An augmented–depleted framework of AI awareness: Concept expansion and scale development

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2025.104164Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Identifying four dimensions of AI awareness.
  • A 16-item scale of AI awareness was developed.
  • A multi-methodological approach was used.

Abstract

Although research on employee AI awareness is gradually increasing, existing work lacks valid conceptualization and measurement scales. Scholars mostly interpret this concept from the perspective of job insecurity and stress, and there is no consensus on the consequences of AI awareness. This study employs two separate investigations to construct an augmented–depleted framework for AI awareness and examines the influence of AI awareness on employee outcomes. Study 1 developed four dimensions of AI awareness (replaced AI-augmented, assisted AI-augmented, replaced AI-depleted, and threatened AI-depleted) with a 16-item scale through a five-stage process: dimension identification, item generation, assessment of content validity, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Study 2 verified the influence of AI awareness on employee cognitional, emotional, and behavioral outcomes through a time-lagged survey of 297 superior–subordinate matching pairs. This study expands the view of AI awareness, develops a new measurement scale, and provides foundations for further research.

Introduction

The Industrial Revolution 4.0, characterized by significant technological advancements, has sparked profound transformations in the tourism and hospitality industry, as noted by Almada-Lobo (2016). In response to this revolution, numerous renowned hotel chains, such as Marriott, Hyatt, and InterContinental, have embraced the future by incorporating intelligent room systems and robots into their daily operations. These systems engage guests through voice or touchscreen interfaces, offering functionalities such as room control, information inquiries, dining services, and travel recommendations. They serve as essential features for addressing diverse daily service needs and enhancing customer experiences (Makridakis, 2017, Li et al., 2019). The introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) technology enables more personalized and memorable experiences for customers, enhances service efficiency, and reduces labor costs for businesses (Davenport and Ronanki, 2018, Liu et al., 2025). However, it also impacts employees’ psychology and behaviors in the hospitality and tourism industry (Brougham and Haar, 2018).
Some scholars have shifted their focus toward employees who are influenced by AI and introduced the concept of AI awareness to reflect their perceptions and beliefs regarding AI. As a vital segment of the service industry, the hospitality sector is undergoing profound transformations driven by AI technology. Employees' acceptance and understanding of AI technology directly influence their job performance and customer experience. Consequently, understanding employees' AI awareness is crucial for enhancing service quality, boosting employee satisfaction, and improving job performance. Scholars such as Brougham and Haar (2018) defined AI awareness as the recognition that AI machines, such as robots and algorithm management systems, may replace employees’ current jobs in the future, which creates an uncertain situation that could be detrimental to employees. This perspective predominantly considers AI to be a source of job insecurity and has been widely accepted by scholars in the tourism and hospitality industry (e.g., Kong et al., 2021; Liang et al., 2022). However, other scholars appraise AI as a challenge that generates potential feelings of achievement fulfillment (Ding, 2021), categorizing AI awareness into two dimensions—challenge and hindrance—from a stress perspective.
Understanding employees’ AI awareness in the tourism and hospitality industry helps understand how to enhance employees’ job satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, work engagement, and service performance in human–AI interactive situations. Scholars adopting a job insecurity perspective suggest that AI awareness increases employees' turnover intentions, depression, cynicism (Brougham and Haar, 2018), and work withdrawal (Teng et al., 2023) while decreasing career competency (Kong et al., 2021). Conversely, from a stress perspective, it is argued that challenging AI awareness fosters intrinsic motivation (Liang et al., 2022) and job crafting (He et al., 2023) while reducing emotional exhaustion (Liang et al., 2022) and job insecurity (He et al., 2023). However, hindrance AI awareness is believed to bring about the opposite effect.
Given the diversity of research perspectives and contradictory conclusions outlined above, it is evident that the current understanding of AI awareness in the tourism and hospitality industry remains incomplete. Notably, although existing studies such as those by Ferikoğlu and Akgün (2022) and Owsley and Greenwood (2024) have developed AI awareness scales in the education and new media sectors, respectively, the applicability and validity of these scales in the hospitality industry have yet to be thoroughly validated. Consequently, the development of a comprehensive and coherent AI awareness scale specifically tailored for employees in the hospitality industry is of paramount importance. This scale would not only address the gaps in existing hospitality research but also serve as a tool for exploring the specific effects of AI awareness on employees' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes.
Building upon this necessity, the study aims to propose a comprehensive classification framework of AI awareness, encompassing two dimensions: AI-augmented and AI-depleted. AI-augmented awareness refers to employees’ positive perception that AI technology can enhance work efficiency, optimize work processes, and create new opportunities (He et al., 2023, Tan et al., 2023). In contrast, AI-depleted awareness reflects concerns that AI may replace human jobs, render skills obsolete, and heighten job insecurity (Zhao et al., 2023, Zhou et al., 2024). Through this classification framework, we aim to offer a more comprehensive understanding of how various types of AI awareness correlate with employees' unique outcomes (Li et al., 2021).
To achieve this goal, two studies were employed to develop and test a comprehensive classification of AI awareness (as shown in Fig. 1). In Study 1, a multi-source, multi-method approach was utilized to develop and test an expanded classification of AI awareness. By combining a priori theory with qualitative data, this study identified the dimensions and measurement items of AI awareness. Furthermore, we validated the scale through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to establish its psychometric properties. In Study 2, data from a time-lagged survey were used to validate the outcomes of AI awareness. By employing complementary methods, this study extends the perspectives on AI awareness, going beyond the existing assumptions that primarily associate AI awareness with job insecurity and stress (e.g., Brougham and Haar, 2018; He et al., 2023). By developing a novel measurement scale and validating the wide-ranging consequences of AI awareness for employee cognitional, emotional, and behavioral outcomes, this study contributes to a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of AI awareness.

