>>4207- It's a stable rolling release so you can update your system after 8 month and it won't break
- xbps is a good package manager, you can do everything you do in pacman with it except maybe choosing dependencies specific to your hardware because it does it automatically
- I've had some issues with systemd like slow application startup or some daemons not launching. Runit is pretty robust and I've had no issues so far, maybe it's because I didn't tinker with it that much but it just werks I like it. Artix implementation of runit or openrc is raisinty btw dont use that
- Arch installation is unnecessary harder than it should be and if you want to use archinstall and something breaks archtroons will berate you if you used an install script and it's generally not supported as an official installation process
- It's pretty minimalist and simple, nothing breaks after updates and once you configured it you can use it for years without breaking and still update all your software abd you don't need to maintain it.
>cons- Not as much packages as arch has (still plenty of them since this distro is like 10 years old o algo)
- No aur (it's a good thing actually)
- A lot of esls(ruzzians) use it for some reason but not as much efls. Idk why
