Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online November 20, 2024

Journalists as individual users of artificial intelligence: Examining journalists’ “value-motivated use” of ChatGPT and other AI tools within and without the newsroom

Abstract

ChatGPT and other AI applications have made the widespread use of artificial intelligence possible with their conversational interfaces and open accessibility – this “mainstreaming” of AI use has become concerning for news organizations as they grapple with the creation of appropriate AI-related guidelines and tools for their newsrooms. Even while such discussions are ongoing, the cultural shift among journalists has already begun. This paper highlights the role of journalists not simply as agents working within the confines of news organizations, but as actors with individual agency to enact change. Their use of AI has already gained significant momentum, with or without newsroom oversight and direction. This paper, supported by field theory, uses in-depth interviews with journalists and editors to uncover how journalists are themselves using AI in their day-to-day work, and how they ensure their values of “good journalism” are not compromised. Results show that journalists are already personally using AI in numerous tasks across all the stages of news production, namely in news gathering, news writing and presentation, news editing, and news promotion, and have three strategies to maintain their practice of “good journalism”. These results prompt the paper’s proposition of a new “value-motivated use” perspective to summarize journalistic adoption of AI – that it is the journalistic values that motivate their increased use of AI, as well as the values that motivate their limitations of this use; journalists will use the technology only to the extent that it aligns with the values of their profession.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Anderson CW (2019) Journalism as procedure, journalism as values. Journalism 20(1): 8–12.
Benson R (1999) Field theory in comparative context: a new paradigm for media studies. Theory and Society 28(3): 463–498.
Bianchi F, Kalluri P, Durmus E, et al. (2023) Easily accessible text-to-image generation amplifies demographic stereotypes at large scale. In: Paper Presented at the 2023 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, Chicago, IL, USA, 12–15 June 2023, 1493–1504.
Bloomberg (2023) Introducing BloombergGPT, bloomberg’s 50-billion parameter large language model, purpose-built from scratch for finance. https://www.bloomberg.com/company/press/bloomberggpt-50-billion-parameterllm-tuned-finance/.
Bourdieu P (2000) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Bourdieu P (2005) The political field, the social science field, and the journalistic field. In: Benson R, Neveu E (eds) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 29–47.
Carlson M (2015) The robotic reporter. Digital Journalism 3(3): 416–431.
Carlson M, Lewis SC (2019) Boundary Work. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K, Hanitzsch T (eds). The Handbook of Journalism Studies. Taylor & Francis, 123–135.
Cools H, Diakopoulos N (2024) Uses of generative AI in the newsroom: mapping journalists’ perceptions of perils and possibilities. Journalism Practice 1–19.
Deuze M (2005) What is journalism? professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism 6(4): 442–464.
Diakopoulos N (2015) Algorithmic accountability. Digital Journalism 3(3): 398–415.
Dickinson R (2008) Studying the sociology of journalists: the journalistic field and the news world. Sociology Compass 2(5): 1383–1399.
Dijkstra AM, de Jong A, Boscolo M (2024) Quality of science journalism in the age of artificial intelligence explored with a mixed methodology. PLoS One 19(6): e0303367.
Domingo D, Quandt T, Heinonen A, et al. (2008) Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond. Journalism Practice 2: 326–342.
Gómez-Mompart J-L, Gutiérrez-Lozano J-F, Palau-Sampio D (2015) Spanish journalists and the loss of news quality: professional judgements. Comunicar 23(45): 143–150.
Gutierrez Lopez M, Porlezza C, Cooper G, et al. (2022) A question of design: strategies for embedding AI-driven tools into journalistic work routines. Digital Journalism 11(3): 484–503.
Gutiérrez-Caneda B, Vázquez-Herrero J, López-García X (2023) AI application in journalism: ChatGPT and the uses and risks of an emergent technology. Profesional de la información 32(5): e320514.
Hays S (1994) Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture. Theory 12(1): 57–72.
Helberger N, Diakopoulos N (2023) ChatGPT and the AI act. Internet Policy Review 12(1): 1–6.
Karppinen K (2018) Journalism, Pluralism, and Diversity. In: Vos TP (ed). Journalism. Berlin, GE: De Gruyter, 493–510.
Korn J (2023) CNN business, how companies are embracing generative AI for employees. . . or not. https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/22/tech/generative-ai-corporate-policy/index.html.
Kovach B, Rosentiel T (2021) The Elements of Journalism: What Newspeople Should Know and the Public Should Expect. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.
