Personality rights

<mediawiki xmlns="http://www.mediawiki.org/xml/export-0.11/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.mediawiki.org/xml/export-0.11/ http://www.mediawiki.org/xml/export-0.11.xsd" version="0.11" xml:lang="en">
  <siteinfo>
    <sitename>Encyclopedia Dramatica</sitename>
    <dbname>edwiki</dbname>
    <base>http://edramatica.com/Main_Page</base>
    <generator>MediaWiki 1.42.1</generator>
    <case>first-letter</case>
    <namespaces>
      <namespace key="-2" case="first-letter">Media</namespace>
      <namespace key="-1" case="first-letter">Special</namespace>
      <namespace key="0" case="first-letter" />
      <namespace key="1" case="first-letter">Talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="2" case="first-letter">User</namespace>
      <namespace key="3" case="first-letter">User talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="4" case="first-letter">Encyclopedia Dramatica</namespace>
      <namespace key="5" case="first-letter">Encyclopedia Dramatica talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="6" case="first-letter">File</namespace>
      <namespace key="7" case="first-letter">File talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="8" case="first-letter">MediaWiki</namespace>
      <namespace key="9" case="first-letter">MediaWiki talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="10" case="first-letter">Template</namespace>
      <namespace key="11" case="first-letter">Template talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="12" case="first-letter">Help</namespace>
      <namespace key="13" case="first-letter">Help talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="14" case="first-letter">Category</namespace>
      <namespace key="15" case="first-letter">Category talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="274" case="first-letter">Widget</namespace>
      <namespace key="275" case="first-letter">Widget talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="456" case="first-letter">Portal</namespace>
      <namespace key="457" case="first-letter">Portal talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="460" case="case-sensitive">Campaign</namespace>
      <namespace key="461" case="case-sensitive">Campaign talk</namespace>
      <namespace key="828" case="first-letter">Module</namespace>
      <namespace key="829" case="first-letter">Module talk</namespace>
    </namespaces>
  </siteinfo>
  <page>
    <title>Personality rights</title>
    <ns>0</ns>
    <id>513290</id>
    <revision>
      <id>1910144</id>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T13:31:12Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Enjoy the truthbomb ;-) .</comment>
      <origin>1910144</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="7392" sha1="5abcr713grstn399oizvsvc2988uhv2" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public Government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige ]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!"]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!"]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“]
* [https://www.lawblog.de/archives/2016/04/14/polizei-hagen-giftet-auf-facebook-gaffer-an/ Polizei Hagen giftet auf Facebook Gaffer an | law blog]

The comments on the Facebook posts are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary)&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen] (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From "Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION", at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalits - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photgraphy and filming of crash sites came into effect.

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>5abcr713grstn399oizvsvc2988uhv2</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910171</id>
      <parentid>1910144</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T15:59:55Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Horst Arnold</comment>
      <origin>1910171</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="7557" sha1="9w3afubq0fd2fei122idqdgajg9pja1" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!"]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!"]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“]
* [https://www.lawblog.de/archives/2016/04/14/polizei-hagen-giftet-auf-facebook-gaffer-an/ Polizei Hagen giftet auf Facebook Gaffer an | law blog]

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary)&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen] (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From "Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION", at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photgraphy and filming of crash sites came into effect.

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>9w3afubq0fd2fei122idqdgajg9pja1</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910172</id>
      <parentid>1910171</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T16:01:24Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor/>
      <comment>closed link</comment>
      <origin>1910172</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="7558" sha1="e9y9fy4f2ylujxxsiinwx07ochismng" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!"]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!"]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“]
* [https://www.lawblog.de/archives/2016/04/14/polizei-hagen-giftet-auf-facebook-gaffer-an/ Polizei Hagen giftet auf Facebook Gaffer an | law blog]

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen] (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From "Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION", at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photgraphy and filming of crash sites came into effect.

