- Low-cost index funds were supposed to reshape investing in India, but distributors and legacy fund houses are keeping them on the sidelines
- New players have slashed fees and pushed innovation, but they still control just a tiny fraction of the mutual-fund industry's passive assets
- Passive funds were meant to be simple, but an explosion of niche indices, smart-beta products, and complex hybrids is making them harder to sell
- Passive funds are slowly growing, but until retail investors shift preferences or a giant like Jio-Blackrock shakes things up, the revolution remains stuck in first gear
Enter your email address to receive a daily summary of all our stories.
What do non-bank Navi and discount brokers Zerodha* and Groww have in common? Sure, they’re the cool new kids trying to shake up India’s $750 billion mutual-fund industry. And yes, they’ve all launched new fund offers (NFOs) in the past six months.
But more importantly, every single one of those NFOs is a passive fund—
In February, Navi Mutual Fund
The playbook is clear. These fund houses—and others like NJ Mutual Fund—dreamed of big disruption, convinced that passive investing was the future. (The Ken had written about
They had good reason to believe so. Last year, passive funds won the big game in the US, where—for the first time ever—they overtook active funds in assets under management (AUM). Blackrock and Vanguard built empires on this shift. So, naturally, the question is: why not in India?
Well.
India’s Vanguard moment isn’t exactly imminent. Passive AUM has certainly surged—it’s more than tripled in four years to Rs 10 lakh crore ($120 billion).
Share this article with your network
Send the article link to friends or colleagues who might find this story interesting or insightful.
Send the article link to friends or colleagues who might find this story interesting or insightful.