Lunden I (2023) BuzzFeed launches infinity Quizzes, creating personalized stories powered by OpenAI. https://techcrunch.com/2023/02/14/buzzfeed-launches-infinity-quizzes-creating-personalized-stories-powered-by-openai/.
Meijer IC (2001) The Public Quality of Popular Journalism: Developing a Normative Framework. Journalism Studies 2(2): 189–205.
Milosavljević M, Vobič I (2019) Human still in the loop: editors reconsider the ideals of professional journalism through automation. Digital Journalism 7(8): 1098–1116.
Møller LA (2023) Designing algorithmic editors: how newspapers embed and encode journalistic values into news recommender systems. Digital Journalism 12: 926–944.
Montal T, Reich Z (2017) I, robot. You, journalist. Who is the author? Digital. Journalism 5: 829–849.
Nishal S, Diakopoulos N (2023) Envisioning the applications and implications of generative AI for news media. In: CHI ’23 worksop on generative AI and HCI, Hamburg, Germany. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 23–28 April 2023, 8.
O’Sullivan J, Heinonen A (2008) Old values, new media: journalism role perceptions in a changing world. Journalism Practice 2(3): 357–371.
Pavlik JV (2023) Collaborating with ChatGPT: considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 78(1): 84–93.
Peña-Fernández S, Meso-Ayerdi K, Larrondo-Ureta A, et al. (2023) Without journalists, there is no journalism: the social dimension of generative artificial intelligence in the media”. Profesional de la información 32(2): e320227.
Reilley M (2024) The Journalist’s Toolbox: A Guide to Digital Reporting and AI. 1st edition. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG (2023) Artificial intelligence hallucinations. Critical Care 27(1): 180.
Schapals AK, Porlezza C (2020) Assistance or resistance? Evaluating the intersection of automated journalism and journalistic role conceptions. Media and Communication 8(3): 16–26.
Schudson M (2001) The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism. Journalism 2(2): 149–170.
Shi Y, Sun L (2024) How generative AI is transforming journalism: development, application and ethics. Journalism and Media 5: 582–594.
Shoemaker PJ, Reese SD (1996) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. New York, NY: Longman.
Tham D (2023) Singapore to triple AI talent pool, build 'iconic' AI site as part of updated national strategy. CNA. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/national-ai-strategy-artificial-intelligence-talent-iconic-site-3963971.
Tracy S (2013) Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
van Dalen A (2012) The algorithms behind the headlines. Journalism Practice 6(5): 648–658.
Walther M (2014) Repatriation to France and Germany: A Comparative Study Based on Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler.
Wu S (2018) Uncovering alternative ‘journalism crisis’ narratives in Singapore and Hong Kong: when state influences interact with Western liberal ideals in a changing media landscape. Journalism 19(9-10): 1291–1307.
Wu S (2024) Why context matters in code studies: exploring ways to globalize/ diversify understandings of algorithmic and AI use in journalism. Digital Journalism 12(7): 1052–1058.
Wu S, Tandoc E, Salmon C (2019a) Journalism reconfigured: assessing human- machine relations and the autonomous power of automation in news production. Journalism Studies 20(10): 1440–1457.
Wu S, Tandoc E, Salmon C (2019b) When journalism and automation intersect: assessing the influence of the technological field on contemporary newsrooms. Journalism Practice 13(10): 1238–1254.
Yang Y (2014) Bourdieu, practice and change: beyond the criticism of determinism. Educational Philosophy and Theory 46(14): 1522–1540.

Biographies

Shangyuan Wu is a lecturer and media researcher at the National University of Singapore’s Department of Communications and New Media. She specializes in research on journalism in the digital age, with a focus on automated, data, and immersive journalism. She is also interested in global journalism studies, the political economy of communication, media and democracy, and comparative media analysis. She has published in the peer-reviewed journals of Digital Journalism, Journalism, Journalism Studies, Information, Communication and Society, and Journalism Practice, among others. She has a background in journalism, having worked previously as a senior broadcast journalist and presenter in Singapore.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 20, 2024

Keywords

  1. Artificial intelligence
  2. ChatGPT
  3. field theory
  4. generative artifical intelligence
  5. journalism
  6. journalistic values
  7. news production

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2024.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Notes

Shangyuan Wu, Department of Communications and New Media, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, AS6, 11 Computing Drive, Singapore 117416. Email: shanwu@nus.edu.sg

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journalism.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 754

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

Get access

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.