This site uses cookies and related technologies, as described in our privacy policy, for purposes that may include site operation, analytics, enhanced user experience, or advertising. You may choose to consent to our use of these technologies, or manage your own preferences.
Dapagliflozin in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation
Published March 29, 2025
N Engl J Med 2025;392:1396-1405
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2500366
Abstract
Background
Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of heart-failure admission among high-risk patients. However, most patients with valvular heart disease, including those undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), have been excluded from randomized trials.
Methods
We conducted this randomized, controlled trial in Spain to evaluate the efficacy of dapagliflozin (at a dose of 10 mg once daily) as compared with standard care alone in patients with aortic stenosis who were undergoing TAVI. All the patients had a history of heart failure plus at least one of the following: renal insufficiency, diabetes, or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or worsening of heart failure, defined as hospitalization or an urgent visit, at 1 year of follow-up.
Results
A total of 620 patients were randomly assigned to receive dapagliflozin and 637 to receive standard care alone after TAVI; after exclusions, a total of 1222 patients were included in the primary analysis. A primary-outcome event occurred in 91 patients (15.0%) in the dapagliflozin group and in 124 patients (20.1%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; P=0.02). Death from any cause occurred in 47 patients (7.8%) in the dapagliflozin group and in 55 (8.9%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.28). Worsening of heart failure occurred in 9.4% and 14.4% of the patients, respectively (subhazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88). Genital infection and hypotension were significantly more common in the dapagliflozin group.
Conclusions
Among older adults with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI who were at high risk for heart-failure events, dapagliflozin resulted in a significantly lower incidence of death from any cause or worsening of heart failure than standard care alone. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04696185.)
Notes
This article was published on March 29, 2025, at NEJM.org.
A data sharing statement provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
Supported by a grant (FIS PI19/01882) from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, a grant (GRS 2459/A/21, 2022) from the Gerencia Regional de Salud de la Junta de Castilla y León y Fondos, a grant (SEC/FEC-INV-CLI 21/004) from the Spanish Society of Cardiology, a grant (SOGACAR 2022) from the Galician Society of Cardiology, a grant (SGLT2-HYPE 101156555, to Dr. Ibáñez) from the European Commission, and by the Spanish National Center for Cardiovascular Research (CNIC), which is supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III; the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; the Pro CNIC Foundation; and a grant (CEX2020-001041-S funded by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033) from the Severo Ochoa Center of Excellence.
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at NEJM.org.
Supplementary Material
Research Summary (nejmoa2500366_research-summary.pdf)
- Download
- 1.58 MB
Protocol (nejmoa2500366_protocol.pdf)
- Download
- 2.15 MB
Supplementary Appendix (nejmoa2500366_appendix.pdf)
- Download
- 682.54 KB
Disclosure Forms (nejmoa2500366_disclosures.pdf)
- Download
- 3.62 MB
Data Sharing Statement (nejmoa2500366_data-sharing.pdf)
- Download
- 69.77 KB
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 2025 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
For personal use only. Any commercial reuse of NEJM Group content requires permission.
Translation
History
Published online: March 29, 2025
Published in issue: April 10, 2025
Topics
Authors
Affiliations
1Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares Carlos III, Madrid
2Cardiology Department, University Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Vigo, Spain
3University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
4Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares, Madrid
5Cardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
6Cardiology Department, University Hospital Son Espases and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Islas Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
7Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain
8Cardiology Department, University Hospital Montecelo, Pontevedra, Spain
9Cardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital San Carlos, Madrid
10Cardiology Department, University Hospital Puerta del Mar, Cádiz, Spain
11Cardiology Department, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
12Cardiology Department, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
13Cardiology Department, University Hospital German Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
14Cardiology Department, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Córdoba, Spain
15Cardiology Department, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
16Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Albacete, Albacete, Spain
17Cardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital, Barcelona
18Cardiology Department, University General Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
19Cardiology Department, University Hospital Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain
20Cardiology Department, University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona
21Cardiology Department, University Hospital La Luz, Madrid
22Cardiology Department, University Hospital Bellvitge, Barcelona
23Cardiology Department, University Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
24Cardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
25Cardiology Department, University Hospital Fundación Jiménez Díaz and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid
26Cardiology Department, University Clinical Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
27Cardiology Department, University Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute IIB-Sant Pau, Barcelona
28Cardiology Department, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
29Cardiology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid
30Cardiology Department, University Hospital Juan Ramon Jiménez, Huelva, Spain
31Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
32Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Cruces, Baracaldo, Spain
33Cardiology Department, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
34Cardiology Department, University Hospital San Cecilio, Granada, Spain
35Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
36Cardiology Department, University Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid
37Cardiology Department, University Hospital Torrejón and University Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid
38Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Jaen, Jaen, Spain
39Cardiology Department, University Hospital Vithas Arturo Soria, Madrid
40University Europea of Madrid, Madrid
41Cardiology Department, University Hospital Puerta del Hierro, Madrid
42Cardiology Department, University Hospital of León, Leon, Spain
43Cardiology Department, Clínica Teknon, Barcelona
44Cardiology Department, University Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
45Anesthesiology Department, University Hospital Montecelo, Pontevedra, Spain
46Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Torrejón, Ribera Salud Group, Madrid
47Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Povisa, Ribera Salud Group, Vigo, Spain
48Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Altmetrics
Citations
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.
Cited by
- Aortic Stenosis — When Valve Intervention Is Not Enough, New England Journal of Medicine, 392, 14, (1443-1444), (2025)./doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2503345
Loading...