Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online September 18, 2023

How Can Women Take Advantage of the High-Tech Era to be Perceived as Effective Leaders? Being Tech-Savvy Helps

Abstract

Given the increasing use of intelligent technologies and the resulting requirement for leaders to be tech-savvy, an important question that emerges is whether perceptions of leadership effectiveness are changing too? Drawing from gender role theory and expectation violation theory, we propose and test a model of whether and how females can benefit from being tech-savvy. To explore whether women may stand to gain from the changing nature of the workforce or not, we ran a series of studies. Our data sources included a cross-sectional time-lagged field study and experimental studies with students and online adults. We found that a definitive skill of the current technological era, tech-savviness, changes perceptions and evaluations of female leaders in a much more positive way than it does for male leaders, as such allowing female leaders to be more likely to be perceived as effective leaders. The reason for the effect that tech-savvy women were more likely to be perceived as effective leaders was driven by the fact that tech-savvy women are seen as more competent and hence, attributed more social status. Our research goes beyond merely focusing on the negative effects of gender stereotypes by providing an actionable solution—that comes from promoting tech knowledge and savviness—for women to counter gender stereotypes that undermine them from being viewed as effective leaders.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Amanatullah E. T., Tinsley C. H. (2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much…or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006
Anderson N., Lievens F., Van Dam K. (2006). A construct-driven investigation of gender differences in a leadership-role assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.555
Badura K. L., Grijalva E., Newman D. A., Yan T. T., Jeon G. (2018). Gender and leadership emergence: A meta-analysis and explanatory model. Personnel Psychology, 71(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12266
Bai, F., Ho, G. C. C., & Yan, J. (2020). Does virtue lead to status? Testing the moral virtue theory of status attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(3), 501.
Berman J. (2021). How to get more women into technology. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/women-in-technology-stem-11622503888
Brescoll, V. L., Dawson, E., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2010). Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1640–1642.
Brislin R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (Vol. 2, pp. 389–444). Allyn & Bacon.
Camerer C. F., Dreber A., Holzmeister F., Ho T. H., Huber J., Johannesson M., Kirchler M., Nave G., Nosek B. A., Pfeiffer T., Altmejd A., Buttrick N., Chan T., Chen Y., Forsell E., Gampa A., Heikensten E., Hummer L., Imai T., Wu H. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in nature and science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637-644. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
Cann A., Siegfried W. D. (1990). Gender stereotypes and dimensions of effective leader behavior. Sex Roles, 23, 7-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289229
Cortes A. F., Herrmann P. (2021). Strategic leadership of innovation: A framework for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(2), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJMR.12246
De Cremer D. (2020). Leadership by algorithm: Who leads and who follows in the AI era? Harriman House.
De Cremer D., Kasparov G. (2021). AI Should Augment Human Intelligence, Not Replace It. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/03/ai-should-augment-human-intelligence-not-replace-it
De Cremer D., van Dijke M., Schminke M., De Schutter L., Stouten J. (2018). The trickle-down effects of perceived trustworthiness on subordinate performance. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000339
Deng H., Leung K., Lam C. K., Huang X. (2019). Slacking off in comfort: A dual-pathway model for psychological safety climate. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1114-1144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317693083
Dirik D. (2021). Leader power bases and perceived leader effectiveness: Conservation of gender stereotypes. Current Psychology, 40(12), 6175-6186. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-020-01169-2/METRICS
Eagly A. H., Karau S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573
Eagly A. H., Makhijani M. G., Klonsky B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3
Eagly A. H., Nater C., Miller D. I., Kaufmann M., Sczesny S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. Public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
Eccles J. S. (2015). Gendered socialization of STEM interests in the family. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2), 116-132. http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/419
Garcia-Holgado A., Mena J., Garcia-Penalvo F. J., Pascual J., Heikkinen M., Harmoinen S., Garcia-Ramos L., Penabaena-Niebles R., Amores L. (2020). Gender equality in STEM programs: A proposal to analyse the situation of a university about the gender gap. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2020-April, 1824-1830. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125326
Giessner S. R., van Knippenberg D. (2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002
Haesevoets T., De Cremer D., Dierckx K., Van Hiel A. (2021). Human-machine collaboration in managerial decision making. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106730
Heilman M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIOB.2012.11.003
Hollander E. P., Fallon B. J., Edwards M. T. (1977). Some aspects of influence and acceptability for appointed and elected group leaders. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 95(2), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1977.9915892
Jachimowicz J. M., To C., Agasi S., Côté S., Galinsky A. D. (2019). The gravitational pull of expressing passion: When and how expressing passion elicits status conferral and support from others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 153, 41-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.06.002
