S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Financial Institutions
Banking & Capital Markets
Economy & Finance
Energy Transition & Sustainability
Technology & Innovation
Podcasts & Newsletters
Financial Institutions
Banking & Capital Markets
Economy & Finance
Energy Transition & Sustainability
Technology & Innovation
Podcasts & Newsletters
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Research — 24 Jan, 2022
By Neil Barbour
Microsoft Corp.'s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard Inc. would make it a top 5 mobile gaming company and the second-largest publisher on PC, according to pro forma revenue estimates compared to Kagan's quarterly gaming revenue tracker.
Combined, Microsoft and Activision would have made an estimated $1.02 billion in mobile gaming revenue in the third quarter of 2021, enough to firmly outpace CyberAgent Inc. but shy of NetEase Inc.'s $1.48 billion. The acquisition gives Microsoft control of Candy Crush and Call of Duty Mobile.
In the PC space, the combined company would have achieved an estimated $744.2 million in third-quarter revenue, enough to overtake NetEase but still well behind Tencent Holdings Ltd.'s $1.8 billion. Microsoft would pick up Activision's World of Warcraft.
Activision's PC and mobile divisions reported a combined $4.61 billion revenue in 2020, and we estimate they made $5.60 billion in 2021. Activision reports year-end earnings on Feb. 3.
In the console space, Microsoft would not make up much ground on Sony at the outset of the deal close. Microsoft would not see a boost in Activision revenue flowing through Xbox because the console vendors recognize digital gaming revenue on a gross basis, before royalty payouts to publishers. Microsoft would get an additional $1 billion to $2 billion in annual Activision revenue from PlayStation royalty payments.
Microsoft records Activision's royalties in its cost of goods sold. So, it's likely that Microsoft's margin would improve after deal close, but Microsoft would then bear development and marketing costs for Activision's games, which would at least partially offset the decrease in cost of goods sold.
The additional $5.5 billion to $7.6 billion annual revenue may not seem like much in comparison to the $68.70 billion deal price, but the company has a longer-term goal in mind with the content it could add to its Game Pass subscription service.
Microsoft is looking disrupt Sony Group Corp. in the console space and giving consumers access to all or most of Microsoft, Electronic Arts Inc. and Activision games for $10 a month would give the company a distinct edge.
Game Pass also provides access to some of its library through cloud gaming via mobile, PC or Xbox. Microsoft has said it wants to push its Game Pass cloud service to smart TVs, expanding its addressable universe. In that sense, the Activision acquisition is a play for cloud gaming dominance over the long term.
We estimate that third-quarter results would have shown Microsoft remaining the fifth-largest gaming company across console, mobile and PC in terms of gross video game revenue (before royalty payments to publishers) with the acquisition of Activision, but it would have been far more competitive with Sony.
In the press release, Microsoft said it would become the third-largest gaming company by revenue, but that estimate either includes only net gaming revenue for Alphabet Inc. and Apple Inc. or excludes the mobile platform holders outright. In a call to discuss the transaction, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said the company faces strong competition from game distributors, likely a nod to Alphabet and Apple.
Note that we are using Tencent's reported net revenue in the chart above. Tencent owns app stores in China, but its distribution business is much smaller than the other companies in our analysis.
Technology is a regular feature from Kagan, a media research group within S&P Global Market Intelligence's TMT offering, providing exclusive research and commentary.
This article was published by S&P Global Market Intelligence and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then some or all of these services may not function properly.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant advertisements on other sites. Targeting cookies uniquely identify your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not know when you have visited our site, and will not be able to monitor its performance.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.