Access through your organization

Check access to the full text by signing in through your organization.

Access through your organization

Section snippets

Employee AI awareness

Brougham and Haar (2018) introduced the acronym STARA as an encompassing framework for smart technology, AI, robotics, and algorithms. They defined STARA awareness as employees' perceptions of the potential impact of intelligent technologies, AI, robotics, and algorithms on their future career prospects. Subsequently, many scholars have adopted and adapted this definition in specific research contexts. For example, Li et al. (2019) proposed that AI awareness refers to employees' feelings of

Phase 1: qualitative research: dimension identification

This study explores employees' awareness and evaluation of AI using qualitative research combined with the analytical method of grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss, 1967) through in-depth interviews with front-line employees in the hospitality and tourism industry to obtain first-hand information about AI awareness. The resulting textual data were further coded, and the connotations of employees' AI awareness and its characteristic dimensions were explored.

Study 2: quantitative results and hypothesis tests

The overall purpose of Study 2 was to test Hypotheses 1–7. To test the external validity of the AI awareness scale, this study explored the influence of two dimensions of employees’ AI awareness on their cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes in a new sample.

Discussion

This study aims to develop a taxonomy of AI awareness with three primary purposes: (1) to integrate the literature and empirical research on AI-augmented and AI-depleted awareness to establish a theoretical framework (Raisch and Krakowski, 2021, Liang et al., 2022); (2) to identify, clarify, and describe any previously unknown specific dimensions of AI awareness; and (3) to demonstrate how specific types of AI awareness are associated with distinct outcomes.
Study 1 employed qualitative research

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Gui Chenglin: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Resources, Methodology, Funding acquisition. Zhao Xuhong: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization. Ai Shanru: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Formal analysis. Ouyang Xi: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Software, Formal analysis. Deng Aimin: Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Investigation. Li Minglong: Writing – review & editing,

Declaration of Competing Interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation, Ministry of Education [23YJC630046], the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [YCJJ20242232], China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2022M723538], the National Natural Science Foundation of China [72202096, 72302112, 72432003, 72472156], and the National Social Science Fund of China (NSSFC) [23BGL179].

References (81)

  • Z. Mo et al.

    How AI awareness can prompt service performance adaptivity and technologically-environmental mastery

    Tour. Manag.

