Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBC News

Kremlin told U.S. it didn't want Trump's Ukraine-Russia envoy at peace talks

Keir Simmons
6 min read
Unfortunately, this video is not available in your region.
Error Code: 100-202
Session Id: bk5kp6k8 (Pls: 4e1e3669-5691-4559-8bd9-39f80206a400)

President Donald Trump’s special envoy for Ukraine and Russia was excluded from high-level talks on ending the war after the Kremlin said it didn't want him there, a U.S. administration official and a Russian official told NBC News.

Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg was conspicuously absent from two recent summits in Saudi Arabia — one with Russian officials and the other with Ukrainians — even though the talks come under his remit.

“Together,” Trump said in announcing Kellogg’s nomination in November, “we will secure PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

But Kellogg did not attend U.S.-Russia talks in Riyadh, the Saudi capital, on Feb. 18. Russian President Vladimir Putin thought he was too pro-Ukraine, a senior Russian official with direct knowledge of the Kremlin’s thinking told NBC News.

“Kellogg is a former American general, too close to Ukraine. Not our kind of person, not of the caliber we are looking for,” according to the official, who is not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

A U.S. official in the Trump administration, who is also not authorized to speak publicly, confirmed that Russia did not want Kellogg involved. The official did not know when that was communicated to the White House.

Where this leaves Kellogg is unclear.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Kellogg's office did not respond to requests for comment on why he has not been involved in the negotiations and whether Russia had requested that he not attend.

National Security Council spokesman James Hewitt said Trump had “utilized the talents of multiple senior administration officials to assist in the bringing the war in Ukraine to a peaceful resolution.” He added that Kellogg remained “a valued part of the team, especially as it relates to talks with our European allies.”

Ending the war

Kellogg, 80, is a staunch Trump loyalist who served in various roles in Trump’s first term, including a stint as Vice President Mike Pence’s national security adviser.

Before he was confirmed as Trump’s envoy for Russia-Ukraine peace in January, he wrote about what he called the Biden administration’s “incompetent” foreign policies.

Image: TOPSHOT-UKRAINE-US-RUSSIA-CONFLICT-WAR (Sergei Supinsky / AFP - Getty Images)
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Keith Kellogg in Kyiv last month.

In a paper for the America First Policy Institute, which was founded to promote Trump’s policies, he suggested that to end the war the United States should arm Ukraine and strengthen its defenses, thus ensuring that “Russia will make no further advances and will not attack again after a cease-fire or peace agreement.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Future American military aid, however, will require Ukraine to participate in peace talks with Russia,” Kellogg and his co-author, Fred Fleit, wrote.

During his presidential campaign, Trump said that it was a top priority to end the war, which started in February 2022 when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of its smaller neighbor, and that he would halt hostilities “24 hours” after taking office.

The war has raged on after Trump became president for a second time, with Russia making slow progress on the battlefield in Ukraine and pressing Ukrainian forces that had taken a sliver of Russian territory across the border in Kursk.

Ukrainian soldiers fire artillery toward Russian positions in the Donetsk region last year. (Evgeniy Maloletka / AP)
Ukrainian soldiers fire artillery toward Russian positions in the Donetsk region last year.

On Feb. 11, Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, went to Moscow and spent 3½ hours with Putin.

Advertisement
Advertisement

There is no official account of their meeting. Witkoff had traveled to Russia to help secure the release of Marc Fogel, an American teacher held for 3½ years for a minor medical cannabis infraction.

In a CBS News interview, Witkoff, a New York real estate developer and a friend of Trump’s, called his hourslong meeting with Putin a “trust building” assignment from Trump. He said that he was the only U.S. official present at the meeting and that he carried a message for Putin from Trump. Witkoff also said Putin “had something for me to transmit back to the president” but did not say what it was.

The following day, Trump wrote on Truth Social that he had spoken with Putin and that they had “agreed to have our respective teams start negotiations immediately.”

“We agreed to work together, very closely, including visiting each other’s Nations,” he added.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov later said that during the 90-minute call, Putin “expressed readiness to receive American officials in Russia regarding areas of mutual interest, including, of course, the topic of Ukrainian settlement.”

On Feb. 13, Trump announced a list of diplomats who would attend the talks with Russia. Witkoff, CIA Director John Ratcliffe and national security adviser Michael Waltz were on the team led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio

Kellogg was not on the list. A second U.S. official told NBC News at the time that the decision stung him.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio during talks with Russian officials in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on Feb. 18, 2025. (Evelyn Hockstein / AFP - Getty Images)
U.S. and Russian officials meet at Riyadh's Diriyah Palace on Feb. 18.

