AI Copyright Lawsuits in the US
Case Name Thomson Reuters v. Ross | Plaintiff(s) Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GMBH and West Publishing Corporation | Defendant(s) Ross Intelligence Inc. | Type of AI tool Legal assistant | Month Filed May 2020 | Status of Case Partial summary judgement issued on February 11, 2025. Thomson Reuters won | Court US District Court - Delaware | Summary In the first known AI copyright lawsuit filed, Thomson Reuters alleges that now-defunct legal research startup Ross Intelligence violated its copyright by reproducing headnotes from Westlaw, which Thomson Reuters owns, with the intention of training a legal AI tool. | Filing PDF |
Case Name Doe v. GitHub | Plaintiff(s) John Does 1-5 | Defendant(s) Github, Microsoft, and OpenAI | Type of AI tool Virtual assistant | Month Filed Nov. 2022 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Northern District of California | Summary The first class action lawsuit concerning generative AI was brought by five anonymous GitHub contributors who object to how the Microsoft-owned code platform’s Copilot and Codex tools were trained. Notably, this case focused on alleged violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. | Filing PDF |
Case Name Anderson v. Stability AI | Plaintiff(s) Sarah Anderson, Karla Ortiz, Grzegorz Rutkowski, Gregory Manchess, Gerald Brom, Jingna Zhang, Julia Kaye, and Adam Ellis | Defendant(s) Stability AI, Runway AI, Deviant Art, and Midjourney | Type of AI tool Image generator | Month Filed Jan. 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Northern District of California | Summary The first class action lawsuit brought by visual artists against AI companies. The artists allege that four firms trained image generators on their work without their consent. | Filing PDF |
Case Name Getty Images v. Stability AI | Plaintiff(s) Getty Images | Defendant(s) Stability AI | Type of AI tool Image generator | Month Filed Feb. 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Delaware | Summary Getty Images alleges that Stability AI violated its copyright by taking more than 12 million of Getty’s photographs, along with corresponding captions and metadata, to train its AI image generator, Stable Diffusion | Filing PDF |
Case Name Kadrey v. Meta | Plaintiff(s) Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Junot Díaz, Andrew Sean Greer, David Henry Hwang, Matthew Klam, Laura Lippman, Rachel Louise Snyder, Jacqueline Woodson, and Christopher Farnsworth | Defendant(s) Meta | Type of AI tool Text generator | Month Filed July 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Northern District of California | Summary A group of high-profile authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehesi Coates, allege that Meta used their writing to train its large language model Llama without their permission | Filing PDF |
Case Name In re OpenAI ChatGPT Litigation | Plaintiff(s) Paul Tremblay, Sarah Silverman, Christopher Golden, Richard Kadrey, Michael Chabon, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Junot Díaz, Andrew Sean Greer, David Henry Hwang, Matthew Klam, Laura Lippman, Rachel Louise Snyder, Ayelet Waldman, and Jacqueline Woodson | Defendant(s) OpenAI | Type of AI tool Text generator | Month Filed July 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Northern District of California | Summary A group of high-profile authors, including comedian Sarah Silverman and Ta-Nehesi Coates, allege that OpenAI unlawfully trained several of its large language models on their work. This lawsuit was originally three separate cases, which have been consolidated into one. The first was filed in June 2023. | Filing PDF |
Case Name In re Google Generative AI Copyright Litigation | Plaintiff(s) Jill Leovy, Jingna Zhang, Sarah Andersen, Hope Larson, and Jessica Fink | Defendant(s) | Type of AI tool Text generator and image generator | Month Filed July 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Northern District of California | Summary Journalist Jill Leovy kicked off this litigation in July 2023, alleging Google scraped her data from the internet to train its language models. (She was initially joined by other writer plaintiffs, but they later left the case.) Her lawsuit was recently consolidated with a case brought by visual artists alleging that Google trained text-to-image generation tools on images of their work without permission. | Filing PDF |
Case Name Authors Guild v. OpenAI | Plaintiff(s) Jonathan Alter, The Authors Guild, David Baldacci, Kai Bird, Mary Bly, Taylor Branch, Rich Cohen, Michael Connelly, Sylvia Day, Jonathan Franzen, John Grisham, Elin Hilderbrand, Christina Baker Kline, Victor LaValle, Eugene Linden, George R.R. Martin, Daniel Okrent, Jodi Picoult, Douglas Preston, Roxana Robinson, Julian Sancton, George Saunders, Stacy Schiff, Hampton Sides, James Shapiro, Jia Tolentino, Scott Turow, Simon Winchester, Rachel Vail, Nicholas A. Basbanes, and Nicholas Ngagoyeanes | Defendant(s) OpenAI | Type of AI tool Text generator | Month Filed Sept. 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Southern District of New York | Summary Three separate cases, including one brought by The Authors Guild, a professional organization for writers, have been consolidated into one. The plaintiffs allege that OpenAI infringed on the copyright of a long list of high-profile authors, including George R.R. Martin and Jia Tolentino, by using their work to train its AI models without permission. | Filing PDF |
Case Name Huckabee v. Meta | Plaintiff(s) Mike Huckabee, Relevate Group, David Kinnaman, Tsh Oxenreider, Lysa TerKeurst, and John Blase | Defendant(s) Bloomberg | Type of AI tool Text generator | Month Filed Oct. 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Southern District of New York | Summary Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee and a group of Christian writers allege that Bloomberg violated their copyright by training its large language model, BloombergGPT, on their books without permission. (When this case was initially filed in October 2023, Meta and the nonprofit EleutherAI were also listed as defendants; it has since been amended, but the case name remains the same.) | Filing PDF |
Case Name Concord Music Group v. Anthropic | Plaintiff(s) Concord Music Group, Universal Music Publishing Group, and ABKCO Music | Defendant(s) Anthropic | Type of AI tool Text generator | Month Filed Oct. 2023 | Status of Case In progress | Court US District Court - Northern District of California | Summary A group of music publishers is suing Anthropic, alleging that the AI company’s text generators were trained on their copyrighted lyrics. This is the first music industry AI copyright case, but it concerns only copyrighted words, rather than musical scores or recordings. This case was originally brought in Tennessee but later moved to Northern California. | Filing PDF |
Use the search bar to find your state
/ 3