what I mean about the artwork being sucky not mattering. This sequence is from Gilda And Meek #45 “All Blood Things: Step Five: The Sword Of Wisdom.”
Cool right?
Here is some of Gilda’s epic final swordfight with Arch-Villain Mistress Augatha, from that same issue:
“Wow, Matt, that artwork SUCKS!”
And yet, I suspect as a reader is going through the sequence they won’t have even noticed it. It’s not relevant at this point.
One last thing about that flame war. People who said my artwork sucked had their comments hidden. Guys, I REALLY wish you hadn’t done that. I appreciate the support, but while I suspect one of those criticisms was merely done to hurt me (which made it bullshit and not something that mattered to me) one of the people there genuinely thought my art sucked.
And you know what? That’s okay! That honest response did NOT deserve to be hidden. I put myself out there, my artwork is fair game for both positive and negative criticism. I actually stirred enough of a reaction for them to give that opinion! That’s almost flattering on some level. Considering the amount of shit I give genre stuff my own damn self it would be beyond hubris and narcissism to believe that artistic criticisms should not affect me.
In the same damn thread I am criticizing Brian McFadden’s art, oh yes, my skills are DEFINITELY up for debate. For damn sure. I think the logic was McFadden is a Front Pager who doesn’t interact with the community, and I’m relatively liked member of the site who does.
But see, personal popularity and affection for the artist should have no part in artistic critical consensus. The idea actually offends me. You know if somebody actually told Todd MacFarlane this and to stop mugging for the camera maybe the comics industry would not in such dire straits. Art must be judged by its own merits. Not on the eccentricities of the individual artists. I know that also is a big part of modern art, but I don’t dig modern art either.
My rule of thumb when listening to and considering criticism of my work: If you say my artwork is terrible, I am completely abusing the format of the comic book, I am the single worst person who ever lived because of it, and that you wished I had a heart attack and died, I’ll be like, “That’s fair.” You complain about my “Woke Agenda” and my comic being “Liberal propaganda” though, I’mma tune you out.
If you want to visit my totally free site here's the link:
gildaandmeekandtheuniverse.blogspot.com/…
There are no ads. There are currently 67 comic book issues on the site and over 3000 pages. You should lower your eyebrows in suspicion at that. Red Flag! “What, all this material is FREE, with no ads? What do YOU get out of it?”
I’m autistic and my comic is how I express myself and relate to the world. I may be nothing more than a hobbyist to most folks, but if somebody understands me even a LITTLE bit better after each issue read, that’s all the payment I need (although I never turn down bought coffees).
This is all about making connections for me. Even if you think the art sucks. Bad connections are still connections.
Update:
Thank you for the support, guys. It means a lot to me.
If you could rec the diary, that would be great. I don’t do a TON of diaries about my art and I could use the exposure.
Here is the rest of The Love Series. I unpublished the diary because it was a bad time of day for it and the recent diary list was too crowded. I figure if I take the extra step of unpublishing it to a more manageable time on the site, I need to make the update worth it, and not just push off important diaries for a second bite at the apple. The Love Series is one of the things on my site I am proudest of. Here it is in its entirety, in order:
Was this story worth reading?
Recommending and sharing stories helps us decide which stories are mostimportant to show our readers.
Keyboard navigation:
- ( L ) Recommend
- ( r ) Reply
- ( p ) Parent
- ( o ) Open/Close
- ( j ) Next
- ( k ) Prev
- ( 1 ) First Comment
- ( 2 ) Last Comment
- ( J ) Next Unread
- ( K ) Prev Unread
- ( esc ) Unfocus Text Field
- ( P ) Edit/Preview
- ( S ) Submit
- ( c ) Cancel
Art is subjective. "Sucky" is just an opinion. Happy to see you back here.
Thanks, Cmae.
Would you mind reccing the diary? I could use the exposure.
Sorry, I thought I did.
Thank you!
🙂
I am a rather old guy and although I have seen your art here I have not payed much attention to it. However … the hippy cartoons I became familiar with in San Francisco when I was 21-22 had a lot of not real nice criticism also but …. I enjoyed them. I felt it was great art, I was young and callow then. I still think the art back then was worth while.
That is part of what art is. Different people may feel it is great, poor, offensive, bad, enjoyable, trashy, peaceful, violent, and many other descriptives . Art is that way. I have nothing else to add except … maybe I should spend more time looking at your drawings and reading the captions. Cartoon art, like all art, is an experience, to be taken in. Hang in there.
Thanks so much!
Nice work, Matt! My artwork sucks too!!
Let’s hear it for sucky artists!