A representative for Witkoff would not comment when NBC News asked whether his boss discussed Kellogg’s exclusion with Putin.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Asked last week whether Russian officials had requested that Kellogg not be included in the high-level talks, Russian Foreign Affairs Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that it was up to American leaders to “fix their delegation” and that Russia’s diplomats had “great experience of dealing with different envoys.”

Andrei Fedorov, a former deputy foreign minister who maintains close ties with the Kremlin, went further, telling NBC News that Kellogg was “not the person with whom Russia will negotiate with” because his position on the talks was to freeze the front line in Ukraine.

Russia wants Kyiv’s forces to withdraw from Ukrainian regions where there is still fighting, including the southern Kherson and Zaporizhzhia administrative regions, known as oblasts, Fedorov, said.

Russia illegally annexed the regions, along with Donetsk and Luhansk, in September 2022.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Little was said about the war in Ukraine after Rubio and his team met with Russian officials in Riyadh on Feb. 18, although Rubio did announce that the countries had agreed to restore embassy staffing.

Trump has since played hardball with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, with relations reaching a low point after their extraordinary Oval Office spat on Feb. 28. The United States subsequently paused intelligence sharing and providing security assistance to Ukraine.

From left: National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and Secretary of State Marco Rubio meeting with Ukrainian officials Andriy Yermak, Andrii Sybiha and Rustem Umerovin Jeddah, Saudi Arabia on March 11, 2025. (AFP - Getty Images)
National security adviser Michael Waltz and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, left, met with Ukrainian officials in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday.
Advertisement
Advertisement

The pause was lifted Tuesday after a Ukrainian delegation agreed to a proposal for a 30-day interim ceasefire at a meeting in Saudi Arabia with Rubio and his team

Kellogg was not present.

On Thursday, Trump dispatched Witkoff to Russia again.

Shortly after he arrived, Putin said at a news conference that he agreed “with the proposals to stop the hostilities” but that there were issues that needed to be discussed. He added that he may need to “have a phone call with Trump.”


This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
CBS-Chicago

Putin visits Kursk amid ceasefire talks

It comes as Ukrainian officials are saying they are open to a 30 day ceasefire. U.S. and Ukrainian officials held talks in Saudi Arabia without any Russians.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
Reuters

Trump cites positive messages on potential Russia-Ukraine ceasefire

1 min read
Irish Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Micheal Martin visits Washington

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said U.S. officials were heading to Russia on Wednesday to discuss a U.S.-Ukraine agreement on a proposed 30-day pause in fighting and a pathway to peace talks.

Trump said it was now up to Russia after Ukraine agreed to a ceasefire during more than eight hours of talks Tuesday with U.S. officials in Saudi Arabia.

"Hopefully we can get a ceasefire from Russia," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"I've gotten some positive messages, but a positive message means nothing. This is a very serious situation."

The Kremlin said on Wednesday it was awaiting details from Washington about a proposal for a ceasefire in Ukraine, while senior Moscow sources said a deal would have to take account of Russia's advances and address its concerns.

Trump said a ceasefire would make sense for Russia but said there was "a lot of downside for Russia too," without elaborating.

"We have a very complex situation solved on one side, pretty much solved. We've also discussed land and other things that go with it," he said. "We know the areas of land we're talking about, whether it's pull back or not pull back."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Asked if he would do anything to pressure Russia, Trump said: "I can do things financially, that would be very bad for Russia. I don't want to do that because I want to get peace."

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal and Katharine Jackson; writing by Doina Chiacu; Editing by Diane Craft)

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
NBC News

Why Putin's ‘cautiously optimistic’ response to Trump’s Ukraine ceasefire hides his dilemma

Alexander Smith
4 min read
Unfortunately, this video is not available in your region.
Error Code: 100-202
Session Id: dkwkh7b5 (Pls: 387f4dff-aa2d-45b1-88b0-272fa5af8167)

There were “certainly reasons to be cautiously optimistic” about the prospect of peace in Ukraine, the Kremlin said Friday, after President Donald Trump’s envoy met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.

The comments by Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov after Putin met with Trump administration envoy Steve Witkoff echoed those of the Russian president, who said Thursday that he in theory accepted the ceasefire proposed by the United States and Ukraine — but only on terms tantamount to a victory over Ukraine.

It was an emphatic "yes, but."

Advertisement
Advertisement

“We agree with the proposals to stop the hostilities,” Putin said in a speech. But only if it leads “to long-term peace and eliminate the root causes of this crisis.”

