Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Reuters

US appeals court rejects copyrights for AI-generated art lacking 'human' creator

Blake Brittain
2 min read
Illustration shows AI (Artificial Intelligence) letters and computer motherboard
Generate Key Takeaways

By Blake Brittain

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed with the U.S. Copyright Office that an image created by Stephen Thaler's AI system "DABUS" was not entitled to copyright protection, and that only works with human authors can be copyrighted.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Tuesday's decision marks the latest attempt by U.S. officials to grapple with the copyright implications of the fast-growing generative AI industry. The Copyright Office has separately rejected artists' bids for copyrights on images generated by the AI system Midjourney.

The artists argued they were entitled to copyrights for images they created with AI assistance -- unlike Thaler, who said that his "sentient" system created the image in his case independently.

Thaler's attorney Ryan Abbott said he and his client "strongly disagree" with the ruling and intend to appeal. The Copyright Office said in a statement that it "believes the court reached the correct result."

Thaler, of St. Charles, Missouri, applied for a copyright in 2018 covering "A Recent Entrance to Paradise," a piece of visual art he said was made by his AI system. The office rejected his application in 2022, finding that creative works must have human authors to be copyrightable.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A federal district court judge in Washington upheld the decision in 2023 and said human authorship is a "bedrock requirement of copyright" based on "centuries of settled understanding." Thaler told the D.C. Circuit that the ruling threatened to "discourage investment and labor in a critically new and important developing field."

U.S. Circuit Judge Patricia Millett wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel on Tuesday that U.S. copyright law "requires all work to be authored in the first instance by a human being."

"Because many of the Copyright Act's provisions make sense only if an author is a human being, the best reading of the Copyright Act is that human authorship is required for registration," the appeals court said.

(Reporting by Blake Brittain in Washington. Editing by David Bario, Leigh Jones and Mark Potter)

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
Fortune

Putin says it’s ‘a profound mistake’ to treat Trump’s push for Greenland and its vast deposits of rare minerals as ‘some preposterous talk’

Paolo Confino
5 min read
Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump attend a bilateral meeting in Osaka, Japan, on June 28, 2019.
  • President Donald Trump’s repeated interest in taking control of Greenland has not gone unnoticed in Russia. During a Thursday speech, Russian President Vladimir Putin said he considered the U.S. interest in Greenland to be serious, pointing to past efforts to acquire the territory. Greenland has massive deposits of rare minerals that are critical to global supply chains, which the Trump administration sees as vital to U.S. interests.

Russian President Vladimir Putin cautioned against taking the Trump administration’s newly declared push for taking over Greenland lightly.

In a speech in the Arctic Circle city of Murmansk, which lies in the northwestern corner of Russia, 110 miles from the Finnish border, Putin said he was taking President Donald Trump’s efforts to claim Greenland for the U.S. seriously.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It can surprise someone only at first glance,” Putin said, according to an English translation of the speech by state-owned media. “It is a profound mistake to treat it as some preposterous talk by the new U.S. administration. Nothing of the sort.”

Since taking office two months ago, Trump has made clear he is eyeing U.S. territorial expansion by annexing Greenland. Trump pointed to Greenland’s rich but untapped mineral deposits as a reason why controlling the territory was vital to U.S. national interest.

The government of Greenland, which is an autonomous region of Denmark, has adamantly rejected any notion that it would become part of the U.S. Both political leaders and citizens have said they have no intention of joining the U.S., while Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said the island was “not for sale,” and that Trump’s interest in Greenland was “not a joke.”

Greenland has 25 of 34 “critical raw materials,” according to a 2023 report from the European Commission. Among those deposits are rare earths and graphite, which are critical for the production of EVs. Other rare and highly coveted raw materials include titanium, tungsten, and uranium, which are used in everything from medical devices to light bulb filaments to nuclear fuel. Currently, the global market for these materials is dominated by China, which has deep reserves of them within its borders. If the U.S. were to control Greenland’s critical resources, it would have its own access to them, thus breaking its reliance on Chinese mining.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Greenland also has unmined supplies of valuable commodities like gold and diamonds.