It’s the spirit behind the art that matters. I would rather look at sucky art that has a great spirit behind it than polished art with a lot of technical perfection that has an ugly spirit behind it. (Which is a lot of what’s out there.)
Exactly. I love what I do. And I hope it shows.
I’ve just remembered a perfect example of that, which struck me years ago when I was in college. My brother was in film school at the time.
Right around then some big movie had come out with Sylvester Stallone, I believe, and in the promotion of it they were making a big deal about how it was, at that point, the most expensive movie ever made. (I think it was something like $40-something million, which would be nothing now, of course.)
So I saw it and thought, “Meh.” Cliched. Formula. Predictable.
Soon afterward my brother borrowed from one of his classmates a little Super-8 film that that classmate had made with his friends while in high school.
It blew the $40-million movie out of the water. It was so genuinely clever and funny, and tight, with so much obvious love and labor put into it (including some really good original music), that I could only think, “I would much rather watch this than that huge, expensive movie.” I wish I had a copy of it right now.
That’s how smaller projects often are. I like to think my comic is the same way. As unprofessional as it looks, I will put both the script and pacing up against the best Hollywood and comics have to offer.
As one who cannot draw a recognizable stick figure, you're art skills are far beyond mine! To me, the artwork is an expression of a person's thought, feelings or opinions. As long as you're happy and it's expressing what you meant to say, it's not sucky at all! And I like them too.
Thanks! And thanks for reading!
I can draw stick figures if spotted a solid set of drafting tools! But seriously. People can like or dislike art; that’s what’s great about art. It’s only “sucky” if it doesn’t mean something. AI art is sucky.
And all that aside, there’s a proud history of webcomics in particular that use… let’s say minimalist art to accomplish their goals. XKCD is one of the most successful webcomics ever and Randall Munroe draws stick figures. Dinosaur Comics has been running since 2003 and uses the exact same art for every nearly-daily strip. PLIF ran for years, and so did Triangle and Robert. And so forth. If you have a style, and something to say, never let someone stop you because they think your work isn’t good enough.
One of my favorites is Order Of The Stick. Surprisingly epic for what it is:
Okay, now I have to recommend Tom Robbins' Skinny Legs and All. en.m.wikipedia.org/... there's art, sex and a painted stick...lots of bad puns too.
I’ll check it out.
Three words: Zippy The Pinhead!
And I agree with everything you said.
That description is what art should be.
I'm very much of an "Abe Simpson shaking his fist" old fart about modern art. And hipsters. And I'm only 62. If I make it to 80, how grumpy can I get?
About TikTok and other social media of younger people, I'm perfectly fine that they have their outlets.
I don't need to understand their slang. If the younger folks want their own space, cool.
There’s always a Nellie hovering around — fck ‘em :)
I need more Nellie Olsen references in my work.
Strangely, I got to be good friends with Richard Bull and his wife in their later years — such nice people. Richard was, of course, Nels Oleson, on Little House on the Prairie — the father of the rotten Nellie. I was especially pleased to find out that the real Nellie — Alison Arngrim — remained a good, close, supportive friend to them for the rest of their lives. I’m so grateful to her for that.
Sorry that all went bad. I also can't stand that cartoonist's work. The only one I avoid on DK.
I will probably do a comprehensive diary later on about why I think that and why McFadden is damaging to the site. But I’m still a little raw currently and don’t want to get into it just yet.
But yeah, he DOES suck.
Me too … but I’m also not fond of the scribbly, colored-pencils one. Aside from the style, where I often can’t tell who a character is supposed to represent, he piles in so much extraneous detail that, for me, it loses the clarity of the point of the cartoon and I often go, “I don’t know what I’m supposed to get from this.”
I’ve been a Tom Tomorrow admirer for years, though … and for me, Tom the Dancing Bug is the tops, just excellent.
You talking Clay Jones? You know, his work isn’t very funny, and not usually on-point. What it is is visually interesting. It’s a detailed panel to pour over. Yeah, it doesn’t usually land. But the joke of the day isn’t why I like it. I’m all about spotting Pizza Rat.
For the record Keef Knight is by far the best cartoonist on the site.
Truth.
He’s amazing.
He is honestly the #1 reason I started visiting Daily Kos.
Thank you Matt!
Thank you for reading!
I suppert your art but not your art criticism.
Fair enough.
Thanks, Matt — this was really fun. I don’t have the right background to fully appreciate cartooning, and much art is beyond me. But Art of any sort (like music, writing,design or other creative pursuits) done with heart and a good mind are far better than any mass-produced product done for $$$. Thanks for your art and your commentary.
You are welcome! Glad you enjoyed it!