HILTON O'BRIEN: Smith government lowering the boom on power-hungry school bureaucrats

'Bill C-51 is a brilliant move to restore power to voters, parents and to protect independent schools.'
Morning worship at Bearspaw Christian School. With around 800 in-house students and an even larger number of home school students in its orbit, the school buildings were paid for by parents and well-wishers. Columnist Hilton O'Brien takes note of how the Government of Alberta has introduced legislation to protect independent schools
Morning worship at Bearspaw Christian School. With around 800 in-house students and an even larger number of home school students in its orbit, the school buildings were paid for by parents and well-wishers. Columnist Hilton O'Brien takes note of how the Government of Alberta has introduced legislation to protect independent schoolsNigel Hannaford
Published on: 

John Hilton-O’Brien is the Executive Director of Parents for Choice in Education

When is a “private” school not private?

In Alberta? Always. Every aspect, from curriculum to teacher certification, is dictated by the Ministry of Education. Christian schools have even been ordered to remove or revise their statements of faith — the very documents that defined their mission and purpose.

So no, these schools have never been “private.” But they are something else — something that enrages Alberta’s powerful public school bureaucracies:

Independent.

With Bill 51: The Education Amendment Act, 2025, the government is finally calling private and Charter schools what they are — independent schools. Not independent from the Crown, mind you. But, independent from the bureaucratic baronies of public education.

Let’s be clear about how the public boards operate.

Publicly elected boards govern: they do not manage. Their only employee is a superintendent, who becomes the de facto ruler of the school division. Superintendents are limited only by legislation and the rules that a part-time board can impose on them. In practice, this means that they have the absolute authority of a medieval baron. Trustees may carry the title of elected representatives, but they can be bullied, silenced, or sidelined if they step out of line.

Independent schools operate outside that structure. They don’t answer to the mighty public-school superintendents. They don’t participate in the political machinery of elections and weaponized codes of conduct. They serve families — not bureaucracies.

And that’s exactly why self-proclaimed “public-school advocates” attack them. They’ve used the old term — “private” schools — to imply that the independent schools are bastions of privilege, dripping in vast wealth and influence as they siphon tax dollars from the poor. 

But actually, the reverse is true. 

Independent school parents have a lower average income than their peers — and money siphoned from their students has long propped up the public schools. In truth, it is the independence of those schools that the public school bureaucrats despise.

For generations, public school boards have refused to sell or lease disused school buildings to charter and independent schools. Even buildings sitting empty for years — maintained on the public dime — have been kept out of reach to protect the monopoly. Partly to fix that, the Alberta government passed the Real Property Governance Act (Bill 13, 2024) last year, making surplus schools revert to Crown ownership. This spring’s Bill 51 goes further — placing even newly constructed schools under Alberta Infrastructure, with the Minister of Education governing the process by Regulation.

This is more than housekeeping. It attacks the ability of public school boards to starve their competition of facilities. The Minister — not the administrative barons — will now decide who gets school buildings. For independent education, this is a strategic victory.

Bill 51 also ends the ability of school boards to disqualify trustees through so-called code of conduct violations. That power will now return to voters, where it belongs.

Why does this matter?

Codes of conduct have too often been used not to protect civility, but to enforce ideological conformity

In one case that was shared with this writer, a superintendent demanded that trustees turn over their personal cell phones, claiming the code of conduct gave her the right to search for unauthorized communications outside of board meetings. 

In another, a trustee was told that they could be disciplined for publicly disagreeing with a board decision, especially if that statement contradicted the Superintendent’s line.

This is the opposite of democracy. When it happens, an unelected bureaucrat is usurping public power. It turns a superintendent into an independent baron.

It gets worse. Administrations have also warned trustees that they have no speech privilege. Unlike MLAs, who enjoy parliamentary privilege, school board trustees are routinely told that if they speak out against the administration, they can be sued personally. And if that happens, they’re on their own.

If we’re serious about local democracy, this must change. Trustees and municipal counsellors deserve the freedom to speak the truth without fear. Elected officials who can be silenced by legal threats are not free — and neither are the people they represent.

Bill 51 doesn’t look revolutionary. But sometimes, the revolution is in the fine print. It limits the ability of public school bureaucracies to control property, silence trustees, and block independent schools. It reaffirms the authority of the Crown over Alberta’s agencies, boards and commissions (ABCs) such as school boards. And with it, it protects the rights of families and communities to pursue educational freedom beyond the reach of bureaucratic barons.

It is subtle, strategic, and smart. Minister Demetrios Nicolaides and his staff can justly be proud of it.

Make no mistake: the real front lines in modern politics are between elected authorities and bureaucratic baronies. 

And with Bill 51, the Crown can reclaim lost territory.

John Hilton-O’Brien is the Executive Director of Parents for Choice in Education, www.parentchoice.ca

Liberal Party leader Mark Carney and then-prime minister Justin Trudeau at the G-20 gathering in 2018, in Buenos Aires. They've been working together a long time and the more you find out about Mr.Carney, the more certain you can be that if he became prime minister, nothing would change except for the worse...

SWIFT: To know Carney is not to love him

Published on: 

Catherine Swift is the President of the Coalition of Concerned Manufacturers & Businesses of Canada

In the barrage of pronouncements coming at Canadians from Liberal leader Mark Carney, two words have been conspicuously absent — net zero. This concept, meaning the achievement of a state in which there are no net greenhouse gases produced by human activity, has be ...

ArriveCan App and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Too many politicians don't understand (or don't care about) Charter rights. Writer John Carpay offers seven good questions to ask aspiring politicians

CARPAY: Seven Charter questions to ask your election candidates

Published on: 

Some judges don’t care about Charter rights and freedoms as much as they should. Fortunately, this sad truth does not prevent Canadian voters from electing candidates who do understand and truly appreciate the principles and foundations of our free society. It’s good when courts strike down freedom-violating laws.

But it’s even better when such laws are never passed in the first ...

Mark Carney

LYTLE: Could Mark Carney stay the course, if defeated?

Published on: 

Politics is a funny sport. 

In June 2015, Alberta’s last airlift hero resigned the very night he won his seat but not his premiership. Jim Prentice left federal politics to lead Albertans to the Promised Land by winning the leadership of the Alberta Conservative Party. The voting rules of the party had twice allowed third-place contenders to win the leadership when the top two c ...

A Royal Navy sailor removes iron restraints from a newly liberated slave. The anti-slavery movement was embedded in Christian morality but writer Joseph Fournier argues, it also got a push from the development of more efficient modern machinery

FOURNIER: How industrialists put a stop to slavery

Published on: 

Throughout all recorded history, slavery and child labour were near universal facts of life, all over the world. Then suddenly over a period of 100 years (the late 18th and 19th centuries,) the global slave trade came to a grinding halt. Highly organized abolitionists from the United States, Europe and the Caribbean drove the slave traders from the high seas and formally ended legal slavery.

MORGAN: Canada's election is in Trump's hands

MORGAN: Canada's election is in Trump's hands

Published on: 

If nothing else, President Trump taught Canadian Conservatives there is no such thing as a forgone conclusion.

Only a few short months ago, the Liberals appeared to be in an impossible spot as they languished at the bottom of the polls. Even with the replacement of Trudeau, nobody thought the party could recover by the next election.

Then Trump was inaugurated and everything chang ...

logo
Western Standard
www.westernstandard.news