Image: RUSSIA-BELARUS-POLITICS-DIPLOMACY (Maxim Shemetov / AFP - Getty Images)
Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on Thursday.

That term — “root causes” — is a reference to long-held Russian grievances about what it sees as NATO’s eastward expansion. Western officials and analysts reject this, saying Putin wants to subjugate Ukraine, drawing it into Russia’s sphere of influence and away from its European tilt.

Despite flirting with the Trump administration, there is little evidence Putin has shifted from his core war goals: cementing his land grabs in Ukraine and stopping it from ever joining NATO. Even so, Trump on Thursday called Putin's remark “a promising statement.”

In a post on Truth Social on Friday, Trump called his administration's discussions with Putin "very good and productive," expressing optimism that "that this horrible, bloody war can finally come to an end."

Advertisement
Advertisement

Switching to all caps, Trump highlighted the stakes of the ceasefire, while positioning himself as a peacemaker by noting that thousands of Ukrainian troops are "completely surrounded by the Russian military, and in a very bad and vulnerable position."

"I have strongly requested to President Putin that their lives be spared. This would be a horrible massacre, one not seen since World War II. God bless them all!!!" he added.

Many officials and experts across Ukraine and Europe are far less impressed.

During his nightly address Thursday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called Putin’s words “manipulative.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

"Putin often does this — he does not say ‘no’ directly, but he does it in such a way that practically everything only delays it and makes normal decisions impossible,” he said, adding, “Putin, of course, is afraid to tell President Trump directly that he wants to continue this war, that he wants to kill Ukrainians.”

Indeed, hours after Putin spoke, his military fired 27 drones at Ukraine overnight into Friday, Ukraine's Armed Forces said.

Ukraine military training  (Andriy Andriyenko / AFP - Getty Images)
Ukrainian servicemen train in the Zaporizhzhia region Thursday.

Some were shot down, according to Ukraine's military, but one hit a civilian hospital in the western village of Zolochiv, setting fire to the building and injuring one staff member.

In the southern city of Kherson, NBC News found a scene of destruction after Russia's latest bombing, which occurs most nights.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Rescue workers were clearing rubble and fixing power lines in a residential area where several homes were blown apart in what they said was a Russian glide bomb attack the day before.

Mykola Vorobjovskii, 69, said he was inside his house when it was destroyed.

“Putin is a liar,” Vorobjovskii told NBC News, choking back tears as he stood next to the wreckage of his home. “He calls black white and white black. He said he is liberating Ukraine. He liberated me from my house, job and car.”

Some Western experts believe the Russian leader is in a tight spot and that his evasive response was an attempt to balance two competing realities.

Advertisement
Advertisement

First, the Kremlin has no reason to accept a truce unless it delivers him a favorable outcome; and second, he wants to achieve a settlement with the White House while it is led by a president amenable to Moscow, said Jonathan Eyal, a director at the Royal United Services Institute think tank in London.

Rubio in Saudi Arabia (Evelyn Hockstein / AFP - Getty Images)
Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, left, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and national security adviser Mike Waltz in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, on Feb. 18.

“It’s not in Putin’s interest to get a ceasefire now," Eyal said Friday. "However, he cannot afford to annoy the American president, and expose and humiliate him with an outright rejection.”

The deal on offer to Putin is not going to improve, Eyal said, adding that the Russian president has “got an amazing opportunity to return to the global stage and [escape] from his isolation — with the help of the United States,” he added. So “he’s got to try to grab this deal without making too many concessions on Ukraine, and that’s his dilemma.”

Officials in Kyiv will be hoping to use Putin’s “evasive” response to “help convince their American colleagues that the Kremlin dictator is not genuinely interested in ending the war,” wrote Mykola Bielieskov, a research fellow at the National Institute for Strategic Studies, a Ukrainian think tank.

Advertisement
Advertisement

While Putin may entertain a truce with terms favorable to Moscow, he will not accept an independent Ukrainian state on Russia’s border, Bielieskov wrote for the Atlantic Council.

“This does not mean that current U.S.-led peace efforts are entirely futile, but it is vital to recognize that freezing the conflict along the current front lines will not be enough to end the war.”

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Advertisement
Advertisement
Up next
The Hill

US puts Putin in hot seat with Ukraine ceasefire proposal

Laura Kelly
5 min read
US puts Putin in hot seat with Ukraine ceasefire proposal
Scroll back up to restore default view.