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>e9y9fy4f2ylujxxsiinwx07ochismng</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910173</id>
      <parentid>1910172</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T16:05:43Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Adding names of the publications; removed personal blog.</comment>
      <origin>1910173</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="7510" sha1="mmqzb3sx0vfujmxrc2kv4f1q3a0e90t" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen] (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From "Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION", at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photgraphy and filming of crash sites came into effect.

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>mmqzb3sx0vfujmxrc2kv4f1q3a0e90t</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910175</id>
      <parentid>1910173</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T16:16:18Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>It seems many people automatically associate the word "drinking" with alcohol.</comment>
      <origin>1910175</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="7519" sha1="hcw8se27q8j173fkbje614gigjaslx3" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen] (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From "Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION", at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photgraphy and filming of crash sites came into effect.

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>hcw8se27q8j173fkbje614gigjaslx3</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910180</id>
      <parentid>1910175</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T16:48:50Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor/>
      <comment>missing "o"</comment>
      <origin>1910180</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="7520" sha1="krjthvgxjk1cfzkrr473pksgnfa7put" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen] (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From "Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION", at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect.

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>krjthvgxjk1cfzkrr473pksgnfa7put</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910181</id>
      <parentid>1910180</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T16:58:00Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>More accurate.</comment>
      <origin>1910181</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="7997" sha1="tgonvcmy8hnpu19aepqapvraocjpm7d" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>tgonvcmy8hnpu19aepqapvraocjpm7d</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910183</id>
      <parentid>1910181</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T17:35:44Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Another name for it.</comment>
      <origin>1910183</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="8031" sha1="bw96ligfps3fozlb1ahyx7vu2ebb6j9" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>bw96ligfps3fozlb1ahyx7vu2ebb6j9</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910186</id>
      <parentid>1910183</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T17:49:52Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>By today's standards, these people were all "violated".</comment>
      <origin>1910186</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="8711" sha1="4xmfg74su3wj5kwss05h2yrinyb7ekg" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state can still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>4xmfg74su3wj5kwss05h2yrinyb7ekg</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910187</id>
      <parentid>1910186</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T17:51:42Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor/>
      <comment>Not only can they. They will.</comment>
      <origin>1910187</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="8712" sha1="kx2jo7dd1huf8eqva3uw4o1vp6oai4s" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom like parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people like police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>kx2jo7dd1huf8eqva3uw4o1vp6oai4s</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910209</id>
      <parentid>1910187</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T20:17:12Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor/>
      <comment>betterLy worded</comment>
      <origin>1910209</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="8719" sha1="g1qvmzfkoiz703uwjdjo1mrhqf22119" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>g1qvmzfkoiz703uwjdjo1mrhqf22119</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910210</id>
      <parentid>1910209</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T20:19:18Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Making it mobile-friendly.</comment>
      <origin>1910210</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="8771" sha1="1a8m1zxkdq800pxq3j9bhv9mnyxin9v" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>1a8m1zxkdq800pxq3j9bhv9mnyxin9v</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910216</id>
      <parentid>1910210</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-17T20:27:49Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>no video - no happen</comment>
      <origin>1910216</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="8820" sha1="fqc7sckv1s6be1hhzb7udl9nybk5w9b" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>fqc7sckv1s6be1hhzb7udl9nybk5w9b</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910381</id>
      <parentid>1910216</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-19T17:39:04Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Exposure of corruption had to be restricted.</comment>
      <origin>1910381</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="9100" sha1="3sfpjw7g3ywuucf6ealsdhra4f3ridy" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be limited and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

In April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>3sfpjw7g3ywuucf6ealsdhra4f3ridy</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910382</id>
      <parentid>1910381</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-19T17:41:59Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>"Don't you dare hold us accountable!"</comment>
      <origin>1910382</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="9221" sha1="pebljhyihticu0o9g3ka5org6s9wgo9" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be limited and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;</text>
      <sha1>pebljhyihticu0o9g3ka5org6s9wgo9</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910579</id>
      <parentid>1910382</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-20T18:12:33Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Hipcrime</username>
        <id>60</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor/>
      <comment>category x3</comment>
      <origin>1910579</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="9281" sha1="bksrclvy6bdnk62682blxclxxrvrb85" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be limited and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>bksrclvy6bdnk62682blxclxxrvrb85</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1910977</id>
      <parentid>1910579</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-23T13:36:21Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>specifically</comment>
      <origin>1910977</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="9300" sha1="s4rfjyclihnhgk4it9pkgukeouwibqe" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed it would, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>s4rfjyclihnhgk4it9pkgukeouwibqe</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1911537</id>
      <parentid>1910977</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-01-29T07:47:22Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Personality rights destroy history.</comment>
      <origin>1911537</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="9508" sha1="bych6xurgmbbwtz8vy1wtr6qkdqwpz2" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed it would, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service'''. These people didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example to force people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>bych6xurgmbbwtz8vy1wtr6qkdqwpz2</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1914214</id>
      <parentid>1911537</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-02-22T20:23:23Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>authority</comment>
      <origin>1914214</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="9555" sha1="mc38cu0i45fvj2kzw6l011x5v4p7dc5" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed it would, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service''', especially from a position of authority. These commenters didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example by forcing people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>mc38cu0i45fvj2kzw6l011x5v4p7dc5</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1914642</id>
      <parentid>1914214</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-02-28T10:03:04Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Why was Apollo Legend punished for exposing [[Billy Mitchell]]'s corruption? Personality rights.</comment>
      <origin>1914642</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="10451" sha1="c130jv718bkmvdugoerwbz0pn03xbu8" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed it would, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

{{#ev:dailymotion|x754710}}

Personality rights were also leveraged to punish Benjamin Smith (Apollo Legend) for exposing the chronic speedrun cheater [[Billy Mitchell]] by using recordings from a public event.&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2025.02.27-171932/https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/youtuber-apollo-legend-reportedly-found-dead-home-hours-suicide-letter-surfaced-online YouTuber "Apollo Legend" reportedly found dead at home hours after suicide letter surfaced online] - "Apollo Legend was a speedrunning commentator/YouTuber who had quit the platform around a year ago after losing a lawsuit against gamer/restaurateur Billy Mitchell, who sued him over some illegal voice and video recordings that he obtained from an Arcade event that was held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida." - It doesn't matter whether they were "illegal", they expose Billy Mitchell's corruption either way.&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service''', especially from a position of authority. These commenters didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example by forcing people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>c130jv718bkmvdugoerwbz0pn03xbu8</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1914643</id>
      <parentid>1914642</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-02-28T10:05:05Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>video moved to right place</comment>
      <origin>1914643</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="10469" sha1="hm4uu5788ybv4ctelhmk97ubc8gttuw" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give. For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". Indeed it would, and rightfully so. Teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.
&lt;center&gt;
{{#ev:dailymotion|x754710}}
&lt;/center&gt;

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

Personality rights were also leveraged to punish Benjamin Smith (Apollo Legend) for exposing the chronic speedrun cheater [[Billy Mitchell]] by using recordings from a public event.&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2025.02.27-171932/https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/youtuber-apollo-legend-reportedly-found-dead-home-hours-suicide-letter-surfaced-online YouTuber "Apollo Legend" reportedly found dead at home hours after suicide letter surfaced online] - "Apollo Legend was a speedrunning commentator/YouTuber who had quit the platform around a year ago after losing a lawsuit against gamer/restaurateur Billy Mitchell, who sued him over some illegal voice and video recordings that he obtained from an Arcade event that was held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida." - It doesn't matter whether they were "illegal", they expose Billy Mitchell's corruption either way.&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service''', especially from a position of authority. These commenters didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example by forcing people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>hm4uu5788ybv4ctelhmk97ubc8gttuw</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1914745</id>
      <parentid>1914643</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-03-01T00:31:38Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>cited law, mentioned Karl Jobst and David Race</comment>
      <origin>1914745</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="12456" sha1="9vwobipjondbt5ouv9da3t8h1dvye6t" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.tastyfish.cz/lrs/rights_culture.html LRS Wiki: rights_culture] - &lt;i&gt;&lt;q&gt;Abuse of rights culture can now be seen clear as day especially with a very common pattern of the word "right" actually meaning "restriction", i.e. its exact opposite, being used as an euphemism -- for example so called "copyRIGHT" does not stand for giving anyone any extra rights at all! It stands for TAKING AWAY the naturally present "right" to freely use, study, modify and share information. Whereas without copy"right" anyone was free to share information, copyright established that this will now be forbidden. Similarly the "right to be forgotten" means that other people will now be FORBIDDEN from talking about someone else.&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/ref&gt; For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". In fact, German law cites protecting individuals' reputations as a reason for its personality rights.&lt;ref name=201a&gt;[https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1935 German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch – StGB) - Section 201a] - "Whoever, without being authorised to do so, makes available to a third party a photograph or other image of another person which is of such a nature as to significantly damage the reputation of the person depicted incurs the same penalty. This also applies, under the same conditions, to a photograph or other image of a deceased person."&lt;/ref&gt; However, a person who misuses their position of authority deserves to have their reputation damaged. The whole point of a reputation is knowing whether you can trust someone. Therefore, teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating children of the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.
&lt;center&gt;
{{#ev:dailymotion|x754710}}
&lt;/center&gt;

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

Personality rights were also leveraged by speedrun cheater [[Billy Mitchell]] to punish Benjamin Smith (Apollo Legend) for using video and audio recordings from a public event to expose his corruption, and David W. Race. To David Race's luck, he lives in a US state where recording phone calls without the other participant's consent is legal. Otherwise, it would have been more difficult for him to expose Mitchell's corruption.&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2025.02.27-171932/https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/youtuber-apollo-legend-reportedly-found-dead-home-hours-suicide-letter-surfaced-online YouTuber "Apollo Legend" reportedly found dead at home hours after suicide letter surfaced online] - "Apollo Legend was a speedrunning commentator/YouTuber who had quit the platform around a year ago after losing a lawsuit against gamer/restaurateur Billy Mitchell, who sued him over some illegal voice and video recordings that he obtained from an Arcade event that was held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida." - It doesn't matter whether they were "illegal", they expose Billy Mitchell's corruption either way.&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYcC0zj66GY When Cartoon Network Destroyed Billy Mitchell] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUdKSLjwZTo Cheater Billy Mitchell Just Keeps Losing] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service''', especially from a position of authority. These commenters didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example by forcing people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref name=201a /&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>9vwobipjondbt5ouv9da3t8h1dvye6t</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1914746</id>
      <parentid>1914745</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-03-01T00:32:24Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <minor/>
      <comment>ref fix</comment>
      <origin>1914746</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="12462" sha1="1igplrbtcg9u83kw3jsmxel4l04dltz" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.tastyfish.cz/lrs/rights_culture.html LRS Wiki: rights_culture] - &lt;i&gt;&lt;q&gt;Abuse of rights culture can now be seen clear as day especially with a very common pattern of the word "right" actually meaning "restriction", i.e. its exact opposite, being used as an euphemism -- for example so called "copyRIGHT" does not stand for giving anyone any extra rights at all! It stands for TAKING AWAY the naturally present "right" to freely use, study, modify and share information. Whereas without copy"right" anyone was free to share information, copyright established that this will now be forbidden. Similarly the "right to be forgotten" means that other people will now be FORBIDDEN from talking about someone else.&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/ref&gt; For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". In fact, German law cites protecting individuals' reputations as a reason for its personality rights.&lt;ref name=201a&gt;[https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1935 German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch – StGB) - Section 201a] - "Whoever, without being authorised to do so, makes available to a third party a photograph or other image of another person which is of such a nature as to significantly damage the reputation of the person depicted incurs the same penalty. This also applies, under the same conditions, to a photograph or other image of a deceased person."&lt;/ref&gt; However, a person who misuses their position of authority deserves to have their reputation damaged. The whole point of a reputation is knowing whether you can trust someone. Therefore, teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating children of the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.
&lt;center&gt;
{{#ev:dailymotion|x754710}}
&lt;/center&gt;

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

Personality rights were also leveraged by speedrun cheater [[Billy Mitchell]] to punish Benjamin Smith (Apollo Legend) for using video and audio recordings from a public event to expose his corruption, and David W. Race. To David Race's luck, he lives in a US state where recording phone calls without the other participant's consent is legal. Otherwise, it would have been more difficult for him to expose Mitchell's corruption.&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2025.02.27-171932/https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/youtuber-apollo-legend-reportedly-found-dead-home-hours-suicide-letter-surfaced-online YouTuber "Apollo Legend" reportedly found dead at home hours after suicide letter surfaced online] - "Apollo Legend was a speedrunning commentator/YouTuber who had quit the platform around a year ago after losing a lawsuit against gamer/restaurateur Billy Mitchell, who sued him over some illegal voice and video recordings that he obtained from an Arcade event that was held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida." - It doesn't matter whether they were "illegal", they expose Billy Mitchell's corruption either way.&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYcC0zj66GY When Cartoon Network Destroyed Billy Mitchell] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUdKSLjwZTo Cheater Billy Mitchell Just Keeps Losing] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service''', especially from a position of authority. These commenters didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example by forcing people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref name=201a /&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>1igplrbtcg9u83kw3jsmxel4l04dltz</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1914748</id>
      <parentid>1914746</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-03-01T00:43:39Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>Archive because its paragraph numbers change over time.</comment>
      <origin>1914748</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="12502" sha1="n3qid3ayplsur6ewr9gl64p53yjvpn0" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.tastyfish.cz/lrs/rights_culture.html LRS Wiki: rights_culture] - &lt;i&gt;&lt;q&gt;Abuse of rights culture can now be seen clear as day especially with a very common pattern of the word "right" actually meaning "restriction", i.e. its exact opposite, being used as an euphemism -- for example so called "copyRIGHT" does not stand for giving anyone any extra rights at all! It stands for TAKING AWAY the naturally present "right" to freely use, study, modify and share information. Whereas without copy"right" anyone was free to share information, copyright established that this will now be forbidden. Similarly the "right to be forgotten" means that other people will now be FORBIDDEN from talking about someone else.&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/ref&gt; For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". In fact, German law cites protecting individuals' reputations as a reason for its personality rights.&lt;ref name=201a&gt;[https://archive.today/2025.03.01-001621/https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1943 German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch – StGB) - Section 201a] - "Whoever, without being authorised to do so, makes available to a third party a photograph or other image of another person which is of such a nature as to significantly damage the reputation of the person depicted incurs the same penalty. This also applies, under the same conditions, to a photograph or other image of a deceased person."&lt;/ref&gt; However, a person who misuses their position of authority deserves to have their reputation damaged. The whole point of a reputation is knowing whether you can trust someone. Therefore, teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating children of the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.
&lt;center&gt;
{{#ev:dailymotion|x754710}}
&lt;/center&gt;

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

Personality rights were also leveraged by speedrun cheater [[Billy Mitchell]] to punish Benjamin Smith (Apollo Legend) for using video and audio recordings from a public event to expose his corruption, and David W. Race. To David Race's luck, he lives in a US state where recording phone calls without the other participant's consent is legal. Otherwise, it would have been more difficult for him to expose Mitchell's corruption.&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2025.02.27-171932/https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/youtuber-apollo-legend-reportedly-found-dead-home-hours-suicide-letter-surfaced-online YouTuber "Apollo Legend" reportedly found dead at home hours after suicide letter surfaced online] - "Apollo Legend was a speedrunning commentator/YouTuber who had quit the platform around a year ago after losing a lawsuit against gamer/restaurateur Billy Mitchell, who sued him over some illegal voice and video recordings that he obtained from an Arcade event that was held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida." - It doesn't matter whether they were "illegal", they expose Billy Mitchell's corruption either way.&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYcC0zj66GY When Cartoon Network Destroyed Billy Mitchell] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUdKSLjwZTo Cheater Billy Mitchell Just Keeps Losing] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service''', especially from a position of authority. These commenters didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example by forcing people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref name=201a /&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>n3qid3ayplsur6ewr9gl64p53yjvpn0</sha1>
    </revision>
    <revision>
      <id>1914749</id>
      <parentid>1914748</parentid>
      <timestamp>2025-03-01T00:52:16Z</timestamp>
      <contributor>
        <username>Yooco</username>
        <id>607</id>
      </contributor>
      <comment>reason</comment>
      <origin>1914749</origin>
      <model>wikitext</model>
      <format>text/x-wiki</format>
      <text bytes="12677" sha1="9j3826gws0edn8kup560nqrifvf36wl" xml:space="preserve">'''Personality rights''' and '''image rights''' are censorship that protects misbehaving people from being held accountable.

Like [[copyright]]s, "personality rights" and "image rights", also known as "rights to ones own image" and "rights to ones own likeness", are worded as "rights" that make them seem beneficial to the individual. In reality, they take away much more than they give.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.tastyfish.cz/lrs/rights_culture.html LRS Wiki: rights_culture] - &lt;i&gt;&lt;q&gt;Abuse of rights culture can now be seen clear as day especially with a very common pattern of the word "right" actually meaning "restriction", i.e. its exact opposite, being used as an euphemism -- for example so called "copyRIGHT" does not stand for giving anyone any extra rights at all! It stands for TAKING AWAY the naturally present "right" to freely use, study, modify and share information. Whereas without copy"right" anyone was free to share information, copyright established that this will now be forbidden. Similarly the "right to be forgotten" means that other people will now be FORBIDDEN from talking about someone else.&lt;/q&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/ref&gt; For example, they prevent cheating women and misbehaving teachers and other authority figures from being exposed.

Video cameras are among the most effective tools for exposing corruption. This is why their use had to be restricted by law and people had to be [[#How_the_media_fooled_Germans_into_happily_accepting_censorship|fooled into embracing censorship]] under the blanket of "personality rights".

"Personality rights" also prevent the preservation of historical events. By today's standards, most photographs ever taken in public violated someone's personality rights, but it never mattered.

&lt;div style="width:100%; overflow-x:scroll;"&gt;
{| style="margin:auto;"
|[[File:swinging-london-11.jpg|thumb|This is a photograph from the 1960s ([https://www.vintag.es/2021/08/swinging-london.html source]). By today's standards, these people were all "violated".]]
|[[File:nyc-street-scene-1960s.jpg|thumb|Another bunch of "violated" people. ([https://allthatsinteresting.com/1960s-new-york-photos source])]]
|}
&lt;/div&gt;

Obviously, you can't leverage "personality rights" against your superiors. The state will still happily surveil you through their CCTV cameras and record all your calls without your consent.

== "Personality rights" protect bad actors ==
So-called "personality rights" prevent bad actors from being held to account.

For example, some teachers behave badly to their students, for example by shouting and humiliating students, throwing chalk at students, or physically forcing a student out of the class room after harmless drinking of water. People outside the classroom such as parents and the school principal might not believe students that describe how their teachers behaved.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxrdqGZTbg My Teacher Bullied Me... I REVENGED!] (animated story, 2018)&lt;/ref&gt; 

So-called "personality rights" prevent other students from picking up their smartphone video cameras and filming the teacher and then publishing the video online with the real name of the teacher. Therefore, teachers don't have to fear consequences while misbehaving towards students. Their abuses stay in the dark. If it wasn't filmed, it's like it didn't happen.

One would say "this is wrong because it would hurt the reputation of the teacher". In fact, German law cites protecting individuals' reputations as a reason for its personality rights.&lt;ref name=201a&gt;[https://archive.today/2025.03.01-001621/https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1943 German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch – StGB) - Section 201a] - "Whoever, without being authorised to do so, makes available to a third party a photograph or other image of another person which is of such a nature as to significantly damage the reputation of the person depicted incurs the same penalty. This also applies, under the same conditions, to a photograph or other image of a deceased person."&lt;/ref&gt; However, a person who misuses their position of authority deserves to have their reputation damaged. The whole point of a reputation is knowing whether you can trust someone. Therefore, teachers who think their bad behaviour is justified shouldn't mind having that behaviour on public record. After all, they carry a responsibility while &lt;s&gt;brainwashing&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/school.xhtml The toxic schooling system]&lt;/ref&gt; educating children of the next generation and need to be held to a high standard.
&lt;center&gt;
{{#ev:dailymotion|x754710}}
&lt;/center&gt;

"Personality rights" also protect unloyal cheating women from being exposed online. While women are free to slander men as rapists publicly and will be automatically believed&lt;ref&gt;[https://avoiceformen.com/mega-featured/how-the-german-legal-system-failed-horst-arnold/ How the German legal system failed Horst Arnold - A Voice for Men]&lt;/ref&gt;, men must not expose women. In places where "personality rights" are weaker or culturally not accepted, cheating women can be exposed.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RN9ffXvJ6Tk Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating And Reacts Perfectly Instead] - Tribe of Men (2022)&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGeEZB6YbEw Guy Caught His Girlfriend Cheating. Instead of Flipping Out He Did Something Surprisingly Unexpected] - Interesting Stories (2021)&lt;/ref&gt;

Personality rights were also leveraged by speedrun cheater [[Billy Mitchell]] to punish Benjamin Smith (who ran the YouTube channel "[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5t8u4kpE0WvLxkPWIp8n-g Apollo Legend]") for using video and audio recordings from a public event he attended to expose his corruption, and competing Pac-Man player David W. Race for recording telephone calls he participated in. To David Race's luck, he lives in a US state where recording phone calls without the other participant's consent is legal. Otherwise, it would have been more difficult for him to expose Mitchell's corruption.&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2025.02.27-171932/https://www.sportskeeda.com/pop-culture/youtuber-apollo-legend-reportedly-found-dead-home-hours-suicide-letter-surfaced-online YouTuber "Apollo Legend" reportedly found dead at home hours after suicide letter surfaced online] - "Apollo Legend was a speedrunning commentator/YouTuber who had quit the platform around a year ago after losing a lawsuit against gamer/restaurateur Billy Mitchell, who sued him over some illegal voice and video recordings that he obtained from an Arcade event that was held in Fort Lauderdale, Florida." - It doesn't matter whether they were "illegal", they expose Billy Mitchell's corruption either way.&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYcC0zj66GY When Cartoon Network Destroyed Billy Mitchell] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUdKSLjwZTo Cheater Billy Mitchell Just Keeps Losing] - Karl Jobst&lt;/ref&gt;

== How the media fooled Germans into happily accepting censorship ==
While Americans understand the importance of being able to hold their public government workers accountable using video cameras,&lt;ref&gt;[http://archive.today/2023.11.12-130609/https://pinacnews.com/index.php/about/ A Brief History of PINAC | PINAC News]&lt;/ref&gt; Germans got fooled into happily accepting censorship under the blanket of "personality rights" and "rights to ones own image".

So how did it all start?

People in authority grew sick of being held accountable for their public actions by plebians and their video cameras, so in April 2016, the police department of Hagen kickstarted a campaign to smear those who film authority people such as police officers as so-called "gawkers" and "sensationalists", through a Facebook post titled "Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof", which traslates into "Shame on you, you gawkers from the train station!"&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.facebook.com/Polizei.NRW.HA/posts/535167986655510 Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof! - Polizei NRW Hagen | Facebook]''&lt;/ref&gt;

In the days following the post, major German news outlets magically picked up on it and publicized it.

&lt;i&gt;
* [https://rp-online.de/panorama/schaemt-euch-ihr-gaffer_aid-18168873 Hagen: „Schämt euch, ihr Gaffer“ – RP Online] 
* [https://www.n-tv.de/panorama/Hagener-Polizei-schimpft-ueber-Schaulustige-article17467661.html Hagener Polizei schimpft über Schaulustige – N-TV]
* [https://www.tz.de/welt/hagen-hunderte-gaffer-blockieren-rettung-maedchen-10-polizei-stinksauer-zr-6309785.html Hier stören Hunderte Gaffer eine Rettung - Polizei: "Schämt Euch!" – TAZ]
* [https://www.bayern3.de/polizei-aerger-unfall-gaffer-schaulustige-hagen "Schämt Euch, ihr Gaffer vom Hauptbahnhof!" – Bayern3]
* [https://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/panorama/Hagen-Schaemt-Euch-Polizei-schimpft-bei-Facebook-ueber-Gaffer-id37483702.html "Schämt Euch!": Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer – Augsburger Allgemeine]
* [https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/politik/artikel/rettungseinsatz-in-hagen-behindert-polizei-schimpft-bei-facebook-ueber-gaffer-schaemt-euch-23383091 Polizei schimpft bei Facebook über Gaffer: „Schämt Euch!“ – Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung]
&lt;/i&gt;

The comments on the Facebook post are full of &lt;s&gt;sheeple&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;sheeple: A combination of the words "sheep" and "people" meaning that the person or persons are acting as a group or to only behave based on what is trending (source: [https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sheeple Urban Dictionary])&lt;/ref&gt; people agreeing that officers should be protected by so-called "personality rights" while performing a '''public service''', especially from a position of authority. These commenters didn't consider the possibility of officers [[police brutality|misusing their powers]], for example by forcing people to &lt;s&gt;suffocate themselves&lt;/s&gt; wear masks or get &lt;s&gt;poisoned&lt;/s&gt;&lt;ref&gt;[https://digdeeper.club/articles/corona.xhtml#vaccines Coronavirus scare and the blueprint for slavery: COVID vaccines suck]&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref&gt;Even German mainstream media admitted the coronavirus vaccines are poison. Two years late, but better than never. ''[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRbnyY00R_0 Gesundheitliche Schäden und Rechtsstreit: Wie Betroffene nach der Corona-Impfung kämpfen]'' (ZDF, 2023)&lt;/ref&gt; vaccinated. One can safely assume that all disagreeing comments were [[deleted|quietly swept under the rug]]. 

It is the same thing that happened four years after that during the plandemic:

&lt;blockquote&gt;
In today's culture of copy-and-paste journalism, it is common for hundreds of unrelated outlets to feature the exact same reports. This is not the result of laziness. This is by design.

When we see identical headlines across seemingly unrelated platforms, the logical mind concludes "well then, it must be true".

The illusion that numerous news sources have arrived at the same conclusion gives us confidence to share the chosen narrative.

And just like that, we become the unwitting pushers of propaganda. 
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(From &lt;i&gt;"Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION"&lt;/i&gt;, at 15:53.)&lt;ref name=plandemic2&gt;[https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Plandemic 2 | INDOCTORNATION] by Mikki Willis&lt;/ref&gt;

But that wasn't enough yet. In late 2017, the state-owned bank sponsored the production of an emotionally fueled propaganda film titled "Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer" ("sensationalists - don't be a gawker"). Besides the million views on YouTube, the film was broadcast on mainstream television. The film implies that any harmless distant filming of crash sites will escalate to people stepping on the crash site and entering fire trucks to take pictures with the helmets left behind by the firefighters.&lt;ref&gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRmuaVPiodI Schaulustige - Sei kein Gaffer] (2017 propaganda movie)&lt;/ref&gt;

The propaganda movie shifted the culture in a way that makes filming officers in public less culturally accepted '''anywhere''', not only on crash sites.

In 2021, the new law specifically punishing the photography and filming of crash sites came into effect, allegedly to protect dead people. The law is worded in a way that implies it only applies to crash sites with dead people. Given that dead people usually exist on a crash site, this effectively outlaws photographing or filming near '''any''' crash sites. As if dead people care in the slightest about appearing on photographs.&lt;ref&gt;''[https://www.bussgeldkatalog.org/gaffer/ Gaffer bei Unfall: Bußgelder &amp; Strafen für Schaulustige 2024 / 2025]''&lt;/ref&gt;&lt;ref name=201a /&gt;

== See also ==
* [[Police brutality]]
* [[DMCA]]

== References ==
&lt;references /&gt;


[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Money]]
[[Category:IRL Shit]]</text>
      <sha1>9j3826gws0edn8kup560nqrifvf36wl</sha1>
    </revision>
  </page>
</mediawiki>