Sonu Sood, Tamannaah Bhatia’s trainer reveals how much Bollywood celebrities spend on fitness per month

While celebrities invest lakhs in their fitness, Bhateja reassured that staying fit does not require excessive spending for an average person

Celebrity trainer Yogesh Bhateja reveals that Bollywood stars spend up to ₹5 lakh per month on fitness, including personal trainers, diets, and gym memberships. He also addresses the use of weight loss drugs and steroids in the industry.

Celebrity trainer Yogesh Bhateja reveals that Bollywood stars spend lakhs per month on fitness, including personal trainers, diets, and gym memberships. He also addresses the use of weight loss drugs and steroids in the industry. (Source: Team Yogesh Fitness/Instagram)

Celebrities are known for their sculpted physiques and high-energy fitness routines, but how much does it actually cost to maintain such a lifestyle?

In a recent interview with Lallantop Cinema, celebrity fitness coach Yogesh Bhateja, who has trained stars like Sonu Sood, Tamannaah Bhatia, and Kangana Ranaut, revealed the expenses behind A-lister fitness regimens.

The high cost of celebrity fitness

When asked about the monthly expenditure of Bollywood celebrities on fitness, Bhateja revealed that the costs vary widely but can range between ₹2-5 lakh per month. “There is no limit. It can be anywhere between ₹2-5 lakh per month, including their diet,” he said, highlighting the extravagant investments stars make in personal trainers, nutritionists, and gym memberships.

Diet plays a crucial role in their fitness plans, and many celebrities consume superfoods like blueberries, avocados, and organic proteins, which add to the overall cost, he said. Bhateja further explained that while these foods are beneficial, they are not essential for the average person, stating that affordable substitutes such as pomegranates and eggs can provide similar nutritional value.

Story continues below this ad

Apart from specialised diets, celebrity trainers charge hefty fees. Bhateja estimated that an average celebrity fitness trainer earns around ₹3,000-5,000 per session, depending on factors like their experience, the number of clients they handle, and their training approach.

High-end fitness studios and gyms, known for their state-of-the-art equipment, privacy, and luxury services, also contribute to the overall cost. Celebrities often opt for one-on-one training sessions, customised workout programs, and even at-home gym setups to maintain their routines while managing hectic schedules.

With the increasing pressure to look a certain way, many celebrities turn to extreme methods for rapid transformations. Bhateja addressed the use of Ozempic for weight loss and the role of steroids in bodybuilding, warning against their adverse health effects. “Losing a lot of weight or building muscle within weeks is not possible naturally. So, if a celebrity and their trainer are using external help, they know the consequences, and there will be ill effects on their health,” he cautioned.

The best long reads delivered to your inbox every Sunday

While celebrities invest lakhs in their fitness, Bhateja reassured that staying fit does not require excessive spending. He encouraged people to focus on affordable, nutrient-rich foods and consistent workouts, emphasising that dedication and smart choices matter more than luxury gym memberships or exotic superfoods.

📣 For more lifestyle news, click here to join our WhatsApp Channel and also follow us on Instagram

This article went live on February twenty-first, twenty twenty-five, at thirty minutes past nine in the morning.

USAID-CEPPS grant | Donald Trump’s latest: ‘$18 million to India for polls… they take advantage of us’