    (2024)
  • S. Pan et al.

    The dark side of robot usage for hotel employees: An uncertainty management perspective

    Tour. Manag.

    (2025)
  • P.E. Spector et al.

    The dimensionality of counterproductivity: are an counterproductive behaviors created equal?

    J. Vocat. Behav.

    (2006)
  • L. Su et al.

    Does seeing deviant other-tourist behavior matter? The moderating role of travel companions

    Tour. Manag.

    (2022)
  • V.U. Vincent

    Integrating intuition and artificial intelligence in organizational decision-making

    Bus. Horiz.

    (2021)
  • M. Yin et al.

    Can AI really help? The double-edged sword effect of AI assistant on employees’ innovation behavior

    Comput. Hum. Behav.

    (2024)
  • Z. Yin et al.

    Interactive effects of AI awareness and change-oriented leadership on employee-AI collaboration: the role of approach and avoidance motivation

    Tour. Manag.

    (2024)
  • J. Zhao et al.

    That honey, my arsenic: the influence of advanced technologies on service employees’ organizational deviance

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2023)
  • S. Zhou et al.

    An empirical study on the dark side of service employees’ AI awareness: behavioral responses, emotional mechanisms, and mitigating factors

    J. Retail. Consum. Serv.

    (2024)
  • J. Złotowski et al.

    Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources

    Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.

    (2017)
  • F. Almada-Lobo

    The Industry 4.0 revolution and the future of manufacturing execution systems (MES)

    J. Innov. Manag.

    (2016)
  • C. Anthony et al.

    Collaborating" with AI: taking a system view to explore the future of work

    Organ. Sci.

    (2023)
  • J. Arias-Pérez et al.

    Understanding knowledge hiding under technological turbulence caused by artificial intelligence and robotics

    J. Knowl. Manag.

    (2022)
  • T. Baenziger et al.

    Optimizing human-Robot task allocation using a simulation tool based on standardized work descriptions

    J. Intell. Manuf.

    (2020)
  • A.G. Bedeian et al.

    A path-analytic study of the consequences of role conflict and ambiguity

    Acad. Manag. J.

    (1981)
  • H. Benbya et al.

    Artificial intelligence in organizations: current state and future opportunities (December 3, 2020)

    MIS Q. Exec.

    (2020)
  • P.P. Brooke et al.

    Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment

    J. Appl. Psychol.

    (1988)
  • D. Brougham et al.

    Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees’ perceptions of our future workplace

    J. Manag. Organ.

    (2018)
  • P. Budhwar et al.

    Artificial intelligence – challenges and opportunities for international HRM: a review and research agenda

    Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag.

    (2022)
  • J.A. Colquitt et al.

    Content validation guidelines: Evaluation criteria for definitional correspondence and definitional distinctiveness

    J. Appl. Psychol.

    (2019)
  • T.H. Davenport et al.

    Only Humans Need Apply: Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines

    (2016)
  • T.H. Davenport et al.

    Artificial intelligence for the real world

    Harv. Bus. Rev.

    (2018)
  • E. Demerouti et al.

    From thought to action: Employee work engagement and job performance

  • B.J. Dietvorst et al.

    Algorithm aversion: people erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err

    J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.

    (2015)
  • L. Ding

    Employees’ challenge-hindrance appraisals toward STARA awareness and competitive productivity: a micro-level case

    Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag.

    (2021)
  • L. Ding

    Employees’ STARA awareness and innovative work behavioural intentions: Evidence from US casual dining restaurants

  • D. Ferikoğlu et al.

    An investigation of teachers’ artificial intelligence awareness: a scale development study

    Malays. Online J. Educ. Technol.

    (2022)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    J. Mark. Res.

    (1981)
  • X. Gao-Urhahn et al.

    How affective commitment to the organization changes over time: a longitudinal analysis of the reciprocal relationships between affective organizational commitment and income

    J. Organ. Behav.

    (2016)
  • B.G. Glaser et al.

    The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research

    (1967)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text