The New York Times’s Tokyo bureau chief, Martin Fackler, writes that Japan’s new (and former) prime minister, Shinzo Abe, and his conservative government may revise Japan’s 1993 apology for forcing thousands of women to be sex slaves in the service of Japanese soldiers during World War II.
In May, Rendezvous wrote about the “comfort women” controversy reaching suburban New York.
Now, the refusal of the government’s spokesman to say clearly whether Mr. Abe, an ardent nationalist who has criticized the apology in the past, would uphold it is seen as confirming some fears that the return of Mr. Abe and his Liberal Democratic Party could roil international relations in Asia in deeply unhelpful ways.
Mark McDonald wrote on Rendezvous last week that Mr. Abe’s return to power (he was prime minister in 2006 and 2007) could further destabilize Japanese-Chinese relations at a time when the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands dispute already has tensions running unusually high.
“The way ahead — combat or compromise — could conceivably hang on one man, Shinzo Abe,” Mark wrote then.
The entire region, along with the United States, is waiting to see which of Mr. Abe’s political personalities emerges most forcefully — the conservative, nationalistic politician with a provocative streak when it comes to China, or the pragmatic statesman who would pull himself and his party back from the fire-breathing campaign rhetoric of recent weeks.
Worryingly, Mr. Abe appeared ready to add a ground dimension to the confrontation at the islands by pledging to station government workers or Coast Guard personnel there.
Mark also quoted media affiliated with the Communist Party of China as saying: “Once Abe takes office, China should let him know about its firm stance. Only with such pressure will Abe hold China in esteem, otherwise he will think China is in a weak position. In recent years, every time Japan has switched to moderate policy toward China, it has been the result of China’s strong stance rather than its concessions.”
As Martin wrote Thursday, an assertive, unapologetic Japan could antagonize much of Asia, especially South Korea, at a time when the United States desperately needs its two closest East Asian allies to work together:
If Mr. Abe revises the apology, the move will run counter to the wishes of the United States. American officials say they have urged Mr. Abe to shelve calls to revise the Kono Statement to avoid increasing tensions with South Korea. The United States has been urging the two countries, its closest allies in the region, to increase cooperation as China is asserting more territorial claims and as North Korea appears to be continuing to strengthen its nuclear weapons and missile programs.
The sex slaves issue remains highly emotional in South Korea, a former Japanese colony. On Thursday, the South Korean Foreign Ministry called on Japan not to forget its militaristic past.
5 Comments
The comments section is closed. To submit a letter to the editor for publication, write to letters@nytimes.com.
Jay
Vancouver January 29, 2013I have noticed that some japanese or sympathizers are trying to mislead the public with distorted facts and history.
First of all, there was no settlement of the diabolical sex crimes against 200,000 young Korean women during the colonial exploitation from 1910 to 1945.
The peace and reparations agreements in 1965, between Korea and japan was basicly economic and property claims. The japanese government which held all their brutal sex crime records, kept silent during the peace negotiation period. Korea wasn't aware till 1988 when a group of investigators found a former Korean sex slave abandoned by japanese soldiers at Okinwa in Japan. She went there forcibly with other girls by japanese soldiers when she was 15 years old, she is now 89 years old.
A survey, conducted by the UN shows that more than 200,000 Asian women, mostly Korean, were tricked into forced prostitution during World War 2. They were gang-raped at gun point by several soldiers a day, and some were even clubbed, and knifed to death.
No matter what it may be, the Japanese government committed diabolical crimes against humanity and must bring perpetrators to justice and adequate monetary compensation to the sex slaves.
It is about the issue of women's rights in time of war. It was an act that contravenes our universal value as human beings and contradicts the flow of history.
The Korean government should put these crimes against humanity on the International War crime tribunal and let them decide.
nyc
nyc January 18, 2013Being forced to service 30 to 50 officers in one day destroyed the sprits of the women and left them with diseases and physical ailments that hindered them for life.
The unspeakable atrocities, past nightmares that the Japanese soldiers inflicted on these women will never be erased by "countless apologies and compensation". HUMANITY and forgiveness cannot be bought by money.
The Japanese government seems to riding on the wave that ignorance and denial is bliss. Why are we not surprised the take a similar stand with territorial disputes? The world must know the truth of what the comfort women endured and how the Japanese tried to eradicate their spirits and culture.
J
Canada January 18, 2013In 1965, the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and Korea was singed. In 2005, the Korean gov’t finally disclosed the documents after kept secret for 40 years.
The doc. recorded that South Korea agreed to demand no further compensation, either at the government or individual level, after receiving $800 million in grants and soft loans from Japan as compensation for its 1910–45 colonial rule.
I don't think Korean Gov't passed the money to those women.
In the wartime, prostitution was legitimate service work in many part of Asia. Some poor women was sold by their own parents. There are some documents found in Japan that many Korean comfort women were in fact responded to the job advertisement spontaneously. Many of them are paid.
ris
UT January 6, 2013Japan has issued countless apologies to Korea and the Korean women. Who should be apologizing, is the Korean government which took the compensation money ( Japan‐Republic of Korea Basic Relations Treaty) from Japan and then did not distribute it to the Korean women.
Why did they not?
Because after WWII and during the Korean War they continued to Korean women as prostitutes serving the US Army. At the end of 1950, there were over 1,000,000 involved (UN figures). Korean police, the brothel owners and their agents and politicians all got their cut. The same women, the same industry. It was the US who turned sex tourism in Asia into an industrial scale to "comfort" their soldiers and all the same force, coercion and racism carried on.
Try being a mixed race child of a prostitute to American soldiers in Korea to know what I am saying.
The Korean government used the comfort women to rebuild the post-war Korean economy attracting sex dollars and sex Yen to Korea long after the Japanese Army.
It is fashionable to repeat the story you have done, it is an "politically correct" holocaust industry... but Japan paid its dues.
Now it is the time of the US and Korean government to do so. Especially the US... which still occupies and still whores and rapes in Asia.
Tim
New York, NY January 4, 2013Words won't change Japan's shameful past, nor will it return Japan to a place of dominance in the new world economy. The Japanese people are free to accept Mr. Abe's nationalist rhetoric in place of a real plan - in the long run they will get what they deserve.