2 hr ago

IN his fifth public statement in a week on the issue, US President Donald Trump claimed Saturday that the Biden administration allocated $18 million in funding to India to help with its elections. His remarks came at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) after he has attacked the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for what his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) listed as $21 million in funding to India for “voter turnout” channelled via the Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS), a group based in Washington, DC. On February 20, The Indian Express had reported that USAID never funded CEPPS for any project in India and that a $21 million USAID-CEPPS grant was sanctioned for a voter program in Bangladesh. Of this, $13.4 million was disbursed, ostensibly for “political and civic engagement” among Bangladesh students in the run-up to the January 2024 elections and projects that put a question mark on the integrity of these elections — seven months before the ouster of Sheikh Hasina. Two functionaries involved in the Nagorik project confirmed the use of USAID-CEPPS funds for the project — one of them directly to The Indian Express. [also_read title = "Read" article_title= "Trump defends DOGE’s move to cut aid to India: ‘Why are we giving $21 million?’" id = "9843673" liveblog = "no" ] On February 22, The Washington Post reported that there was no record of a CEPPS program matching DOGE’s description in India, citing people familiar with the organization’s work. CEPPS did have a $21 million USAID contract — not for India, but for neighbouring Bangladesh, the Post reported. It quoted a US official “with knowledge of the aid programs,” as saying: “It seems that they are conflating numbers from other programs.” “We don’t know anything about elections in India because we have never been involved,” a person familiar with CEPPS’s work told The Post. “We were all shocked to see that claim from DOGE.” However, this funding-for-elections-in-India continues as a Trump refrain, its framing changing with every statement. "18 million dollars for helping India with its elections. Why the hell? Why don't we just go to old paper ballots, and let them help us with their elections, right? Voter ID. Wouldn't that be nice? We're giving money to India for elections. They don't need money," he said February 23. [also_read title = "Read" article_title= "MEA says ‘deeply disturbing’, being looked at by ministries, agencies" id = "9848605" liveblog = "no" ] "They take advantage of us pretty good. One of the highest tariff nations in the world...We have a 200 per cent (tariffs) there and then we're giving them a lot of money to help them with their election," Trump said. He has even referred to the alleged funding as trying to "get somebody else elected”; a "kickback" scheme; and even going to “my friend Prime Minister Modi in India” for voter turnout. Consider these: * Feb 19: Trump questioned providing $21 million to India for “voter turnout” as he reiterated that the US "can hardly get in there" because of high Indian tariffs. He added that he has a "lot of respect for India. I have a lot of respect for the Prime Minister,” and noted that PM Narendra Modi had visited the White House the previous week. * Feb 20: At a summit in Miami, Trump said: “…Why do we need to spend $21 million for voter turnout in India? Wow, I guess they (the Biden administration) were trying to get somebody else elected. We have got to tell the Indian Government." [also_read title = "Read" article_title= "Congress demands white paper on USAID funding after BJP flags Trump’s statement" id = "9846470" liveblog = "no" ] * Feb 21: Trump, speaking at the Republican Governors Association meeting in Washington DC, said, “$21 million for voter turnout in India. Why are we caring about India's turnout? We have got enough problems. We want our own turnout…I would say in many cases, many of these cases, anytime you have no idea what we're talking about, that means there's a kickback because nobody has any idea what's going on there." * Feb 22: Trump, speaking at a 'Governors Working Session,' said: “$21 million going to my friend Prime Minister Modi in India for voter turnout. We're giving 21 million for voter turnout in India. What about us? I want voter turnout too.” The MEA on February 21 said the revelations about USAID funding for certain activities in the country are "deeply troubling" and have led to concerns about foreign interference in its internal affairs. MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said: “Relevant departments and agencies are looking into this matter. It would be premature to make a public comment at this stage, so relevant authorities are looking into it and hopefully, we can come up with an update on that subsequently.” The next day, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar echoed this saying the information put out by Trump administration people is "concerning" and that the government is looking into it. During an interaction at Delhi University, he also said USAID was allowed in India "in good faith, to do good faith activities", and suggestions are being made in US that "there are activities which are in bad faith". "So, it surely warrants a look. And, if there is something to it, I think the country should know who are the people involved in the bad faith activities," Jaishankar said. “As a government, we are looking into it, because such organisations have an obligation to report. And, my sense is, the facts will come out," Jaishankar said. The controversy started on February 16, when DOGE, led by billionaire Elon Musk, announced a series of expenditure cuts, listing $21 million allocated for "voter turnout in India."

View all shorts