The United States has for the first time shifted the pressure to Russia in President Trump’s push for a ceasefire in Ukraine, after securing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s support for a 30-day truce in the war.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio came out of talks in Saudi Arabia on Tuesday saying the geopolitical ball was now in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s court.

Steve Witkoff, special envoy and top Trump negotiator with Russia, was reportedly planning a meeting with Putin as soon as this week. Senate Republicans expressed doubt Wednesday that Russia would back the ceasefire and warned that Putin was not an honest broker.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“I am extremely skeptical that Russia will accept the ceasefire and I am very doubtful they want to end this war. Zelensky has passed the test of wanting peace. It is now up to Putin to show his cards,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) wrote in a post on the social platform X.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) shared a similar skepticism.

“I personally am skeptical, because [Putin’s] ideologically driven of wanting to restore the Russian empire, and he’s shown that he doesn’t respect any agreements,” Cornyn said.

“I think [a ceasefire is] kind of a necessary prerequisite to further more serious discussions. It’s not an end in and of itself, but at least hopefully people aren’t being killed, so that’s a good thing.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trump signaled Wednesday that he could exert pressure on Putin if Russia holds back from joining a ceasefire agreement.

“I can do things financially that would be very bad for Russia, I don’t want to do that because I want to get peace,” he said, echoing past threats to tariff and isolate Moscow economically.

Putin is likely to assert his own demands in the deal, dragging out the process toward a ceasefire, Bloomberg reported Wednesday.

“What we want to do is have the best possible negotiating position for Ukraine, because we know we can’t trust Russia,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), the ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“We’ve seen that. What we need is to hold Vladimir Putin accountable for what he’s done.”

Zelensky helped repair ruptured U.S. relations when he agreed Tuesday to accept the terms of an immediate ceasefire — also securing the resumption of American military assistance and intelligence sharing, which Trump had cut off following a contentious Oval Office meeting late last month.

Zelensky discussed the terms of the 30-day ceasefire proposal in his nightly address to the country. It includes a halt in fighting across the entirety of the front line — an estimated 600 miles — and stopping missile, drone and bomb attacks, including in the Black Sea.

Russia has only ramped up attacks on Ukraine since Trump began his public push for peace talks about a month ago.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Trump said U.S. officials were on their way to Russia and a response could come “very soon.”

“I’ve gotten some positive messages. But a positive message means nothing,” he said.

Graham said he is introducing “bone-breaking sanctions and tariffs” legislation against Russia to compel its commitment to any ceasefire deal and negotiations.

“If they [Russia] do not pursue the ceasefire with the same vigor as Ukraine, there will be hell to pay,” he said.

Shelby Magid, deputy director of the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center, a Washington-based think tank, said it’s in Putin’s interest to accept the ceasefire and take advantage of warming relations with Trump, but cautioned that Putin has shown no shift “in his maximalist aims against Ukraine.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The Kremlin has a nasty habit of violating ceasefires as seen with the Minsk Accords,” she said, referring to the 2014 and 2015 ceasefire agreements that sought to halt Russia’s fighting on eastern Ukrainian territory it invaded and occupied. Negotiations over implementation of the agreements lasted years until Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

“If Russia rejects the ceasefire proposal, or accepts it only to violate it, the key question is how President Trump will respond once burned.”

The rapprochement between the U.S. and Ukraine has eased relations with Europe, where officials are largely supportive of the Trump administration’s latest move in the talks.

“The ball, as always, is in Russia’s court,” Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s top diplomat, wrote in a post on X.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Lithuania’s defense minister, Dovilė Šakalienė, warned that the only way to negotiate with Russia is with a gun on the table.

“In my opinion, the only efficient diplomacy with Russia was what Al Capone said: ‘The only good negotiation is when you have a gun on the table,'” she said in an interview with Fox News last week. “So that’s probably the kind of diplomacy that would work with Russia.”

Trump threatened banking sanctions and tariffs against Russia if it bucks opportunities for peace.

Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.) said Trump could also use oil prices as leverage to get Putin to the table.

“That’s the main source of funding for Russia right now. If you start cutting off their income, they’ll have a more difficult time funding war,” he said. “So I think the president will probably consider ideas like that to put pressure on Putin to come to the table.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sen. Jim Risch (R-Idaho), the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Putin would be “a fool” not to carefully listen to Trump’s words.

“I know the president really well. He’s a really, really good negotiator and he has — when you read these stories, they talk about ‘so and so has the cards, so and so has the cards,'” Risch said.

“I’ll tell you who has got the cards: That’s Donald Trump.”

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement