×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 7,971 articles on Polcompball Anarchy Wiki. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki
    Polcompball Anarchy Wiki
    7,971Articles
    in:
    Democratic, Technocrats, Welfarists,
    and 30 more
    [dismiss]
    Join our Discord!
    Calling all wiki editors! Join over 1000 other wiki editors and discuss about everything related to Polcompball and more! We host events, debates, polls, and talk about all types of things. What are you waiting for? Click here to join the official Polcompball Wiki Discord!

    Midskism, or a fully Leftist-Yakutian theory is a economically left leaning, civical liberal, far-international, culturally left ideology. This ideology basing on world federation goal what were everyone feels free and equal. This ideology thinks that Russia should be a peaceful and pro-liberal country, but with a hard preserve of world interests.

    A template for relation: {{Midskism}}
    Midskism
    With tags: {{MidskismIcons}}
    Midskism (////)
    And Midsk himself: {{MidskUser}}
    Mittenreich (Midsk)

    Overview

    CAUTION
    I am not so educated and this is normal to be idealist in my age

    Beliefs

    Basic Values

    The values of French revolution: "Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite", is a very beautiful values, but i am don't think these words can fit this ideology. I am absolutely excited from liberty and equality, but i am also wanting a "balance", "progress" and "rationality".

    Economics

    Nordic System

    Nordic Model is a most effective economic system what ever been in our world. That system can professionally balance between socialism and capitalism. I am supportive of keynesian school and welfare programs.

    Cooperativism

    Globalism

    I think that globalism is a very good for our motherland, because we are have very big natural legacy. We need to democratize our global trade, to prevent classical imperialism.

    Opposition to Extremism

    Georgism

    Maintenance of Rights of Property

    The rights of property and free businesses is a basis of well functioning economics. And as a socialist side i saying that we have no rights to harm this. But we cannot privatise a healthcare, roads, investment and electricity, these are most important to left them to markets. They're should be even municipalised.

    Government

    Parliamentary Government

    The history multiple times showed there's a one man cannot adequately rule the government in our time and there's should be a bicameral parliament with a politicians with good knowledge of various goods. The particracy can unify a people with a similar views and for political plurality.

    Scientocracy

    The full democracy is a unfortunately a inefficient and slow system. The scientocracy or technoliberalism combine a the most important parts of technocracy and erasing a bad parts of democracy.

    Civic

    Humanism

    We have no rights to harm basic human rights and I see that as a somewhat "evil". If some country harming humans rights, these governments should be toppled.

    I am don't think that critique of humanism is a bad. Humans can be cruel. But i am think that humans are equal from birth and from a external factors, they're becoming corrupted. From a social and economic equality I think that corruption will slowly decrease and will cease to exist.

    People's Education

    A unenlightened people is a hidden and big problem, what can end very horrible end. History also many times showed that a these people can elect a demagogue. A reformation of education is a key to stability and enlightenment.

    Culture

    "Happiness of nation people is the only"


    LGBT rights

    I don't respect a oppression and this is a mostly just stupid and idealistic actions what comes to violence. From this i think cultural liberalism and legalization of LGBTQIA+ rights is a not bad ideas.

    Migration

    I support a multiculturalism and i don't think bad if cultures will mixes. The our time showed that open migration can lead to bad consequences, but if migrants from a warring country and have a passport, they can be welcomed.

    Piratism

    I don't see bad on open internet and policy of piratism. The big corporations with a copyright can destroy a community and ban just a innocent man. But, a internet full of people with a bad thoughts and with a full abolishion of copyright they're can use in bad goals.

    Foreign

    "If you want a peaceful, or even non-warring world, you should establish a global federation of humanity."


    World Federalism

    For humanity we should unite for solving a global problems like terrorism, global warming and corruption. Yes this can be idealistic, but every problems are from diverse of earth, where nationalists are making meaningless war.

    Opposition to Nationalism

    Nationalism can be good if this is just being proud to your nation, like patriotism. But nationalism in his basis is the xenophobic thought. This leads to chauvinism and pride, what are comes to violence, wars and genocides. Only nationalists (neither religions or ethnic) restrains humanity from united world and we should reeducate them to be more peaceful and international.

    Geopolitics

    I dislike all three sides in this imperialist cold war. But i am seeing NATO as a potential cosmopol what can be a fundament of hawkish politics of Russia.

    Defense from Extremists

    In our, modern world democracy can easily hijacked by any extremists. We should enforce and topple authoritarian governments and establish democratic republic with humanitarian help from UN to make extremists unpopular.

    Technology/Nature

    Technogaianism/liberalism

    Technology is a openly positive and good way, what we should welcome. Usage of eco-friendly technologies can be beneficial for us and nature.

    Post-Industrialism

    Humanity cannot go back in technological progress. That can come to catastrophic consequences and regular people don't accept this. We need to innovate technology if we want a progress and new solutions of global problems.

    Bright Green/Blue Environmentalism

    Orbiting Earth in the spaceship, I saw how beautiful our planet is. People, let us preserve and increase this beauty, not destroy it!

    Yuri Gagarin


    We know that nature get heavily injured and we should use modern and future technologies to take care of nature.

    Water is a basic and fundamental element of our world and he is a get more and more dirty. I see in this a lethal problem, what can lead to fully extinction of humans. We cannot do nothing with this and i want innovate technology to purify ocean from micro plastics.

    Galacticism

    In our time we are on the brink of an energy crisis and this can lead to severe and maybe incorrigible consequences. WIP

    Nuclear Power

    Nuclear power and other alternative energy is a very effective variation between of thermal power station. The risk of disaster a minimal. In history there's only two major disasters:

    • Chernobyl — Reason: incompetence of employees and negligent handling of equipment.
    • Fukushima — Reason: earthquake and tsunami.

    On this data we should hire a professional employers and place stations on quite place.

    Relations

    "The political criticism on existing Ideologies is a good and progressive way to show a views."


    Literally me

    • World Federalism — If you want a peaceful, or even safe world, that's should be a global federation of humanity.
    • Bright Green Environmentalism — The bright compromise between nature and technology. Why destroy progress, if you can make this a eco-friendly.
    • Pragmatism — Fanaticism is a bleak remnant of past. I should be more pragmatic.
    • Nordic Model — Really working socialism, what can be useful in our motherland.

    Amazing

    • Democratic Scoialism — You are a very good dude, but you are cannot realise the market is necessary for efficiency.
    • Radical Centrism — Your pragmatic vision on extremists are very cool.
    • Social Democracy — Very good, but i am not a hardline democrat. But anyway very similar.
    • Progressive Conservatism — A real conservatism, don't let right-wing populists and paleoconservatists hijack you!
    • Patriotism — Have proud and loyal to your nation is a mostly good. But sometimes we need a cooperation with others.

    Good

    • Technocracy — Not bad, but you are too elitarian.
    • Conservatism — You are seem as a good man, but your mainstream version are very disgusting. You are just not want a cultural and social chaos and instability and that i respect.
    • Reformist Marxism — Very not bad, but i am not like marxism, but you are on good way.

    Unsure

    • Revolutionary Progressivism — I like your strive of progress, but you are too chaotic.
    • Anti-Putinism — Very good. But you are just a bunch of various Ideologies, from anarchists, to nazbols. But anyway you are better than Putin.
    • Cosmicism — Hmm, i would've disagree you in politics, but in philosophy.... No, no! That can't be! *Dead silence*...

    Acceptable

    • Yeltsinism — Alcohol makes you economically stupid. Thanks for destroying a remnants of USSR, but you instead of them established a poor and drinking government.
    • Nationalism — You caused many wrong, you are basis of many genocidals. But you are moderate for a lower tiers.

    Awful

    • Paleoconservatism, Classical Conservatism — Misinterpretation of conservatism and a cancer for progressive countries.
    • Putinism — You are a tyrant, who make suffer ukrainians. Imperialist, who wants to take a random land for some reason!

    PURE Corruption

    • Nazism — The hell on earth. Burn in hell with your "volk purified" state.
    • Fourth Theory — NOT LIBERALISM WANT DESTROY POLITICS, YOU WANT COLLAPSE RUSSIA!
    • Alt-Right — On this dark times, these who are politically doesn't have knowledge will believe on darkest and corrupted ideologies.
    • Counter-Enlightenment — I can have some understandable on ancaps, authoritarians, marxists and darwinists, but i cannot understand your fanaticism. Literally. I cannot find reasons for your existence.

    Literally me

    • Neoradical Liberalism — Extremely based russian. Because from you i accept free market.
    • Floral Republicanism — Pretty good enough. Nothing special or unique can i say.
    • Evolutionary Socialism — Anyway, i am agreeing with you in almost all. I don't have amy serious questions to you and i will remind idea about non-violent revolution in authoritarian governments.

    Amazing

    • Albanism — Common democratic socialist, and this good. Mostly me, but in november 2024.
    • Sellenism — Very glad for cultural, economical and civical views.
    • Snowism — Fellow liberal, alike floral republicanism but a bit righter on economics.
    • Brazilian Liberalism — Technoliberalism, cultural liberalism, federalism and liberal hawkism are very good parts. But state capitalism, nationalism and neo-mercantelism not in my favor.
    • Kuzism — A very cool soclib, but I am not love agrarianism.

    Good

    • Social Relationism — Yes, you are a good one in social, civic and foreign politics. But your controversial economics alienate us.
    • Centrism J-Side — I see your politics common and reactionary, that is more like apolitical than pragmatic policy. But you are a liberal and welfarist what make you instantly in this tier.
      • Clean-Up Centrism — Now you are more reactionary and authoritarian. But anyway you saving liberal tendency and that is a not bad.
    • Scientific Altruism — On first view you are very good. You are have a reasonable views on marxist society. But the positivism and anti-progressivism is a oxymoron for scientocracy.
    • VMism — Very cool thought, in every sides. But libertarianism is not ok, but anyway we are almost very similar.
    • Zankism — Very good and nice, if don't look on anti-democracy and post-modern ideas.

    Not bad

    • Koetism — Don't like your slightly right-wing position. Libertarianism is not bad, if this not too radical. I believe your policy doesn't goes to Yeltsinism.
    • Wathenheindism — Very good for communist beliefs. I am very grateful for your democratic, progressive and international sides. Only revolutionary praxis is not good, but this is not bad for you.

    Uhh..

    • Minervism — Not so bad at all. Just a mythicallist tankie who are larping on civical centrist.
      • Postlibertarian socialism is not civical centrism, it is synthesis of authoritarian technodemocracy and dictablanda. And i'm not larping, I’m here only for systemising my political views (after EST not only mines) and systemising my fantasies (World of Three Stones and Esoteric Minervism)
    • Aploism — WIP
    • Hendersonism — A very paradoxal unit. At first you are a fellow progressivist and cosmopolitan. But your authoritarian side with illiberal democracy and slight capitalism not in my mind.
    •  Ylloism — I am not like your nationalism and alternate modernism, but you have redeemable parts as a welfarism and democracy. And in counter-critics i am not seeing our modern-day world for my views and i seeing perspectives in future-day world federalism.

    Acceptable

    • Neo-Dirigisme — You are not bad in economics (please, abandon these parts ) and in government you are beneficial, but your chauvinism... Oh damn.

    Redeemable

    • Itapism — I don't see you as a really bad or something alike them. But i don't see a syndicated government with monarchy as a something beneficial. And nationalist views not in my taste. Other views redeemable.
    • Yatagarasism — A paradoxal unit, you are leftist but in pseudo-politics, what i extremely disagree. But your sane character made me up you.
    •  Oștism — You are not bad in basis, but nationalism and protectionism for me is a not beneficial. And your anti-leftism are not acceptable, but you are moderate for a tier lower.
    • Andrionism — Austrian school? Nationalism? Traditionalism? No, thanks.
    • Reiism — Fascism? Seriously? But you are not evil fascist and i see you are fellow welfarist and feminist. But i am not alternative modernist.

    Awful

    • sunflowerist — Another dogmatic left commie.
    • Bolshebitchism — On the edge of sanity this ideology is a awful, economics and civics full leninist dogma and extremist cultural views. Only foreign politics are decent.
    • Dingusbingusism — A Kira Kween, but on other corner of compass and worse. I am absolutely don't appreciate your post-right side.
    • Patrickism — Religious, monarchist and traditionalist. Okay you are have a redeemable parts but anyway you are a really bad.
    • Aristocratic Humanism — You are fake humanist! You violating a many rights and liberties, with aristocracy, timocracy and anti-egalitarianism. Only meritocracy and constitutionalism are redeemable parts.

    OH HUMANITY

    • Abelism — I WILL NOT FORGET, I WILL NOT FORGIVE.
    • N.Brioism — Total LARP, i cannot believe that can be seriously adopted in our time.
    • Nitrism — A really horrific ideology, anti-egalitarian, anti-democracy, anti-liberalism, anti-materialism and anti-secularism. My unironic polar opposite.
    • Ordo-Traditionalism — Neo-reactionaryism and counter-enlightenment saying about you. But thanks that you are welfarist.

    Uninteresting Section

    Ideological Evolution

    Classical starting pack of post-soviet kid + + -2022
    Starting involving in politics + + 2022-2024
    Year of Red + + 2024
    New Age + + Early 2025-

    User Test

    What Political Figure do i Remind?

    • Midskism - Mikhail Gorbachev (Template)

    DozenValues Results

    DozenValues
    60.4%
    39.6%

    61.1%
    38.9%

    43.1%
    56.9%

    74.3%
    25.7%

    73.6%
    26.4%

    31.3%
    68.7%

    Closest Match: Nordic Model, 99.3%
    Other Matches
    2. Social Democracy, 99.2%
    3. Liberal Socialism, 98.8%
    4. Paleoliberalism, 98.8%
    5. Left-Libertarianism, 98.7%
    6. Cooperativism, 98.5%
    7. Left-Wing Populism, 98.5%
    8. Labourism, 98.3%
    9. Social Corporatism, 98.3%
    10. Liberal Corporatism, 98.3%
    11. Techno-Populism, 98.3%
    12. Social Georgism, 98.0%
    13. Democratic Liberalism, 97.9%
    14. Radical Liberalism, 97.7%
    15. Social Liberalism, 97.7%

    Comments

    Critics

    Navigation

    About


    Government/Civic

    Economics

    Culture

    Diplomacy

    Technology/Nature



    1. ↑ Only on Nationalist, Reactionary, Bolshevist parties
    Retrieved from "https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Midskism?oldid=563069"
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
    More information
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
    More information