On Thursday, ahead of Vice President JD Vance’s visit to Greenland, Trump reiterated his desire to take the island.

“We’ll go as far as we have to go,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “We need Greenland.”

Greenland’s geographic positioning between North America and Europe also makes it a crucial trade route between the western and eastern hemispheres. Shipping routes to Asia and Europe through the Arctic are about 40% shorter than others, such as via the Suez and Panama canals, according to the U.S. Naval Institute, though it cautions shorter shipping routes does not necessarily equate to faster or cheaper transport. Traveling through the Arctic is more cumbersome because cargo ships need icebreakers and crews need to be specially trained for the frigid climate.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Russia, which controls more territory in the Arctic Circle than any other country, sees that part of the world as critical to its own national interests for the same reasons. In his speech, Putin referenced Russia’s need for trade routes through the Arctic and its role as a critical hub of oil and natural gas production. In recent years, Putin has grown increasingly concerned about what he considers to be the West’s encroachment on Russia’s influence in the Arctic. He was particularly frustrated when Finland and Sweden joined NATO in 2023 and 2024, respectively. Russia, which shares an 800-mile border with Finland, called the country’s admittance to NATO a mistake.

“The role and importance of the Arctic for Russia and for the entire world are obviously growing,” Putin said. “Regrettably, the geopolitical competition and fighting for positions in this region are also escalating.”

Owing to the Arctic Circle’s growing importance in global geopolitics, Putin was unsurprised the U.S. was angling for more influence in the region.

“The United States has serious plans regarding Greenland,” Putin said in his speech. “These plans have long historical roots … and it is obvious that the United States will continue to consistently advance its geo-strategic, military-political, and economic interests in the Arctic.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

The U.S. first took an interest in acquiring Greenland in 1867. Shortly after completing the purchase of Alaska from the Russian Empire, then–Secretary of State William Seward set his sights on acquiring Greenland from Denmark. The two countries never reached an agreement. Later, after World War II, President Harry Truman offered Denmark $100 million in gold and a portion of Alaskan oil. That offer was rebuffed.

During World War II, the U.S. had several military bases in Greenland that surveilled the Axis powers and were meant to be a first line of defense against any potential westward expansion on their behalf. The U.S. continues to maintain bases in Greenland.

Putin alluded to the possibility that if the U.S. were to take control of Greenland, it would escalate tensions with Russia. He accused NATO countries of using the Arctic as a “springboard for possible conflicts.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
The Hill

Shouted questions at Trump have consequences: New actions by White House

Dominick Mastrangelo
5 min read

“Mr. President! You talked about some of the violence that’s been going on at dealerships,” a reporter yelled to President Trump as he stood next to Elon Musk and a Tesla parked near the White House lawn earlier this month.

“Some say they should be labeled domestic terrorists.” 
 
“I’ll do that,” Trump interjected. “We’re going to stop it if we catch anybody doing it because they’re harming a great American company.” 
 
Days later, Trump’s FBI would launch a task force dedicated to investigating and referring for prosecution suspects in a string of incidents protesting Musk at Tesla dealerships across the country. 
 
It was one of several instances during the first three months of Trump’s second term in which a shouted question or suggestion from a media member has resulted in direct action from the president. 
 
It’s a trend several reporters in the Washington press corps and national political insiders told The Hill this week underscores Trump’s intense focus on press coverage – and how the coverage can lead to new efforts by Trump to take actions that will create additional headlines – and new news cycles.

“It’s getting to the point where a reporter can just offhandedly mention something to him on camera and start an entire news cycle off of it,” said one White House correspondent. “It’s unclear if Trump is actually unaware of some of this stuff beforehand or is just professing ignorance for tactical reasons.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trump, a news junkie, regularly shares feedback on cable news segments and front page stories in public statements, social media posts and on-camera conversations with top aides.

The president in recent weeks has made a habit of asking which outlet a reporter works for before deciding whether to accept the question. If the reporter works for an outlet Trump feels has treated him unfairly, get ready to be ignored or insulted.

But increasingly, questions from friendlier outlets that get shouted in Trump’s direction have more than just caught the president’s eye – they’ve led him to act.

“The astronauts that you just helped save from space, they didn’t get any overtime pay,” Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy told the president during an Oval Office gaggle last week. “Is there anything the administration can do to make them whole?”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trump, seemingly amused by Doocy, responded with a smirk and said, “nobody’s ever mentioned this to me!”

“If I have to, I’ll pay it out of my own pocket, okay?” he told Doocy. “I’ll get it for them … I like that. I’ll get it done.”

It was unclear as of Friday afternoon if Trump had made good on his promise to pay the astronauts. The White House did not immediately respond to The Hill’s inquiry seeking confirmation.

The Trump administration also earlier this month pulled Secret Service protection for Hunter Biden, the former president’s son, after Trump was asked if former government officials and their families needed such security privileges.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“What he sees on television and what he’s asked by the press definitely influences how he responds to things … and how he makes decisions,” said Peter Loge, a political scientist at George Washington University. “He’s defined himself by his own television and popular persona for decades. He thinks in media terms first, like a television producer who translates television into policy.”

Media outlets hoping to capitalize on a “Trump bump” in ratings and audience to dedicating more resources and airtime to the new administration.

Some of the “new media” faces on the White House grounds have made regular habit of asking out-of-the-box or partisan questions to get a response from Trump.

Many of these reporters, journalists at more mainstream outlets say, are eager to create a soundbite or video clip of themselves posing a question to the commander in chief and eliciting a response or promise to act.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It kind of seems like they’re testing the limits of what he’ll respond to,” one national Republican strategist told The Hill. “And on Trump’s side, he’s using the answer to the shouted question as a sort of testing ground for some of these decisions might land in terms of reaction form the public.”

Other observers suggested West Wing staff could be planting or at least suggesting questions to members of the press pool in an attempt to get an issue to the front of Trump’s mind.

Doocy, during an interview earlier this year, noted background conversations with Biden’s White House staff was essential to his reporting, which he said sought to pose “different” questions than the “singular focus” of some press briefings.

The White House declined to comment.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“I’ve always found if you put on a smile and ask politely, you’re going to get a response from him,” another White House correspondent told The Hill. “It seems a lot of reporters are taking that approach given the access drama that is unfolding in the middle of all of this.”

The White House is locked in a legal battle with the Associated Press over its decision to ban the wire service from key West Wing spaces over its “Gulf of America” stylebook policy.

Getting Trump’s attention can be a fickle game, those who have worked around the president say, and sometimes the best way to get him to listen is through the mouth of a reporter.

“He tends to react quickly to anything that touches on his brand, or legacy – especially now that he’s in his second term,” the Republican strategist said. “Especially if the framing is somewhat critical or casts doubt on his authority or popularity – those tend to rise to the top of his radar.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
Fortune

Trump seeks even more aggressive tariffs to fundamentally transform the US economy and eyes a single universal duty, report says

Jason Ma
3 min read
President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on Friday.
  • President Donald Trump is pressing his staff to take a harder stance on tariffs as part of an effort to transform the US economy, sources told the Washington Post. That could include a universal tariff that hits most imports without regard to the country of origin. The discussions come right before April 2, which Trump has billed as "Liberation Day," when his next batch of tariffs will be unveiled.

As part of an effort to fundamentally transform the US economy, President Donald Trump has been pushing his staff to get even more aggressive on tariffs, sources told the Washington Post.

That could include a universal tariff that hits most imports, no matter which country they are from, the report said, adding that Trump views a single duty as less likely to be watered down by exemptions.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Intense discussions are ongoing ahead of April 2, which Trump has billed as "Liberation Day," when his next batch of tariffs will be unveiled.

For now, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's "dirty 15" plan to set tariffs on the 15% of countries that the administration considers the worst trading partners is seen as the most likely outcome, according to the Post.

"There’s still a lot of options still on the table. They are considering everything and trying very hard to make the idea of a reciprocal tariff both understandable to the American public and effective," Wilbur Ross, Trump’s commerce secretary during his first term, told the Post. "They are quite correctly exploring every alternative in the hope they come to the best possible solution."

The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trump has already slapped tariffs on China, Canada, Mexico, steel, aluminum and autos, while threatening duties on pharmaceuticals, chips, lumber and the European Union.

He said reciprocal tariffs would come out on April 2, but suggested he would show some "flexibility." And earlier reports that said those would be more targeted raised hopes on Wall Street that their impact would be less severe.

But after stocks rallied, his announcement of the auto tariffs on Wednesday contributed to another selloff, which was also fueled by signs that tariffs were worsening inflation and consumers' expectations of future inflation.

Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee recently warned that inflation expectations could become a self-fulfilling prophecy, and Boston Fed President Susan Collins has said tariff-induced inflation "looks inevitable," adding that he suspects the central bank will hold rates steady for longer.

Advertisement
Advertisement

After their most recent policy meeting this month, Fed officials lowered their forecasts for economic growth and raised their inflation estimates, raising the specter of "stagflation."

Meanwhile, surveys of consumers and businesses show that they are turning increasingly gloomy about the economy amid tariff uncertainty and mass federal layoffs. Even executives in deep-red states that voted for Trump say business conditions are collapsing.

And economists have been hiking recession odds, with some even seeing a 50-50 chance of a downturn.

Fitch Ratings previously estimated that If Trump carries out all his plans, the effective US tariff rate could hit 18% on average—the highest level in 90 years.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trump has acknowledged Americans will feel "some pain" from his tariffs but that they are necessary to revitalize US manufacturing and rebalance trade to more favorable terms.

While several companies have pledged to set up more factories in the US, Wall Street has warned that tariffs meant to reshuffle the auto sector, which has closely integrated supply chains across Canada and Mexico, will create chaos.

Still, the White House said the Trump administration is committed to delivering on his vision restore the US industrial base.

“America cannot just be an assembler of foreign-made parts—we must become a manufacturing powerhouse that dominates every step of the supply chain of industries that are critical for our national security and economic interests,” spokesman Kush Desai previously told Fortune.

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
Fortune

Social Security employee warns ‘people could be out of benefits for months’ as staffers who fix payment glitches exit

Jason Ma
3 min read
A United States Treasury government check.
  • President Donald Trump's efforts to slash federal staffing across agencies is also resulting in the loss of technical expertise need to help maintain critical systems, including those used to pay Social Security benefits. That means payments could be at risk if there's a glitch and the right people aren't there to fix it.

Social Security employees with key expertise are reportedly heading for the exits amid President Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, raising the risk that any technical glitches could interrupt benefits.

That's as the administration looks to shrink the Social Security Administration by thousands, including via voluntary separation offers.

Advertisement
Advertisement

One Baltimore-based staffer who works on payment systems told the Washington Post that nearly a quarter of his team is gone or will soon be gone due to resignations and retirements.

Those with top software skills are leaving the Social Security Administration to get high-paying jobs in the private sector, he added.

As a result, several software updates and modernization processes that were supposed to be completed soon will likely miss their deadlines, and many of the experts who fix glitches that can stop payments are now exiting, the report said.

"That has to get cleaned up on a case-by-case basis, and the experts in how to do that are leaving," the Baltimore employee told the Post. "We will have cases that get stuck, and they’re not going to be able to get fixed. People could be out of benefits for months."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Former Social Security Commissioner Martin O’Malley previously warned of a "system collapse" that could halt payments, saying changes that the Department of Government Efficiency is making to the agency have already caused IT system outages.

On Friday, Wired reported that DOGE is forming a team to migrate the Social Security Administration’s computer systems off the archaic COBOL programming language in a matter of months.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration also plans to phase out payments via paper checks, but that will affect nearly half a million Social Security recipients.

According to an analysis of Social Security Administration data by Axios, 0.7% of 68.2 million total recipients were still getting paper checks as of March. While that is a minuscule share, it still translates to nearly 456,000 Americans.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The SSA gave instructions on how to switch to direct deposit or sign up to receive benefits through a debit card. But anyone who's not computer savvy may need to call, and phone lines have been flooded with people lately, with wait times running for hours.

To be sure, exceptions will be made for people without banking or electronic payment access as well as certain emergency payments or law enforcement activities and other special cases.

"With a resounding mandate from the American people, President Trump is moving quickly to fulfill his promise of making the federal government more efficient. He has promised to protect social security, and every recipient will continue to receive their benefits," White House spokeswoman Liz Huston told Fortune in a statement.

While Trump has maintained that he won't touch benefits, critics of DOGE have said its changes are part of a “backdoor” effort to cut payments and gut the agency.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In fact, other Social Security employees told the Post that phone lines are so backed up that one field office has told people to send questions via fax.

Another said online claims, which field staff must complete, are piling up, and that complicated benefits cases are falling by the wayside, the report said.

“There is just no time to breathe or get anything else done,” an employee told the Post. “We used to be efficient.”

This story was originally featured on Fortune.com

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
The Independent

JD Vance and other officials told Trump to fire Waltz. There was just one reason he didn’t

Oliver O'Connell
2 min read
Generate Key Takeaways

Reporting by multiple outlets suggests that while President Donald Trump has been outwardly supportive of his national security adviser since the Signalgate security breach fiasco, internal discussions about Mike Waltz’s future were somewhat different.

After a day of bruising headlines about the now-infamous group chat that has inadvertently included journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, on Wednesday evening, Vice President JD Vance, Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, and top personnel official Sergio Gor had a private meeting with the president, Politico reports.

In that meeting, they suggested that it might be best for Waltz to be dismissed, two people familiar with the conversations who were granted anonymity to discuss them told the outlet.

Advertisement
Advertisement

While the president agreed that Waltz was at fault for the debacle, he ultimately decided not to fire him for one reason — that it would be a win for Democrats and the liberal media.

President Donald Trump and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz (Getty Images)
President Donald Trump and National Security Adviser Mike Waltz (Getty Images)

“They don’t want to give the press a scalp,” one of the people, a White House ally close with the team, told Politico.

According to Axios, Trump officials say the president was more angry that Waltz had Goldberg's number in his phone than he was about the exposure of sensitive military strike details. Things got worse after Waltz's sloppy explanation on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News show.

The New York Times reports that even before the Signal leak, Waltz was already on “shaky footing” and was viewed as too hawkish and keen for military action against Iran. This has caused friction with other members of the Trump team and the wider MAGA world.

Advertisement
Advertisement

On Friday’s visit to Greenland, Waltz accompanied Vance and, according to an official who spoke to Axios, was counseled by him on the flight back about “knowing his place” and “working more collaboratively.”

For now, key administration figures are standing by Waltz, with statements of support from Trump, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, and Vance again in Greenland.

“If you think you’re going to force the president of the United States to fire anybody, you’ve got another thing coming,” he said.

“President Trump has said it on Monday, on Tuesday, on Wednesday, on Thursday, and I’m the vice president saying it here on Friday, we are standing behind our entire national security team.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

While Waltz still has his job five days after the scandal broke, that doesn’t mean he’s safe, the two people who spoke to Politico said. Indeed, they say that some officials are waiting for the right time to let Waltz go once the news cycle moves on.

When might that be?

One predicted: “They’ll stick by him for now, but he’ll be gone in a couple of weeks.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Putin calls to remove Zelensky, 'finish off' Ukrainian troops
AFP
US orders French companies to comply with Trump's diversity ban
Reuters
Advertisement