Joshi A. (2014). By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(2), 202-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214528331
Jussim L., Coleman L. M., Lerch L., Linville P., Zajonc B., Markus H., Manis M., Jackson J., Ryan E. B., Krosnick J., Vi F. P. M., Taylor R., Henderson E., Martinez J., Baum L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 536-546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
Kai-Uwe Brock J., von Wangenheim F. (2019). Demystifying AI: What digital transformation leaders can teach you about realistic artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 110-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504219865226
Kim P. H., Ferrin D. L., Cooper C. D., Dirks K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104
Koenig A. M., Eagly A. H., Mitchell A. A., Ristikari T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616-642. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557
Lanaj K., Hollenbeck J. R. (2015). Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: The role of gender and countervailing biases. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1476-1494. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2013.0303
Larson L., DeChurch L. A. (2020). Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101377. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2019.101377
Lisak A., Erez M. (2015). Leadership emergence in multicultural teams: The power of global characteristics. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JWB.2014.01.002
Lucas J. W. (2003). Status processes and the institutionalization of women as leaders. American Sociological Review, 68(3), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519733
Maxwell S. E., Lau M. Y., Howard G. S. (2015). Is Psychology Suffering From a Replication Crisis? What Does “Failure to Replicate” Really Mean? https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400
Orlikowski W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
Parasuraman A. (2000). Technology readiness Index (tri): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
Paustian-Underdahl S. C., Manderville A., Eaton A. A., Jacobson R., Quiroz V. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036751
Peer E., Brandimarte L., Samat S., Acquisti A. (2017). Beyond the Turk: Alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006
Pinto dos Santos D., Giese D., Brodehl S., Chon S. H., Staab W., Kleinert R., Maintz D., Baeßler B. (2019). Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: A multicentre survey. European Radiology, 29(4), 1640-1646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1
Porath C. L., Gerbasi A., Schorch S. L. (2015). The effects of civility on advice, leadership, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1527-1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000016
Rico R., Sánchez-Manzanares M., Antino M., Lau D. (2012). Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025231
Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1–13.
Sandberg S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. Random House.
Schaumberg R. L., Flynn F. J. (2017). Self-reliance: A gender perspective on its relationship to communality and leadership evaluations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1859-1881. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0018
Schein V. E., Mueller R., Liu J. (1996). Think manager-think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199601)17:1
Tang P. M., Koopman J., Mai K. M., De Cremer D., Zhang J., Reynders P., Ng C. T. S., Chen I.-H. (2023). Unpacking the Work and After-work Consequences of Interacting with Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001103
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2021). Women in the labor force: a databook. https://www.bls.gov/opub/reports/womens-databook/2020/home.htm
Wang M. T., Degol J. L. (2017). Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): Current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x
West M., Kraut R., Ei Chew H. (2019). I’d blush if I could: Closing gender divides in digital skills through education. EQUALS/UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000367416
Williams E., Galvin J., LaBerge L. (2021). The new digital edge: Rethinking strategy for the postpandemic era. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-new-digital-edge-rethinking-strategy-for-the-postpandemic-era
Woetzel J., Orr G., Lau A., Chen Y., Chang E., Seong J., Chui M., Qiu A. (2014). The McKinsey Global Institute. www.mckinsey.com/mgi
Yeoh K. (2022, August 24). Commentary: Are we ready to be the digital workforce Singapore needs? Channel News Asia. https://www.channelnewsasia.com/commentary/singapore-digital-workers-skills-upgrading-transformation-society-2894386

Biographies

Mahak Nagpal is an Assistant Professor at The University of St. Thomas, Opus College of Business. She received her Ph.D. in Organization Management from Rutgers Business School - Newark and New Brunswick.
Jieqiong Cao is a Lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, School of Business. She received her PhD from the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School.
Ke Michael Mai is an Assistant Professor of Management and Organisation at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School. Previously, he worked as an Assistant Professor of Management at SKK Graduate School of Business, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU).
David de Cremer is the Dunton Family Dean at Northeastern University's D'Amore-McKim School of Business. Previously he was Provost's Chair and Professor of Management and Organization at NUS Business School, and the Director of the Centre on AI Technology for Humankind. Prior to that, he was the KPMG Endowed Professor of Management Studies at the Judge Business School, Cambridge University.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: September 18, 2023
Issue published: November 2023

Keywords

  1. gender stereotypes
  2. expectation violation theory
  3. leadership
  4. tech-savviness
  5. technology

Rights and permissions

© The Authors 2023.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Notes

Mahak Nagpal, University of St. Thomas, 1000 LaSalle Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55403, USA. Email: mnagpal@stthomas.edu

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 755

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

Get access

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.